<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hughes Telematics and Chrysler relationship looks to be over]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ces/" rel="tag">CES</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gallery/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/full/#6"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/hughesjeep_580.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Back in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/24/in-depth-hughes-telematics-planning-to-outdo-onstar-and-sync/">2008 at the Consumer Electronics Show</a> in Las Vegas, we got to spend some time in a Jeep Grand Cherokee outfitted with a bunch of technogoodies from Hughes Telematics. And again at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/13/ces-2009-dodge-journey-to-get-onstar-like-features-this-summer/">this year's CES,</a> Hughes let us play with even cooler stuff in a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/27/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-dodge-journey-r-t/">Dodge Journey</a>. They bragged of downloadable apps for your Chrysler-branded vehicle and super-cool, futuristic travel guides from your in-dash nav system. Stuff that might convince someone to actually purchase a Journey.<br /><br />But, alas, since then, Chrysler went bankrupt and it seems the company's relationship with Hughes soured. In an official statement Hughes tells Autoblog:<br /><blockquote><em>New Chrysler introduced additional business terms that were not part of either the prior business discussions or the original arrangement. As a result, we reached an impasse in the negotiations and are ceasing our work with new Chrysler to deploy our hardware and launch our services with them in the fourth quarter of 2009, as was previously planned.</em><br /></blockquote>That's okay, Hughes says, because they still have Mercedes-Benz as a customer, and they don't need Chrysler anymore. We're not financial experts by any means, but as we stumbled through the SEC report, it was obvious Hughes had invested a lot of time, money and emotions into making things work with Chrysler and that it might take a while to get over losing the bond they once cherished. <br /><br />In any case, you can <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1410240/000119312509176069/d10q.htm#toc57169_4">read the SEC filing for yourself here</a> or check out Hughes' full official statement to Autoblog after the jump<a href="http://www.hughestelematics.com/" />. <em>Thanks for the tip, MBAcurafan!</em><br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/low/">Hughes Telematics at CES 2008</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/drivecon_1280_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/drivecon_diag_1280_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/drivecon_map_1280_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/hughesjeeepbk_1280_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/hughes-telematics-at-ces-2008/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/hughesjeep_1280_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1410240/000119312509176069/d10q.htm#toc57169_4">SEC.gov</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hughes Telematics and Chrysler relationship looks to be over</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/">Hughes Telematics and Chrysler relationship looks to be over</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1410240/000119312509176069/d10q.htm#toc57169_4>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19133503/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/20/hughes-telematics-and-chrysler-relationship-looks-to-be-over/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ces</category><category>ces 2008</category><category>Ces2008</category><category>ces2009</category><category>chrysler</category><category>hughes telematics</category><category>HughesTelematics</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and exchange comm</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeComm</category><category>securitiesandexchangecommission</category><category>uconnect</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Forbes takes on the 0-60]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/forbes-takes-on-the-0-60/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/forbes-takes-on-the-0-60/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/forbes-takes-on-the-0-60/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/vehicles/2007/07/19/cars-mph-fast-forbeslife-cx_jh_0720cars.html?partner=rss"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/450px-speedo_angle.jpg"  alt="" /></a>0-60 time is the gold standard in automotive performance. It's the first thing an enthusiast looks at when presented with a car's stats, and typically trumps all others. Top speed is all but completely irrelevant in most cases, while the quarter mile is only valued in drag-racing circles. Attempts have been made to substitute something more all-encompassing, like the 0-100-0 acceleration/braking test, but it hasn't replaced the old 0-60. Lap times around a given course might be more useful for comparison, but unless every manufacturer tested on the same track, that falls to pieces. At the end of the day, 0-60 is where it's at, but as Forbes points out, it's not the most reliable or useful performance indicator.
