<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: CAFE fuel economy standards to rise 8% by 2011]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/report-cafe-fuel-economy-standards-to-rise-by-8-by-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/report-cafe-fuel-economy-standards-to-rise-by-8-by-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/report-cafe-fuel-economy-standards-to-rise-by-8-by-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20090327/AUTO01/903270399/Average+mpg+to+increase+8+"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/03/oil-derricks-at-night-with-cars-getty-mcnew-580.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The nation's Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards will swell to 27.3 miles-per-gallon by 2011. That's the word coming out of Washington, where the U.S. Department of Transportation is expected to bump the fleet fuel economy standards for the first time in more than a quarter-century.<br /><br />The 27.3 mpg figure represents an 8% increase over the current 2010 requirement of 25.3. In specific, cars will need to average 30.2 mpg and light trucks will need to hit 24.1 mpg. <br /><br />The truck figure is expected to be a tough one for automakers to meet within that timetable (most of the vehicles for 2011 are already well along in development - if not on dealer lots already). However, automakers are actually operating ahead of the 2010 requirements, achieving 2007 model year averages of 31.3 mpg for cars and 23.1 mpg for trucks, so there is some hope that the figures are workable.<br /><br />Further, General Motors and Chrysler may have some additional federal funds to help them get there - the Obama administration is hinting that it will release more federal aid to the troubled automakers. The two companies have already received $17.4 billion in loans and are seeking a further $21.6 billion to stave off bankruptcy.<br /><br />This is a separate issue from the decision that President Obama's administration is mulling over whether it should allow California (and the 13 other states that follow its policies) to mandate a 30 percent drop in tailpipe emissions by 2016, essentially a backdoor mandate of 34.5 mpg by 2015.<br /><br />Federal estimates say the new CAFE figures will save 887 million gallons of fuel and 8.3 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20090327/AUTO01/903270399/Average+mpg+to+increase+8+">Detroit News</a> | Image: David McNew/Getty]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/report-cafe-fuel-economy-standards-to-rise-by-8-by-2011/">REPORT: CAFE fuel economy standards to rise 8% by 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/report-cafe-fuel-economy-standards-to-rise-by-8-by-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1500212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/27/report-cafe-fuel-economy-standards-to-rise-by-8-by-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAFE</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>diesel</category><category>emissions</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>gas</category><category>gas consumption</category><category>GasConsumption</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GM</category><category>greenhouse gas</category><category>GreenhouseGas</category><category>hybrid</category><category>Obama</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[California gives its lawmakers unlimited gas cards]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/27/california-gives-its-lawmakers-unlimited-gas-cards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/27/california-gives-its-lawmakers-unlimited-gas-cards/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/27/california-gives-its-lawmakers-unlimited-gas-cards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/news/_a/gas-cards-give-lawmakers-free-ride/20080926105309990001?ncid=AOLCOMMautodynlsec0004"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/california-state-flag_250.jpg" alt="" /></a>What's up with California's lawmakers? First, they pass legislation that makes it illegal to use cell phones while driving, yet texting while behind the wheel is still legal (thankfully <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/25/california-outlaws-texting-while-driving-finally/">rectified earlier this week</a>). Now they get caught with unchecked, taxpayer-reimbursed, unlimited-use gas cards...while driving state-issued vehicles! The "gas cards" are supposed to be used for fuel, but they can also be used for incidental purchases such as snacks or drinks. The lawmakers never see the bills as they are sent directly to the Senate and Assembly rules committees for payment. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the golden state of California is unique with this program -- in most other states (<em>not </em>facing $15 billion budget deficits) lawmakers must submit expense forms for gas. Yeah, just like the rest of us do...</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://autos.aol.com/article/news/_a/gas-cards-give-lawmakers-free-ride/20080926105309990001?ncid=AOLCOMMautodynlsec0004">AOL Autos</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/27/california-gives-its-lawmakers-unlimited-gas-cards/">California gives its lawmakers unlimited gas cards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/27/california-gives-its-lawmakers-unlimited-gas-cards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1326049/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/27/california-gives-its-lawmakers-unlimited-gas-cards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arnold schwarzenegger</category><category>arnoldschwarzenegger</category><category>autmakers</category><category>california</category><category>gas cards</category><category>GasCards</category><category>gasoline</category><category>government waste</category><category>GovernmentWaste</category><category>legislators</category><category>unlimited expenses</category><category>UnlimitedExpenses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could U.S. become net exporter of gasoline?