<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tesla Model S gets over 500 reservations in first week]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/1455012/full/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/04/teslamodelslive_08_opt.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><small><strong><em>Tesla Model S - Click above for high-res image gallery<br /></em></strong></small><strong></strong></div>
<br />It's been barely a week since the <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2009/03/26/tesla-model-s-50-000-ev-sedan-seats-seven-300-mile-range-0-6/">curtain was lifted</a> on the <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/tag/Tesla+Model+S">Tesla Model S</a>, and not only has its design received positive reviews, those sensuous lines have seduced 520 people to fork over some deposit cash for the new all-electric sedan. Tesla won't say, however, how many people chose the standard version that requires a refundable deposit of $5,000 or one of the 2,000 Signature Edition models that requires a $40,000 deposit. <br /><br />Initial sales of the Model S have exceeded Tesla's expectations and are quite a feat considering the economic times, plus the fact that these cars are still a few years away from being delivered. The real test of the S's ability to beguile may come tonight as the all-electric sedan makes its East Coast debut. With the company attempting to secure a $350 million loan from the Department of Energy's Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program for a plant in which to build the Model S, the car will begin a string of appearances on the right side of the country with a showing at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C. <br /><br />Tesla also has good <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/tag/Tesla+Roadster">Roadster</a> news. Production of the two-seater sports car continues to speed up and reached 104 units for the month of March. That gives the automaker a total of 170 Roadsters built for the first quarter of 2009 and about 320 altogether, in case you're keeping track. Hit the jump for the press release and bonus videos of the Tesla Model S in action, as well as having its auto-extending door handles explained by CEO Elon Musk.<br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-1/low/">Tesla Model S</a></strong></p><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/model-s-official-5b_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/model-s-official-4b_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/model-s-official-6b_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/model-s-official-2b_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/model-s-official-1b_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/low/">Tesla Model S: LIVE REVEAL</a></strong></p><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/teslamodelslive_01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/teslamodelslive_02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/teslamodelslive_03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/teslamodelslive_04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/tesla-model-s-live-reveal/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/03/teslamodelslive_05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/">Tesla Motors</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tesla Model S gets over 500 reservations in first week</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/">Tesla Model S gets over 500 reservations in first week</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1506162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/02/tesla-model-s-gets-over-500-reservations-in-first-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autobloggreen</category><category>Department of Energys Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing</category><category>DepartmentOfEnergysAdvancedTechnologyVehicleManufacturing</category><category>Model S</category><category>ModelS</category><category>sales figures</category><category>SalesFigures</category><category>Tesla</category><category>Tesla Model S</category><category>Tesla Roadster</category><category>TeslaModelS</category><category>TeslaRoadster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Domenick Yoney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyundai CEO says early Genesis Coupe sales numbers are "simply smoking"]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/16/hyundai-ceo-says-early-genesis-coupe-sales-numbers-are-simply-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/16/hyundai-ceo-says-early-genesis-coupe-sales-numbers-are-simply-s/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/16/hyundai-ceo-says-early-genesis-coupe-sales-numbers-are-simply-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/1434405/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/000_10genesiscoupe_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe - Click above for high-res gallery</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br />"Simply smoking." Those are the exact words that John Krafcik, CEO of Hyundai USA, used to describe early sales of the automaker's new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/26/hyundai-genesis-coupe-goes-on-sale-early-we-have-a-few-first-im/">Genesis Coupe</a> during a recent interview with <em>Motor Trend</em>. The highly-anticipated two-door is selling better than the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/13/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-hyundai-genesis-sedan/">Genesis Sedan</a>, which arrived on the market last year, even though Hyundai has focused more advertising dollars on the larger luxury sedan.<br /><br />Still a newcomer, the Genesis Coupe is offered in turbocharged 2.0-liter and normally-aspirated 3.8-liter trim. The bulk of the cars on dealer lots have been the V6 models, with the late-to-arrive four-cylinder variants (including the Track model and next year's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/11/chicago-2009-hyundai-introduces-r-spec-genesis-coupe-for-enthus/">R-Spec</a> model) yet to make a significant impact on sales. Seemingly undeterred by its $27,500 sticker price, Krafcik says that more than 50 percent of the 3.8-liter buyers are driving home in the loaded Grand Touring model (the entry-level 2.0T starts at just $22,000).