<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[<i>Car and Driver</i> calls out J.D. Power IQS]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/design-style/" rel="tag">Design/Style</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-ford-explorer-ecoboost-first-drive/#photo-4401726/"><img alt="2012 Ford Explorer" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/2012-ford-explorer-ecoboost-fd-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> has <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/">taken it on the chin from J.D. Power</a> since the carmaker rolled out its new MyFord Touch system in the 2011 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/explorer/">Explorer</a>. Ford's ranking in the influential Initial Quality Survey dropped from fifth last year all the way down to 23rd, in large measure because of customer dissatisfaction with the new technology and its voice recognition interface, but also because of refinement complaints about the PowerShift dual-clutch transmission in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fiesta/">Fiesta</a>. But unlike, say, the Houston Cougars, who plummeted in the Bowl Championship Series rankings after getting blown out in the Conference USA title game this weekend, Ford can make a pretty good case that it's getting jobbed.<br />
<br />
The traditional definition of quality when it comes to new cars and trucks has been based on those vehicles being free of defects. But in the last few years, the tide has been turning, in large measure because J.D. Power is increasingly weighing customer complaints related to design and, in particular, new electronic technology. <em>Car and Driver</em> paints the complaints that have dogged Ford among the latter, suggesting that these are less valid quality metrics than something like a poorly assembled door panel.<br />
<br />
The venerable buff book doesn't stop at defending Ford, however, cautioning against what it sees as a trend "toward the lowest-common-denominator solutions to reduce design 'problems.'" Citing examples like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/">BMW</a> moving its cruise control from a separate stalk to buttons on the steering wheel to appease whining customers and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/">Porsche</a> getting dinged on IQS for using brake pads that generate too much dust, C/D doesn't say it outright, but certainly implies that J.D. Power is no longer pushing automakers in the right direction.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/"><i>Car and Driver</i> calls out J.D. Power IQS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20120747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apeal</category><category>apeal study</category><category>car and driver</category><category>explorer</category><category>fiesta</category><category>ford</category><category>initial quality study</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>jd power</category><category>myford touch</category><category>mylincoln touch</category><category>powershift</category><category>quality</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20120747/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/12/05/car-and-driver-calls-out-j-d-power-iqs/20120747/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20120747</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/2012-ford-explorer-ecoboost-fd-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2011 J.D. Power Initial Quality report praises Lexus, Honda, pans Ford]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a></p><a href="/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#continued"><img alt="J.D. Power IQS study graph" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/jdp-iqs-2007-2011.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The calendar has kicked over to summer, and that means <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/j.d.+power">J.D. Power</a> has just updated its Initial Quality report. The 2011 edition of the IQS is a bit surprising, mostly because the quality of new model launches has been trending upward since 2007 for the entire industry on average. The tune has changed for 2011, as J.D. Power notes the first quality decline in four years, though it notes that carryover models performed better than ever - it's the new models that are drawing complaints. It's not all bad news, though, as a few automakers have managed to stand out from the competition:<br />
<br />
According to the study, which tracks buyer satisfaction after 90 days of ownership, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/honda">Honda</a> is a notable leader in quality, and its lineup shares seven awards for specific models. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord">Accord</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/accord+crosstour">Accord Crosstour</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic">Civic</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/element">Element</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/fit">Fit</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/insight">Insight</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ridgeline">Ridgeline</a> all receive recognition from J.D. Power. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/lexus">Lexus</a> isn't too far behind Honda, with four models getting the 2011 IQS thumbs up. Lexus also leads automakers in across-the-line quality, with Honda, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/acura">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mercedes-benz">Mercedes-Benz</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mazda">Mazda</a> chugging along right behind. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> showed strong signs of a comeback, motoring all the way from 21st place in 2010 back up to 7th place. Another item of note, is that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/land+rover">Land Rover</a> made a major leap in quality, and has reduced quality issues by 47 problem per every 100 vehicles.<br />
<br />
