<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA ready to submit rearview camera mandate to Congress [UPDATE]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/28/business/us-rule-set-for-cameras-at-cars-rear.html?_r=2"><img alt="backup camera" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/backup-camera-body-630.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 414px;" /></a><br />
<br />
About 100 children and over 200 adults die every year because drivers accidentally back over them. It's a sad statistic that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> feels can be prevented if all new vehicles <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/28/report-nhtsa-to-delay-backup-camera-regulations/">come standard</a> with backup cameras.<br />
<br />
<em>The</em> <em>New York Times</em> reports that NHTSA plans to announce this week that rearview cameras will be mandatory on all vehicles by 2014. The compulsory cameras and interface for viewing what the camera sees is estimated to set new car buyers back an additional $160 to $200, but the government feels the cost is worth it if it prevents some of the 17,000 Americans that are harmed in backup accidents every year.<br />
<br />
Clarence Ditlow, director for the Washington-based Center for Auto Safety, tells <em>The New York Times</em> that while the government acknowledges that in terms of pure numbers, the cost of the program is high and the amount of lives saved is small compared to some other safety implementations. But those numbers look a lot more doable when considering how devastating roll-over deaths are to families. "When you have a parent that kills a child in an incident that's utterly avoidable, they don't ever forget it."<br />
<br />
What do you think, should rearview cameras become legally required? Have your say in Comments.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>UPDATE:</strong></em> <em>Ward's Auto</em> <a href="http://wardsauto.com/auto-makers/nhtsa-delays-final-rear-vision-camera-rule">reports NHTSA has delayed</a> submitting its recommendation to Congress, likely to hold more discussions to hear and address concerns from the auto industry.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/">NHTSA ready to submit rearview camera mandate to Congress [UPDATE]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20182136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>backover death</category><category>camera</category><category>car safety</category><category>clarence ditlow</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>rear view camera</category><category>rearview</category><category>rearview camera</category><category>rollover death</category><category>safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:34:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20182136/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/29/nhtsa-ready-to-submit-rearview-camera-mandate-to-congress/20182136/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20182136</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/backup-camera-body-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[China announces new, more stringent crash standards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">
	<a href="/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/#continued"><img height="408" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/brilliance-crash-test-2007.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
	<br />
	There are innumerable design and engineering hurdles to clear if you're an automaker intent on selling your wares worldwide, but few are more core to the business than safety. China knows this all too well. For years now, we've been hearing how the nation was planning to go global with its vehicles - several companies have even gone so far as to hold press conferences at U.S. auto shows.<br />
	<br />
	And while there are many reasons why you don't have a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/chery">Chery</a> or <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/byd">BYD</a> dealer down the street yet, China's expansionist efforts have been hampered by the persistent perception of poor automotive safety standards, an impression not helped by the viral spread of a number of frightening crash-test videos on the internet (like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/22/brilliance-bs6s-adac-crash-test-is-anything-but/">2007 Brilliance BS6</a> shown above and <a href="/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/#continued">after the jump</a>). But that may be about to change. According to new reports, the China New Car Assessment Program (C-NCAP) is coming in for a comprehensive overhaul.<br />
	<br />
	A raft of changes are expected to go into effect in July of 2012, and the revised standards are expected to include new low-speed crash testing and whiplash standards. In addition, the safety of rear seat occupants will be considered for the first time (previously, only the safety of front seat occupants was measured). The more stringent crash test standards will reportedly also weigh the presence of other safety systems, including electronic nannies like stability control. Overall, the new standards are expected to more closely mimic the standards of other markets (namely Europe's NCAP), including tougher scenarios like the 40 mph offset frontal crash test.<br />
	<br />
	China Car Times reports that only 59 new models have been awarded five-star ratings under current C-NCAP standards - about 43 percent of those models tested since 2006. As Chinese automakers are already having a tough time meeting current crash test regulations, meeting the new standards that go into effect next year will likely pose a very serious challenge. But while any Chinese automaker looking to play in established markets like North America or Europe will still have to pass local crash test standards, they'll almost certainly have a better shot at good results - and better public perception - if the regulations in their home country are similar.</div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China announces new, more stringent crash standards</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/">China announces new, more stringent crash standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20081934/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>brilliance bs6</category><category>bs6</category><category>c-ncap</category><category>car safety</category><category>china car safety</category><category>chinese cars</category><category>crash test</category><category>crash testing</category><category>ncap</category><category>new car assessment program</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:16:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20081934/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/10/14/china-announces-new-more-stringent-crash-standards/20081934/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20081934</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/brilliance-crash-test-2007_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Opinion: If distracted driving is such an epidemic, why don't statistics show it?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><em><big>Declining Highway Death Rate Challenges Distracted Driving Fears</big></em><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/"><img alt="Distracted driving" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/distracted-driving.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px; width: 630px; height: 418px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<div style="border: 0px dotted black; margin: 5px; padding: 2px 3px; color: rgb(153, 0, 0); line-height: 120%; font-size: 1.5em; float: right; width: 220px; text-align: center;">
