<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Report: NHTSA doesn't have any software or electrical engineers on staff to investigate Toyota]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1042836_nhtsa-has-no-software-engineers-or-ees-to-analyze-toyotas"><img hspace="0" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/630lahood.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
"<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">NHTSA</a> officials told investigators that the agency doesn't employ any electrical engineers or software engineers."<br />
<br />
So says <em>The</em> <em>Washington Post</em>, in a revelation that's at least shocking if nothing else. Consider your car for a moment. How many electrical connections and silicon bits are there making the whole kit-n'-kaboodle operate? Plenty, right? In fact, The Car Connection estimates that the average "modern luxury car has something close to 100 million lines of software code in it, running on 70 to 100 microprocessors." Though the quote about the government safety agency came out in the government hearings on <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/toyota">Toyota</a> safety, that figures to be worrisome news to all motorists, as modern vehicles from all manufacturers are more or less rolling computers, and their very movement is governed by computers that NHTSA apparently cannot begin to analyze - at least internally.<br />
<br />
Hopefully, the report regarding the lack of electrical and software engineers at NHTSA was either misunderstood or incorrect. We have a feeling that's likely the case - in fact, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in his testimony on Capitol Hill today that the agency does at least have access to such engineers.<br />
<em><br />
<strong>UPDATE:</strong> During today's remarks, LaHood said there was some confusion in his comments yesterday about a lack of electrical engineers. He has yet to divulge how many engineers NHTSA employs and there's still some question about software engineers. Updates to follow as we learn more.</em><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota_recall/guide"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/ab-recall-banner-sm-1265124357-1266872213-1266887266-1266941479.png" alt="" /></a><br />
<em><strong><small>Tired of Toyota recall news? Try out the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/exclude/toyota+recall">recall-free version</a> of Autoblog.</small></strong></em><br />
<br />
[Sources: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/22/AR2010022204887.html">The Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1042836_nhtsa-has-no-software-engineers-or-ees-to-analyze-toyotas">The Car Connection</a> | Image: Alex Wong/Getty Images]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/">Report: NHTSA doesn't have any software or electrical engineers on staff to investigate Toyota</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/marty-blog/1042836_nhtsa-has-no-software-engineers-or-ees-to-analyze-toyotas>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19371650/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automotive safety</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>electrical engineer</category><category>ElectricalEngineer</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>NhtsaRecall</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><category>software engineer</category><category>SoftwareEngineer</category><category>toyota recall</category><category>toyota recalls</category><category>ToyotaRecall</category><category>ToyotaRecalls</category><category>unintended acceleration</category><category>UnintendedAcceleration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19371650/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/02/24/report-nhtsa-doesnt-have-any-software-or-electrical-engineers/19371650/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19371650</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/630lahood_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Volvo looks to locusts to prevent accidents]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a></p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/09/volvo-thinks-lo.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/locust_bozo_455.jpg" /></a><br /><br />If you think your morning commute looks (and feels) like a bunch of insects randomly swarming toward a multitude of random destinations, you'd be mostly right. But only mostly. Research by the <a href="http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/claire.rind/try1.htm">Insect Vision Laboratory</a> shows that like your fellow rush-hour drivers, swarming African locusts are busy calculating the position, direction and speed of the other travelers around them. Unlike all those other drivers, African locusts never run into each other. We'd be willing to argue that's definitive proof most drivers are dumber than common insects.<br /><br />Volvo, however, sees more than just the obvious. Instead, they see a possible way to keep all those clueless drivers safe by studying just how those locusts are able to avoid collisions.<br /><br />But there's a lot of work to do before the automaker can put nature to work on the streets. The researchers theorize that the bugs can easily miss hitting each other because they're somehow able to send information straight from their sensory organs to their wings, completely bypassing their simplistic brains. That ability to instantly translate data into action keeps the locusts crash free. The problem is that currently automotive technology can't match the locusts' data-processing talents. So for at least the immediate future, have a little sympathy for those other guys out there. They actually are less intelligent than the bugs stuck in your grille.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/09/volvo-thinks-lo.html">Wired</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/">Volvo looks to locusts to prevent accidents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/09/volvo-thinks-lo.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1320426/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automotive safety</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>volvo</category><category>volvo safety</category><category>VolvoSafety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1320426/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/09/23/volvo-looks-to-locusts-to-prevent-accidents/1320426/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1320426</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/locust_bozo_455_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports debuts crash-in theater]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><br /><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/crash-videos-ov.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/neoncrashweb.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Oh how we all love a good car crash, but finding good, slow-motion automotive carnage on the Web hasn't been all that easy to find. Until now. <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/safety-recalls/carcrashtest/crashtestvideo.htm">Consumer Reports</a> has put hours of crash-test video from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety online, free for anyone to see.<br /><br />We've already lost hours of productivity to CR's new Crash-In Theater and we're sure you will too. We highly recommend watching the frontal offset test of the 2000 Dodge Neon. It's just amazing how bent out of shape the door frame gets and surprising how much air the rear tires achieve. Oh, and the narrator says the steering wheel actually snapped off from the steering column. That can't be good.<br /><br />While we found the videos highly entertaining, used- and new-car shoppers will surely find the videos and accompanying analysis beneficial. For those shopping for a used Pontiac Transport, you really, really should watch that video. For those squeamish about seeing a crash-test dummy pretty much destroyed, you really, really shouldn't.<br /><br />[Source: Consumer Reports]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/">Consumer Reports debuts crash-in theater</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/crash-videos-ov.