According to JDP, the leading reasons noted for a drop in quality includes growing consumer dissatisfaction with engine/transmission issues and audio/navigation matters. Chief among those who were dinged by both factors is Ford, which <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/03/mulally-facing-pressure-to-fix-ford-fix-tech-and-quality-glitche/">drew black marks for its complex MyFordTouch/Sync technologies</a>, along with its PowerShift dual clutch transmission behavior. The technology updates saw <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> plummet from 5th place overall (first among non-premium marques) to 23rd place out of 32 brands.<br />
<br />
Read the full report by <a href="/2011/06/23/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#continued">clicking past the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2011 J.D. Power Initial Quality report praises Lexus, Honda, pans Ford</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/">2011 J.D. Power Initial Quality report praises Lexus, Honda, pans Ford</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19975680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>ford quality</category><category>honda</category><category>honda quality</category><category>initial quality study</category><category>iqs</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>j.d. power initial quality report</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power iqs</category><category>jdp</category><category>lexus</category><category>toyota quality</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:04:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19975680/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/06/24/2011-j-d-power-initial-quality-report-praises-lexus-honda-pan/19975680/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19975680</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/jdp-iqs-2007-2011_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Domestics surpass imports as a whole in 2010 J.D. Power APEAL study]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/" rel="tag">Suzuki</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/volkswagen/" rel="tag">Volkswagen</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/j-d-power-2010-apeal-awards/med/#3175768"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/apealpage.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><small>Click above for gallery of the graphics from J.D. Power and Associates</small></em></strong></div>
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/porsche/">Porsche</a> once again grabs the top spot (for the sixth time in a row) in the J.D. Power and Associates 2010 Automotive Performance, Execution, and Layout (APEAL) Study. This year's study asked 76,000 owners 90 days after purchasing their 2010 model-year cars "how gratifying their new vehicle is to own and drive." The answer, for the first time since 1997, was that the domestic brands were more "appealing" as a whole than the imports (the domestics earned a score of 787 on a 1,000-point scale - 13 points greater than the imports).<br />
<br />
When it comes down to specific awards (as shown in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/j-d-power-2010-apeal-awards/med/#3175769">segment-level graphics</a>), <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> leads with five. The automaker earned one each for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/expedition">Expedition</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/explorer">Explorer Sport Trac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/flex">Flex</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/fusion">Fusion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/taurus">Taurus</a>. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/audi/">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/bmw/">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> each garner two awards. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/taurus">Ford Taurus</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/avalanche">Chevrolet Avalanche</a>, both segment leaders, are the only two models that ranked highest in the 2010 APEAL study and in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/">2010 Initial Quality Study</a> (IQS) announced in June. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/suzuki/">Suzuki</a> is credited with the greatest improvement this year, while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/jeep/">Jeep</a> drops one slot from last year's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/16/hyundai-trumps-bmw-and-jaguar-in-j-d-power-2009-apeal-study/">2009 APEAL Study</a> and falls to the bottom of the list for 2010. Check out the gallery for the graphics, and read the full press release after the break.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/j-d-power-2010-apeal-awards">J.D. Power 2010 APEAL Awards</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/j-d-power-2010-apeal-awards/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/apealmain_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/j-d-power-2010-apeal-awards/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/apealone_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/j-d-power-2010-apeal-awards/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/apealtwo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/">JDPower.com</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Domestics surpass imports as a whole in 2010 J.D. Power APEAL study</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/">Domestics surpass imports as a whole in 2010 J.D. Power APEAL study</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19555001/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2009 APEAL</category><category>2009 IQS</category><category>2009Apeal</category><category>2009Iqs</category><category>2010 APEAL</category><category>2010 Study</category><category>2010Apeal</category><category>2010Study</category><category>APEAL</category><category>APEAL Study</category><category>ApealStudy</category><category>Award</category><category>Execution</category><category>IQS</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>J.D. Power and Associates</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>J.d.PowerAndAssociates</category><category>jd power</category><category>JDPA</category><category>JdPower</category><category>Layout</category><category>Performance</category><category>Recipient</category><category>Survey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19555001/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/07/15/domestics-surpass-imports-as-a-whole-in-j-d-power-2010-apeal-st/19555001/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19555001</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/07/apealpage_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[TheDetroitBureau.com on Autoblog with Paul Eisenstein]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a></p><strong><big><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqslead2-short.jpg" /><br />