	<strong>The distracted driving debate is being marred by an overdose of hype and hysteria.</strong></div>
My weekend nearly got off to a disastrous start when a driver, busy texting, suddenly realized he was going to miss his exit. At the last possible moment, he slammed his brakes and surged across four lanes of traffic, avoiding the need to go a few miles out of the way - but nearly touching off a multi-car accident in the process.<br />
<br />
We've all <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/05/survey-19-admit-using-internet-while-driving/">seen the texters</a>, the women putting on makeup, the guys checking their sports scores. Heck, a woman in Florida recently crashed while giving herself a bikini shave. But are we experiencing, as <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/16/secretary-of-transportation-ray-lahood-has-something-hed-like/">Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood puts it</a>, "a deadly epidemic" of <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/distracted driving">distracted driving</a> - one that can only be addressed by the most draconian of new laws?<br />
<br />
There's no question that there are some things you just shouldn't be doing behind the wheel, and few would argue against the laws that many states have passed prohibiting motorists from texting while driving. But what other steps are needed? The latest federal data on highway fatalities suggests we've probably gone far enough - and that the distracted driving debate is being marred by an overdose of hype and hysteria.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/">Continue reading...</a><br />
<br />
<hr style="width: 630px;" />
<div style="text-align: right;">
	<em><img alt="Paul Eisenstein" border="1" class="right border" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/11/paul-eisenstein-small-opt.jpg" vspace="4" />Paul A. Eisenstein is Publisher of </em><a href="http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/"><em>TheDetroitBureau.com</em></a><em>, and a 30-year veteran of the automotive beat. His editorials bring his unique perspective and deep understanding of the auto world to Autoblog readers on a regular basis.</em></div>
<hr style="width: 630px;" />
<br />
[Image: Corbis]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Opinion: If distracted driving is such an epidemic, why don't statistics show it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/">Opinion: If distracted driving is such an epidemic, why don't statistics show it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19905307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aaa</category><category>auto safety</category><category>death rate</category><category>distracted driving</category><category>paul eisenstein</category><category>ray lahood</category><category>safe driving</category><category>telematics</category><category>texting</category><category>texting while driving</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Eisenstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19905307/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/04/07/opinion-if-distracted-driving-is-such-an-epidemic-why-dont-st/19905307/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19905307</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/distracted-driving_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. D.O.T. says 2010 traffic fatalities lowest they've ever been]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/#continued"><img alt="Ray LaHood" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/04/lahood250opt.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px; float: right;" /></a>United States Transportation Secretary <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/22/opinion-five-questions-for-ray-lahood/">Ray LaHood</a> said that traffic deaths in 2010 were the lowest they've ever been, falling three percent from 2009's record low. According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration projections, traffic fatalities fell from 33,808 in 2009 to 32,708 in 2010.<br />
<br />
The Department of Transportation and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/21/nhtsa-issues-new-child-seat-guidelines/">NHTSA</a> see the news as evidence that their public awareness campaigns, and stricter enforcement of traffic laws nationwide are working. According to NHTSA, traffic fatalities have steadily dropped in the last five years, falling 25 percent since 2005.<br />
<br />
Specifically, the DOT and NHTSA cited programs like Over the Limit, Under Arrest, Click-it or Ticket and LaHood's anti-distracted driving campaign as contributing factors to the drop in fatalities.<br />
<br />
The biggest regional drop was in the Pacific Northwest, where fatalities plummeted 12 percent from last year. Arizona, California and Hawaii tied for second, each dropping 11 percent over 2009.<br />
<br />
While we applaud most of the campaigns championed by NHTSA and the DOT, we can't help but think that there are probably some larger factors at work here - namely, that Americans are motoring around in vehicles that are safer than ever before thanks to the proliferation of improved safety systems like stability control. Check out the official press release and associated horn-tooting after the jump.<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA | Image: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. D.O.T. says 2010 traffic fatalities lowest they've ever been</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/">U.S. D.O.T. says 2010 traffic fatalities lowest they've ever been</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19899945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>driving fatalities</category><category>fatalities</category><category>lahood</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>ray lahood</category><category>traffic deaths</category><category>traffic fatalities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Richardson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19899945/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/04/01/u-s-d-o-t-says-2010-traffic-fatalities-lowest-theyve-ever-bee/19899945/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19899945</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/04/lahood250opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Video: Australian safety council urges you to slow down... naturally]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/#continued"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/enjoy-the-ride.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; margin: 4px;" /></a><br />
<div class="iphone_hide" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px; font-style: italic;">
	"Enjoy The Ride" PSA - Click above to watch the video <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/22/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/">after the jump</a></div>
<br />
Remember the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/05/video-the-most-beautiful-seatbelt-advocacy-commercial-ever/">Embrace Life PSA</a> that urged auto occupants to use their safety belts? It's a beautiful safety ad with a very powerful message. The Road Safety Council of Western Australia must have been watching, because they've taken their safety message to the next level of serenity.<br />
<br />
