<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[NYPD arrests couple for stealing traffic cams w/cherry picker]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07222009/news/regionalnews/brooklyn/spy_camera_snatch_shot_180660.htm"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/07/red-light-camera-springfield-ohio.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />One of the more controversial developments in traffic safety enforcement in recent years has been the deployment of automated speed and red-light cameras, which use radar sensors to nab alleged scofflaws and ticket them via mail. According to the NYPD, pair of thieves allegedly spent the better part of a month trolling the city in a pickup truck with a cherry picker, raiding red-light camera for their valuable innards, including the Nikon cameras that actually take the photos. Police arrested the pair, identified as Brooklynites Anthony Cintorrino and Tara Laburt, after recovering some of the stolen items from a reseller and tracing them backwards from there. Following the couple's arrest, police found more stolen items in their homes, and reportedly expected to recover everything. All told, over $88,000 of equipment was swiped. Cintorrino apparently knew what he was doing -- in the past, he had worked as a contractor for the firm that installs and maintains the cameras for the city. Now, if you live in New York, don't go around thinking you start running red lights without getting snagged. The city claims all of the cameras were replaced within 48 hours of the thefts.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/07222009/news/regionalnews/brooklyn/spy_camera_snatch_shot_180660.htm">The New York Post</a> | Image: Wikimedia Commons]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/">NYPD arrests couple for stealing traffic cams w/cherry picker</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/07222009/news/regionalnews/brooklyn/spy_camera_snatch_shot_180660.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19108194/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/25/nypd-arrests-pair-for-stealing-red-light-cameras-w-cherry-picker/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>red light</category><category>red light camera</category><category>red light camera thefts</category><category>red light cameras</category><category>RedLight</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>RedLightCameras</category><category>RedLightCameraThefts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[National Motorists Association ranks states most hostile to drivers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><a href="http://www.motorists.org/rankings/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/05/newjerseypolice_opt.jpg" /></a><br /><br />For as long as there has been traffic enforcement, drivers from different states have gathered to compare notes on whose police and legal systems are the most oppressive and toughest to deal with. While most such conversations rarely progress beyond the anecdotal, the folks over at the National Motorists Association have actually gone to the trouble of ranking all 50 states using a set of seventeen criteria, just in time to adjust your travel plans ahead of this weekend's Memorial Day holiday. <br /><br />The list was compiled by weighing such factors as 'Speed Traps Per Capita," the use of speed and red-light cameras, as well as legal factors like the presence of mayor's courts, the availability of trial-by-declaration, and so on.<br /><br />We're not sure we agree with each of the criterion (e.g. singling out whether cellular phone use is legal), but it's a very interesting list all the same, and might give you some fuel for the inevitable water cooler discussion following your next moving violation.<br /><br />Click on the jump to see the full list of factors and where your stomping grounds stack up among the least motorist-friendly states in the nation. <em>Hot tip, Frank!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.motorists.org/rankings/">National Motorists Association</a>, Source Photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/icanchangethisright/">bradleygee</a> | CC2.0]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>National Motorists Association ranks states most hostile to drivers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/">National Motorists Association ranks states most hostile to drivers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 May 2009 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1552880/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/05/21/national-motorists-association-ranks-states-most-hostile-to-driv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cell phone drivers</category><category>CellPhoneDrivers</category><category>drivers</category><category>law enforcement</category><category>LawEnforcement</category><category>motorists</category><category>National Motorists Association</category><category>NationalMotoristsAssociation</category><category>red light camera</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>road safety</category><category>RoadSafety</category><category>speed cameras</category><category>SpeedCameras</category><category>traffic enforcement</category><category>TrafficEnforcement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bring on the heat: Njection updates Speedtrap site]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a></p><a href="http://njection.com/speedtrap/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/speedtrap_450.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<p> </p>
<p>The team at Njection have updated their Speedtrap site with new features and more detailed speed trap information. After introducing the ability to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/njection-and-garmin-partner-to-identify-speed-traps/">upload speed trap information to Garmin GPS units</a> in March, Njection has now added color-coded maps on its website. Locations of user-reported police radar, or other speed enforcement devices, are displayed as colored dots based on the threat level. Low level threats are yellow, while medium threats are orange. The highest level threats are displayed in red. In addition to the map upgrades, a new "speed trap heat map" visually charts the day and time of the week when the threats are the highest. As before, all database information for the free service is provided by registered users on the site who report on their local enforcement tactics. Check out the press release after the jump for a special incentive for new registered users that may or may not be of any value to you. </p>
