<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. car sales in the doldrums <strike>to infinity</strike> until 2012 and beyond]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/07/u-s-car-sales-in-the-doldrums-strike-to-infinity-strike-unti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/07/u-s-car-sales-in-the-doldrums-strike-to-infinity-strike-unti/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/07/u-s-car-sales-in-the-doldrums-strike-to-infinity-strike-unti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/06/business/06auto.php"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/nw_arw.jpg"  alt="" /></a>There were about three million fewer cars sold in 2008 than 2007. Based on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/#comments">2007's numbers</a>, it would be the same as if Acura, Audi, BMW, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Lexus, MINI, Porsche, and Saab all closed their doors in 2008. In terms of pure automotive carnage, that's not the kind of damage you can just buff out. And the predictions for the future agree on two points: it's going to get worse, and it won't return to what it was for years to come.<br /><br />The only difference in the predictions of gloom is exactly how long things are going to stay depressed. Everyone agrees that the vertiginous sales drop in Q4 of 2008 is going to continue at least until the middle of 2009. Some, though, think that 2009 will "<a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090106/AUTO01/901060372/1148/rss25">look a lot like 2008, but in reverse</a>," with a slight sales rebound possible in the latter half. That prediction depends on the size of the proposed economic stimulus package, and whether it actually stimulates the economy. After all, banks received their own stimulus packages, yet getting a loan is as hard as ever. <br /><br />Others say we are "entering a prolonged period of conservation." One analyst predicts that U.S. car sales won't see the north side of 15 million in annual sales until "2012 or later," while another said that we won't see 16 million annual sales again "for the forseeable future." Naturally, with such conservation comes other cuts, like R&amp;D budgets and model facelifts, that could mean the cars on offer won't be as interesting or as cutting edge as before. While that could be looked at as a benefit, saving manufacturers the need to put new redesigned cars in showrooms every three years, the necessary auto industry infrastructure changes (plant closers, layoffs, etc.), the certain extinction of some companies, and the uncertain future are going to hurt.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/06/business/06auto.php">IHT</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/07/u-s-car-sales-in-the-doldrums-strike-to-infinity-strike-unti/">U.S. car sales in the doldrums <strike>to infinity</strike> until 2012 and beyond</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/06/business/06auto.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/07/u-s-car-sales-in-the-doldrums-strike-to-infinity-strike-unti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1419796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/07/u-s-car-sales-in-the-doldrums-strike-to-infinity-strike-unti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>auto sales</category><category>auto sales 2007</category><category>auto sales 2008</category><category>auto sales 2009</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>AutoSales2007</category><category>AutoSales2008</category><category>AutoSales2009</category><category>car buying</category><category>CarBuying</category><category>earnings</category><category>financials</category><category>us auto sales</category><category>UsAutoSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By The Numbers - 2008: Phew! Glad That's Over Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/hill_car1ab.png" alt="" />We didn't know sales for the U.S. auto industry in 2008 would be this bad when the year began, but it sure ended on a fitting note. Over the past six months or so we've seen the U.S. auto sales market nearly collapse and almost take our own domestic auto industry with it. <br /><br />Nevertheless, there were a couple of standouts. Both MINI and Subaru somehow managed to post sales gains in 2008 compared to the previous year. The success of MINI is likely due to production capacity more than popularity, but we have no explanation for Subaru other than its sales staff is more persuasive than at your average car dealership.<br /><br />As for the big dogs, despite the whole lot of them being hit equally hard over the past few months, Japanese automakers had a stronger first half of 2008. As such, their year-end sales data looks better than the domestics with Toyota being the worst performing Japanese automaker at -15.4% and Honda fairing the best with a drop of just 7.91%. In comparison, Ford Motor Company (-20.7%) and General Motors (-22.9%) were equally unimpressive while the Chrysler Group hemorrhaged sales and finished down a full 30%.<br /><br />As for the rest of the auto industry, it's all there below and it isn't pretty.<br /><br /><style type="text/css"> #comparechart { border: 2px solid #333; border-collapse: collapse; } #comparechart td { padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; vertical-align: top; margin: 0; line-height: 1.3em; font-size: 80%} #comparechart th { font-size: 80%; font-weight: bold; text-align: left; padding: 4px; background: #eee; } #comparechart th.mainth { font-size: 75%; border-bottom: 1px solid #333; } #comparechart td.red { background-color: #f08c85; } #comparechart td.green { background-color: #b3e2c4; } #comparechart td.yellow { background-color: #ffffcc;} </style>
<table width="580" height="112" cellspacing="0" id="comparechart">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <th colspan="7">BY THE NUMBERS - 2008</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <th class="mainth">Brand</th> <th class="mainth">Vol. % Change</th> <th class="mainth">Total Sales 2008</th> <th class="mainth">Total Sales 2007</th> <th class="mainth">DSR % Change</th> <th class="mainth">Daily Avg. 2008</th> <th class="mainth">Daily Avg. 2007</th>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td><strong>Acura<br /></strong></td>
            <td class="red">-19.8%<br /></td>
            <td>144,504<br /></td>
            <td>180,104<br /></td>
            <td class="red">-20%<br /></td>
            <td>469<br /></td>
            <td>587<br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Audi</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-6.1% </td>
            <td valign="top">87,760 </td>
            <td valign="top">93,506 </td>
            <td class="red">-6.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">285 </td>
            <td valign="top">305 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>BMW</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-15.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">249,113 </td>
            <td valign="top">293,795 </td>
            <td class="red">-15.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">809 </td>
            <td valign="top">957 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Buick</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-26.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">137,197 </td>
            <td valign="top">185,791 </td>
            <td class="red">-26.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">445 </td>
            <td valign="top">605 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Cadillac</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-24.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">161,159 </td>