Beyond the jump is a three-minute ad titled "Enjoy The Ride." The first two minutes of the video explain how important it is to slow down in every day life. If you don't, the PSA explains, you're on the fast track to early aging, heart disease and even erectile dysfunction. You wouldn't know this is an auto safety spot until the last minute of the PSA, when the real message reveals itself. Slow down and enjoy the ride. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/#continued">Hit the jump</a> to view the video - just be prepared to breath a little deeper... you may want to join yoga after this. <em>Hat tip to Chris!</em><br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRwfwyaHXDk">YouTube</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video: Australian safety council urges you to slow down... naturally</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/">Video: Australian safety council urges you to slow down... naturally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRwfwyaHXDk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19888370/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>australian safety ad</category><category>auto safety</category><category>enjoy the ride</category><category>enjoy the ride safety ad</category><category>motorist safety</category><category>psa</category><category>road safety</category><category>road safety council of western australia</category><category>traffic safety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19888370/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/03/31/video-australian-safety-council-urges-you-to-slow-down-natur/19888370/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19888370</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/03/enjoy-the-ride_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: 136 recall campaigns in 2010 have covered 17.2M autos, and it's still not a record year]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/recall_levels_high_101221/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/recall-pedal.jpg" alt="Toyota recall pedal fix parts" /></a><br />
<br />
It's been a banner year for big recalls, or at least it feels that way. What with high profile recalls from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota">Toyota</a> for everything from runaway vehicles to brake issues and a host of smaller problems from nearly every automaker in the market, it certainly felt like 2010 was at the top of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/recall">recall</a> heap. Only it wasn't. According to <em>Ward's Auto</em>, a total of 136 recalls sent 17.2 million vehicles back to the dealer this year, and while that's an impressive sum, it still falls short of the record. Way back in 2000, manufactures recalled 24.3 million vehicles due in part to the now infamous <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/explorer">Ford Explorer/Firestone</a> tire scandal.<br />
<br />
Still, while this number's figure falls short of the big double-oh, recalls crept up by 800,000 units compared to 2009. Not surprisingly, Toyota led the way with 17 recalls covering around 6.6 million vehicles in 2010, but according to <em>Ward's</em>, the automaker still has plenty of work to do on some of the recalls from last year. Toyota is still only 65 percent of the way through repairing the 5.6 million vehicles that were recalled this year for faulty floor mats. That figure includes 80 percent of the trapped-pedal cars that were recalled in 2009. <br />
<br />
And what of other automakers, you ask? <em>Ward's</em> reports that combined, the Big Three brought back around 4.6 million vehicles. Head over to <a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/recall_levels_high_101221/">Ward's Auto</a> to see the full breakdown for yourself.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/recall_levels_high_101221/">Ward's Auto</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/">Report: 136 recall campaigns in 2010 have covered 17.2M autos, and it's still not a record year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19772459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010 recalls</category><category>auto safety</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><category>toyota recall</category><category>wards auto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19772459/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/12/22/report-136-recall-campaigns-in-2010-have-covered-17-2m-autos-a/19772459/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19772459</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/recall-pedal_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA proposes mandatory backup cameras by 2014]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="Backup camera view with body" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/backup-camera-body-630.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is proposing new regulations to mandate back-up cameras in all passenger cars, trucks, minivans and buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or less. If the proposed law goes into effect, automakers must get 10 percent of the fleet in compliance by 2012, 40 percent by 2013 and 100 percent of new vehicles by 2014.<br />
<br />
These measures are being proposed by NHTSA to try and reduce the number of back-over fatalities and injuries that occur on a yearly basis. According to NHTSA, 292 people die every year from back-over accidents while another 18,000 are injured. Will making rearview cameras mandatory help curb this? Is it possible but is this another case where drivers are moving further away from knowing actual driving skills and closer to reliance on digital assistance?<br />
<br />
In this case, perhaps not. Rearview cameras simply allow for a better picture of what's going on behind your vehicle, and with rollover standards and the increasing size of vehicles, rearward visibility in new vehicles seems to be getting worse, not better. Still, if NHTSA's proposal becomes law, there will be added cost passed on to consumers. Most luxury vehicles are already equipped with this technology - particularly those with navigation systems - but even if the systems aren't that expensive for automakers to install, they're likely to have a disproportionate impact on the MSRPs of inexpensive models.<br />
<br />
In any case, you can read some more insight into NHTSA's proposal in their official press release <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/#continued">after the jump</a>.<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA | Image: Damon Lavrinc/Autoblog/AOL]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NHTSA proposes mandatory backup cameras by 2014</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/">NHTSA proposes mandatory backup cameras by 2014</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19743373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>back-over</category><category>back-up camera</category><category>breaking</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>rear-view camera</category><category>rearview camera</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19743373/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/12/03/nhtsa-proposes-mandatory-backup-cameras-by-2014/19743373/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19743373</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/12/backup-camera-body-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Video: Volvo suffers another auto-stop safety system failure in public fashion]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/australia/" rel="tag">Australia</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/#continued"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/volvo-v60-dummy-impact-630.jpg" alt="Volvo V60 Pedestrian Detection failure" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Volvo V60 Pedestrian Detection test failures - Click above to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/#continued">watch the videos</a></small></strong></em></div>
<br />