<br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/low/">2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/000_10genesiscoupe_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/001_10genesiscoupe_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/002_10genesiscoupe_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/003_10genesiscoupe_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-hyundai-genesis-coupe-7/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/004_10genesiscoupe_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://wot.motortrend.com/6485334/auto-news/hyundai-ceo-genesis-coupe-sales-are-smoking-38-gt-is-volume-leader/index.html">Motortrend</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/16/hyundai-ceo-says-early-genesis-coupe-sales-numbers-are-simply-s/">Hyundai CEO says early Genesis Coupe sales numbers are "simply smoking"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/16/hyundai-ceo-says-early-genesis-coupe-sales-numbers-are-simply-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1488853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/16/hyundai-ceo-says-early-genesis-coupe-sales-numbers-are-simply-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car sales</category><category>CarSales</category><category>Coupe sale</category><category>CoupeSale</category><category>Genesis Coupe</category><category>Genesis Sedan</category><category>GenesisCoupe</category><category>GenesisSedan</category><category>Hyundai Genesis Coupe</category><category>HyundaiGenesisCoupe</category><category>John Krafcik</category><category>JohnKrafcik</category><category>sales figures</category><category>SalesFigures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hybrid sales slide 9.9% in 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/hybrid-sales-slide-9-9-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/hybrid-sales-slide-9-9-in-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/hybrid-sales-slide-9-9-in-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20090123/ANA05/901229967/1186/FRONTPAGE"><img hspace="4" border="0" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/hybrids_down_580.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Despite all the clamor about how hybrids are going to save the planet, cure cancer, facilitate the second coming, etc., sales of battery-pack-mobiles are down nearly ten percent for 2008. At the beginning of 2008, it looked like hybrids were going to have their best year ever, driven by high fuel prices and a recessive economy. That recession, however,has caused consumers to cut way back, leading to dramatic drop in fuel prices, killing much of the argument for a hybrid's price premium. Consumers shy away from hybrids when fuel dips below $3.50 per gallon, and the incessant clang of news stories about expensive fuel also dries up, causing the issue of fuel efficiency to fall from consciousness. <br /><br />Toyota is still the hybrid sales king, with 241,000 units shifted in 2008. Honda managed to ring up 31,000 sales, and Ford came in third with nearly 20,000 vehicles sold. While nearly every automaker offering hybrids is down (Nissan actually saw a 5 percent increase, and General Motors garnered a whopping 179 percent jump thanks to its 2008 introductions), Ford was hardest hit, with a 22 percent drop. Some might say "we told you so" about the way things have played out - by the time everyone got on board with more efficient offerings, the bottom has fallen out of the price of fuel - and others might use the sales figures to agitate for a gas tax to stimulate the purchase of fuel efficient vehicles. <br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20090123/ANA05/901229967/1186/FRONTPAGE">Auto News - sub req</a>]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/hybrid-sales-slide-9-9-in-2008/">Hybrid sales slide 9.9% in 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/article/20090123/ANA05/901229967/1186/FRONTPAGE>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/hybrid-sales-slide-9-9-in-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1439800/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/25/hybrid-sales-slide-9-9-in-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>escalade hybrid</category><category>EscaladeHybrid</category><category>ford escape</category><category>ford fusion hybrid</category><category>ford hybrid</category><category>FordEscape</category><category>FordFusionHybrid</category><category>FordHybrid</category><category>gm hybrid</category><category>GmHybrid</category><category>honda hybrid</category><category>HondaHybrid</category><category>hybrid</category><category>hybrid car sales</category><category>hybrid cars</category><category>hybrid sales</category><category>hybrid vehicle</category><category>hybrid vehicle sales</category><category>hybrid vehicles</category><category>HybridCars</category><category>HybridCarSales</category><category>hybrids</category><category>HybridSales</category><category>HybridVehicle</category><category>HybridVehicles</category><category>HybridVehicleSales</category><category>nissan hybrid</category><category>NissanHybrid</category><category>sales figures</category><category>SalesFigures</category><category>tahoe hybrid</category><category>TahoeHybrid</category><category>toyota prius</category><category>ToyotaPrius</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As yen sweetens, Toyota sales sour]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/as-yen-sweetens-toyota-sales-sour/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/as-yen-sweetens-toyota-sales-sour/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/as-yen-sweetens-toyota-sales-sour/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080320/ANA02/444963504/1078/rss06&amp;rssfeed=rss06"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/toyota_250_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a>Being Toyota doesn't grant you any additional immunity from simple global economics. Word from Tokuichi Uranishi, executive vice president of Toyota, is that one of the world's largest automakers is going to miss its sales target of 9.85 million vehicles for 2008. </p>