            <td valign="top">214,726 </td>
            <td class="red">-25.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">523 </td>
            <td valign="top">699 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chevrolet</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-20.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,801,131 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,265,641 </td>
            <td class="red">-20.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">5,848 </td>
            <td valign="top">7,380 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chrysler</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-38.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">335,108 </td>
            <td valign="top">543,011 </td>
            <td class="red">-38.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,088 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,769 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Dodge</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-25.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">784,113 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,058,402 </td>
            <td class="red">-26.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">2,546 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,448 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Ford</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-19.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,687,731 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,101,244 </td>
            <td class="red">-19.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">5,480 </td>
            <td valign="top">6,844 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>GMC</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-25.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">376,996 </td>
            <td valign="top">505,746 </td>
            <td class="red">-25.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,224 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,647 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Honda</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-6.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,284,261 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,371,438 </td>
            <td class="red">-6.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">4,170 </td>
            <td valign="top">4,467 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>HUMMER</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-50.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">27,485 </td>
            <td valign="top">55,986 </td>
            <td class="red">-51% </td>
            <td valign="top">89 </td>
            <td valign="top">182 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Hyundai</strong></td>
            <td class="red">NA </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
            <td class="red"> </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Infiniti</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-11% </td>
            <td valign="top">112,989 </td>
            <td valign="top">127,038 </td>
            <td class="red">-11.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">367 </td>
            <td valign="top">414 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Jeep</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-29.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">333,901</td>
            <td valign="top">475,237 </td>
            <td class="red">-30% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,084</td>
            <td valign="top">1,548 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Kia</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-10.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">273,397 </td>
            <td valign="top">305,473 </td>
            <td class="red">-10.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">888 </td>
            <td valign="top">995 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Lexus</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-21% </td>
            <td valign="top">260,087 </td>
            <td valign="top">329,177 </td>
            <td class="red">-21.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">844 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,072 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Lincoln</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-18.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">107,295 </td>
            <td valign="top">131,487 </td>
            <td class="red">-18.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">348 </td>
            <td valign="top">428 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mazda</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-10.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">263,949 </td>
            <td valign="top">296,110 </td>
            <td class="red">-11.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">857 </td>
            <td valign="top">965 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mercedes-Benz</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-11.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">225,128 </td>
            <td valign="top">253,433 </td>
            <td class="red">-11.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">731 </td>
            <td valign="top">826 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mercury</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-28.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">120,248 </td>
            <td valign="top">168,422 </td>
            <td class="red">-28.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">390 </td>
            <td valign="top">549 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>MINI</strong></td>
            <td class="green">28.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">54,077 </td>
            <td valign="top">42,045 </td>
            <td class="green">28.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">176 </td>
            <td valign="top">137 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Mitsubishi</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-24.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">97,257 </td>
            <td valign="top">128,993 </td>
            <td class="red">-24.8% </td>
            <td valign="top">316 </td>
            <td valign="top">420 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Nissan</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-10.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">838,361 </td>
            <td valign="top">941,200 </td>
            <td class="red">-11.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">2,722 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,066 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Pontiac</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-25.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">267,348 </td>
            <td valign="top">358,022 </td>
            <td class="red">-25.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">868 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,166 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Porsche</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-25% </td>
            <td valign="top">26,035 </td>
            <td valign="top">34,693 </td>
            <td class="red">-25.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">85 </td>
            <td valign="top">113 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Saab</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-34.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">21,368 </td>