Volvo's new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/18/2011-volvo-s60-hands-on-demonstration-w-video/">Pedestrian Detection with Full Auto Brake</a> is under scrutiny after a series of demonstrations for journalists in Australia went awry in rather spectacular fashion. During the presentation, an inflatable test dummy was mowed down after the system failed to detect its presence in time to stop. This, despite the fact that the technology was showcased under controlled conditions. The optional hardware, which debuts on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/s60">2011 S60</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/05/officially-official-volvo-v60-sports-wagon-gets-surprisingly/">V60 wagon</a>, utilizes both radar and camera technology to avoid or mitigate an accident with a pedestrian by automatically slowing the vehicle to either a full stop or at least initiating full braking to lower the rate of impact (Volvo: "The system can avoid a collision at speeds up to 22 mph. At higher speeds, the focus is on reducing the car's speed as much as possible prior to the impact").<br />
<br />
<div style="border: 0px dotted black; margin: 5px; padding: 2px 3px; color: rgb(153, 0, 0); line-height: 120%; font-size: 1.5em; float: right; width: 220px; text-align: center;"><strong>Volvo officials themselves cautioned... that the system may not always detect the dummy's presence.</strong></div>
According to Aussie motoring website Car Advice, journalists at the demonstration were told by a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/volvo/">Volvo</a> spokesperson that the system may have been 'confused' by a tractor-trailer parked around 30 meters behind the dummy, but the subsequent removal of the big rig still saw two more failures resulting in impacts. According to the same report, Volvo noted that "around 650 media participated in the week-long demonstration - with a claimed 99.7 per cent success rate - the nature of the failed 0.3 per cent of runs appears to be undisclosed."<br />
<br />
Autoblog had the chance to sample this system firsthand at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/20/2011-volvo-s60-first-drive-road-test-review/">Oregon launch of the S60</a> earlier this month in similar parking lot tests with different dummies. It performed as-advertised for us, though a few other journalists did record failures of their own - though those lapses were evidently at least partially exacerbated by the drivers giving-in to their instinct to tromp on the brake pedal. Interestingly, Volvo officials themselves cautioned us in advance that the system may not always detect the dummy's presence, in part because it doesn't mimic the behavior of a human (the Pedestrian Detection system is trained to look for human movements - arms swaying, legs moving, and so on). In fact, when we asked if the system would also detect and activate when animals are in the road, officials said that the safety feature has not yet been trained to do so - it is only capable of registering bipeds.<br />
<br />
As you may recall, this is not the first failure of Volvo's new auto-stop impact avoidance systems. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/07/volvo-s60-crashes-during-safety-demonstration-with-cameras-rolli/">Back in May</a>, we told you about another incident in which an S60's City Safety auto-brake system test resulted in the car plowing into the back of a semi truck. Volvo would apparently later state that the crash was caused by a 'low-voltage event' in the car's electrical system that turned the rear-impact avoidance system off, a flaw that has since been repaired.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Follow</span><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/#continued"> the jump</a> to watch videos of the PSD failures as well as an official Volvo video explaining how the system is designed to work.<br />
<br />
[Sources: <a href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/84669/volvo-global-pedestrian-brake-demonstration-goes-bad/">Car Advice</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcJ9xgBZJdI&amp;feature=related">YouTube</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Video: Volvo suffers another auto-stop safety system failure in public fashion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/">Video: Volvo suffers another auto-stop safety system failure in public fashion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19650302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>car safety</category><category>city safety</category><category>pedestrian detection</category><category>Pedestrian Detection with Full Auto Brake</category><category>pedestrian safety</category><category>PedestrianSafety</category><category>s60</category><category>safety</category><category>V60</category><category>video</category><category>volvo safety</category><category>VolvoSafety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19650302/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/09/27/video-volvo-suffers-another-auto-stop-safety-system-failure-in/19650302/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19650302</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/volvo-v60-dummy-impact-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Vancouver using 3D optical illusion to scare motorists into safer driving?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/driving-a-message-home-with-an-optical-illusion/article1693547/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="3D Girl safety image" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/3d-girl-250.jpg" /></a>Safety organizations and the District of West Vancouver, Canada are joining forces to build awareness about careful driving during the start of the school year. Thanks the work of the BCAA Traffic Safety Association, drivers motoring down 22nd Street in West Vancouver will be met with a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/3d">3D image</a> of a girl chasing a ball across the street. No one is saying exactly how the tech works, but it's meant to be a wakeup call for drivers who may be distracted or otherwise not paying enough attention to their surroundings while driving near school zones.<br />
<br />
The display will be installed for just one week and cost a princely total of $14,400 (USD) to operate. According to <em>The Globe and Mail</em>, drivers will be able to see that there is something on the road as they approach the 3D image. Once the vehicle reaches a certain point, the image of the child and her toy will appear. According to the BCAA Traffic Safety Association, September and October are the two months with the highest child fatalities, and this exercise should go well beyond the typical awareness campaign. Here's hoping it doesn't trigger any panic-braking induced accidents in the process.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/driving-a-message-home-with-an-optical-illusion/article1693547/">The Globe and Mail</a>]<br />