<br />
J.D. Power Initial Quality Study analysis</big></strong><br />
<br />
When I bought my first new car, back in 1973, I'd been warned by friends to expect a good half dozen defects that would need to be straightened out by the dealer. It turned out there were only five, I quickly counted, before taking my little sedan back to the shop for repairs. I was lucky. The worst problem I had to deal with was a loose mirror. A college chum, meanwhile, got stuck with a bad transmission on the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> he bought about the same time. But he took it in stride, as long as it got fixed right. And so did just about everyone else. Dealing with defects was a part of buying a car back then. <br />
<br />
<div style="border: 0px dotted black; margin: 5px; padding: 2px 3px; color: rgb(153, 0, 0); line-height: 120%; font-size: 1.5em; float: right; width: 220px; text-align: center;"><strong>One could argue surveys like IQS made Toyota and Honda by quantifying the quality gap.<br />
</strong></div>
But things started to change even before I was ready to trade in. The twin oil shocks of the '70s initially put the focus on fuel economy - more specifically on high-mileage imports. But as memories of gas lines faded, the emphasis shifted to the unexpectedly high quality the best of the Asians were delivering.<br />
<br />
One could argue - as an NPR talk show host did during my appearance this morning - that J.D. Power and Associates, with surveys like the Initial Quality Study, made <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/honda/">Honda</a> by quantifying that quality gap. And it was a big one, domestic makers routinely suffered twice the number of "problems" of the top foreign makers. Of course, even the imports had their issues back then, but as quality became a watchword, even the worst manufacturers suddenly started to make it a top priority, and, year-after-year, the defect count for the typical car rolling off the assembly line has steadily shrunk.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/">According to Power's latest survey</a>, the average buyer of a 2010 car, truck or crossover is experiencing about 1.08 problems during the first 90 days of ownership. More precisely, in the language of the Initial Quality Survey, there are an average of 108 "problems" per 100 vehicles. <br />
<br />
The products produced by the worst manufacturer on the list, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/land-rover/">Land Rover</a>, suffered 170 problems per 100, or 170 PP100 - less than two glitches for every vehicle. Put another way, that's less than half what the best makers could deliver in the early years of the IQS. The best individual model, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/ls">Lexus LS</a>, racked up just 55 PP100 on the latest study, which translates into just one complaint ticked off on the Power survey form by every other buyer.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>TheDetroitBureau.com on Autoblog with Paul Eisenstein</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/">TheDetroitBureau.com on Autoblog with Paul Eisenstein</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19521975/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car defects</category><category>car problems</category><category>CarDefects</category><category>CarProblems</category><category>eisenstein</category><category>featured</category><category>initial quality study</category><category>initial quality study 2011</category><category>InitialQualityStudy</category><category>InitialQualityStudy2011</category><category>iQS</category><category>iqs 2011</category><category>Iqs2011</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>jd power</category><category>JdPower</category><category>Paul Eisenstein</category><category>PaulEisenstein</category><category>quality survey</category><category>QualitySurvey</category><category>TheDetroitBureau</category><category>thedetroitbureau.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Eisenstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19521975/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/06/18/thedetroitbureau-com-on-autoblog-with-paul-eisenstein/19521975/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19521975</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqslead2-short_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power 2010 Initial Quality Study released, first time ever domestics lead imports]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/acura/" rel="tag">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lincoln/" rel="tag">Lincoln</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-j-d-power-and-associates-iqs/med/#3090967"><img hspace="0" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqslead2.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Click above for a gallery of graphtastic images from J.D. Power and Associates</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2010 Initial Quality Study (IQS) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/porsche/">Porsche</a> has earned back the top spot that was occupied by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/lexus/">Lexus</a> in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/">last year's study</a>. The annual J.D. Power study measures IQS based on problems reported per 100 vehicles (PP100) - a lower score means a lower rate of problem incidences and higher quality. <br />
<br />