            <td valign="top">32,711 </td>
            <td class="red">-34.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">69 </td>
            <td valign="top">107 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Saturn</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-21.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">188,004 </td>
            <td valign="top">240,091 </td>
            <td class="red">-21.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">610 </td>
            <td valign="top">782 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Subaru</strong></td>
            <td class="green">0.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">187,699 </td>
            <td valign="top">187,208 </td>
            <td class="red">-0.06 </td>
            <td valign="top">609 </td>
            <td valign="top">610 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Suzuki</strong></td>
            <td class="red">NA </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
            <td class="red"> </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
            <td valign="top"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Toyota</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-14.6% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,957,575 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,291,648 </td>
            <td class="red">-14.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">6,356 </td>
            <td valign="top">7,464 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Volkswagen</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-3.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">223,128 </td>
            <td valign="top">230,572 </td>
            <td class="red">-3.5% </td>
            <td valign="top">724 </td>
            <td valign="top">751 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Volvo</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-31.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">73,102 </td>
            <td valign="top">106,213 </td>
            <td class="red">-31.4% </td>
            <td valign="top">237 </td>
            <td valign="top">346 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td class="yellow"> <strong>COMPANIES</strong></td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
            <td class="yellow"> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>BMW Group</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-9.7%<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">303,190<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">335,840<br /></td>
            <td class="red">-10%<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">984<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,094<br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Chrysler LLC</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-30% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,453,122 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,076,650 </td>
            <td class="red">-30.3% </td>
            <td valign="top">4,717 </td>
            <td valign="top">6,764 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>FoMoCo</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-20.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">1,988,376 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,507,366 </td>
            <td class="red">-30% </td>
            <td valign="top">6,456 </td>
            <td valign="top">8,167 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>General Motors</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-22.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">2,980,688 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,866,620 </td>
            <td class="red">-23.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">9,678 </td>
            <td valign="top">12,594 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Honda America</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-7.91%<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,428,765<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">1,551,542<br /></td>
            <td class="red">-8.21%<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">4,369<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">5,054<br /></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Nissan NA</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-10.9% </td>
            <td valign="top">951,350 </td>
            <td valign="top">1,068,238 </td>
            <td class="red">-11.2% </td>
            <td valign="top">3,081 </td>
            <td valign="top">3,480 </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top"><strong>Toyota Mo Co</strong></td>
            <td class="red">-15.4%<br /></td>
            <td valign="top">2,217,662 </td>
            <td valign="top">2,620,825 </td>
            <td class="red">-15.7% </td>
            <td valign="top">7,200 </td>
            <td valign="top">8,537 </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<br /> <small><em>2008 had 308 selling days versus 307 selling days for 2007</em></small><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/">By The Numbers - 2008: Phew! Glad That's Over Edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1419254/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/05/by-the-numbers-2008-phew-glad-thats-over-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 sales data</category><category>2008SalesData</category><category>auto sales</category><category>auto sales 2008</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>AutoSales2008</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>featured</category><category>u.s. auto industry sales</category><category>U.s.AutoIndustrySales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power and Associates predict even lower U.S. vehicle sales]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/jd_power.jpg" alt="" />We really didn't expect good news... J.D. Power and Associates, the global information services company who seem to have highly regarded insight within the industry, is predicting auto sales this year to hit short of their original estimates. According to the firm, declining consumer confidence, lower spending, and turbulent financial and economic market conditions will contribute to an anticipated drop in new light-vehicle sales in 2008 that will put total sales at their lowest level since 1994.</p>
<p>U.S. light-vehicle automotive sales as recently as 2000 and 2001 topped 17 million units and retail sales last year were a more disappointing 16.2 million units. It was originally assumed that sales in 2008 would even lower, at 15.7 million units. Now, weak retail and fleet sales have driven that number down to J.D. Power's estimate of 14.95 million units. </p>
<p><em>Press Release after the jump.</em></p>
<p> </p>
[Source: <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2008031">J.D. Power and Associates</a>]
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power and Associates predict even lower U.S. vehicle sales</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/">J.D. Power and Associates predict even lower U.S. vehicle sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1143408/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>auto sales 2008</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>AutoSales2008</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>j.d. power and assoc...</category><category>j.d. power ratings</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>J.d.PowerAndAssoc...</category><category>j.d.powerandassociates</category><category>J.d.PowerRatings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>