<p> </p>
[Source: <a href="http://njection.com/speedtrap/">Njection</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bring on the heat: Njection updates Speedtrap site</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/">Bring on the heat: Njection updates Speedtrap site</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1262354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/21/njection-updates-speedtrap-site/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>enforcement</category><category>njection</category><category>radar enforcement</category><category>RadarEnforcement</category><category>red light camera</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>speed trap</category><category>speeding ticket</category><category>SpeedingTicket</category><category>SpeedTrap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trapster exposes speed traps on your mobile device]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/24/trapster-exposes-speed-traps-on-your-mobile-device/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/24/trapster-exposes-speed-traps-on-your-mobile-device/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/24/trapster-exposes-speed-traps-on-your-mobile-device/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/general/v2/_a/speed-trap-service-from-trapster/20080521102009990001"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/trapster_450.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>"Your mobile phone alerts you as you approach speed traps." That's the idea behind <a href="http://www.trapster.com/index.php">Trapster</a>, an innovative service that uses technology, not the age-old flashing headlamps approach, to notify other drivers of a police speed trap. Motorists who come across an enforced speed zone are encouraged to report the location via an application running on their cell phone, PDA, and other types of devices. The notification is then broadcast to other Trapster members who receive audio or text message warnings as they approach the area. </p>
<p>There are four default alerts: police, speed camera, red light camera, and usual hiding place. Each is displayed in a color that alters from green to yellow to red, based on the "confidence" of the trap (more reports on a single trap increase the confidence). In a helpful move, known traps can be viewed on a Google-powered map on the Trapster web site before you leave the house or office and jump behind the wheel. </p>
<p>According to the inventors, Trapster works with any kind of phone. However, it is optimized with devices that support GPS or WiFi. While you'd think law enforcement would oppose the exposure of their speed traps, it hasn't been met with much resistance, as it actually encourages motorists to slow down. Unfortunately, as others point out, it also requires drivers to take their eyes off the road as they fumble to send alerts with their electronic devices. </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/general/v2/_a/speed-trap-service-from-trapster/20080521102009990001">AOL Autos]</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/24/trapster-exposes-speed-traps-on-your-mobile-device/">Trapster exposes speed traps on your mobile device</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 24 May 2008 11:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/24/trapster-exposes-speed-traps-on-your-mobile-device/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1204729/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/24/trapster-exposes-speed-traps-on-your-mobile-device/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Highway Patrol</category><category>HighwayPatrol</category><category>Law Enforcement</category><category>LawEnforcement</category><category>Police</category><category>Red Light Camera</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>Speed Traps</category><category>Speeding</category><category>SpeedTraps</category><category>Ticket</category><category>Trapster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 11:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Charlotte NC speed cameras could unwittingly cost city $4.6 million]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/charlotte-nc-speed-cameras-could-unwittingly-cost-city-4-6-mill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/charlotte-nc-speed-cameras-could-unwittingly-cost-city-4-6-mill/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/charlotte-nc-speed-cameras-could-unwittingly-cost-city-4-6-mill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/11/1151.asp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/andy-davy-gatso-resized.jpg" alt="" /></a><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"></font></p>
Authorities in Charlotte, North Carolina have switched off their red light and speed camera units. The move stems from a May 16 decision by the NC state appeals court directing some 90 percent of proceeds to state schools, not to the city or the company that operates the cameras.<br /><br />Peek Traffic Inc., the firm responsible for operating and monitoring the cameras had been receiving a whopping $35 out of every $50 for every ticket for blowing a red light, or $39 for those snapped speeding. The new ruling means that the city would have to shell out $30-$34 per ticket, something they obviously aren't keen to do. By this ruling, Charlotte now owes the school system $4.6 million dollars.<br /><br />City council members are set to convene June 5 to figure out a way to get out of its contract with Peek Traffic, as well as figure out how to pay the $4.6 million dollars, provided officials don't take up the ruling with North Carolina's Supreme Court.