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/28/could-u-s-become-net-exporter-of-gasoline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/28/could-u-s-become-net-exporter-of-gasoline/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/28/could-u-s-become-net-exporter-of-gasoline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/08/shifts-in-energ.html#more"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/us_exports_gas.jpg" /></a>A number of factors are conspiring to create a situation that recently would have been unthinkable: the United States as a supplier of gasoline to world markets. According to Booz &amp; Company, those factors are the rise of biofuels in the West, the introduction of plug-in electric and other alternative fuel vehicles, and the growth of the really cheap car, like the Tata Nano. <br /><br />The United States imports oil to feed its gasoline habit, but the U.S. has refining capacity that developing nations cannot match. The U.S. is also lowering its reliance on traditional gasoline due to the price, states' mandates on switching to biofuels, and the dawn of mass market alternative fuel vehicles. This adds up to the United States importing oil, and then selling it to nations like India and China to feed their larger appetites for gasoline. <br /><br />In the middle of all of this are the refineries, who made predictions for today's business plans two decades ago. Sure, no one is crying for them -- they need extra pages to include the zeros on their profit statements -- but they have to start figuring out who's going to need which products and how they are going to deliver them. And, by refining company standards, they need to do it quickly, which is a method of operation they aren't well versed in.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/08/shifts-in-energ.html#more">Green Car Congress</a> via <a href="http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2008/08/us-could-become.html">Kicking Tires</a>; Photo <a href="http://search.creativecommons.org/#">CC 2.0 - National Archives</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/28/could-u-s-become-net-exporter-of-gasoline/">Could U.S. become net exporter of gasoline?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/08/shifts-in-energ.html#more>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/28/could-u-s-become-net-exporter-of-gasoline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1297953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/28/could-u-s-become-net-exporter-of-gasoline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative fuel</category><category>alternative fuels</category><category>AlternativeFuel</category><category>AlternativeFuels</category><category>gas</category><category>gasoline</category><category>oil</category><category>refineries</category><category>refining</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hurricane season may bring $6-a-gallon gas]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/hurricane-season-may-bring-6-a-gallon-gas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/hurricane-season-may-bring-6-a-gallon-gas/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/hurricane-season-may-bring-6-a-gallon-gas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/economy/hurricane_season/index.htm?postversion=2008060110"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/06/katrina_wiki.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Don't like the weather? Just wait, it'll change. Don't like gas prices? Just wait, they'll change, too. But if the weather brings a hurricane, some experts say gas prices could hit as high as $6 a gallon.<br /><br />NOAA has <a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080522_hurricaneoutlook.html">predicted</a> as many as nine named storms this season, with five of those possibly reaching major status. One expert in a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/economy/hurricane_season/index.htm?postversion=2008060110">CNN story</a> says that a typical hurricane will shut down an off-shore oil rig and interrupt supply lines for as long as two weeks. If even one of those damages Gulf of Mexico drilling rigs, you can bet the crude markets will go nuts, and today's black gold and $4/gallon gas will seem like a bargain. <br /><br />The good news? Hurricane season ends Nov. 30. If we make it to December with no major hurricanes, we might see oil and gas prices fall. Maybe.<br /><br />[Sources: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/economy/hurricane_season/index.htm?postversion=2008060110">CNN</a>, <a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080522_hurricaneoutlook.html">NOAA</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/hurricane-season-may-bring-6-a-gallon-gas/">Hurricane season may bring $6-a-gallon gas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/economy/hurricane_season/index.htm?postversion=2008060110>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/hurricane-season-may-bring-6-a-gallon-gas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1212104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/02/hurricane-season-may-bring-6-a-gallon-gas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cheap gas</category><category>CheapGas</category><category>economizer</category><category>expensive gas</category><category>ExpensiveGas</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>hurricanes gas prices</category><category>HurricanesGasPrices</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dealership offers free gas or gun with new car: 80% choose gun]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/21/dealership-offers-free-gas-or-gun-with-new-ca-80-choose-gun/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/21/dealership-offers-free-gas-or-gun-with-new-ca-80-choose-gun/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/21/dealership-offers-free-gas-or-gun-with-new-ca-80-choose-gun/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.kmbc.com/news/16345443/detail.html"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/max_motors_250.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a><span style="MARGIN-TOP: 7px; FLOAT: left; MARGIN-RIGHT: 10px"> <script> var digg_url = 'http://digg.com/autos/Free_Gas_or_a_Hand_Gun_with_New_Car_Sold_80_Choose_Gun'; </script><script src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>In a move certain to generate both controversy and publicity, a new and used car dealer in Butler, Missouri, is offering his customers a choice between two sales incentives with their vehicle purchase: $250 in gasoline or a free semi-automatic handgun. </p>
