Autoblog http://www.autoblog.com Autoblog http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif Autoblog http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[France's Sarkozy urges verification that U.S. auto aid jibes with world trade rules]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/28/frances-sarkozy-urges-verification-that-u-s-auto-aid-jibes-wit/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/28/frances-sarkozy-urges-verification-that-u-s-auto-aid-jibes-wit/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/28/frances-sarkozy-urges-verification-that-u-s-auto-aid-jibes-wit/#commentsFiled under: , , ,



The European Union made noises last year about having the WTO verify that the U.S. auto industry assistance package doesn't violate any international trade rules. Now French President Nicolas Sarkozy has said he will ask the World Trade Organization to stick their hands into the matter.

Critics suggest that this could be a diversionary tactic - Sarkozy himself was accused of violating trade rules with his proposed assistance to Renault and PSA Peugeot/Citroen. Or it could be a way to see if both the proposed French and U.S. proposals will pass the WTO test. Either way, Sarkozy and other European heads of state will meet to plan a Europe-wide response to the auto industry situation, as the E.U. continues to mull whether to bring a formal appeal to the WTO regarding the United States' bailout package.

[Source: Automotive News Europe, sub req'd. | Image: Eric Feferberg/AFP/Getty]

France's Sarkozy urges verification that U.S. auto aid jibes with world trade rules originally appeared on Autoblog on Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:23:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industryauto industry bailoutAutoIndustryAutoIndustryBailouteueuroeuropeeuropean unionEuropeanUnionfrancegovernmentnicolas sarkozyNicolasSarkozysarkozyworld trade organizationWorldTradeOrganizationwtoSat, 28 Feb 2009 08:23:00 EST<![CDATA[Saab not long for the U.S. market, GM unsure of other brands' futures]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/02/saab-not-long-for-the-u-s-market-gm-unsure-of-other-brands-fut/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/02/saab-not-long-for-the-u-s-market-gm-unsure-of-other-brands-fut/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/02/saab-not-long-for-the-u-s-market-gm-unsure-of-other-brands-fut/#commentsFiled under: , , , , ,



Let's go ahead and get it out there: General Motors doesn't have a plan for Saab, Saturn, or HUMMER - it has a bunch of hopes, ideas and proposals. The best that GM can do with Saab is try to extricate the brand from its entangled web, which might make it more attractive to a buyer. That includes moving 9-3 and 9-5 production to Sweden and being "engaged with the Swedish government" on a plan for Saab's future. But GM has admitted that "Saab is not a U.S. strategy," and the code behind that statement is probably, "We get rid of or kill it."

GM's focus is on Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC, and Pontiac "will shrink substantially." The other brands appear to be waiting out their death row sentences on appeal. Saturn, like Saab, is so entrenched in GM that an outside buyer is a remarkably dim prospect. Saturn production is funded until 2012 (for now), but unless GM finds a partner or folds it into the mothership, it would appear to have no future beyond then. HUMMER is living like a medieval leper, locked up in a shed outside the castle walls.

But let's also get this out there: there are two ways out of this impasse. One of them is to spend a lot of money assisting GM. The other is to let GM fail and spend a lot of money cleaning up after GM. (Remember our perspective on "a lot of money:" Citibank got $45 billion after a couple of phone calls and recently had to be asked by the Obama administration not to spend $50 million on a French corporate jet.)

In two weeks GM is supposed to "show that it is likely to achieve long-term profitability and has a positive net present value." Let's be honest: there is no way GM (nor Chrysler) can prove long term viability in the next 15 days. (Neither could many companies if they had to.) If GM's viability plan is rejected, the government could ask for its $13.4 billion dollars back, which would be the equivalent of taking GM out back and shooting it. And that would be the equivalent of emptying another ammo clip into the economy's slowly-beating heart. All of which is to say that we have no idea how this will play out, but we're pretty sure that this is only the beginning of the beginning.

