<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Rendered Speculation: Volvo's Vs could get new roofline]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/22/rendered-speculation-volvos-vs-could-get-new-roofline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/22/rendered-speculation-volvos-vs-could-get-new-roofline/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/22/rendered-speculation-volvos-vs-could-get-new-roofline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rendered-speculation/" rel="tag">Rendered Speculation</a></p><a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/Volvo-V70/235477/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/10/2110885179_250op.jpg"  alt="" /></a>One of the last bastions of contentment for wagon lovers may be over as reports indicate that Volvo is considering abandoning the classic long and low shape for something a bit more modern. Of course, that means a higher roof-line, ground clearance and seating position, along with a slightly trimmed footprint. In fact, the Swedish automaker seriously considered making a change to its current V70 model before it was released to the public. The true test will come when the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/05/geneva-2008-volvo-xc60-softroads-in-style/">XC60 crossover</a> hits the market, as its sales figures will determine how Volvo designs its next V50 and V70. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/17/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-ford-flex-limited-w-video/">Ford's Flex</a> might offer a preview of the shape of things to come from the Swedish automaker, as its design is similar to what may be on offer from Volvo if it scraps the traditional wagon. We wouldn't expect anything too 'trucky' though, as sales of traditional SUVs have fallen off dramatically in the last two years. <br /><br />Redesigns of the mid-sized S60 and XC90 have also reportedly been pushed a bit further into the future as the automaker struggles to reign in its recent lack of profits. The latest timetable puts the new sedan's appearance in 2010 while the 'ute's redesign isn't expected until 2012, though a refresh could spice things up a bit in 2010 with a possible hybrid drivetrain.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/Volvo-V70/235477/">Autocar</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/22/rendered-speculation-volvos-vs-could-get-new-roofline/">Rendered Speculation: Volvo's Vs could get new roofline</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle/Volvo-V70/235477/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/22/rendered-speculation-volvos-vs-could-get-new-roofline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1349958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/22/rendered-speculation-volvos-vs-could-get-new-roofline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>volvo</category><category>volvo v50</category><category>volvo v70</category><category>volvo wagon</category><category>volvo wagons</category><category>volvo xc60</category><category>VolvoV50</category><category>VolvoV70</category><category>VolvoWagon</category><category>VolvoWagons</category><category>VolvoXc60</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wagons Ho! Volvo V70 gets R-Design treatment]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/08/wagons-ho-volvo-v70-gets-r-design-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/08/wagons-ho-volvo-v70-gets-r-design-treatment/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/08/wagons-ho-volvo-v70-gets-r-design-treatment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uk/" rel="tag">UK</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/v70-rdesign/795473/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/v70rdesign-1280-front_opt.jpg" /></a><br /><em>Click above for more high-res pics of the Volvo V70 R-Design</em><br /><br />Once upon a time, there was a subtle wagon called the V70R who's meek outward appearance belied the snortiest turbo 5-cylinder Volvo has ever put in a production car. All-wheel-drive helped the power get to the ground instead of immolating the front tires, and the R sat atop the V70 trim-level range. Alas, the R is no more. While it was awesome and amusing, it was also outgunned by the competition, even with 300 hard-breathing horsepower. Still, there are those who desire the look and demeanor of the R, while finding no fault with the lesser powertrains that Volvo offers. <br /><br />Those buyers can find what they're looking for with the new V70 R-Design package on the third generation wagon. Since the demise of the R, the V70 has moved up to become the wagon version of the S80, and the R-Line package adds a little visual oomph and chassis verve to the big estate. Ride height has been reduced and thicker swaybars are added, along with higher durometer bushings in the suspension. Like we saw on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/new-york-2008-volvo-c30-r-design/">C30 R-Design</a>, matte finish metal accents are added to exterior pieces like the mirror housings and grille surround. Sporty-looking exhaust outlets, a rear spoiler and 18-inch wheels round out the exterior changes. The interior gets blue-faced gauges, unique metal trim pieces, and Volvo's already excellent seats get R-Design logos and sportier bolstering. The R-Design package adds &pound;2,000 or so to the price of a UK V70, a decent price for a handling upgrade