Domestic brands, as a whole, demonstrated higher initial quality than import brands for the first time in an IQS (impressive, as the company has been conducting the study for 24 years). "Domestic automakers have made impressive strides in steadily improving vehicle quality, particularly since 2007," said David Sargent, vice president of global vehicle research at J.D. Power and Associates. "This year may mark a key turning point for U.S. brands as they continue to fight the battle against lingering negative perceptions of their quality." According to J.D. Power, the industry average for initial quality is 109 problems per 100 vehicles (PP100) in 2010 (that is a slight increase from 108 PP100 in 2009). However, initial quality for domestic brands as a whole has improved to an average of 108 PP100, slightly better than the initial quality of import brands, which average 109 PP100 in 2010.<br />
<span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u1:p></u1:p></span><o:p></o:p> <u5:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" u1:spt="75" u1:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"><u5:stroke joinstyle="miter"><u5:formulas><u5:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"><u5:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"><u5:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"><u5:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"><u5:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"><u5:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"><u5:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"><u5:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"><u5:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"><u5:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"><u5:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"><u5:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></u5:f><u5:path u1:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" u1:connecttype="rect"></u5:path></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:f></u5:formulas></u5:stroke></u5:shapetype><br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/acura/">Acura</a> made an impressive improvement in the 2010 study. The automaker climbed from 111 PP100 in 2009 to just 86 PP100 in 2010, earning second spot just under Porsche (83 PP100). <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> (87 PP100) earned third position with Lexus (88 PP100) immediately following. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a> (93 PP100) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/lincoln/">Lincoln</a> (106 PP100) also earned Top 10 positions. Interestingly enough, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> (117 PP100) fell from its seventh position in 2009 to 21st in the 2010 study. The complete J.D. Power press release and charts can be found after the jump and in the gallery below.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-j-d-power-and-associates-iqs">2010 J.D. Power and Associates IQS</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-j-d-power-and-associates-iqs/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqs1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-j-d-power-and-associates-iqs/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqs2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-j-d-power-and-associates-iqs/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqs3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/">J.D. Power and Associates</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>J.D. Power 2010 Initial Quality Study released, first time ever domestics lead imports</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/">J.D. Power 2010 Initial Quality Study released, first time ever domestics lead imports</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19519684/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010 IQS</category><category>2010Iqs</category><category>Acura</category><category>Ford</category><category>Initial Quality Study</category><category>Initial Quality Study 2010</category><category>InitialQualityStudy</category><category>InitialQualityStudy2010</category><category>intial quality</category><category>IntialQuality</category><category>IQS</category><category>j.d. power</category><category>j.d. power and assoc...</category><category>J.D. Power ratings</category><category>J.D. Power Survey</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>J.d.PowerAndAssoc...</category><category>J.d.PowerRatings</category><category>J.d.PowerSurvey</category><category>jd power</category><category>jd power 2010 initial quality study</category><category>jd power initial quality study</category><category>JDPA</category><category>JdPower</category><category>JdPower2010InitialQualityStudy</category><category>JdPowerInitialQualityStudy</category><category>Lincoln</category><category>Mercedes-Benz</category><category>Porsche</category><category>quality</category><category>reliability</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19519684/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/06/17/jd-power-2010-initial-quality-study-domestics-lead-imports/19519684/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19519684</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/06/2010iqslead2_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lexus leads, Hyundai improves, while Infiniti drops in J.D. Power 2009 Initial Quality Study]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infiniti/" rel="tag">Infiniti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/" rel="tag">Lexus</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/" rel="tag">Suzuki</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-j-d-power-iqs-results/2098559/full/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/2009_jdpa_iqs.jpg" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>Click above for a gallery of the graphtastic images from J.D. Power and Associates</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br />J.D. Power and Associates has released its 2009 Initial Quality Study (IQS) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lexus/">Lexus</a> has taken the top spot away from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/porsche/">Porsche</a>, the initial quality leader for the past three years. The annual J.D. Power study measures IQS based on problems reported per 100 vehicles (PP100) -- a lower score means a lower rate of problem incidences and higher quality.<br /><br />This year, the industry average is 108 PP100, demonstrating a steady improvement from 118 PP100 in 2008, and 125 PP100 in 2007.
