<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[By the Numbers June 2008: Not That Bad Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/hill_car1a.png" />You're going to be reading in the mainstream press about how horrible sales were in the U.S. during June, 2008. Yes, they were bad for many automakers, but consider that there were only 24 selling days last month versus 27 days in June, 2007. This makes comparing raw sales numbers misleading, since there were three fewer days to sell. Thus, as always, all the percentages below represent the <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">change in Daily Sales Rate</span>, i.e. the average number of vehicles sold per day, not the change in raw number of vehicles sold.<br /><br />The big news is how hard Toyota fell last month, its DSR dropping 11.5% as a whole while the Toyota brand itself fell 10.3%. Cross-island rival Honda, however, bucked that trend by improving its DSR a whopping 13.8% and 17.9% for the Honda brand alone. Among the domestics, General Motors fared best with its DSR falling only 8.3%. If you look closely at the list below, while HUMMER, Saab and GMC were down in the big double digits, GM's volume brands held their own and most were down less than 5%. Ford, meanwhile, dropped its DSR by 19.1% (note this is the first month Jaguar and Land Rover sales were not included in Ford's numbers), and Chrysler, LLC, which performed the worst, saw its DSR plunge 28%. As you can see, however, many brands found a way to make it work in June, with Audi, MINI, Hyundai, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Subaru, Suzuki and Volkswagen all up in a big way.<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />40.5% at 5,211 (6/07: 4,174)<br /><br /><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-54.2% at 2,072 (6/07: 5,093)<br /><br /><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.4% at 12,456 (6/07: 16,766)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />18.5% at 8,203 (6/07: 7,789)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-6.6% at 20,944 (6/07: 25,220)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-34.4% at 9,631 (6/07: 16,519)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-3.1% at 14,337 (6/07: 16,647)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-3.5% at 159,998 (6/07: 186,474)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-36% at 27,128 (6/07: 47,658)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-21.3% at 63,687 (6/07: 91,089)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.8% at 145,715 (6/07: 204,303)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-14.6% at 30,713 (6/07: 40,457)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />17.9% at 130,083 (6/07: 124,169)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-54.2% at 2,072 (6/07: 5,093)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />14% at 50,033 (6/07: 49,368)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-0.9% at 9,304 (6/07: 10,558)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-32.8% at 26,642 (6/07: 44,600)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />21% at 28,292 (6/07: 26,288)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-21% at 20,253 (6/07: 28,869)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-12.5% at 9,718 (6/07: 12,494)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />3.8% at 23,771 (6/07: 25,761)<br />Mercedes-Benz <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />12.4% at 19,576 (6/07: 19,589)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-16.3% at 11,657 (6/07: 15,660)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />40.5% at 5,211 (6/07: 4,174)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-35.2% at 7,494 (6/07: 13,014)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.3% at 66,543 (6/07: 81,655)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-5.1% at 28,402 (6/07: 33,683)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.7% at 2,650 (6/07: 3,267)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-51.7% at 1,872 (6/07: 4,361)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-1.9% at 18,912 (6/07: 21,686)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />18.4% at 18,007 (6/07: 17,108)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />6.6% at 9,785 (6/07: 10,325)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-10.3% at 172,981 (6/07: 216,870)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />12.8% at 23,208 (6/07: 23,137)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-17.7% at 7,001 (6/07: 9,572)<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Not Yet Reported</span><br />Jaguar<br />Land Rover<br /><br /><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />0.1% at 26,155 (6/07: 29,394)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-28% at 117,457 (6/07: 183,347)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-19.1% at 167,090 (6/07: 232,457)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-8.3% at 265,937 (6/07: 326,300)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__up_arrow.jpg" />13.8% at 142,539 (6/07: 140,935)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-7.5% at 75,847 (6/07: 92,213)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/07/__down_arrow.jpg" />-11.5% at 193,234 (6/07: 245,739)<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/">By the Numbers June 2008: Not That Bad Edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1242668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/01/by-the-numbers-june-2008-not-that-bad-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>june 2008 auto sales</category><category>june 2008 sales</category><category>june 2008 u.s. auto sales</category><category>June2008AutoSales</category><category>June2008Sales</category><category>June2008U.s.AutoSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>