<p>Toyota execs cite slowing sales in the United States, Europe, and Japan as a primary factor. In addition, rising raw material costs are hurting the global automaker, which assembled 9.37 million vehicles in 2007. To top it off, a yen that hit a 13-year high against the dollar at the beginning of this week is cutting profits on exports from Japan.</p>
<p>It may be up to China, Russia, and Korea to pick up some of the slack. Those emerging Asian markets are active, and Toyota is looking at them for future growth. In a move towards achieving that goal, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/01/in-the-autoblog-garage-2007-toyota-prius-touring/">Prius</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/20/toyota-announces-camry-hybrid-50th-anniversary-edition/">Camry</a>, and RAV4 sports-utility will be introduced in South Korea shortly. Sales are expected to be just 500 units per month initially, and then increase to upwards of 1,000 a month. </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="https://home.autonews.com/clickshare/authenticateUserSubscription.do?CSProduct=autonews&amp;CSAuthReq=1:173286063642743:AID|IDAID=20080320/ANA02/444963504|ID=:42C2CB510B59B7E65FDA27C5A9274094&amp;AID=20080320/ANA02/444963504&amp;title=Toyota%20says%20likely%20to%20miss%20%2708%20sales%20target&amp;ID=&amp;CSTargetURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.autonews.com%2Fapps%2Fpbcs.dll%2Fexec%3Fname%3DMHCPayPerArticleResponse%26nocache%3D1%26AssignSessionID%3D173286063642743%26AID%3D20080320%2FANA02%2F444963504">Automotive News</a>, subs req'd]<br /><br /><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/as-yen-sweetens-toyota-sales-sour/">As yen sweetens, Toyota sales sour</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/as-yen-sweetens-toyota-sales-sour/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1145000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/20/as-yen-sweetens-toyota-sales-sour/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>camry</category><category>camry hybrid</category><category>CamryHybrid</category><category>rav4</category><category>sales figures</category><category>SalesFigures</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota camry</category><category>toyota prius</category><category>ToyotaCamry</category><category>ToyotaPrius</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: September 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/by-the-numbers-september-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/by-the-numbers-september-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/by-the-numbers-september-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/hill_car1a.png" />Analysts who feared the worst for September 2007 car sales were wrong. It wasn't that bad at all. General Motors pulled out a 3.8% <em>increase</em> in sales, for Pete's sake! Fellow domestics Chrysler LLC and Ford Motor Company, however, did not fare as well. Chrysler LLC sales went down only 1.5% last month thanks to the saving graces of the Jeep Wrangler, as well as the mere presence of new models like the Dodge Nitro and Avenger. <br /><br />FoMoCo, however, is shrinking fast. The Blue Oval sold at a 21% slower rate this September than last. Blame the car division, which in raw numbers dropped 45.1% in sales. Of course, those are mostly lost fleet sales, and Ford shrinking in size is a good thing once it finds an equilibrium that produces profits. <br /><br />In other big news, Toyota Motor Co.'s sales rate actually fell last month, though only by 0.6%. Meanwhile, cross island rivals Honda (13.8%) and Nissan (11.0%) both saw appreciable gains for their North American divisions. <br /><br />The individual break down by brand is below, so check them out. Remember, there were only 25 selling days in September 2007, versus 26 selling days in September 2006. Thus, our percentages reflect the change in the <em>Daily Average Sales</em> rate rather than the change in raw number of units sold. <br /><strong><br />Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />41.4% at 4,031 (09/06: 2,964)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser<br /></strong>HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-21.6% at 5,080 (09/06: 6,739)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser (Honorable Mention)</strong><br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-21% at 155,037 (09/06: 204,070)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-8.4% at 14,369 (09/06: 16,323)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />4.2% at 8,021 (09/06: 8,004)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />6.9% at 20,901 (09/06: 20,339)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-5.1% at 17,754 (09/06: 19,463)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />4.9% at 20,398 (09/06: 20,217)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />6.1% at 194,637 (09/06: 190,825)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-14.8% at 38,668 (09/06: 47,211)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />9% at 83,671 (09/06: 79,784)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-21% at 155,037 (09/06: 204,070)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />18.9% at 44,754 (09/06: 39,141)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />17.5% at 112,831 (09/06: 99,903)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-21.6% at 5,080 (09/06: 6,739)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />3.5% at 33,214 (09/06: 33,384)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />2.7% at 10,250 (09/06: 10,378)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-4.7% at 