<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/">Vancouver using 3D optical illusion to scare motorists into safer driving?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19620689/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D</category><category>3D Image</category><category>3dImage</category><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>BCAA Traffic Safety Association</category><category>BcaaTrafficSafetyAssociation</category><category>Child Safety</category><category>ChildSafety</category><category>driver safety</category><category>DriverSafety</category><category>Safety</category><category>Traffic Safety</category><category>TrafficSafety</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19620689/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/09/03/vancouver-using-3d-optical-illusion-to-scare-motorists-into-safe/19620689/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19620689</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/3d-girl-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford: Aftermarket replacement parts can be inferior, possible safety hazards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2010-07-22-fordparts22_ST_N.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/2010-ford-taurus-impact-test-630.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Today's autos are chock-full of safety equipment that vastly improves your chances of survival in the event of a crash. And if an automaker wants to achieve the best crash test scores, it has to ensure that parts like bumper beams, air bag sensors and radiator supports perform properly during a collision. But while automakers are concerned about their safety record, in some cases, aftermarket parts makers are more concerned with keeping costs down.<br />
<br />
<em>USA Today</em> reports that <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> has called out some some aftermarket parts inferior, as the Dearborn, MI-based automaker's internal testing has shown that some non-OEM parts are made of cheaper materials that may not perform adequately in the event of an accident. Parts marketing manager Mike Warwood says the company was "surprised at the gap between original manufacturer equipment and aftermarket parts," adding that the gap was larger than anticipated. The easy way to avoid this issue is to demand OEM parts when your vehicle is in the shop for repairs, but unfortunately, some insurance companies insist that cheaper aftermarket replacement parts are used.<br />
<br />
It makes sense for Ford push its factory-made parts, as the company makes lots of money selling in excess of 24,000 different replacement components. Ford insists that it is merely looking for aftermarket parts standardization to ensure the safety of its customers, along with stickers warning consumers that non-standard parts are being used. Insurance companies and aftermarket shops likely wouldn't be too happy if a standardization process is initiated, but it's hard to argue with oversight in the name of safety. After all, automakers test and build parts like bumpers for optimal safety, and consumers purchase those vehicles in part because of the safety ratings those vehicles earn. <br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2010-07-22-fordparts22_ST_N.htm">USA Today</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/">Ford: Aftermarket replacement parts can be inferior, possible safety hazards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2010-07-22-fordparts22_ST_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19563936/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aftermarket part safety</category><category>AftermarketPartSafety</category><category>auto insurance</category><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoInsurance</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>blue oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>car insurance</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarInsurance</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>ford</category><category>ford aftermarket parts</category><category>FordAftermarketParts</category><category>motorcraft parts</category><category>MotorcraftParts</category><category>oem parts</category><category>OemParts</category><category>replacement part</category><category>replacement parts</category><category>ReplacementPart</category><category>ReplacementParts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19563936/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/23/ford-aftermarket-replacement-parts-can-be-inferior-possible-sa/19563936/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19563936</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/2010-ford-taurus-impact-test-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Congress mulling in-car alcohol detectors [w/poll]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><em><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/field-sobriety-test-getty-point.jpg" /><br />
<br />
The New York Times</em> reports that the U.S. Congress is considering a six-fold increase in the annual funding of in-car devices to detect drunk drivers. The Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety program's budget would increase from $2 million per year to $12 million for the next five years, likely expediting the development of an effective device.<br />
<br />
<span style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/autos/Report_Congress_Mulling_In_Car_Alcohol_Detectors'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>History suggests that such a device would save thousands of lives. In 2008 alone, nearly 12,000 people died in alcohol-impaired car crashes. Many of those deaths would likely be preventable if there were a way for a vehicle system to seamlessly detect elevated alcohol levels in drivers. Scientists are working on a device that could instantly detect a driver's blood alcohol level by reading alcohol levels on the breath or use a light beam to assess alcohol levels on the skin.<br />
<br />
Program Director Susan Ferguson says that said device should be "very fast, very accurate, highly reliable and precise," adding that achieving a high level of precision is going to take a lot of money. Ferguson feels that the alcohol detection system could be the safety equivalent of the next seatbelt, suggesting that it could save 8,000 to 9,000 lives per year.<br />
<br />
A total of 13 automakers are behind the project as well, and the goal is for drivers to voluntarily add the mechanism to their vehicles as an added safety measure. We're guessing that adding such a system could greatly reduce the cost to insure the vehicle, giving drivers a financial incentive to add the device. Of course, adding the cost of the device to new cars will likely cost automakers (and in turn, consumers) a fair bit of money, but the hope is that reduced insurance costs could cover the difference.<br />
<br />
What do you think, are in-car alcohol detectors a good idea? Cast your vote in our survey below and leave your thoughts in Comments.<br />
<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/#poll48689">View Poll</a></p><br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/congress-mulls-funding-for-in-car-alcohol-detection-system/">The New York Times</a> | Image: Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/">Report: Congress mulling in-car alcohol detectors [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/congress-mulls-funding-for-in-car-alcohol-detection-system/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19532808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alcohol Detection System for Safety</category><category>AlcoholDetectionSystemForSafety</category><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>breathalyzer</category><category>Breathalyzers</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>drunken driving</category><category>DrunkenDriving</category><category>dui</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19532808/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/06/28/report-congress-mulling-in-car-alcohol-detectors/19532808/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19532808</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/field-sobriety-test-getty-point_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: U.S. safety bill could triple cost of automotive black boxes to $5,000]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100530/OEM/100529826/1424"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/black-box-250.jpg" class="right border" alt="" /></a>When word first came down that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/27/report-house-committee-passes-bill-requiring-black-boxes-brake/">Congress</a> was looking to mandate that all new vehicles to be sold with Event Data Recorders, we knew that the added tech was going to be pricey. According to <em>Automotive News</em>, if legislators have their way, the new automotive <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/30/usa-today-investigates-how-automotive-black-boxes-can-h/">black boxes</a> will need to be both fire resistant and waterproof. Add in a significant amount of recording time before and after an accident, and suddenly the price tag per unit could soar up to a lofty $4,000 to $5,000. Currently, the EDRs track about five seconds worth of information just before an accident, though some legislators are pushing for up to 75 seconds of recording pre-crash. Between the fire insulation and added recording time, analysts believe the devices will swell to shoebox size, also creating a new packaging issue for automakers.<br />