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/971590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>automotive safety</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>crash test videos</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>CrashTestVideos</category><category>IIHS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/971590/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/971590/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>971590</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/neoncrashweb_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Forbes names the 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles for sale today]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/vehicles/2007/07/26/cars-dangerous-twenty-forbeslife-cx_bh_0726cars.html?partner=rss"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/rendezvous.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Tiger, you should be ashamed pushing that beastly Buick <a href="http://autos.aol.com/buick-rendezvous-2007:8387-overview">Rendezvous</a> on an unsuspecting public. Not only was it little more than a warmed-over minivan trying to look hip, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/vehicles/2007/07/26/cars-dangerous-twenty-forbeslife-cx_bh_0726cars.html?partner=rss">Forbes</a> says it's possibly the most dangerous new vehicle for sale today. Luckily for all the uninformed car shoppers out there, the Rendezvous and several others, like the Ford <a href="http://autos.aol.com/ford-ranger-2008:9213-overview">Ranger</a>, on the list won't be on sale much longer.<br /><br />Forbes took many factors into consideration when deciding what constituted a dangerous vehicle. Instead of using only crash test data or fatality statistics, the magazine also looked at safety equipment and Consumer Reports' accident avoidance ratings.<br /><br />Lots of weight was given to standard safety equipment which is what damned vaunted nameplates like Toyota's <a href="http://autos.aol.com/toyota-matrix-2008:8976-overview">Matrix</a>, Chrysler's <a href="http://autos.aol.com/chrysler-pt-cruiser-2008:9346-overview">PT Cruiser</a> and Ford's <a href="http://autos.aol.com/ford-focus-2007:8339-overview">Focus</a>. But at least those cars have optional side air bags, Suzuki's <a href="http://autos.aol.com/suzuki-reno-2007:8751-overview">Reno</a> and <a href="http://autos.aol.com/suzuki-forenza-2007:8748-overview">Forenza</a> don't even offer them as optional equipment.<br /><br />There were some surprises, though. Forbes praises the Honda <a href="http://autos.aol.com/honda-s2000-2007:8793-overview">S2000</a> for having admirable crash test results and superior handling that could help in crash avoidance, but puts it on the list anyway for not having standard side air bags.<br /><br />Check out the story and entire list <a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/vehicles/2007/07/26/cars-dangerous-twenty-forbeslife-cx_bh_0726cars.html?partner=rss">here</a>.<br /><br />[Source: Forbes]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/">Forbes names the 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles for sale today</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/vehicles/2007/07/26/cars-dangerous-twenty-forbeslife-cx_bh_0726cars.html?partner=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/951122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automotive safety</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>dangerous vehicles</category><category>DangerousVehicles</category><category>most dangerous car</category><category>most dangerous cars</category><category>MostDangerousCar</category><category>MostDangerousCars</category><category>safest car</category><category>SafestCar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/951122/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/07/27/forbes-names-the-20-most-dangerous-vehicles-for-sale-today/951122/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>951122</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/rendezvous_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Automakers, suppliers team to seek virtual crash testing]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070414/NEWS09/70414026"><img width="449" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="321" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/oss_integrated5pointchildrestraint_36.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Nine major automakers and two automotive suppliers have formed a group to look into and develop virtual crash tests that they say will be more realistic than violently smashing cars into immovable barriers.<br /><br />DaimlerChrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Toyota joined suppliers TRW and Takata last year to form the Global Human Body Models Consortium LLC. The group is expected to announce its plans today at the <a href="http://www.sae.org/servlets/index">Society of Automotive Engineers</a> World Congress in Detroit.<br /><br />And just what are their plans? They have recruited 40 research and university groups worldwide to develop "virtual humans" that will simulate crash test dummies which, they say, will provide better accident prediction data. The group hopes to have the project wrapped up in 2011. The companies will split the budgeted $18 million cost, but are looking to Uncle Sam and the Michigan Economic Development Corp. for a funding boost.<br /><br />GM spokesman Alan Adler told the <a href="http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070414/NEWS09/70414026">Associated Press</a> that the data acquired from simulated tests would still be confirmed using good old crash testing.<br /><br />Ford has a leg up on the group, having already developed a virtual adult male it uses to develop interiors and some safety devices. TRW also does some simulated tests on their restraint systems, pictured above.<br /><br />[Source: The Associated Press via Journal and Courier Online]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/">Automakers, suppliers team to seek virtual crash testing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070414/NEWS09/70414026>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/874534/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automotive safety</category><category>automotive safety research</category><category>automotive testing</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>AutomotiveSafetyResearch</category><category>AutomotiveTesting</category><category>computer simulated automotive crash testing</category><category>computer simulated automotive crash tests</category><category>computer simulated crash testing</category><category>computer simulated crash tests</category><category>computer simulation</category><category>ComputerSimulatedAutomotiveCrashTesting</category><category>ComputerSimulatedAutomotiveCrashTests</category><category>ComputerSimulatedCrashTesting</category><category>ComputerSimulatedCrashTests</category><category>ComputerSimulation</category><category>crash dummy</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash test dummies</category><category>crash testing</category><category>CrashDummy</category><category>CrashTest</category><category>CrashTestDummies</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>Global Human Body Models Consortium LLC</category><category>GlobalHumanBodyModelsConsortiumLlc</category><category>safety research</category><category>SafetyResearch</category><category>virtual crash dummies</category><category>virtual crash dummy</category><category>virtual crash testing</category><category>VirtualCrashDummies</category><category>VirtualCrashDummy</category><category>VirtualCrashTesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:37:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/874534/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/04/15/automakers-suppliers-team-seeks-virtual-crash-testin/874534/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>874534</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/oss_integrated5pointchildrestraint_36_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>