<p>"We got high gas prices, theft, carjackings, innocent people getting hurt," Walter Moore, from Max Motors, told KMBC-TV. It seems the resourceful dealer is offering car buyers a solution for it all -- and the gun is proving to be the popular choice with 80 percent of his customers choosing the firearm over free fuel. As expected, not everyone is happy. Considering most of his customers already own guns, Moore doesn't understand why people's feathers are getting all ruffled. Customers who choose the semi-auto pistol over the gas are handed a certificate that must be redeemed, after the requisite forms and background check are complete, at a local gun shop. This, of course, keeps the local police much happier. <em>Thanks for the tip, mccreery!</em></p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.kmbc.com/news/16345443/detail.html">KMBC-TV</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/21/dealership-offers-free-gas-or-gun-with-new-ca-80-choose-gun/">Dealership offers free gas or gun with new car: 80% choose gun</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 21 May 2008 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/21/dealership-offers-free-gas-or-gun-with-new-ca-80-choose-gun/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1201857/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/21/dealership-offers-free-gas-or-gun-with-new-ca-80-choose-gun/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Gasoline</category><category>Gun</category><category>Max Motors</category><category>MaxMotors</category><category>missouri</category><category>New Car</category><category>NewCar</category><category>Used Car</category><category>UsedCar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Price of gas capped at $4/gallon for pumps that can't help it]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/price-of-gas-capped-at-4-gallon-for-pumps-that-cant-help-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/price-of-gas-capped-at-4-gallon-for-pumps-that-cant-help-it/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/price-of-gas-capped-at-4-gallon-for-pumps-that-cant-help-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/361465_gaspumps02.html?source=rss"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/450gaspumps_187mu_engels_copy_opt.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Machines are only as smart as their creators, which doesn't say much about gas pump manufacturers in the mid-1990s. A <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/361465_gaspumps02.html?source=rss">report from Washington</a> reveals that at least 12 gas stations in the state are using pumps not 13 years old that are unable to display and calculate a price of gas higher than $3.99 9/10 per gallon. These pumps were produced before everything went digital and you could simply slide your AmEx into the little slot to pay for your premium petrol. They use a mechanical computer with gears to calculate the price of gas, and the cost of retrofitting them to account for the current reality of $4+/gallon gasoline amounts to $8,500 in upgrades according to one station owner, if he could even find the parts since they're all on back order. <br /><br />Just like computer engineers couldn't imagine that their little machines would last until Y2K, the mechanical engineers who designed these pumps back in 1995 when gas was the equivalent of $1.60/gallon apparently couldn't imagine a day in 2008 when dead dino juice would be this expensive. Unfortunately for customers who patron stations with this antiquated equipment, they aren't getting their fuel for the price advertised on the pump. Rather, the state's Weights and Measures program is giving these businesses extra time to upgrade or replace their pumps as long as the actual price of gas is clearly displayed and customers get an explanation of what's going. For now they're doing it the old fashioned way, by multiplying the gallons pumped by the price on the sign. <em>Thanks for the tip, bojac!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/361465_gaspumps02.html?source=rss">Seattlepi</a> via <a href="http://www.fashionfunky.com/2008/05/pumps_that_protest_against_ope.php">Fashion Funky</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/price-of-gas-capped-at-4-gallon-for-pumps-that-cant-help-it/">Price of gas capped at $4/gallon for pumps that can't help it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 May 2008 08:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/price-of-gas-capped-at-4-gallon-for-pumps-that-cant-help-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1187741/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/07/price-of-gas-capped-at-4-gallon-for-pumps-that-cant-help-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4 gallon</category><category>4 gas</category><category>4Gallon</category><category>4Gas</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gas pumps</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>GasPumps</category><category>old gas pumps</category><category>OldGasPumps</category><category>price of gas</category><category>PriceOfGas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gas buyers favor brand, not price]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/gas-buyers-favor-brand-not-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/gas-buyers-favor-brand-not-price/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/gas-buyers-favor-brand-not-price/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><a href="http://adage.com/article.php?article_id=126525"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/80768876_opt.jpg" /></a>Oil company advertising is apparently much more effective than we had originally thought. As gasoline prices creep up towards $4.00 per gallon <em>(already there in Southern California)</em>, consumers are still more likely to purchase fuel based on brand over price.
