<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ford reminds world that it didn't "willfully" violate wiper patent]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/intermittent-wiper-history/1064646/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/intermittent-wipers-450.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"><small>Click to enlarge</small></span><br /></div>
<br />Engineer Bob Kearns had been granted a patent for a design of intermittent windshield wipers in 1967, two years before Ford introduced them in production. Unfortunately for Kearns, Ford had "developed" its own system rather than licensing Kearns' design. Needless to say, litigation ensued and it took until 1995 for the U.S. Supreme Court to finally rule against Ford and Chrysler and award Kearns $30 million. That story has now been turned into a major motion picture being released this week called <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/flash-of-genius-film-reveals-dirty-history-of-intermittent-wiper/"><span style="font-style: italic;">Flash of Genius</span></a>, and Ford wants you to know that the facts of the matter are much less dramatic than what the movie portrays.<br /><br />While reminding people that the facts have been dramatized, Ford also mentions that a jury ruled it did not "willfully" infringe on Kearns' patent. That's not to say Ford and Chrysler didn't infringe - juries ruled that they did. It just wasn't "willful." Did Kearns ultimately win? That's hard to say considering how his life turned out, but he was vindicated. On the other hand, many owners of older English cars would argue that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Industries_plc">Joseph Lucas</a> invented the intermittent windshield wiper, although again not willfully. <br /> <br />[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford reminds world that it didn't "willfully" violate wiper patent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/">Ford reminds world that it didn't "willfully" violate wiper patent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1328492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob kearns</category><category>BobKearns</category><category>flash of genius</category><category>FlashOfGenius</category><category>intermittent wiper</category><category>IntermittentWiper</category><category>lawsuit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1328492/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/09/30/ford-reminds-world-that-it-didnt-willfully-violate-wiper-pate/1328492/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1328492</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/intermittent-wipers-450_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
