<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Gun owners want their other car to be a Chevy Volt]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/14/gun-owners-want-their-other-car-to-be-a-chevy-volt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/14/gun-owners-want-their-other-car-to-be-a-chevy-volt/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/14/gun-owners-want-their-other-car-to-be-a-chevy-volt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/352905/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/x07cc_ch060_450.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>click image above for high-res gallery of the Chevy Volt</em><br /><br /><span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"> <script> var digg_url = 'http://www.digg.com/business_finance/Gun_owners_want_their_other_car_to_be_a_Chevy_Volt'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>Unlike most hybrids, the Chevy Volt may have the uncanny ability to attract buyers outside the culture of environmentally conscious citizens. Case in point is AR15.com, a gun owners website and forum that's having an enlightening discussion about why the Volt hits their sweet spot. Forget about "tree-huggin stump-humping global warming alarmist" types (their words, not ours), these gun owners like the Volt because it promises a range equal to cars with gas engines and the ability to use no fuel for short trips. Who wouldn't like that? The forum member who started the thread with a link to an article on the Volt comments repeatedly that the first production series hybrid from GM will be a "game changer". <br /><br />It seems that many people, like the AR15.com posters, willfully alienate themselves from the current crop of green cars on the market specifically because they're touted by the liberal elite as the morally responsible choice of transportation we should all be driving. In fact, there <em>are </em>many conservatives in this country who also care about the environment and are interested in reducing dependence on foreign oil, but would rather not sacrifice the reliability, range, and general usefulness of their gas vehicles for hybrids that a.) don't live up to their hype, and/or b.) simply don't suit their needs. If the Volt delivers on all of its promises, then it should also attract these people who wouldn't touch a Prius with a ten-foot pole.<br /><br />Don't forget that the Volt is also produced by a domestic U.S. automaker and will be the first of its kind on the market. That makes it a technological tour de force that patriots can be proud to own. You can't say that about a Prius, and though U.S. automakers do produce hybrids, they arrived pretty late to the game and haven't made a significant impact in the market with their offerings. The Volt will certainly be a game changer, as we suspect it will be the first "green" car on the market to rack up sales that rival its gas-powered counterparts specifically because its appeal plays on both sides of the aisle.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/low/">Chevy Volt Concept</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/x07cc_ch007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/x07cc_ch008_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/x07cc_ch009_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/x07cc_ch010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevy-volt/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/x07cc_ch011_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/14/gun-owners-want-their-other-car-to-be-a-chevy-volt/">Gun owners want their other car to be a Chevy Volt</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&amp;f=5&amp;t=607518>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/14/gun-owners-want-their-other-car-to-be-a-chevy-volt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/965088/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/14/gun-owners-want-their-other-car-to-be-a-chevy-volt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chevy volt</category><category>ChevyVolt</category><category>conservative</category><category>democrat</category><category>featured</category><category>gun owners</category><category>GunOwners</category><category>guns</category><category>liberal</category><category>NRA</category><category>republican</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Carjackers beware! New bill in Tennessee allows "deadly force" against attackers]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/15/carjackers-beware-new-bill-in-tennessee-allows-deadly-force-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/15/carjackers-beware-new-bill-in-tennessee-allows-deadly-force-a/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/15/carjackers-beware-new-bill-in-tennessee-allows-deadly-force-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/pratique_carjack.jpg"  alt="" />Apparently the increase in violent crimes in Tennessee is leading legislators to take some unprecedented actions. They have filed bills that would increase the rights of citizens to bear arms and use those arms with deadly force in certain situations. Like during a carjacking. One bill in particular would allow motorists to kill an attacker that they feel is threatening to "murder, rape, kidnap, rob or carjack the car's occupants." Filing the bill was Rep. Ulysses Jones and Sen. Reginald Tate, two Memphis Democrats. "I've heard a lot of support for this. It's time to give citizens the opportunity to protect themselves. Right now, we're at the mercy of what I call 'scum'," said Jones, a Memphis Fire Department paramedic. <br /><br />The important shift here is that potential victims had only been allowed the right of defense inside their homes. Extending the right to outside the home, and particularly to a motorist in a vehicle, is a dramatic change. The NRA has helped push similar laws through in Florida, but Tennessee is believed to be the first effort to extend rights to motorists. These so-called "No Retreat" laws change the burden of attackees so that fleeing isn't the only option. Standing your ground and defending yourself and your property is allowed instead. <br /><br />[Source: Memphis Commercial Appeal]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/15/carjackers-beware-new-bill-in-tennessee-allows-deadly-force-a/">Carjackers beware! New bill in Tennessee allows "deadly force" against attackers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.commercialappeal.com/mca/midsouth_news/article/0,1426,MCA_1497_5349925,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/15/carjackers-beware-new-bill-in-tennessee-allows-deadly-force-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/754433/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/15/carjackers-beware-new-bill-in-tennessee-allows-deadly-force-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carjacking</category><category>gun laws</category><category>GunLaws</category><category>Memphis</category><category>NRA</category><category>Rep. Ulysses Jones</category><category>Rep.UlyssesJones</category><category>Sen. Reginald Tate</category><category>Sen.ReginaldTate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>