<p> </p>
<p>According to NPD Group analyst David Portalatin, consumers cite "product performance" as their justification for buying one particular brand over another. It's all due to very effective branding and marketing, cites Portalatin. <em>(We'd have to agree, as we've yet to meet anyone who can discern a difference between a tank of Chevron or Costco fuel from the driver's</em> <em>seat.)</em> Now that the massive oil mergers are behind them, the petroleum giants are focusing on selling "quality" to differentiate themselves from the discount fuel stations. As consumers continue to blindly drive towards big brand gasoline, their efforts are apparently working -- regardless of cost. Let's just hope Starbucks doesn't catch wind of this trend and try a new source of revenue...</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/article.php?article_id=126525"></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>[Source <a href="http://adage.com/article.php?article_id=126525">Advertising Age</a>, Photo by David McNew, Getty Images]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/gas-buyers-favor-brand-not-price/">Gas buyers favor brand, not price</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/gas-buyers-favor-brand-not-price/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1172945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/gas-buyers-favor-brand-not-price/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevron</category><category>Cost</category><category>Expensive</category><category>Fuel</category><category>Gasoline</category><category>Oil Companies</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>Prices</category><category>Shell</category><category>Unocal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2009 HUMMER H2 and H2 SUT will be E85 compatible]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/30/2009-hummer-h2-and-h2-sut-will-be-e85-capable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/30/2009-hummer-h2-and-h2-sut-will-be-e85-capable/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/30/2009-hummer-h2-and-h2-sut-will-be-e85-capable/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hummer/" rel="tag">Hummer</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080328/ANA02/99999064/1186"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/e85_hummer_dealer.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />In Dallas, a businessman has spent half a million dollars to install nine pumps that dispense E85, E10, and biodiesel. The catch: the businessman is a HUMMER dealer, and the pumps are next to his dealership. The station is called Classic Clean Fuels, and it is intended to make a statement for next year's H2 and H2 SUT, which will be the first production models to be Flex-fuel capable. <br /><br />You won't need to drive a HUMMER to get E85 at the station. The pumps are open to the public, a first for a dealer-owned gas station. By 2010, GM has said all HUMMERs will be biofuel-capable. GM plans to market 15 Flexfuel models next year, but only one percent of the country's service stations sell E85. GM is using that as an opportunity to open the public's (and dealers') minds to putting alternative fuel stations in alternative places.<br /><br />Said GM's Larry Burns, "Down the road we may even want to consider hydrogen dispensers at dealerships."<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080328/ANA02/99999064/1186">Auto News</a>, sub req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/30/2009-hummer-h2-and-h2-sut-will-be-e85-capable/">2009 HUMMER H2 and H2 SUT will be E85 compatible</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080328/ANA02/99999064/1186>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/30/2009-hummer-h2-and-h2-sut-will-be-e85-capable/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1152383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/30/2009-hummer-h2-and-h2-sut-will-be-e85-capable/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biodiesel</category><category>biofuel</category><category>biofuels</category><category>dealer</category><category>dealers</category><category>dealership</category><category>dealerships</category><category>e10</category><category>e85</category><category>e85 stations</category><category>e85stations</category><category>flex</category><category>flex fuel</category><category>flex-fuel</category><category>FlexFuel</category><category>gas</category><category>gas station</category><category>gas stations</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasStation</category><category>GasStations</category><category>h2</category><category>h2 sut</category><category>h2sut</category><category>hummer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AAA survey says fuel mileage paramount in consumers minds]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/aaa-survey-says-fuel-mileage-paramount-in-consumers-minds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/aaa-survey-says-fuel-mileage-paramount-in-consumers-minds/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/aaa-survey-says-fuel-mileage-paramount-in-consumers-minds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drive</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080324/AUTO01/803240337"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/gas_pump.jpg" alt="" /></a>In a sign that the high cost of gasoline has finally struck a central nerve, car shoppers today are reportedly more concerned about fuel economy than they are about the brand of vehicle when shopping for a new car. In addition, consumers want more government control over fuel economy. This startling news, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/30/price-still-most-important-factor-when-buying-car-fuel-economy/">a reversal of consumer trends two years ago</a>, is the result of a new AAA survey which studied consumers' attitudes towards fuel prices.</p>