<p>In most cases, it takes ideal conditions - including a professional driver - to hit sixty in the time specified. As a result, some manufacturers quote conservative figures so as not to disappoint customers who can't manage the quoted time. Further confusing the situation, some automakers prefer to quote acceleration time in kilometers, but while the 0-100 km/h (62mph) standard might be very close to the mark, in acceleration times every millisecond counts.</p>
<p>It may be the gold standard, but even gold has its imperfections.</p>
<p>[Source: Forbes Autos]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/forbes-takes-on-the-0-60/">Forbes takes on the 0-60</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/vehicles/2007/07/19/cars-mph-fast-forbeslife-cx_jh_0720cars.html?partner=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/forbes-takes-on-the-0-60/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/946986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/23/forbes-takes-on-the-0-60/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>0-60</category><category>acceleration</category><category>km/h</category><category>kph</category><category>mph</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford restates earnings and finds an extra $550 million in Q3]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/ford-restates-earnings-and-finds-an-extra-550-million-in-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/ford-restates-earnings-and-finds-an-extra-550-million-in-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/ford-restates-earnings-and-finds-an-extra-550-million-in-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061114/REUTERS/61114001/1003&amp;refsect="><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/18444457_ff904b50f3.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>The accountants over at Ford have cleaned off their desks looking for every available financial number between 2001 and 2005 and discovered the company had actually made more money than it originally reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In fact, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/23/ford-loses-5-8-billion-in-q3/">$5.8 billion net loss</a> the Blue Oval recorded for the third quarter of 2006 has been reduced by $550 million to $5.25 billion. For the first three quarters of 2006, the company found an additional $250 million that reduces its year-to-date loss to an even $7 billion. The accounting adjustments come mainly from Ford's finance division and has something to do with derivatives and volatile interest rates. Whatever. Money's money and Ford will take it, even if it's money from the past that has already spent by now. Analysts aren't too impressed by the on-paper improvement either, noting that the corrections don't change the fact that Ford's pre-Way Forward turn around plan announced in 2002 didn't work. Ford will be filing new paperwork with the SEC by November 20th that finally brings its financial reportings in line with SEC requirements. <br /><br />[Source: Automotive News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/ford-restates-earnings-and-finds-an-extra-550-million-in-q3/">Ford restates earnings and finds an extra $550 million in Q3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061114/REUTERS/61114001/1003&amp;refsect=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/ford-restates-earnings-and-finds-an-extra-550-million-in-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/701686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/ford-restates-earnings-and-finds-an-extra-550-million-in-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>financial reporting</category><category>FinancialReporting</category><category>net</category><category>profit</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM's second-largest shareholder unloads some stock, yawn]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/gms-second-largest-shareholder-unloads-some-stock-yawn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/gms-second-largest-shareholder-unloads-some-stock-yawn/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/gms-second-largest-shareholder-unloads-some-stock-yawn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061114/AUTO01/611140343/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/gm_logo1.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>We don't want to bore you with all the financial details, so here's the short and (not-so) sweet of it.<br /><br />Capital Research and Management Co. is the second-largest shareholder of General Motors. At the end of June, they held over 60 million shares of the General's stock, or almost 11-percent. Yesterday, they filed a reduction of that stock with the SEC, which stated that they've reduced their GM ownership to 8.4-percent or about 48 million shares.<br /><br />The spokesman for the company, Chuck Freadhoff, said that they won't comment on the reason for the sale, but analysts insist that there's no real rhyme or reason to it, just another day at the office.<br /><br />This does spell a trend for the mutual fund managing firm, as they've unloaded another 33.6 million shares of the automaker earlier this year.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit News]<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/gms-second-largest-shareholder-unloads-some-stock-yawn/">GM's second-largest shareholder unloads some stock, yawn</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061114/AUTO01/611140343/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/gms-second-largest-shareholder-unloads-some-stock-yawn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/701583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/14/gms-second-largest-shareholder-unloads-some-stock-yawn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>capitol research and management</category><category>CapitolResearchAndManagement</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>sec</category><category>security and exchange commision</category><category>SecurityAndExchangeCommision</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM adds a couple hundred mil to Q2 losses; GMAC sale may not come until '07]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/gm-adds-a-couple-hundred-mil-to-q2-losses-gmac-sale-may-not-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/gm-adds-a-couple-hundred-mil-to-q2-losses-gmac-sale-may-not-com/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/gm-adds-a-couple-hundred-mil-to-q2-losses-gmac-sale-may-not-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><div style="display: block;" id="imageResults"><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/060802/autos_gm_gmac.html?.v=3"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/GM-logo-(resized-250).JPG" /></a></div>