<br />
And who's going to be shelling out the cash for the indestructible, mammoth recorders? The short answer is the automakers, though you can bet they won't just be soaking up the cost out of the goodness of their hearts. Odds are that $4,000-per-box price tag will be passed right along to consumers if such devices become law, so don't be surprised to see sticker prices climb if the boxes become mandatory in 2015.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100530/OEM/100529826/1424">Automotive News</a> - sub. req.]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/">Report: U.S. safety bill could triple cost of automotive black boxes to $5,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 31 May 2010 18:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19497530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>black box</category><category>Black Box Legislation</category><category>Black Boxes</category><category>BlackBox</category><category>BlackBoxes</category><category>BlackBoxLegislation</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>Congress</category><category>crash analysis</category><category>CrashAnalysis</category><category>EDR</category><category>Event Data Recorder</category><category>EventDataRecorder</category><category>Legislation</category><category>NHTSA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:41:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19497530/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/31/report-u-s-safety-bill-could-triple-cost-of-automotive-black-b/19497530/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19497530</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/black-box-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: NHTSA chief looking to augment safety arm's powers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://detnews.com/article/20100520/AUTO01/5200348/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" align="right" alt="" class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/strickland-250.jpg" /></a>Thanks to the barrage of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> recalls in recent months, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/18/nhtsa-reportedly-investigating-c5-corvette-over-leaky-fuel-tanks/">National Highway Transportation Safety Administration</a> has its eyes on more power. According to <em>The Detroit News</em>, David Strickland (pictured), who heads up the government safety agency, recently met with the Senate Commerce Committee to discuss his agency's need for the ability to order immediate recalls, halt production or stop the importation of vehicles that pose an imminent and significant safety risk. The House of Representatives has already drafted a bill that would give NHTSA those powers. Meanwhile, the Senate has created a new auto safety bill that Strickland believes falls short of giving his agency the power it needs.<br />
<br />
Even if Congress awards <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/03/ruh-roh-nhtsa-investigating-2007-dodge-caliber-for-sticky-pedal/">NHTSA</a> a greater reach, the majority of recalls would still fall squarely on automaker shoulders. The move would simply allow the government to respond more quickly if a manufacturer drags its heels during the recall process.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://detnews.com/article/20100520/AUTO01/5200348/1148/rss25">The Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/">Report: NHTSA chief looking to augment safety arm's powers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19484898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>David Strickland</category><category>DavidStrickland</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>NationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>recall safety</category><category>Recalls</category><category>RecallSafety</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19484898/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/20/report-nhtsa-chief-looking-to-augment-safety-arms-powers/19484898/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19484898</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/strickland-250_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[NHTSA announces 2009 fatalities lowest since 1954, continue downward trend]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" align="right" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/nader.jpg" class="right border" alt="" /></a>Safety doesn't sell cars. At least that's what Detroit executives walked around saying back in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. The whole of them were convinced that if you even mentioned the word "safety" in a marketing campaign it would imply that cars were unsafe. In fact, it took a crusader like <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/ralph+nader">Ralph Nader</a> to stand up to the auto industry and say enough with the death traps, like he did when he published his infamous <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/unsafe+at+any+speed"><em>Unsafe at Any Speed</em></a> (only one chapter is about the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/corvair">Corvair</a>!) in 1965. Like him or loathe, if you've walked away from a serious car accident in the last forty or so years, you probably owe him.<br />
<br />
And it looks like many more of us have been walking away from car accidents lately. According to a new report from The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the death rate for calendar 2009 plummeted by a frankly significant 8.9-percent from 2008. 33,963 Americans were killed on our roads last year, as opposed to the 37,261 people that perished in 2008. Still terrible, but much, <em>much</em> better. In fact, 2009's fatality rate (measured with the totally morbid metric, "death per mile") is actually the lowest such rate since 1954. Were cars safer back then? No, not even kinda sorta. It's just that a much smaller percentage of the population drove back then. The Interstate system was still two years off, so road trips were rare and mostly for truckers and beatniks. <br />
<br />
Why the drop in the death rate? Many factors. Cars are getting safer. More air bags, crumple zones, better construction techniques, stability control, better tire technology - all of it is adding up to help prevent accidents, or at least make them more survivable. Also, campaigns like "Click It or Ticket" have increased seatbelt usage, and cops nationwide are cracking down harder than ever on drunk drivers. However, there's one other reason the death rate fell so far in 2009: people drove less. Meaning that if our economy recovers and we start driving more, the death rate could - and probably will - increase. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/">Make the jump</a> to read the press release.<br />