<p>It appears that consumers were getting used to the cyclic fluctuations of gas prices. Prices shot up based on market conditions, supply and demand, and season increases. However, they always seemed to drop back to more palatable levels... at least they used to. Today, according to leading economists, consumers are finally catching-on to the idea that $4 a gallon gas might be the norm. This reality-check of fuel costs will lead to downsizing, and a focus on vehicle efficiency. Have we finally found the Achilles heel of the SUV?</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080324/AUTO01/803240337">The Detroit News</a>, photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/aaa-survey-says-fuel-mileage-paramount-in-consumers-minds/">AAA survey says fuel mileage paramount in consumers minds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/aaa-survey-says-fuel-mileage-paramount-in-consumers-minds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1147585/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/24/aaa-survey-says-fuel-mileage-paramount-in-consumers-minds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cafe s...</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>fuel economy bill</category><category>fuel economy standards</category><category>FuelEconomy</category><category>FuelEconomyBill</category><category>FuelEconomyStandards</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Geneva '08 Preview: Lotus goes <i>tri</i>-fuel with Exige 270E]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/conceptcars/" rel="tag">Concept Cars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/geneva-motor-show/" rel="tag">Geneva Motor Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lotus/" rel="tag">Lotus</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/673260/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/exige-270e-tri-fuel-3-450.jpg" /></a><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Click above for a high-res gallery of the Lotus Exige 270E Tri-Fuel</span><br /><br />While assorted activists, politicians and random individuals carry on about the spectres of global warming, imported oil, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and other issues that combine to create timetable-free doomsday scenarios, there <em>are </em>people working on potential solutions that do <em>not</em> involve us driving around four-wheeled Segway scooters. That's right: the "dreaded" internal combustion engine might yet provide the answer -- or at least <em>an</em> answer. And because Lotus is the entity searching for the answer in this particular case, the end result might not only be green -- it looks ridiculously fun, too.<br /><br />The car you see here is the Geneva-bound Lotus Exige 270E Tri-Fuel concept, the successor to 2006's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/24/green-speed-the-lotus-exige-265e/">Exige 265E</a>, which made 265 horses running on E85. The 270E goes a step further. Not only can it run on gasoline or ethanol, it achieves its peak output -- 270 horsepower and 184 lb-ft -- on <span style="font-style: italic;">methanol</span>, hence the Tri-Fuel label. Incidentally, that power figure is the highest yet for an Exige coming out of Hethel. Even more interesting, however, is Lotus' research into producing <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/673263/"><span style="font-style: italic;">carbon-neutral</span> synthetic methanol</a>. You can read about it in detail after the jump, but in summary, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/673259/">the process</a> involves using atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and reacting it with hydrogen created via renewable electrical power to create methanol. Liquid methanol could be transported and distributed much in the same way gasoline is now, making for a feasible infrastructure if the idea were to take hold somewhere down the line. <br /><br />Lotus is also hunting for solutions involving EVs, as well as optimizing the traditional gasoline-powered ICE through its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/23/lotus-annouces-new-hybrid-and-electric-vehicle-group/">Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Grou</a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/23/lotus-annouces-new-hybrid-and-electric-vehicle-group/">p</a>. One must admit, however, that the idea of a sustainable, synthetic, carbon-neutral fuel driving internal combustion engines with the same levels of power we currently enjoy is the equivalent of having your cake and eating it. Press on, Lotus. <br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/low/">Lotus Exige 270E Tri-Fuel</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/exigetrifuel_2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/exigetrifuel_11_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/exigetrifuel_10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/exigetrifuel_6_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-1/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/exigetrifuel_5_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: Lotus via <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/03/01/geneva-08-lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-gas-ethanol-and-methanol/">AutoblogGreen</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Geneva '08 Preview: Lotus goes <i>tri</i>-fuel with Exige 270E</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/">Geneva '08 Preview: Lotus goes <i>tri</i>-fuel with Exige 270E</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/03/01/geneva-08-lotus-exige-270e-tri-fuel-gas-ethanol-and-methanol/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1128917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/03/geneva-08-preview-lotus-goes-i-tri-i-fuel-with-exige-270e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>270e</category><category>breaking</category><category>carbon-neutral</category><category>ethanol</category><category>exige</category><category>exige 270e</category><category>Exige270e</category><category>gasoline</category><category>geneva</category><category>geneva 2008</category><category>geneva motor show</category><category>Geneva2008</category><category>GenevaMotorShow</category><category>methanol</category><category>synthetic methanol</category><category>SyntheticMethanol</category><category>tri-fuel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Science magazine declares ethanol worse for the Earth than fossil fuels]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/21/science-magazine-declares-ethanol-worse-for-the-earth-than-fossi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/21/science-magazine-declares-ethanol-worse-for-the-earth-than-fossi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/21/science-magazine-declares-ethanol-worse-for-the-earth-than-fossi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/02/10/ethanol-myth-blasted-in-new-science-mag.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/the_problem_with_ethanol.jpg" /></a>Jon Markman at MSN Money doesn't hold back when he says "Corn-based ethanol production is sure to go down as one of the greatest mistakes ever in U.S. energy policy." It's even more provoking when he writes "replacing fossil fuels with corn-based ethanol would double greenhouse gas emissions over the next three decades. The studies show that switchgrass, an alternative to ethanol that's more weed than plant, would boost emissions by 50%."<br /><br />The problem isn't with the cars, the problem is with what it takes to grow the biofuel in the first place. Clearing the land, harvesting, and refining the crops, plus the loss of forest and wild lands and habitats, amounts to creating a carbon footprint worse than fossil fuels. According to the Science <a href="http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&amp;click_id=143&amp;art_id=vn20080210085730876C308900">article</a> which, admittedly, posits an extreme scenario, it would take 423 years to even out the carbon debt if Indonesia's peat lands were converted to palm oil fields.<br /><br />The research is starting to give some people pause, such as the folks at the European Union who declared they wanted ten-percent of the block's transport fuel to come from plants. And Joe Fargione of the U.S. Nature Conservancy asks, "Is it worth it? ...[S]urprisingly the answer is 'no'. These natural areas store a lot of carbon, so converting them to crops results in tons of carbon emitted into the atmosphere." <br /> <br /><em>Thanks for the tip, Zo!</em><br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/02/10/ethanol-myth-blasted-in-new-science-mag.aspx">MSN Money</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/21/science-magazine-declares-ethanol-worse-for-the-earth-than-fossi/">Science magazine declares ethanol worse for the Earth than fossil fuels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstocks/archive/2008/02/10/ethanol-myth-blasted-in-new-science-mag.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/21/science-magazine-declares-ethanol-worse-for-the-earth-than-fossi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1114092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/21/science-magazine-declares-ethanol-worse-for-the-earth-than-fossi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>AlternativeEnergy</category><category>biodiesel</category><category>biofuel</category><category>carbon footprint</category><category>CarbonFootprint</category><category>deforestation</category><category>e85</category><category>emissions</category><category>ethanol</category><category>fuel</category><category>gasoline</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: Consumers want cup holders, not fuel economy]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/report-consumers-want-cup-holders-not-fuel-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/report-consumers-want-cup-holders-not-fuel-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/report-consumers-want-cup-holders-not-fuel-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/lifestyle/" rel="tag">Lifestyle</a></p><a href="www.forbes.com/part_forbes/2008/0225/038.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/02/cupholder_450-op.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br /><br />
