<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Minneapolis judge orders 'lights out' for traffic signal cameras]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a></p><p><a href="http://www.kmsp.com/news/story.asp?1652534"><img alt=""src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/02/1e1c45d2-0b59-485e-ba9b-19ed72cd59b5.jpg" align="right" /></a>A Minneapolis,Minnesota area judge has given red-light cameras a taste of their own medicine. Hennepin County District Judge MarkWernick has put the red light on the county's automated&nbsp;traffic signal&nbsp;cameras installed this past July. </p>
<p>The judge found legal fault with the county's 'Stop On Red' program, which (like virtually allred-light camera programs) tickets the owners of the offending vehicles, not the drivers themselves. As Minnesota statelaws put the responsibility for light violations on the driver, Wernick threw out the challenging ticket, saying thatMinneapolis lacks the authority to make law an ordinance that would hold vehicle owners responsible.</p>
<p>The motorist who brought the case to court was represented by an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) volunteerattorney, Howard Bass, who argued that the ordinance was unconstitutional, though Judge Wernick didn't comment onthat facet of their case.</p>
<p>The city is mulling whether to appeal the decision, but the case could set an important legal precident nationwide,as it is estimated that as many as 160 other cities employ red light cameras.</p>
<p>[Source: Associated Press via KMSP Fox 9 News]</p>
<p>(Top&nbsp;tip, Jenni!)</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/">Minneapolis judge orders 'lights out' for traffic signal cameras</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.kmsp.com/news/story.asp?1652534>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/599903/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ACLU</category><category>Hennepin</category><category>Mark Wernick</category><category>MarkWernick</category><category>Minneapolis</category><category>Photo Cop</category><category>Photo Radar</category><category>PhotoCop</category><category>PhotoRadar</category><category>Red Light</category><category>Red Light Camera</category><category>RedLight</category><category>RedLightCamera</category><category>Speed Camera</category><category>SpeedCamera</category><category>Stop On Red</category><category>StopOnRed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/599903/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/16/m/599903/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>599903</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/02/1e1c45d2-0b59-485e-ba9b-19ed72cd59b5_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