1,061 (09/06: 1,158)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-7.0% at 37,460 (09/06: 41,893)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />25.6% at 4,190 (09/06: 3,469)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />1.6% at 25,114 (09/06: 25,700)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />38% at 9,764 (09/06: 7,362)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />28.8% at 25,098 (09/06: 20,261)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />18.0% at 22,549 (09/06: 19,873)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-9.6% at 11,403 (09/06: 13,117)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />41.4% at 4,031 (09/06: 2,964)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />22.3% at 12,102 (09/06: 10,287)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />12.0% at 84,019 (09/06: 77,962)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-11.5% at 31,817 (09/06: 37,376)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />24.2% at 2,641 (09/06: 2,211)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-17.9% at 2,424 (09/06: 3,069)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />7.2% at 20,776 (09/06: 20,153)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />6.1% at 16,457 (09/06: 16,128)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />0.2% at 7,653 (09/06: 7,940)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-0.9% at 187,929 (09/06: 197,250)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-2.2% at 18,891 (09/06: 20,082)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-9.6% at 8,408 (09/06: 9,672)<br /><br /><strong>NOT YET REPORTING</strong><br />Kia<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />11.3% at 24,932 (09/06: 23,303)<br />Chrysler LLC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-1.5% at 159,799 (09/06: 168,888)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-17.3% at 189,863 (09/06: 238,848)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />3.8% at 337,640 (09/06: 338,380)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />13.8% at 127,200 (09/06: 116,226)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__up_arrow.jpg" alt="" />11.0% at 94,269 (09/06: 88,340)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/__down_arrow.jpg" alt="" />-0.6% at 213,043 (09/06: 222,950)<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/by-the-numbers-september-2007/">By the Numbers: September 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/by-the-numbers-september-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1003697/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/02/by-the-numbers-september-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automanufacturer sales figures</category><category>AutomanufacturerSalesFigures</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>by the numbers september 2007</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>ByTheNumbersSeptember2007</category><category>featured</category><category>sales figures</category><category>SalesFigures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Game on: Truck incentives set to soar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/05/game-on-truck-incentives-set-to-soar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/05/game-on-truck-incentives-set-to-soar/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/05/game-on-truck-incentives-set-to-soar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><img width="448" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="316" border="0" align="top" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/chevy-silverado-12.jpg" alt="2007 Chevy Silverado" /><br /><br />The slumping housing market and gas prices have hurt truck sales, so automakers are going to have to step up on givebacks to keep metal moving. Toyota has taken the first shot with thier five month old <a href="http://autos.aol.com/toyota-tundra-2007:8808-overview">Tundra</a>, with 0% financing and buckets of cash. Edmunds tallied final Tundra incentives at $5,083 per unit last month, which is second to only the much older Dodge Ram. The new <a href="http://autos.aol.com/chevrolet-silverado-1500-2008:9251-overview">Silverado</a>, which currently carries only $1,500 to $2,000 on the hood, is set for a bump in incentives to help level the playing field vs. the fierce competition, and older offerings from Ford and Dodge will have to follow suit. With Toyota's deep pockets, there may be no end to how far the folks from Aichi will go to reach their stated sales goal of 200,000 units in 2007, so $5,000 may just be the beginning.<br /><br />If you've been waiting on your truck purchase, we have a feeling your patience is about to be rewarded. Everybody's pickup offerings are stronger than they've ever been, and with more competition comes more money in your pocket.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/05/game-on-truck-incentives-set-to-soar/">Game on: Truck incentives set to soar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070704/AUTO01/707040378/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/05/game-on-truck-incentives-set-to-soar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/933529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/05/game-on-truck-incentives-set-to-soar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevy</category><category>GM</category><category>Incentives</category><category>Sales figures</category><category>SalesFigures</category><category>Silverado</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Tundra</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 13:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: December 2006]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2006/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2006/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/hill_car1a.png" />The numbers are in for December, the last month of 2006, and it appears that those year-end sales drives produced results for many brands. We haven't seen this much green on the sales chart all the year. Congrats go to Kia for being the months Biggest Winner by posting a 66% sales gain over last year, and our sympathies once again go out to Jaguar, the Biggest Loser again this month, which on average sold 34% less this month. Strong gains were also posted by Audi (39.7%), BMW (21%), Hyundai (19.56%), Toyota (18.1%) and, look out, Saturn (41.8%). Last year at this time, however, Saturn was a three-vehicle brand, whereas this year it's been bolstered by the Aura, Sky Roadster, and even the Outlook, which tacked on 144 sales despite only being on sale for a fraction of the month.