<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Auto__s: Jaguar supercar rumors refuted]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/27/battle-of-the-auto__s-jaguar-supercar-rumors-refuted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/27/battle-of-the-auto__s-jaguar-supercar-rumors-refuted/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/27/battle-of-the-auto__s-jaguar-supercar-rumors-refuted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rumormill/" rel="tag">Rumormill</a></p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/article/20090126/FREE/901269977"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/supercarsbj09_10_opt.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />A couple of weeks back we <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/">reported</a> on an ongoing debate between British automotive sites <em>Autocar </em>and <em>AutoExpress </em>over the emergence of a new Jaguar sportscar. While the former reported that Jaguar was to supplement the existing XK line with a smaller variant, likely named XE, the latter <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/21/new-renderings-of-jags-hush-hush-supercar/">issued claims</a> that the new model would be positioned above the XK with an engine placed behind. A third source, <em>AutoWeek</em>, has now thrown its hat into the ring, refuting <em>AutoExpress</em>' supercar reports and running instead with <em>Autocar</em>'s idea of a smaller sportscar.<br /><br />According to <em>AutoWeek</em>'s man in the UK, rumors of a successor to the XJ220 are purely fantastical speculation, citing unnamed inside sources while noting quite rationally that something closer to the Porsche Boxster would make more business sense than a supercar in the Audi R8 mold. Who'll be vindicated in the Battle of the <em>Auto___</em>s? Time will tell, while here at Autoblog we'll contribute this much: why not build both? Wishful thinking to be sure, but if Jaguar hopes to take on Germany's best, they're going to need a wider range - and a halo car - to do it.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autoweek.com/article/20090126/FREE/901269977">AutoWeek</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/27/battle-of-the-auto__s-jaguar-supercar-rumors-refuted/">Battle of the Auto__s: Jaguar supercar rumors refuted</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/article/20090126/FREE/901269977>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/27/battle-of-the-auto__s-jaguar-supercar-rumors-refuted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1442036/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/27/battle-of-the-auto__s-jaguar-supercar-rumors-refuted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jaguar</category><category>jaguar f-type</category><category>jaguar sportscar</category><category>jaguar supercar</category><category>jaguar xj220</category><category>JaguarF-type</category><category>JaguarSportscar</category><category>JaguarSupercar</category><category>JaguarXj220</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rumormill: Jaguar aims at R8 with new mid-engine supercar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a></p><div align="center"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/612087/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/jaguarf-type-12.jpg" /></a><br /></div>
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>Click above to view the 2000 Jaguar F-Type concept in high resolution</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br />Reports from across the pond regarding Jaguar's plans for a new supercar are coming out of the woodwork, but while <em>Autocar</em> contends that Jag is (still) working on the return of the F-type, <em>AutoExpress</em> reports that an all-new mid-engine supercar is coming in concept form within the next year.<br /><br />While under Ford PAG management, Jaguar cut back its development projects to its core products, but Tata figures there's more than one way to skin a cat. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/">F-Type</a> was first shown as a concept car in 2000, but was subsequently shelved. However, under Tata's leadership more niche vehicles like the F-Type, which could hit the market by 2011, could make Jaguar a more compelling alternative brand to the big German automakers and help buoy Jaguar's image.<br /><br />Back in 2001, Jaguar unveiled the R-Coupe concept, which could influence this new Audi R8 competitor. Based on the current XK, and possibly named the XE, the mid-engine coupe would be powered by the XFR's 503-hp supercharged, 5.0-liter V8 and would be the first vehicle from Jag with an engine mounted amidships since the XJ220. According to Jaguar's managing director, Mike O'Driscoll, the "XK is the car that began a revolution for us, but it's not the end of the story. I firmly believe the best car we could build to compliment this is a flagship coupe." If it does come to fruition, expect the XE to debut at the Geneva Motor Show in 2010.