<br />
[Source: NHTSA | Image: Bantam Dell Publishing Group]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NHTSA announces 2009 fatalities lowest since 1954, continue downward trend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/">NHTSA announces 2009 fatalities lowest since 1954, continue downward trend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19394894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>Corvair</category><category>Deaths per Mile</category><category>DeathsPerMile</category><category>fatalities</category><category>Fatality Rate</category><category>FatalityRate</category><category>NHTSA</category><category>Ralph Nader</category><category>Ralph Nader Corvair</category><category>RalphNader</category><category>RalphNaderCorvair</category><category>road fatalities</category><category>road safety</category><category>RoadFatalities</category><category>RoadSafety</category><category>Safety</category><category>traffic fatalities</category><category>TrafficFatalities</category><category>Unsafe at Any Speed</category><category>UnsafeAtAnySpeed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Lieberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19394894/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/11/nhtsa-announces-2009-fatalities-lowest-since-1954-continue-down/19394894/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19394894</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/nader_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: Want to improve your odds of surviving a crash? Have another sammich]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/erwinwurm-fat_car.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />There aren't a lot of positives about being overweight, but a study by the University of Michigan shows that there could be one reason for the chunky among us to celebrate. U of M studied 300,000 traffic fatalities obtained from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration between 1998 and 2008, and it has reportedly found that overweight people had a 22 percent lower fatality rate than underweight people. However, the story changes for the worse if you're a man with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35 to 50 and you are not wearing a safety belt. The study shows that obese men are 10 percent more likely to die in an accident if they don't buckle up. <br />  <br />  There was reportedly no statistical evidence that showed that females were affected by their weight in a crash. Unfortunately, there was evidence that women were 1.1 times as likely to die in a car crash then were men. And everyone is safer when buckled up, as evidenced by the not-so-surprising observation that those who do not fasten their safety belts are 2.1 times more likely to die in a car accident. U of M says that the study does show that the large mass of some men shows that airbags and seat belts may need to be redesigned in the future because their larger size could possibly be overwhelming the safety equipment. Maybe we won't have that extra pastrami on rye after all.<br />  <br />  [Source: <a href="http://www.annarbor.com/news/overweight-men-have-higher-chance-of-surviving-a-car-crash-university-of-michigan-study-finds/">AnnArbor.com</a> | Image: <a href="http://blog.lilinelson.com/index.php/category/lunivers-de-lili/">Lili Nelson</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/">Study: Want to improve your odds of surviving a crash? Have another sammich</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.annarbor.com/news/overweight-men-have-higher-chance-of-surviving-a-car-crash-university-of-michigan-study-finds/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19355373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air bag</category><category>AirBag</category><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>BMI</category><category>car crash</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarCrash</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>obese</category><category>overweight</category><category>overweight driver</category><category>overweight drivers</category><category>OverweightDriver</category><category>OverweightDrivers</category><category>U of M</category><category>University of Michigan</category><category>UniversityOfMichigan</category><category>UOfM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19355373/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/02/12/study-want-to-improve-your-odds-of-surviving-a-crash-have-anot/19355373/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19355373</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/erwinwurm-fat_car_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: NHTSA to mandate lane departure warning and auto-brake systems?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20090702/AUTO01/907020346/1148/auto01/NHTSA+may+impose+more+safety+features"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/volvo-lane-departure-warning-graphic-580.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />Is the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about to add some more safety measures to your next new car? According to <em>The Detroit News</em>, they might be. The Motown daily says that government officials are pondering whether or not they should require new vehicles to be fitted with lane-departure warning systems and automatic braking systems that trigger upon warning of an impending accident. Both systems are currently available only in very small percentage of new passenger cars - primarily luxury vehicles. According to the DetNews report, safety experts believe that the systems "show significant promise" in their ability to reduce traffic accident-related fatalities and injuries. <br /><br />NHTSA will decide whether to require such systems in 2011 after further cost-benefit analysis, including looking at insurance company data and estimated manufacturing costs. It has already added new components to its New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) for 2011 vehicles, including a test that measures the effectiveness of lane-departure warning systems and a different frontal-crash program.<br /><br />NHTSA hopes to announce its findings by the end of the year.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20090702/AUTO01/907020346/1148/auto01/NHTSA+may+impose+more+safety+features">The Detroit News</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/">REPORT: NHTSA to mandate lane departure warning and auto-brake systems?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19086296/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>bike abs</category><category>BikeAbs</category><category>car safety</category><category>CarSafety</category><category>lane departure</category><category>lane departure warning</category><category>LaneDeparture</category><category>LaneDepartureWarning</category><category>motorcycle abs</category><category>MotorcycleAbs</category><category>NCAP</category><category>new car assessment program</category><category>NewCarAssessmentProgram</category><category>nhtsa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19086296/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/07/03/report-nhtsa-to-mandate-lane-departure-warning-and-auto-brake-s/19086296/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19086296</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/volvo-lane-departure-warning-graphic-580_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Reports debuts crash-in theater]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><br /><a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/crash-videos-ov.