<p>Despite the fact that Wall Street is giddy about General Motor's performance in the second quarter of 2006, the automaker still lost $3.2B due mostly to write-downs associated with employee buyouts. Or, rather, make that $3.4B, according to a filing with the Security and Exchange commission. The discrepancy - one of several in recent months - comes as the company takes an additional charge of $200M related to a difference in declared value and taxable value of some GMAC assets. </p>
<p>And while the automaker was on the topic of GMAC, it also saw fit to mention that the sale of GM's lending arm might not be completed this calendar year. Apparently, the Federal Deposit Insurance Company has placed a six-month halt on the sale of any industrial loan companies, and that includes GMAC. The impact of this isn't known at this time, but it's unlikely to be severe, and GM states that the details of the sale will still be worked out by the fourth quarter of this year. </p>
<p>[Source: Reuters]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/gm-adds-a-couple-hundred-mil-to-q2-losses-gmac-sale-may-not-com/">GM adds a couple hundred mil to Q2 losses; GMAC sale may not come until '07</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/060802/autos_gm_gmac.html?.v=3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/gm-adds-a-couple-hundred-mil-to-q2-losses-gmac-sale-may-not-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/649733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/gm-adds-a-couple-hundred-mil-to-q2-losses-gmac-sale-may-not-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acceptance corporation</category><category>FDIC</category><category>general motors</category><category>GM</category><category>gmac</category><category>rick wagoner</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Probe into Delphi finances targets seven former company officials]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/probe-into-delphi-finances-targets-seven-former-company-official/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/probe-into-delphi-finances-targets-seven-former-company-official/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/probe-into-delphi-finances-targets-seven-former-company-official/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060606/AUTO01/606060347/1148"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/delphilogo.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>Presumably, the fact that "target letters" have been sent to seven ex-Delphi executives by the Securities and Exchange Commission&nbsp;is not a&nbsp;welcome sign for those on the receiving end of that particular&nbsp;communiqu&eacute;.&nbsp;It's likely that the letters are a step towards civil charges being filed against the individuals for their roles in the accounting scandal that led Delphi to dramatically restate several years of earnings, with an adjustment of over $300M being made to the company's profits prior to its October bankruptcy filing. At this time, it's not clear exactly who is being targeted by the SEC. </p>
<p>The Justice Department may soon be joining the case to&nbsp;toss in some criminal penalties, and several shareholders and retirees have filed their&nbsp;own civil lawsuits against Delphi. </p>
<p>[Source:&nbsp;Detroit News]&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/probe-into-delphi-finances-targets-seven-former-company-official/">Probe into Delphi finances targets seven former company officials</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060606/AUTO01/606060347/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/probe-into-delphi-finances-targets-seven-former-company-official/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/630538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/probe-into-delphi-finances-targets-seven-former-company-official/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>Delphi</category><category>financial statements</category><category>FinancialStatements</category><category>GM</category><category>JT Battenburg</category><category>profits</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securites   Exchange</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM changes its mind, posts Q1 profit]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/09/gm-changes-its-mind-posts-q1-profit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/09/gm-changes-its-mind-posts-q1-profit/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/09/gm-changes-its-mind-posts-q1-profit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><img src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2005/12/GM-LOGO.gif" align="right" alt="" /></p>
<p>General Motors has revised its first quarter earnings statement to show a profit of $445 million, rather than the $323 million reported earlier this month. GM says the change is based on conversations the company had with SEC regulators regarding whether or not it could write off the settlement it made with blue collar retirees over health care. The charges will instead be broken out over seven years starting third quarter, when the changes take effect.</p>
