<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Government credits 180,000 sales to Cash-for-Clunkers incentive]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/06/government-credits-180-000-sales-to-cash-for-clunkers-incentive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/06/government-credits-180-000-sales-to-cash-for-clunkers-incentive/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/06/government-credits-180-000-sales-to-cash-for-clunkers-incentive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20090805/ANA05/308059874/1273"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/08/cashforclunkers_630.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Even without a Cash for Clunkers <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/31/house-approves-2-billion-more-for-cash-for-clunkers-senate-vot/">$2 billion extension locked in place by the Senate</a>, the U.S. government bean counters are crediting the auto incentive for moving more than 180,000 vehicles off dealer lots. The big winner so far is Toyota, knocking Ford's Focus off the top-selling vehicle spot with its economy-oriented Corolla sedan.<br />
<br />
According to the numbers, more than 80 percent of the traded-in vehicles were light trucks (including SUVs, pickups, and vans), and 59 percent of the purchases are passenger cars... meaning the program is successfully replacing those thirsty vehicles with a class that is a bit more efficient. <br />
<br />
The list of top-10 most traded-in vehicles is chock-full of domestic trucks. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/31/video-cash-for-clunkers-engine-being-killed/">soon-to-be-euthanized victims</a> include five light trucks by Ford, three Jeep and Dodge brands, and two Chevys. And lastly, for those keeping track of the decimal points, the new vehicles being sold under the program earn an average 25.3 mpg, while the condemned only brought an 18.5 mpg average to the party.<br />
<br />
[Source: Automotive News, subs. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/06/government-credits-180-000-sales-to-cash-for-clunkers-incentive/">Government credits 180,000 sales to Cash-for-Clunkers incentive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/06/government-credits-180-000-sales-to-cash-for-clunkers-incentive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19120868/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/06/government-credits-180-000-sales-to-cash-for-clunkers-incentive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C4C</category><category>CARS Program</category><category>CarsProgram</category><category>cashforclunkers</category><category>Clunker</category><category>Figures</category><category>Incentive</category><category>Numbers</category><category>Old Cars</category><category>OldCars</category><category>Rebate</category><category>Trade-in</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power lowers U.S. sales forecast... again]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/j-d-power-lowers-u-s-sales-forecast-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/j-d-power-lowers-u-s-sales-forecast-again/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/j-d-power-lowers-u-s-sales-forecast-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080723/ANA05/61584175/1078"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/jd_power.jpg" alt="" /></a>J.D. Power and Associates have lowered their U.S. sales light-vehicle forecast for 2008 to just 14.2 million units. This is the third time the global information services company have updated their numbers. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/19/j-d-power-and-associates-predict-even-lower-u-s-vehicle-sales/">In March</a>, they announced that sales would not hit their initial 15.7 million estimate, instead they would come in at about 14.95 million units. Now, the company is estimating sales at 14.2 million units (the industry sold 16.2 million units in 2007). J.D. Power is citing the prolonged credit crisis, deteriorating economic conditions, and the high cost of fuel as reasons consumers are holding off on purchasing new vehicles. Not helping the matter, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/19/gm-to-continue-weaning-itself-off-fleet-sales/">fleet sales</a> (a common way for the automakers to boost sales in the past) are also down 21 percent from last year.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080723/ANA05/61584175/1078">Automotive News</a>, subs. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/j-d-power-lowers-u-s-sales-forecast-again/">J.D. Power lowers U.S. sales forecast... again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/j-d-power-lowers-u-s-sales-forecast-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1266045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/25/j-d-power-lowers-u-s-sales-forecast-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Decline</category><category>Forecast</category><category>inventory</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power and associa...</category><category>jd powers</category><category>JdPower</category><category>JdPowerAndAssocia...</category><category>JdPowers</category><category>Numbers</category><category>Sale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW reports best-ever sales first half-year of 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/bmw_logo_250_opt.jpg" alt="" />Demonstrating that there is good news still to be found in some sales departments, BMW Group announced their worldwide January through June 2008 sales for BMW, MINI and Rolls-Royce brands increased 4.7 percent compared to last year. The sales total of 764,874 automobiles marked the most successful half-year of sales in the history of BMW Group. All three brands contributed to the sales increase, in varying capacities. BMW sales grew 2.4 percent, thanks to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/frankfurt-2007-bmw-1-series-in-depth/">BMW 1 Series</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/23/bmw-makes-the-3-series-convertible-official/">3 Series Cabrio</a>, while MINI sales were boosted 17.9 percent as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/10/04/pics-aplenty-mini-clubman-s/">MINI Clubman</a> rolled into showrooms. Most impressive was Rolls-Royce, boasting a 68.4 percent increase in sales compared to last year. The only segment where BMW Group was unable to maintain sales levels was with its motorcycles, as sales fell 5.6 percent compared to last year.</p>