<br /><br />[Sources: TheNewspaper.com; Art by Andy Davey]<br /><br />&nbsp;<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/charlotte-nc-speed-cameras-could-unwittingly-cost-city-4-6-mill/">Charlotte NC speed cameras could unwittingly cost city $4.6 million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 May 2006 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/11/1151.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/charlotte-nc-speed-cameras-could-unwittingly-cost-city-4-6-mill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/622717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/29/charlotte-nc-speed-cameras-could-unwittingly-cost-city-4-6-mill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Charlotte</category><category>gatso</category><category>Peek Traffic</category><category>PeekTraffic</category><category>police camera</category><category>PoliceCamera</category><category>red light camera</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>speed camera</category><category>SpeedCamera</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: Maryland county's red light cameras net $2.85 million, increase accidents]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/maryland-countys-red-light-cameras-net-2-85-million-increase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/maryland-countys-red-light-cameras-net-2-85-million-increase/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/maryland-countys-red-light-cameras-net-2-85-million-increase/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1051.asp"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/atscamera.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Anne Arundel Countyin Maryland has been running five red light cameras for five years, during which period they raised a fat $2.85 millionin ticket revenue. Unfortunately, a comparison of accident statistics shows that the cameras <ahref="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1051.asp">have increased the rate of accidents.</a><br /><br />Immediatelyafter installation, the cameras sparked a 40-percent increase in rear-end collisions, and never looked back, withfive-year increases in accident rates far exceeding a 10-percent increase in traffic.<br /><br />Unfortunately, this ishardly an isolated phenomenon. TheNewspaper.com <a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1050.asp">reports</a>similar results in the state of Georgia, where the city of Duluth's one and only camera is forecast to generate awhopping $1 million next year, at the cost of a 21-percent increase in accidents. A <ahref="http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/gwinnett/stories/0402gwxredlight.html">study </a>by the AtlantaJournal-Constitution showed red light cameras were linked to an increase in accidents, injuries and revenues across thestate, although there is early indication that the rate of serious accidents in intersections is falling.<br /><br/>Critics charge that cities are at best trading one kind of accident for another, and that the proliferation oftraffic cameras is really just a money generator, while advocates maintain that they encourage safer driving.<br /><br/>[Sources: theNewspaper.com, <span class="template"><span class="source">The AtlantaJournal-Constitution]</span></span><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/maryland-countys-red-light-cameras-net-2-85-million-increase/">Study: Maryland county's red light cameras net $2.85 million, increase accidents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/maryland-countys-red-light-cameras-net-2-85-million-increase/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/605628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/05/maryland-countys-red-light-cameras-net-2-85-million-increase/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>red light camera</category><category>traffic camera</category><category>TrafficCamera</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 09:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Minneapolis judge orders 'lights out' for traffic signal cameras]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a></p><p><a href="http://www.kmsp.com/news/story.asp?1652534"><img alt=""src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/02/1e1c45d2-0b59-485e-ba9b-19ed72cd59b5.jpg" align="right" /></a>A Minneapolis,Minnesota area judge has given red-light cameras a taste of their own medicine. Hennepin County District Judge MarkWernick has put the red light on the county's automated&nbsp;traffic signal&nbsp;cameras installed this past July. </p>
<p>The judge found legal fault with the county's 'Stop On Red' program, which (like virtually allred-light camera programs) tickets the owners of the offending vehicles, not the drivers themselves. As Minnesota statelaws put the responsibility for light violations on the driver, Wernick threw out the challenging ticket, saying thatMinneapolis lacks the authority to make law an ordinance that would hold vehicle owners responsible.</p>
<p>The motorist who brought the case to court was represented by an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) volunteerattorney, Howard Bass, who argued that the ordinance was unconstitutional, though Judge Wernick didn't comment onthat facet of their case.</p>
<p>The city is mulling whether to appeal the decision, but the case could set an important legal precident nationwide,as it is estimated that as many as 160 other cities employ red light cameras.</p>
<p>[Source: Associated Press via KMSP Fox 9 News]</p>
<p>(Top&nbsp;tip, Jenni!)</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/">Minneapolis judge orders 'lights out' for traffic signal cameras</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.kmsp.com/news/story.asp?1652534>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/599903/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ACLU</category><category>Hennepin</category><category>Mark Wernick</category><category>MarkWernick</category><category>Minneapolis</category><category>Photo Cop</category><category>Photo Radar</category><category>PhotoCop</category><category>PhotoRadar</category><category>Red Light</category><category>Red Light Camera</category><category>RedLight</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>Speed Camera</category><category>SpeedCamera</category><category>Stop On Red</category><category>StopOnRed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>