and a hunkered look. Volvo hasn't decided whether to bring it to the United States  yet. If it does come to the North American market, the V70 R-Design will be a 2009 model, and we'll know by early summer if we have to look longingly across the pond for a clean-looking, sporty-driving wagon. <br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/v70-rdesign/low/">V70 RDesign</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/v70-rdesign/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/v70rdesign-1280-front_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/v70-rdesign/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/v70rdesign-1280-rear_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/v70-rdesign/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/v70rdesign-1280-grille_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/v70-rdesign/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/v70rdesign-1280-interior_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: Volvo]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/08/wagons-ho-volvo-v70-gets-r-design-treatment/">Wagons Ho! Volvo V70 gets R-Design treatment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 08 May 2008 12:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/08/wagons-ho-volvo-v70-gets-r-design-treatment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1189912/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/08/wagons-ho-volvo-v70-gets-r-design-treatment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>volvo r</category><category>volvo r-design</category><category>volvo r-line</category><category>volvo v70</category><category>volvo wagon</category><category>volvo wagons</category><category>VolvoR</category><category>VolvoR-design</category><category>VolvoR-line</category><category>VolvoV70</category><category>VolvoWagon</category><category>VolvoWagons</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Volvo thinks it needs more crossovers and wagons]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/volvo-thinks-it-needs-more-crossovers-and-wagons/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/volvo-thinks-it-needs-more-crossovers-and-wagons/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/volvo-thinks-it-needs-more-crossovers-and-wagons/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volvo/" rel="tag">Volvo</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/volvo-xc60-concept/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/volvo-xc60---07_450.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />And as a new father in need of a larger vehicle, I agree. Volvo has long been known for their safe, sensible wagons and last year almost half its total sales came from this class of vehicles.<br /><br />Volvo Car Corp. COO Steven Armstrong tells <a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070117/FREE/70116007/1024/LATESTNEWS">Autoweek</a> that his company sees plenty of wagon and crossover-type market gaps that need filling. <span id="intelliTXT">Lex Kerssemakers, Volvo Car senior vice president of brand business and product strategy (we hope he gets paid by the syllable, btw) is a little more specific, saying that if the company were to target those gaps, it would likely be in the <a href="http://www.volvocars.us/models/v70/">V</a> or <a href="http://www.volvocars.us/models/xc90/">XC</a> range.<br /><br />Again, as the new daddy, I'd love to see Volvo reintroduce the <a href="http://www.volvoclub.org.uk/history/v90.shtml">V90</a> as an ultra luxury wagon to give the class a more upscale image. But as a practical new dad (hey, diapers ain't cheap) I say bring on a fuel-efficient 5-seater crossover simiilar to, but smaller and cheaper than, the upcoming <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/08/detroit-auto-show-volvo-debuts-the-oh-so-swedish-xc60/">XC60</a> (pictured above). But as the father who still craves some excitement now and then, I would, of course, opt for the European delivery with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/buy-a-volvo-drive-it-at-nurburgring/">Nurburgring package.</a> <br /><br />With so few automakers competing in the U.S. in the wagon segment, we see Volvo snagging lots of new customers. But the Swedes need to be quick before Honda and Toyota decide to re-enter with Accord and Camry wagons.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070117/FREE/70116007/1024/LATESTNEWS">Autoweek</a>]<br /></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/volvo-thinks-it-needs-more-crossovers-and-wagons/">Volvo thinks it needs more crossovers and wagons</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070117/FREE/70116007/1024/LATESTNEWS>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/volvo-thinks-it-needs-more-crossovers-and-wagons/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/737665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/17/volvo-thinks-it-needs-more-crossovers-and-wagons/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Volvo</category><category>Volvo crossover</category><category>volvo crossovers</category><category>volvo v90</category><category>Volvo wagon</category><category>Volvo wagons</category><category>volvo xc90</category><category>VolvoCrossover</category><category>VolvoCrossovers</category><category>VolvoV90</category><category>VolvoWagon</category><category>VolvoWagons</category><category>VolvoXc90</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>