<p>Consumers prefer cup holders and heated seats over fuel efficiency, according to CNW Marketing Research. That's right, we all talk about how we want our vehicles to be environmentally friendly and easy on gas, but when it comes down to it, what we really want are things to hold our coffee and keep our derri&egrave;res warm. On the plus side, General Motors is saying fuel economy is becoming more of a priority to shoppers - it points out that four years ago it wasn't even in the top ten (studies by GM list fuel economy behind styling and value). So, what is it going to take to wake up consumers and make fuel efficiency a priority? Most experts feel that a significant hike in the cost of gas will be the kick that sets us straight. Just don't take away the cup holders. </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/part_forbes/2008/0225/038.html">Forbes</a> via <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/search/?q=cup+holder">AutoblogGreen</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/report-consumers-want-cup-holders-not-fuel-economy/">Report: Consumers want cup holders, not fuel economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/part_forbes/2008/0225/038.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/report-consumers-want-cup-holders-not-fuel-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1117528/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/report-consumers-want-cup-holders-not-fuel-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNW Marketing Research</category><category>CnwMarketingResearch</category><category>Economy</category><category>Fuel</category><category>gasoline</category><category>MPG</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[On again, off again: BMW and Daimler may enter engine partnership]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/on-again-off-again-bmw-and-daimler-may-enter-engine-partnershi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/on-again-off-again-bmw-and-daimler-may-enter-engine-partnershi/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/on-again-off-again-bmw-and-daimler-may-enter-engine-partnershi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/daimlerchrysler/" rel="tag">Daimler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071127/ANE02/71127004/1170/rss03&amp;rssfeed=rss03"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/11/a-class_450-o.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />It's been rumored for some time and the newest comments from BMW CEO Norbert Reithofer is further proof that the propeller people are looking to get in bed with other automakers to cut the high costs of engine development and production.<br /><br />This isn't a first for BMW, which partnered with PSA/Peugeot-Citroen on the engine for the current crop of MINI models, but this newest endeavor could involve one of Bimmer's biggest rivals, Daimler. Mercedes is in need of small, four-cylinder gasoline and diesel engines for its next line of A- and B-class vehicles, and the MINI's mill could be a good fit. The talks aren't exclusive with BMW, however, as Daimler is also sitting down with unnamed Japanese manufacturers to provide petrol and diesel powerplants.<br /><br />[Source: Automotive News - sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/on-again-off-again-bmw-and-daimler-may-enter-engine-partnershi/">On again, off again: BMW and Daimler may enter engine partnership</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071127/ANE02/71127004/1170/rss03&amp;rssfeed=rss03>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/on-again-off-again-bmw-and-daimler-may-enter-engine-partnershi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1049203/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/27/on-again-off-again-bmw-and-daimler-may-enter-engine-partnershi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4 cylinder</category><category>4Cylinder</category><category>bmw</category><category>daimler</category><category>diesel</category><category>engine development</category><category>EngineDevelopment</category><category>four cylinder</category><category>four-cylinder</category><category>FourCylinder</category><category>gasoline</category><category>mercedes</category><category>mercedes benz</category><category>mercedes-benz</category><category>MercedesBenz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon Lavrinc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mulally not proposing a gas tax - but he's not against it]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/AUTO01/708090419/1148/rss25"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/mulally_gas_tax.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>The hallmark of the environmental debate is that there are so many important players on so many different sides. Eminent scientists and intellectuals have taken every side of the debate, challenging their eminent colleagues. When it comes to the two most involved and highly charged players, the automakers and politicians, things get even more curious. On the same day that Bush opposed a gas tax to give states more money to repair bridges, Alan Mulally said he supports the idea of a gas tax to encourage customers to buy more fuel efficient vehicles.</p>
<p>Mulally believes Congress' CAFE standards represent failed policy and has hurt automakers. Regulating fuel efficiency has, in his opinion, only lead to consumers buying more cars and driving more. While making sure to stress that he and Ford are all in favor of fuel efficient vehicles and environmental health, he wants some of the onus put back on consumers. He said, "I just think it's so important that we all join in this debate and we really decide what we want to do about energy security and global warming. A piece of that could be a tax." </p>