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/neoncrashweb.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Oh how we all love a good car crash, but finding good, slow-motion automotive carnage on the Web hasn't been all that easy to find. Until now. <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/safety-recalls/carcrashtest/crashtestvideo.htm">Consumer Reports</a> has put hours of crash-test video from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety online, free for anyone to see.<br /><br />We've already lost hours of productivity to CR's new Crash-In Theater and we're sure you will too. We highly recommend watching the frontal offset test of the 2000 Dodge Neon. It's just amazing how bent out of shape the door frame gets and surprising how much air the rear tires achieve. Oh, and the narrator says the steering wheel actually snapped off from the steering column. That can't be good.<br /><br />While we found the videos highly entertaining, used- and new-car shoppers will surely find the videos and accompanying analysis beneficial. For those shopping for a used Pontiac Transport, you really, really should watch that video. For those squeamish about seeing a crash-test dummy pretty much destroyed, you really, really shouldn't.<br /><br />[Source: Consumer Reports]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/">Consumer Reports debuts crash-in theater</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2007/08/crash-videos-ov.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/971590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto safety</category><category>automotive safety</category><category>AutomotiveSafety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>Consumer Reports</category><category>ConsumerReports</category><category>crash test videos</category><category>crash tests</category><category>CrashTests</category><category>CrashTestVideos</category><category>IIHS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/971590/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/08/23/consumer-reports-debuts-crash-in-theater/971590/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>971590</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/neoncrashweb_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Forbes names least safe cars of 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/saturn/" rel="tag">Saturn</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/" rel="tag">Suzuki</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p>In an obvious effort to keep its readership alive (and in turn circulation numbers up) <em>Forbes</em> magazine has made a list of the least safe cars of 2007. Before the flame wars start, note that cars on the list are not necessarily unsafe, but instead are not as safe as other cars available. Therefore, they are the least safe 2007 model year cars.<br /><br />Most of the vehicles on the list are there because they don't have standard side air bags. But three -- Saturn's Ion, as well as Suzuki's Aerio and Forenza -- made the cut even with side air bags. To understand why these particular vehicles were named in the article, Forbes outlines its <a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/2006/10/30/safety-cars-airbags-forbeslife-vehicles-cx_dl_1031lsafe_2.html">methodology</a>, which includes crash tests, injury claims and the opinions of Consumer Reports' researchers. <br /><br />The seven models named by Forbes are after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: Forbes Magazine]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Forbes names least safe cars of 2007</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/">Forbes names least safe cars of 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/2006/10/30/safety-cars-airbags-forbeslife-vehicles-cx_dl_1031lsafe.html?partner=yahootix>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/694238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air bags</category><category>AirBags</category><category>auto safety</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>chevrolet cobalt</category><category>ChevroletCobalt</category><category>chevy cobalt</category><category>ChevyCobalt</category><category>corolla</category><category>crash testing</category><category>CrashTesting</category><category>ford focus</category><category>FordFocus</category><category>ion</category><category>least safe cars</category><category>least safe vehicles</category><category>LeastSafeCars</category><category>LeastSafeVehicles</category><category>mazda</category><category>mazda3 safety</category><category>Mazda3Safety</category><category>safety ratings</category><category>safety ratins</category><category>SafetyRatings</category><category>saturn ion</category><category>SaturnIon</category><category>side air bags</category><category>SideAirBags</category><category>Suzuki aerio</category><category>suzuki forenza</category><category>SuzukiAerio</category><category>SuzukiForenza</category><category>toyota corolla</category><category>ToyotaCorolla</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:41:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/694238/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/11/01/forbes-names-least-safe-cars-of-2007/694238/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>694238</postid>
<thumbnail></thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[VIDEO: Animation of Audi's trick Side Assist]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a></p><a href="http://www.foursprung.com/2006/03/audi-q7-side-assist-animation.html"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4"height="167" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/004__scaled_600_031_001.jpg"/></a>The new Q7 SUV from Audi will feature a nifty safety device called <ahref="http://www.fourtitude.com/news/publish/Audi_News/article_2080.shtml">Side Assist</a> that uses radar to senseapproaching vehicles in adjacent lanes and warm the driver of their impending passing. If the Q7's turn signal isactivated when another vehicle is in range, LEDs embedded in the rearview mirrors will visually alert the driver of thedanger. The LEDs appear to vary their intensity as well as blink rate depending on how close the approaching vehicle isto passing. <br /><br />Audi's Side Assist technology recently won the "Innovation of the Future"award from Germany's largest consumer mag, <em>Guter Rat</em>. Since the Q7 has been on sale in Europe sinceMarch 10th, nearly 25-percent of all units have been ordered with the 550 Euro safety feature.<br /><br />Foursprunghas posted a <a href="http://www.foursprung.com/2006/03/audi-q7-side-assist-animation.html ">video</a> of the SideAssist feature in action that originated on <ahref="http://www.fourtitude.com/news/publish/Audi_News/article_2080.shtml">Fourtitude</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/">VIDEO: Animation of Audi's trick Side Assist</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.foursprung.com/2006/03/audi-q7-side-assist-animation.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/601282/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audi</category><category>auto safety</category><category>auto technology</category><category>AutoSafety</category><category>AutoTechnology</category><category>side assist</category><category>SideAssist</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/601282/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/21/video-animation-of-audi-s-trick-side-assist/601282/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>601282</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/004__scaled_600_031_001_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