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/low/">Jaguar F-Type Concept</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/jaguarf-type-9_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/jaguarf-type-11_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/jaguarf-type-12_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/jaguarf-type-7_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jaguar-f-type-concept/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/jaguarf-type-4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?AR=236840">Autocar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/233541/jaguar_supercar.html">AutoExpress</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/">Rumormill: Jaguar aims at R8 with new mid-engine supercar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1426385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/14/rumormill-jaguar-aims-at-r8-with-new-mid-engine-supercar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>f type</category><category>f-type</category><category>FType</category><category>geneva motor show 2010</category><category>GenevaMotorShow2010</category><category>jaguar</category><category>jaguar f-type</category><category>jaguar porsche rival</category><category>jaguar xe</category><category>JaguarF-type</category><category>JaguarPorscheRival</category><category>JaguarXe</category><category>mid-engine</category><category>midengine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rendered Speculation: 2012 Jaguar F-type]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/rendered-speculation/" rel="tag">Rendered Speculation</a></p><a href="http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=12&amp;article_id=6783"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/4202008235238_250-op.jpg"  alt="" /></a>For Jaguar fans, the one car that's been missing from the lineup for far too long is a direct replacement for the legendary E-Type. While Jaguar tried to compete on volume with Mercedes and BMW by producing cars like the S-Type and X-Type, concepts like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/29/rumormill-jaguar-planning-porsche-911-rival/">2000 F-Type</a> were left to whither on the vine. Now that Jaguar is under new management from the sub-continent, things are starting to change. A new, smaller sports car along the lines of the F-Type now seems to be set to arrive, perhaps as soon as 2012. Unlike the concept that looked like a smaller version of the previous generation XK, the production roadster is likely to take cues from new Jags, including the recently launched XF and the upcoming XJ. Power is expected to be provided by a variant of the current 3.0-liter Duratec, and while a turbocharged, direct-injected V6 variant of Ford's EcoBoost might not be out the question, it remains highly unlikely. The other question would be the name. Now that Jaguar has a pattern with XF, XK and XJ, it seems unlikely the new roadster will get badged as an F-Type. Do we hear XD, hearkening back to the old D-type?<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=12&amp;article_id=6783">Road &amp; Track</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/">Rendered Speculation: 2012 Jaguar F-type</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 May 2008 12:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?section_id=12&amp;article_id=6783>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1194028/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/13/rendered-speculation-2012-jaguar-f-type/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jaguar</category><category>jaguar f-type</category><category>jaguar f-type concept</category><category>jaguar roadster</category><category>JaguarF-type</category><category>JaguarF-typeConcept</category><category>JaguarRoadster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: Jaguar shows Tata plans for F-Type, two-door XF, four-door XK]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/06/report-jaguar-shows-tata-plans-for-f-type-two-door-xf-four-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/06/report-jaguar-shows-tata-plans-for-f-type-two-door-xf-four-do/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/06/report-jaguar-shows-tata-plans-for-f-type-two-door-xf-four-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tata/" rel="tag">Tata</a></p><a href="http://www.just-auto.com/article.aspx?id=93792&amp;lk=alrt3&amp;amd=3069"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/jaguar_logo1a.jpg" alt="" /></a>As we've reported previously, Jaguar isn't waiting around to see how its future unfolds to move ahead with new product development. We've seen <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/23/spy-shots-the-next-jaguar-xj/">spy shots of the next flagship XJ sedan</a>, and heard rumors of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/29/rumormill-jaguar-planning-porsche-911-rival/">a new sportscar to rival the Porsche 911</a>. Emerging reports now suggest that Jaguar executives have begun coordinating with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/30/report-tata-to-get-full-stake-in-jaguar-and-land-rover/">their bosses-to-be at Tata</a> over several intriguing new models.