<p>[Source: BMW Group]</p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BMW reports best-ever sales first half-year of 2008</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/">BMW reports best-ever sales first half-year of 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1248952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/08/bmw-reports-best-ever-sales-first-half-year-of-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BMW</category><category>BMW Group</category><category>BmwGroup</category><category>Financials</category><category>Numbers</category><category>Sales</category><category>Worldwide Sale</category><category>WorldwideSale</category><category>Year</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers: August 2007]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/hill_car1a.png" />You didn't think we forgot to report the numbers, did you? We imagine some automakers wish we had, for instance Jaguar and Mercury, which share our Biggest Loser honor this month by dropping an identical 20.2% in sales. Another of Ford's brands, Land Rover, was the Biggest Winner, jumping 32.2% in sales last month versus August 2006. <br /><br />Kudos to General Motors for pulling out a 5.3% increase in sales thanks to a big effort by Chevrolet (up 8.6%) and GMC (up 21.2%) that offset losses at the automaker's other brands. FoMoCo, meanwhile, took a hit by dropping 14.4% in sales (thanks Biggest Losers!). Even Toyota felt the crunch, slipping 2.8% in sales last month despite Lexus being up 3.6%. The newly christened Chrysler LLC reported a 6.0% fall in sales, with Dodge, Jeep and Chrysler brands all reporting lower sales last month versus 2006. <br /><br />Overall, August 2007 seemed like a mixed bag for automakers, with some pulling out a victory (GM, Honda, Nissan, BMW) and others taking it on the chin (Ford, Toyota, Chrysler). This makes it hard to label August 2007 a good or bad month for the industry, but at least it's in the bag.<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Land Rover 32.2% at 4,853 (08/06: 3,671)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Jaguar -20.2% at 1,359 (08/06: 1,704)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Mercury -20.2% at 12,296 (08/06: 15,417)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Acura -10% at 16,436 (08/06: 18,263)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Audi 7.1% at 7,620 (08/06: 7,115)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />BMW 18.5% at 26,562 (08/06:22,421)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Buick -15.4% at 19,324 (08/06: 22,853)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Cadillac -2.8 at 19,481 (08/06: 20,036)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Chevrolet 8.6% at 229,012 (08/06: 210,860)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Chrysler -7.0% at 43,650 (08/06: 47,132)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Dodge -8.0% at 82,841 (08/06: 89,790)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Ford -16.1% at 180,282 (08/06:214,759)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />GMC 21.2% at 51,222 (08/06: 42,262)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Honda 6.7% at 141,906 (08/06: 132,990)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />HUMMER -15.4% at 5,677 (08/06: 6,711)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Hyundai 1.0% at 45,087 (08/06: 44,635)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Infiniti 8.7% at 10,252 (08/06: 9,429)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Jaguar -20.2% at 1,359 (08/06: 1,704)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Jeep -1.0% at 41,712 (08/06: 42,243)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Kia 7.0% at 26,874 (08/06: 25,114)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Land Rover 32.2% at 4,853 (08/06: 3,671)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Lexus 3.6% at 32,199 (08/06: 31,074)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Lincoln 16.1% at 10,423 (08/06:8,979)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Mercedes 1.8% at 20,980 (08/06: 20,602)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Mercury -20.2% at 12,296 (08/06: 15,417)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />MINI 25.4% at 4,077 (08/06: 3,252)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Mitsubishi 19% at 13,020 (08/06: 10,954)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Nissan 6.0% at 85,275 (08/06: 80,419)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Pontiac -1.0% at 39,324 (08/06: 39,711)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Porsche 6.0% at 2,548 (08/06: 2,397)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Saab -5.0% at 3,011 (08/06: 3,168)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Saturn -4.2% at 21,117 (08/06: 22,050)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Subaru -7.5% at 16,573 (08/06: 17,809)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Suzuki 6.0% at 8,916 (08/06: 8,399)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Toyota -3.7% at 201,272 (08/06: 209,104)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Volkswagen -7.5% at 21,655 (08/06: 23,420)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Volvo 13.8% at 9,119 (08/06: 10,582)<br /><br />NA: Mazda<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />BMW Group 19.3% at 30,639 (08/06: 25,673)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Chrysler Group -6.0% at 168,203 (08/06: 179,165)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Ford Motor Co -14.4% at 218,332 (08/06: 255,112)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />General Motors 5.3% at 388,168 (08/06: 368,776)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Honda America 4.7% at 158,342 (08/06: 151,253)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__up_arrow.jpg" />Nissan North America 6.3% at 95,527 (08/06: 89,848)<br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/09/__down_arrow.jpg" />Toyota Motor Co. -2.8% at 233,471 (08/06: 240,178)<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/">By the Numbers: August 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/981373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/05/by-the-numbers-august-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007</category><category>august</category><category>august 2007</category><category>August2007</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>features</category><category>numbers</category><category>sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>