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document" />
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12" />
<meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 12" />
<link rel="File-List" href="file:///H:\DOCUME~1\MICHAE~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_filelist.xml" />
<link rel="themeData" href="file:///H:\DOCUME~1\MICHAE~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_themedata.thmx" />
<link rel="colorSchemeMapping" href="file:///H:\DOCUME~1\MICHAE~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtmlclip1\01\clip_colorschememapping.xml" /><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp /> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables /> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx /> <w:Word11KerningPairs /> <w:CachedColBalance /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m:brkBin m:val="before" /> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&amp;#45;-" /> <m:smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispDef /> <m:lMargin m:val="0" /> <m:rMargin m:val="0" /> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m:intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true" DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading" /> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><style type="text/css"> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face 	{font-family:"MS Mincho"; 	panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4; 	mso-font-alt:"ＭＳ 明朝"; 	mso-font-charset:128; 	mso-generic-font-family:modern; 	mso-font-pitch:fixed; 	mso-font-signature:-1610612033 1757936891 16 0 131231 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:"Cambria Math"; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:1; 	mso-generic-font-family:roman; 	mso-font-format:other; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:"\@MS Mincho"; 	panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4; 	mso-font-charset:128; 	mso-generic-font-family:modern; 	mso-font-pitch:fixed; 	mso-font-signature:-1610612033 1757936891 16 0 131231 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-unhide:no; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	mso-hyphenate:none; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho"; 	mso-fareast-language:AR-SA;} .MsoChpDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	mso-default-props:yes; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --> </style><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} </style> <![endif]--> In addition to the marked improvement by the industry overall, many brands continued to perform well in 2009. Following Lexus and Porsche is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> (which moves from 10th rank position in 2008 to third in 2009), <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> (jumping from 13th rank position in 2008 to 4th in 2009) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/honda/">Honda</a> (up from 7th in 2008 to 5th in 2009). <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infiniti/">Infiniti</a>, second in last year's study, drops to 11th overall, while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suzuki/">Suzuki</a> posts the largest improvement in ranking, moving from 32nd place in 2008 to 9th in 2009. The complete J.D. Power press release and charts can be found after the jump and in the gallery below.<br /><br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-j-d-power-iqs-results">2009 J.D. Power IQS Results</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-j-d-power-iqs-results/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/2009_iqs_1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-j-d-power-iqs-results/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/2009_iqs_2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-j-d-power-iqs-results/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/2009_iqs_3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-j-d-power-iqs-results/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/2009_iqs_4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/">J.D. Power and Associates</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lexus leads, Hyundai improves, while Infiniti drops in J.D. Power 2009 Initial Quality Study</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/">Lexus leads, Hyundai improves, while Infiniti drops in J.D. Power 2009 Initial Quality Study</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19074249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking</category><category>Cadillac</category><category>Initial Quality</category><category>Initial Quality Study</category><category>InitialQuality</category><category>InitialQualityStudy</category><category>IQS</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>J.D. Power and Associates</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>J.d.PowerAndAssociates</category><category>JDPA</category><category>Lexus</category><category>Porsche</category><category>Quality Ranking</category><category>QualityRanking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19074249/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/06/22/lexus-leads-hyundai-improves-while-infiniti-drops-in-j-d-powe/19074249/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19074249</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/06/2009_jdpa_iqs_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford dominates J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt025_450.jpg"  alt="" /><br /><br />Hot on the heels of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/hyundai-tops-in-strategic-vision-total-quality-awards-toyota-a/">2007 Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards</a>, J.D. Power and Associates has released its <a href="http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2007088">2007 Initial Quality Study</a>. You'll no doubt be hearing about how well Ford has done in this year's IQS, as J.D. Power reports the Blue Oval has garnered five top model segment awards, more than any other automaker. Those models include the Ford Mustang, Lincoln Mark LT, Lincoln MKZ, Mercury Milan and the Mazda MX-5.