<p> </p>
<p>Although Tata is not in a position to sign off on the development of new models at this point, it reportedly received the sportscar project with the most enthusiasm. While executives reportedly favor basing the Porsche rival off the XF's steel chassis, Coventry engineers are pushing to modify the XJ's aluminum platform; the engine bay would be able to accommodate both V6 and V8 engines. Jaguar also presented its hosts with plans to lop off two doors and a couple of inches of roofline from the new XF sedan to make a coupe version, although a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/12/rendered-speculation-jaguar-xf-convertible/">convertible</a> variant was ruled out. Lastly, and perhaps most dramatically, a plan was presented to lengthen the XK coupe and add two more doors to build its own rival for former corporate cousin <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/17/spy-shots-aston-martin-rapide-in-the-round/">Aston Martin's upcoming Rapide</a>. This last development contradicts earlier reports that suggested the next XJ sedan would adopt the four-door-coupe approach, offering instead that the new XJ would include more interior space than the model it replaces. </p>
<p>[Source: Just-Auto.com - sub. req'd]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/06/report-jaguar-shows-tata-plans-for-f-type-two-door-xf-four-do/">REPORT: Jaguar shows Tata plans for F-Type, two-door XF, four-door XK</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.just-auto.com/article.aspx?id=93792&amp;lk=alrt3&amp;amd=3069>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/06/report-jaguar-shows-tata-plans-for-f-type-two-door-xf-four-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1108006/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/06/report-jaguar-shows-tata-plans-for-f-type-two-door-xf-four-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jaguar</category><category>jaguar 911 rival</category><category>jaguar aston martin rapide rival</category><category>jaguar f-type</category><category>jaguar porsche rival</category><category>jaguar tata</category><category>jaguar xf cabrio</category><category>jaguar xf convertible</category><category>jaguar xf two-door</category><category>jaguar xk four-door</category><category>Jaguar911Rival</category><category>JaguarAstonMartinRapideRival</category><category>JaguarF-type</category><category>JaguarPorscheRival</category><category>JaguarTata</category><category>JaguarXfCabrio</category><category>JaguarXfConvertible</category><category>JaguarXfTwo-door</category><category>JaguarXkFour-door</category><category>tata</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TCC lists 10 concepts Detroit should have built]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/tcc-lists-10-concepts-detroit-should-have-built/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/tcc-lists-10-concepts-detroit-should-have-built/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/tcc-lists-10-concepts-detroit-should-have-built/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/conceptcars/" rel="tag">Concept Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jaguar/" rel="tag">Jaguar</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><a href="http://www.thecarconnection.com/Car_Shows_and_Concept_Cars/Concept_Cars/Ten_Concepts_Detroit_Should_Have_Built.S283.A12202.html?pg=11"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/astroii.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Show cars, dream cars and concept cars have long been a staple of the auto show circuit. Ever since Harley Earl dropped the 1938 Buick Y-Job on the unsuspecting public, automakers have been teasing us with concepts that more often than not fail to make it to production. Sometimes certain design elements or powerplants or nametags make it to showrooms, even whole vehicles occasionally slip through with minor changes, but there are always cars we wish automakers would have built but didn't. That's what The Car Connection addresses in its newest top ten list. "Ten Concepts Detroit Should Have Built," as you may guess, focuses on concepts American manufacturers should have made.<br /><br />TCC gives a thorough description of each choice and an explanation of its merits, and also invites readers to weigh in on which they would choose as the pick of the litter. We encourage you to click over and check them out for yourself, but here's the list:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Chrysler Norseman, 1956</li>
    <li>Chevrolet Astro II, 1967</li>
    <li>Chevrolet Corvette Four-Rotor, 1972</li>
    <li>Chrysler Phaeton, 1997</li>
    <li>Pontiac Aztek, 1999</li>
    <li>Jaguar F-Type, 2000</li>
    <li>Chevrolet Nomad 1999 and 2003</li>
    <li>Lincoln Continental, 2002</li>
    <li>Cadillac Sixteen, 2003</li>
    <li>Ford Reflex, 2006</li>
</ul>
Add our votes for the Astro II (pictured), the Nomads and Cadillac's Sixteen concept, though ourl list would have also included the <a href="http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=car.php&amp;carnum=1182">Dodge M80</a>, <a href="http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.php?file=car.php&amp;carnum=1576">Ford 427</a> and <a href="http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z7927/Buick_Velite/default.aspx">Buick Velite</a>.<br /><br />[Source: TheCarConnection]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/tcc-lists-10-concepts-detroit-should-have-built/">TCC lists 10 concepts Detroit should have built</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thecarconnection.com/Car_Shows_and_Concept_Cars/Concept_Cars/Ten_Concepts_Detroit_Should_Have_Built.S283.A12202.html?pg=11>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/tcc-lists-10-concepts-detroit-should-have-built/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/872920/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/12/tcc-lists-10-concepts-detroit-should-have-built/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cadillac Sixteen</category><category>CadillacSixteen</category><category>Chevrolet Astro</category><category>Chevrolet Corvette Four-Rotor</category><category>Chevrolet Nomad</category><category>ChevroletAstro</category><category>ChevroletCorvetteFour-rotor</category><category>ChevroletNomad</category><category>Chrysler Norseman</category><category>Chrysler Phaeton</category><category>ChryslerNorseman</category><category>ChryslerPhaeton</category><category>concept car</category><category>ConceptCar</category><category>dream car</category><category>DreamCar</category><category>Ford Reflex</category><category>FordReflex</category><category>Jaguar F-Type</category><category>JaguarF-type</category><category>Lincoln Continental</category><category>LincolnContinental</category><category>Pontiac Aztek</category><category>PontiacAztek</category><category>show car</category><category>ShowCar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>