<p>[Source: Reuters]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/09/gm-changes-its-mind-posts-q1-profit/">GM changes its mind, posts Q1 profit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 09 May 2006 07:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/business/newsArticle.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyID=2006-05-09T004437Z_01_N08231286_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-AUTOS-GM-DC.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/09/gm-changes-its-mind-posts-q1-profit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/616274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/09/gm-changes-its-mind-posts-q1-profit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financials</category><category>GM</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>SEC</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 07:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford considering amending employment policy's sexual orientation clauses]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/ford-considering-amending-employment-policys-sexual-orientation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/ford-considering-amending-employment-policys-sexual-orientation/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/ford-considering-amending-employment-policys-sexual-orientation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hirings-firings/" rel="tag">Hirings/Firings/Layoffs</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/fordlogo1928.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0"alt="" /></p>
<p>Ford's shareholders are to reportedly consider changing the company's equal employment policy languageto exclude any mention of sexual orientation. The move is expected after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) rejected the automaker's bid to keep the matter from its proxy statement. As of right now, the BlueOval's policy includes clauses that specifically outline the company's pledge not to discriminate basedupon sexual orientation, but a request by shareholder Robert Hurley has&nbsp;submitted the proposal forconsideration.</p>
<p>Ford has apparently been petitioning the government agency to exclude the issue, arguing that its inclusion willhurt the automaker's chances of wooing potential employees at certain universities (that require sexualorientation to be included in recruiting companies' policies), also fearing that backlash stemming from such achangeover could hurt sales to GLBT supporters.</p>
<p>The proxy statement goes out this Friday, at which point shareholders will vote on the issue. The result isexpected to be made public on May 11 at Ford's annual meeting.</p>
<p>[Source: Associated Press via Detroit News]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/ford-considering-amending-employment-policys-sexual-orientation/">Ford considering amending employment policy's sexual orientation clauses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060405/UPDATE/604050444/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/ford-considering-amending-employment-policys-sexual-orientation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/605666/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/ford-considering-amending-employment-policys-sexual-orientation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ACLU</category><category>Blue Oval</category><category>BlueOval</category><category>Employment</category><category>Equal Opportunity</category><category>EqualOpportunity</category><category>Ford</category><category>Gay</category><category>GLB</category><category>GLBT</category><category>Lesbian</category><category>SEC</category><category>Trans-Gender</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC subpoenas Lear for more details on supplier's relationship with GM]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/13/sec-wants-more-details-on-lear-gm-relationship/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/13/sec-wants-more-details-on-lear-gm-relationship/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/13/sec-wants-more-details-on-lear-gm-relationship/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060311/AUTO01/603110319/1148"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/SEC-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>With the Securitiesand Exchange Commission a bit curious about some of <ahref="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/10/27/gm-on-receiving-end-of-sec-probe/">General Motors' accounting practices</a> asit relates to the automaker's price concessions negotiated with suppliers, Lear now finds itself on the receiving end ofa subpoena of its financial records. Lear 'fessed up to its newfound role in the investigation last week, but receivedthe Fed's request back in February.</p>
<p>Records of transactions dating back to 2001 are said to be of interest in the investigation. GM has long beenregarded as the most aggressive of the automakers when it comes to <ahref="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/05/31/poll-probes-automaker-supplier-relations/">putting the screws tosuppliers</a>, so it's likely safe to assume that there's a bit of Schadenfreude circulating among its suppliers withword of this case. </p>
<p>[Source: The Detroit News]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/13/sec-wants-more-details-on-lear-gm-relationship/">SEC subpoenas Lear for more details on supplier's relationship with GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060311/AUTO01/603110319/1148>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/13/sec-wants-more-details-on-lear-gm-relationship/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/598870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/13/sec-wants-more-details-on-lear-gm-relationship/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Lear</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>