<br /><br />BMW's strong sales overcame the small deficit of the MINI brand to give the group as a whole a 20% increase in sales for the month, but again it's Toyota that continues to astonish with a 16.6% gain in December to follow up on its 15.9% jump in November. Both Ford and General Motors saw their sales fall over 9%, and Toyota Motor Co. was just over 5,000 units away from passing FoMoCo for the No. 2 sales spot in the U.S. this month. Toyota can take heart, however, its namesake division bested the Ford brand in December by just 173 units, making it the second-best selling brand in the U.S. behind Chevrolet for the month. <br /><br />Keep an eye out for our <strong>By The Numbers: 2006 </strong>yearly wrap-up post later day.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />Kia<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />66% at 30,004 (12/05: 18,767)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-34% at 1,553 (12/05: 2,445)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.3% at 19,056 (12/05: 18,621)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />39.7% at 11,897 (12/05: 8,842) <br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />21% at 30,945 (12/05: 24,464)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-24.5% at 15,986 (12/05: 22,002)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />2.8% at 22,715 (12/05: 22,946)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-12.9% at 194,369 (12/05: 231,628)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />11% at 55,839 (12/05: 52,208)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />9% at 88,489 (12/05: 84,023)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.2% at 190,914 (12/05: 223,324)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-14.4% at 41,770 (12/05: 50,688)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />2.5% at 112,722 (12/05: 114,179)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.9% at 6,928 (12/05: 8,079)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />19.56% at 43,021 (12/05: 37,365)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />5.9% at 13,112 (12/05: 12,856)<br />Isuzu <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />9.56% at 2,566 (12/05: 2,432)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-34% at 1,553 (12/05: 2,445)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10% at 46,087 (12/05: 53,218)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />66% at 30,004 (12/05: 18,767)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-9.65% at 6,014 (12/05: 6,913)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />9.9% at 37,235 (12/05: 35,186) <br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />5.44% at 12,806 (12/05: 12,612)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />7.94% at 19,912 (12/05: 19,156)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.39% at 28,115 (12/05: 31,192)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.16% at 13,809 (12/05: 13,507)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />5.38% at 2,472 (12/05: 2,436)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.39% at 9,910 (12/05: 9,673)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.2% at 78,663 (12/05: 78,397)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.2% at 32,772 (12/05: 36,288)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.95% at 2,947 (12/05: 2,944)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />32.7% at 3,535 (12/05: 2,766)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />41.8% at 20,686 (12/05: 15,145)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />7.46% at 20,613 (12/05: 19,919)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />14% at 7,317 (12/05: 6,662)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />18.1% at 191,087 (12/05: 168,093)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-20.2% at 19,942 (12/05: 25,956)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-2.5% at 8,525 (12/05: 9,080)<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />20% at 33,417 (12/05: 28,900)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />4% at 190,415 (12/05: 189,449)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-9.43% at 233,621 (12/05: 267,881)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__down_arrow.jpg" />-9.6% at 341,327 (12/05: 392,041)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.0% at 131,778 (12/05: 132,800)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />4.4% at 91,775 (12/05: 91,253)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/__up_arrow.jpg" />16.6% at 228,322 (12/05: 203,279)<br /><br /><strong>Note: </strong>December of 2005 had 27 selling days, whereas December of 2006 had 26 selling day. On acount of this, all percentages reflect a change in the daily average sales rate, not the difference in the number of raw units sold each month. The percentages, in effect, reflect the difference in how many vehicles were sold per day on average during each month.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2006/">By the Numbers: December 2006</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/728742/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/03/by-the-numbers-december-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>monthly</category><category>sales</category><category>sales figure</category><category>sales figures</category><category>SalesFigure</category><category>SalesFigures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>