<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[UAW head says Chrysler needs concessions from union]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uaw-unions/" rel="tag">UAW/Unions</a></p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070618/BUSINESS01/70618004"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/a013-gettelfinger.jpg" alt="" /></a>Two years ago, the UAW gave some health care concessions to struggling GM and Ford in an effort to help the Detroit giants save billions of dollars and stay afloat. At the time, Chrysler was relatively well-off and so the union rejected a similar package for them. UAW President Ron Gettelfinger says that it's time to make up for that omission. Since 2005, the Chrysler Group went from a profit of $1.8 billion, to a loss of $618 million last year, and on to a $1.98 billion loss so far this year. Gettelfinger said a review of Chrysler's finances shows there's a problem that needs to be addressed, so talks are ongoing.<br /><br />More after the jump.<br /><br />[Source: Detroit Free Press]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UAW head says Chrysler needs concessions from union</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/">UAW head says Chrysler needs concessions from union</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070618/BUSINESS01/70618004>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/920638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/19/uaw-head-says-chrysler-needs-concessions-from-union/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cerberus</category><category>Chrysler Group</category><category>ChryslerGroup</category><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>healthcare costs</category><category>HealthcareCosts</category><category>Ron Gettelfinger</category><category>RonGettelfinger</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The other shovel that helped dig the domestics' hole]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/27/the-other-shovel-that-helped-dig-the-domestics-hole/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/27/the-other-shovel-that-helped-dig-the-domestics-hole/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/27/the-other-shovel-that-helped-dig-the-domestics-hole/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/26/news/companies/pluggedin_taylor_ford.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007012611"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="218" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/01/shovel.gif" alt="" /></a>So how exactly can a company with the heritage and scope of Ford Motor Company manage to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/25/ford-burns-12-7-billion-in-2006/">lose $12.7 billion</a> in one year? Or, for that matter, how could GM lose $10.6 billion last year? All while Toyota continues to soldier on, racking up profits and closing in on number one. Well, it's more involved than most people realize. Sure we can gripe about product and quality all day long, but as CNN tells us, there's a lot more to it than that. Using a report by the Detroit consulting firm of Harbour-Felax, they paint a pretty bleak picture for the domestics. Some of the numbers in the findings are staggering. <br /><br />Domestics trail the Japanese by $2900 in per vehicle profit. The main reason there's such disparity is labor costs. Sure we've been hearing that line for a while, but check out the data supporting it. Health care alone accounts for $1,635 per vehicle for GM. That's how much they spend on every active AND retired worker. Toyota on the other hand doesn't have many retired workers, doesn't spend a dime on them, and only pays about $215 for health care for active workers. Add to that the $630 per vehicle GM spends on other union related costs like work rules, line relief and holiday pay, plus the $350 per vehicle pay UAW workers get for not working when plants are shut, and you start to see where part of the problem lies.<br /><br />We highly recommend reading the whole fascinating story on the other side of the read link.<br /><br />Thanks for the tip, Stedwoo!<br /><br />[Source: CNN Money]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/27/the-other-shovel-that-helped-dig-the-domestics-hole/">The other shovel that helped dig the domestics' hole</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/26/news/companies/pluggedin_taylor_ford.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007012611>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/27/the-other-shovel-that-helped-dig-the-domestics-hole/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/743334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/27/the-other-shovel-that-helped-dig-the-domestics-hole/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>healthcare costs</category><category>HealthcareCosts</category><category>labor costs</category><category>LaborCosts</category><category>UAW</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Filipponio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:07:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>