[Source: Automotive News, sub req'd]

Saab not long for the U.S. market, GM unsure of other brands' futures originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutbridge loanBridgeLoanbuickchevroletearningsgmgm bailoutgm bridge loanGmBailoutGmBridgeLoangmcgovernmenthummerpontiacsaabsaturnMon, 02 Feb 2009 10:29:00 EST<![CDATA[UAW agrees to suspend GM job banks on Feb 2]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/28/uaw-agrees-to-suspend-gm-job-banks-on-feb-2/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/28/uaw-agrees-to-suspend-gm-job-banks-on-feb-2/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/28/uaw-agrees-to-suspend-gm-job-banks-on-feb-2/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

The UAW idled Chrysler's jobs bank earlier this week, and as of February 2, the UAW and General Motors will shut down the job bank it also maintains for its workers. GM is paying the 1,600 workers currently in the system 85% of their on-the-job wages. As of February 3, they will receive a measure of supplemental pay from GM and can apply for unemployment, the total of which should come to 72% of their former pay. The move potentially leaves Ford's jobs bank as the only one left running, but Ford has yet to comment on its status.

[Source: The Detroit News]

UAW agrees to suspend GM job banks on Feb 2 originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:22:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutbridge loanBridgeLoanfinancialsgmjob bankJobBankjobs bankJobsBankmanufacturingplantsuawunionWed, 28 Jan 2009 15:22:00 EST<![CDATA[GM warns it could be out of cash by March 31 if second $5.4M loan is delayed]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/gm-warns-it-could-be-out-of-cash-by-march-31st-if-second-5-4m-l/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/gm-warns-it-could-be-out-of-cash-by-march-31st-if-second-5-4m-l/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/gm-warns-it-could-be-out-of-cash-by-march-31st-if-second-5-4m-l/#commentsFiled under: , ,

General Motors is ringing the alarm bell over a delay in the second installment of its bridge loan. Chrysler faced the same thing when it was waiting on its first installment, but eventually got its money in time.

GM puts the delay down to having to fill out a great deal of paperwork and having to wait on the Treasury to finish doing the ballroom-and-cocktail circuit during a little thing called the presidential inauguration. GM President Fritz Henderson said the money should arrive "in the next several days." And even though it's still only January, just in case you needed a reminder, he also said "If we don't get our second installment ... we'll run out of cash" by March 31. Cue the wailing and gnashing of teeth...

[Source: Detroit Free Press]

GM warns it could be out of cash by March 31 if second $5.4M loan is delayed originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutbailoutbridge loanBridgeLoanearningsfinancialsfritz hendersonFritzHendersongeneral motorsGeneralMotorsgmWed, 21 Jan 2009 19:01:00 EST<![CDATA[REPORT: French government calls for auto execs to forego bonuses]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/report-french-government-calls-for-auto-execs-to-forego-bonuses/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/report-french-government-calls-for-auto-execs-to-forego-bonuses/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/report-french-government-calls-for-auto-execs-to-forego-bonuses/#commentsFiled under: , , , , ,

The French government has put €6 billion ($7.79 billion USD) on the table for car companies. And as part of the effort to make sure that every drop of the money goes toward maximizing performance and retaining jobs, the French government has asked that Peugeot/Citroen and Renault company bosses take a pass on their bonuses.

Renault responded by saying that its execs were told seven months ago that there would be no extra fat for them. Peugeot/Citroen said its remuneration committee would determine the fate of executive bonuses when its 2008 results are known next month. The French government probably won't make executive compensation a key component of the deal, but just as in the U.S., French auto execs are likely looking at their banking industry counterparts and wondering: "Why is all the heat on us?"

[Source: Automotive News, sub req'd]

REPORT: French government calls for auto execs to forego bonuses originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutbailoutbonusesbridge loanBridgeLoancitroeneuroeuropeexecutive bonusExecutiveBonusexecutivesfinancingfrancegovernmentgovernment loansGovernmentLoanspeugeotpsarenaultWed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:00 EST<![CDATA[Does Washington's GMAC bailout hurt Ford?]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/04/does-washingtons-gmac-bailout-hurt-ford/#commentsFiled under: , ,

The Wall Street Journal puts forth the case that the government's $5 billion lifeline to GMAC has given GMAC a competitive advantage compared to its rivals. After the taxpayer cash was received, GMAC dropped the required credit score to get a loan and began offering 0% financing on several models, and rates from about 1% to 6% on a host of others. While doing so, it admitted that "without this [loan] . . . we would not be able to do this today."

The Journal cries foul, saying that because GMAC is essentially doing this with -- or at least, because of -- government money, "the feds have now put the muscle of the state behind one company's products." The Journal also considers that the government might do what it can to make sure the horses it bet on win the race, saying "the Washington temptation will be to take other steps to help the two companies gain market share at the expense of their private competitors."