<br /><br />Indeed, Ford did very well this year, with the Lincoln brand improving from 12th place to 3rd, Mercury from 17th to 8th and Ford jumping from 16th to 10th. We take umbrage, however, with J.D. Power choosing to include the Mazda MX-5 in Ford's list of segment leaders. Ford owns a controlling 33% stake in Mazda, but doesn't include the Japanese brand's sales among its own at the end of the month, and neither does the Japanese-built MX-5 share its plaform with any other Ford models. And, while rattling off how well each Ford brand ranked, J.D. Power doesn't mention that Mazda ranked 35th, second to last ahead of Land Rover, another Ford brand. Still, even without including the MX-5, Ford's four segment leaders is still more than any other automaker. Mercedes-Benz and Toyota each had three. <br /><br />J.D. Power also gives out Assembly Plant Awards, and in a surprising twist of fate, Ford's Wixom assembly plant that shut its doors forever this past week became the first North American assembly plant to earn the Platinum Plant Quality award for producing vehicles with the fewest defects. We suppose that means 2007 Lincoln Town Car owners are in for some trouble-free times with their cars. <br /><br />You can check out the complete rankings in the gallery below and read the official press release from J.D. Power and Associates after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: J.D. Power &amp; Associates]<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jd-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-study">JD Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jd-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-study/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/jdpower3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jd-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-study/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/jdpower2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jd-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-study/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/jdpower4_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/jd-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-study/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/jdpower_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford dominates J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/">Ford dominates J.D. Power and Associates 2007 Initial Quality Study</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2007088>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/912118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Initial Quality Study</category><category>InitialQualityStudy</category><category>IQS</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>J.D. Power and Associates</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>J.d.PowerAndAssociates</category><category>JD Power</category><category>JD Power and Associates</category><category>JdPower</category><category>JdPowerAndAssociates</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:54:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/912118/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/06/06/ford-dominates-j-d-power-and-associates-2007-initial-quality-st/912118/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>912118</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/abgar_an_stangvrt025_450_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[J.D. Power revamp should swing quality ratings]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060511/AUTO01/605110403/1148/rss25"><img width="225" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="282" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/JDPTrophySRP.jpg" alt="" /></a>The Detroit News is reporting that J.D. .Power is tinkering with its Initial Quality Survey for the first time since 1998 and only the second time since it was introduced in 1987, and the results could mean an increase in reports of problems by up to 40 percent. <br /><br />The changes affect the number of questions asked (217 vs. 135) and the way in which they're asked to the almost 60,000 new car and truck owners. Owners are also given the chance to reply in essay form for the first time. <br /><br />Though some manufacturers might cry foul if they drop in the rankings as a result of the new survey, most appreciate the additional material they'll be able to glean from J.D. Power's results.<br /><br />[Source: The Detroit News]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/">J.D. Power revamp should swing quality ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 12 May 2006 19:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060511/AUTO01/605110403/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/617826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car purchase</category><category>CarPurchase</category><category>Initial Quality Survey</category><category>InitialQualitySurvey</category><category>IQS</category><category>J.D. Power</category><category>J.d.Power</category><category>new car</category><category>NewCar</category><category>quality</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 19:09:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/617826/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/05/12/j-d-power-revamp-should-swing-quality-ratings/617826/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>617826</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/05/JDPTrophySRP_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
