<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Five people hurt in GM lab explosion, A123 battery reportedly responsible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/04/11/battery-explodes-at-gm-tech-center-research-lab-one-or-more-inj/#continued"><img alt="GM Warren Tech Center explosion aftermath" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/gm-tech-center-explosion-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 362px;" /></a><br />
<br />
More details are filtering in about <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/11/battery-explodes-at-gm-tech-center-research-lab-one-or-more-inj/">yesterday's explosion</a> at the <a href="http://autoblog.com/gm">General Motors</a> Technical Center battery research lab in Warren, Michigan.<br />
<br />
First, the number of people injured has climbed to five, with one taken to the hospital and four treated at the scene. The local deputy fire chief said none of the injuries were life-threatening. The fire department also told the local mayor that it was fumes from hydrogen sulfide that caused the explosion, but GM declined to comment on that aspect. We learned yesterday that a battery under "extreme testing" caused the explosion.<br />
<br />
According to <em>The Detroit News</em>' David Shepardson on <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/davidshepardson/status/190176401654165505">Twitter</a>, "Chemical gases from the battery cells were released and ignited in the enclosed chamber. The battery itself was intact" <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/davidshepardson/status/190183982716043264">and</a>, "All areas of the Alternative Energy Center except for the battery lab and adjacent offices will operate normally on Thursday."<br />
<br />
Unnamed sources have told the media that it was a prototype battery pack made by A123 that caused the fire. Fox News <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/04/12/chevy-spark-battery-pack-reportedly-caused-gm-lab-explosion/">says</a> that pack was being tested for use in the Chevy Spark EV and other all-electric vehicles. Batteries made by A123 were recently involved in <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2012/03/26/fisker-karma-involved-in-new-55m-battery-replacement-program-fr/">a $55 million replacement effort</a> in the <a href="http://autoblog.com/fisker/karma">Fisker Karma</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/">Five people hurt in GM lab explosion, A123 battery reportedly responsible</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20214186/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battery</category><category>battery fire</category><category>battery testing</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet spark</category><category>chevrolet spark ev</category><category>chevy spark</category><category>electric vehicle</category><category>gm technical center</category><category>li-ion battery</category><category>spark ev</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Blanco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20214186/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/04/12/five-people-hurt-in-gm-lab-explosion-a123-battery-reportedly-re/20214186/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20214186</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/gm-tech-center-explosion-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chevy Volt fire to prompt new safety procedures?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-volt-review-1/"><img alt="2011 Chevrolet Volt" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/01-2011-chevrolet-volt-review-1302065043-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
In the aftermath of a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/volt/">Chevrolet Volt</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/">catching fire at a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration test facility</a>, NHTSA may move to require electric vehicle batteries to be drained after major wrecks. The<em> Detroit Free Press</em> reports that the agency is contemplating issuing a ruling, but a decision has yet to be made.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/">General Motors</a>' position on the fire is that the battery should have been drained after NHTSA crash-tested the car, a preventative measure the automaker says it recommends.<br />
<br />
NHTSA's inquiry involves other carmakers who use lithium-ion battery packs, not just GM. According to the report, the agency is reviewing the automaker's responses, which likely pertain to the feasibility of requiring first-responders to drain battery packs. The<em> Detroit Free Press</em> says GM must currently deploy a team to drain Volt batteries, though a GM spokesman says a tool to drain batteries may become available to dealerships next year.<br />
<br />
The safety of electric vehicle batteries and the <a href="http://www.green.autoblog.com/2010/06/07/video-first-responders-discuss-chevrolet-volt-safety-training/">unique dangers they pose to first responders </a>have been an <a href="http://www.green.autoblog.com/2007/02/16/hybrids-dangerous-for-accident-first-responders/">ongoing concern</a> since the first hybrids hit the market over a decade ago. The market's shift toward lithium-ion batteries and an increase in the size of battery packs have only drawn the issue into starker focus.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/">Chevy Volt fire to prompt new safety procedures?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20105667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 chevrolet volt</category><category>2012 chevrolet volt</category><category>battery fire</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevy</category><category>first responders</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm</category><category>lithium ion</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>volt</category><category>volt fire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20105667/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/14/chevy-volt-fire-to-prompt-new-safety-procedures/20105667/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20105667</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/01-2011-chevrolet-volt-review-1302065043-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chevy Volt battery catches fire at NHTSA [UPDATE]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/electric/" rel="tag">Electric</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-chevrolet-volt-review-1"><img height="390" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/01-2011-chevrolet-volt-review-1302065043.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
As a tipster put it: "Crap."<br />
<br />
Even though there is plenty of evidence that the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/volt">Chevrolet Volt</a> is a safe car (one just protected its occupants in a recent <a href="http://www.plugincars.com/chevy-volt-totaled-collision-school-bus-occupants-unharmed-110117.html">crash with a bus</a>), there are now new and seemingly legitimate worries about the safety of the 16-kWh battery pack after a crash. <em>Bloomberg</em> reports that a Volt that was parked at a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration test center recently caught fire, burning nearby vehicles. The Volt had been put through a side-impact crash test three weeks prior and an official told <em>Bloomberg</em> that investigators determined the battery was indeed the source of the fire. Apparently, NHTSA reps are talking with "all automakers" with lithium-ion vehicle for sale (or coming soon) about the safety of their battery packs.<br />
<br />
On the one hand, this is bad news for people who already have worries about the safety of plug-in vehicle. On the other hand, a crashed car, whether powered by gasoline or lithium, isn't exactly a safe item. Given that this fire follows <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2011/11/07/chevy-volt-possibly-involved-in-second-garage-fire-in-north-caro/">a second garage fire involving a Volt</a> (whose cause has not yet been determined), we expect a spike of "plug-in cars are bad" news soon. Whether this is warranted or not is another question. NHTSA has issued a statement to <em>Bloomberg</em> that said:
<blockquote>
	<p>
		<em>Based on the available data, NHTSA does not believe the Volt or other electric vehicles are at a greater risk of fire than gasoline-powered vehicles. In fact, all vehicles - both electric and gasoline-powered - have some risk of fire in the event of a serious crash.</em></p>
</blockquote>
Indeed. We'll have more on this as details are released.<br />
<br />
<strong>UPDATE:</strong> <em>General Motors has released an official statement, which has been added <a href="/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/#continued">after the jump</a>.</em><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chevy Volt battery catches fire at NHTSA [UPDATE]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/">Chevy Volt battery catches fire at NHTSA [UPDATE]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20104558/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 chevrolet volt</category><category>battery fire</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevy volt</category><category>electric vehicle</category><category>lithium</category><category>lithium-ion battery</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>plug-in hybrid</category><category>volt</category><category>volt fire</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastian Blanco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20104558/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/11/chevy-volt-battery-catches-fire-in-nhtsa-lab/20104558/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20104558</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/01-2011-chevrolet-volt-review-1302065043_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>