As to the issue of granting the loan to GMAC at all, the government didn't have much choice unless it wanted its previous investment in GM to potentially get flushed by a GMAC bankruptcy. As to 0% fiancing, it's being offered on SUVs and Saabs, none of which are making the cash register overheat. A quick comparison between financing in Southern California through GMAC or Ford Credit found similar rates on other cars: the 2009 Malibu gets 4.9% APR, the same as the 2009 Ford Taurus SEL AWD.

Will the government try to otherwise help GM and Chrysler (beyond pushing more money their way)? The airlines got $15 billion after 9/11, yet would anyone accuse the government of otherwise aiding the industry? As to intervention in the free market... well, when was the last time the market was truly free? And Does GMAC's ability to offer the new incentives give it a competitive advantage over the other companies? It only lasted until January 5th, and some GM dealers did say they were moving metal -- but if the benefit really was that lopsided, we're sure those competitors will let us know about it soon enough.

[Source: Wall Street Journal]

Continue reading Does Washington's GMAC bailout hurt Ford?

Does Washington's GMAC bailout hurt Ford? originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:32:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutbank bailoutBankBailoutcar buyingCarBuyingfinancialfinancialsfinancingford creditFordCreditgmacgmac loanGmacLoangovernmentwall street journalWallStreetJournalSun, 04 Jan 2009 19:32:00 EST<![CDATA[Industry crunch hitting design students hard]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/26/industry-crunch-hitting-design-students-hard/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/26/industry-crunch-hitting-design-students-hard/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/26/industry-crunch-hitting-design-students-hard/#commentsFiled under:



Another casualty in the collateral damage of auto industry woes: Graduating car designers are no longer finding jobs. The LA Times reports that in years past, manufacturer representatives would attend the Pasadena's Art Center College of Design's senior showcase and welcome a few visionaries into the hallowed world of car design. Now, manufacturer representation is down to one or two (if any), and those who show don't always end up hiring. For students who weren't chosen by manufacturers, the fallback was often working for a supplier, but these days, prospects there are just as bleak.

The fallback plan now for studious car design aspirants tends to be interiors or the world outside of car design. Those who can find any place at all in the car world will settle for penning A/C vents for now, and those who can't are looking at consumer appliances like cellular telephones. Although we have no doubt that current designers can deliver worthy goods when given the freedom to do so, as car enthusiasts, we look forward to when the gates open up again for the greatest minds of the collegiate generation.

[Source: LA Times]

Industry crunch hitting design students hard originally appeared on Autoblog on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industryauto industry bailoutauto industry outlookAutoIndustryAutoIndustryBailoutAutoIndustryOutlookcar designcar designerCarDesignCarDesignerdesigndesignerdesignersFri, 26 Dec 2008 10:27:00 EST<![CDATA[Canada officially approves its own $4 billion auto aid package]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/21/canada-officially-approves-its-own-4-billion-auto-aid-package/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/21/canada-officially-approves-its-own-4-billion-auto-aid-package/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/21/canada-officially-approves-its-own-4-billion-auto-aid-package/#commentsFiled under: , ,

True to their word, the Canadians came through with an aid package to support the auto industry, namely GM and Chrylser. The amount to be loaned is $4 billion Canadian, with $2.7 billion coming from the national government and $1.3 billion coming from Ontario, where much of the industry is based. With the conversion from Canadian to U.S. dollars at today's rates, that works out to just about the 20-percent that was promised. Parts suppliers in Canada will also have access to the money, and some portion of the loan will also be used to provide impetus to get banks to lend money to buyers. Yet, as with the American loan, it won't last long: one analyst said "It probably only buys them three months or four months where they can get their ducks in order ... and hopefully come up with a plan to get everything straightened out so that they can survive."

[Source: CTV]

Canada officially approves its own $4 billion auto aid package originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:11:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutcanadadetroit bridge loansDetroitBridgeLoansgovernmentgovernment bailoutGovernmentBailoutloansSun, 21 Dec 2008 10:11:00 EST<![CDATA[Porsche head predicts a hedge fund will swallow GM or Ford]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/01/porsche-head-predicts-a-hedge-fund-will-swallow-gm-or-ford/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/01/porsche-head-predicts-a-hedge-fund-will-swallow-gm-or-ford/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/12/01/porsche-head-predicts-a-hedge-fund-will-swallow-gm-or-ford/#commentsFiled under: , , , , ,

Little guy Porsche is taking huge swings, and not just at the giant that is Volkswagen. Porsche head Wendelin Wiedeking had fierce Teutonic words for General Motors and Ford, and banks. His Rindfleisch - beef, that is - with U.S. automakers is that, through unsound practices, they have thrown absolutely everything into turmoil. In the words of the Guardian, in fact, they have driven "the industry to the brink of ruin."

Those are big and perhaps hyperbolic words. But he then singles out GM for "openly threatening" the U.S. Government with bankruptcy, and predicts a hedge fund will take control of "one of the U.S. car manufacturers." Since Chrysler is already controlled by a hedge fund, that only leaves GM and Ford as the possible subjects of that comment. We can't imagine a hedge fund trying to swallow GM or Ford, especially after Cerberus has taken such a beating with Chrysler that seemingly all they can say is "Must... find... the exit."

Wiedeking is on more Earthly ground when he talks about the little guys, suppliers, who are quietly going under -- even though many of them ran their business correctly -- due to the banks' refusal to lend money while the clash of automotive titans continues. In a quote that people in many different industries can applaud, he says "We need banks to give credit, not just talk about credit ratings but start real actual lending to companies." Amen. Thanks for the tip, Sonny!

[Source: The Guardian]

Porsche head predicts a hedge fund will swallow GM or Ford originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutbailoutbailout billbailout planBailoutBillBailoutPlanchryslerfordgmhedge fundsHedgeFundsporschewendelin wiedekingWendelinWiedekingMon, 01 Dec 2008 13:01:00 EST<![CDATA[UAW head says that unions aren't to blame for Detroit's problems]]>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/16/uaw-head-says-that-unions-arent-to-blame-for-detroits-problems/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/16/uaw-head-says-that-unions-arent-to-blame-for-detroits-problems/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/16/uaw-head-says-that-unions-arent-to-blame-for-detroits-problems/#commentsFiled under: , ,

Ron Gettelfinger's basically saying "it's not our fault" when discussing the state of Detroit's automakers. Rather than admit that the UAW's plum labor agreements and contentious negotiations have contributed to the current gloomy situation, the United Auto Workers head man says that the economic downturn is to blame for everything, and that Congress should approve loans to the auto industry, saying "We cannot afford to...see this industry collapse." You've got to love that black and white logic. The current state of the economy, and in turn the automakers' pain, are both closely related, and separate issues at the same time.

Boosting sales numbers for the last decade by financing anyone who filled out some nominal paperwork was probably not such a hot idea, but it kept the lines running, putting off layoffs even though it meant overproducing. An automaker propping up its sales to avoid strife with its labor union? Why, that sounds like it's at least partially the UAW's doing; and now those chickens have come home to roost as easy credit has dried up. Bad management and uncompetitive products from domestic automakers is pretty much the story of the last 35 years, and that's something the auto industry in the United States is certainly responsible for. Only now, when they're on the brink of massive failure, are American cars truly competitive with the import competition that's been dogging them for 25-plus years. It's certainly true that current economic forces unrelated to the automotive business have a large role to play in this ongoing saga, but if a bailout plan is passed, will it really help?

Consumer confidence is at record lows, and at a time when people aren't buying household widgets, is it really conceivable that they could be enticed into a big-ticket automotive purchase from a carmaker that may or may not soon file for bankruptcy? All the dire predictions about how the auto industry cannot be allowed to fail amount to so much hot air; even if we pump federal dollars into the industry, if nobody's buying, it could still fail. If that happens, there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth, but it's not an impossibility. If one of the Detroit automakers goes down, then what? The UAW will have to find some other industry to choke, that's for sure.

[Source: Breitbart.com]

UAW head says that unions aren't to blame for Detroit's problems originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:02:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>auto industry bailoutAutoIndustryBailoutcongress bailoutCongressBailoutgettelfingergettelfinger bailoutGettelfingerBailoutron gettelfingerRonGettelfingeruawuaw bailoutuaw gettelfingerUawBailoutUawGettelfingerSun, 16 Nov 2008 14:02:00 EST