<p>[Source: Detroit News]</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mulally not proposing a gas tax - but he's not against it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/">Mulally not proposing a gas tax - but he's not against it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/AUTO01/708090419/1148/rss25>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/961358/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/09/mulally-not-proposing-a-gas-tax-but-hes-not-against-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ford</category><category>gas</category><category>gasoline</category><category>mulally</category><category>tax</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Diesel, without the diesel: Mercedes-Benz debuts DiesOtto]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/25/diesel-without-the-diesel-mercedes-benz-debuts-diesotto/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/25/diesel-without-the-diesel-mercedes-benz-debuts-diesotto/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/25/diesel-without-the-diesel-mercedes-benz-debuts-diesotto/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a></p><p><a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=121817"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/diesotto1-450.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Diesel technology has improved by leaps and bounds, but the trouble is, it still runs on diesel. In the American market, at least, finding a diesel pump is still a pain compared to filling up with conventional gasoline. Mercedes-Benz says it's found the solution with a new developmental powertrain concept it calls DiesOtto.</p>
<p>We <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/05/23/mercedes-explains-the-diesotto/">first reported</a> on the project a couple of years ago, but the German automaker now has a functioning prototype. Rather than actually running on diesel, the DiesOtto engine is said to incorporate the benefits of a diesel engine, but runs on regular old unleaded. The prototype is a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine that uses direct injection, variable compression, turbocharging and something MB calls "controlled auto ignition" to deliver 238 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque, with a claimed return of "less than 6 liters per 100 kilometers", which translates to 39.2 mpg. Those numbers, Benz claims, are not based on a small car (like the C-Class or smaller) but on a large sedan (like the S-Class). They may not be entirely revolutionary figures, but any way you look at it, they're damn impressive.</p>
<p>Mercedes hasn't put a timeline on producing and marketing a powertrain based on the DiesOtto prototype, but says it's a "feasible proposition in the midterm". We certainly hope so.<br /> </p>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mercedes-benz-diesotto/low/">Mercedes-Benz DiesOtto</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mercedes-benz-diesotto/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/diesotto3_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mercedes-benz-diesotto/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/diesotto2_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mercedes-benz-diesotto/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/diesotto1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div></p>
<p>[Source: Edmunds' Inside Line]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/25/diesel-without-the-diesel-mercedes-benz-debuts-diesotto/">Diesel, without the diesel: Mercedes-Benz debuts DiesOtto</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=121817>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/25/diesel-without-the-diesel-mercedes-benz-debuts-diesotto/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/948643/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/25/diesel-without-the-diesel-mercedes-benz-debuts-diesotto/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benz</category><category>daimler</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesotto</category><category>direct</category><category>economy</category><category>gasoline</category><category>injection</category><category>mercedes</category><category>turbo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seriously, gas isn't THAT expensive]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/seriously-gas-isnt-that-expensive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/seriously-gas-isnt-that-expensive/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/seriously-gas-isnt-that-expensive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><a href="http://theautoprophet.blogspot.com/2007/05/inflation-adjusted-gas-prices.html"><img width="450" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="308" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/gas_inflation.gif" /></a><br /><br />You've heard this point before, but despite the price of gas being at record levels, adjusted for inflation, it's still not the most expensive we've ever paid for dead-dino juice in the U.S. The Auto Prophet, one of the original auto-related bloggers that's still keepin' it real, found this informative chart (see larger version <a href="http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/images/charts/Oil/Gas_inflation.gif">here</a>) from <a href="http://www.inflationdata.com/">InflationData.com</a> that illustrates this fact in a straightforward way. The black line is the actual average price of gasoline in the U.S. since 1918, while the red line represents the price of gas since 1918 adjusted for inflation. <br /><br />The most we've paid for gas was when we first started buying a lot of it back in 1918 when the chart begins. That year Americans paid an average of around a quarter per gallon, or just under $3.50/gallon in 2007 dollars. Last week's record average price of $3.28/gallon still falls below those early levels. <br /><br />The chart is particularly interesting because it shows a general downward trend in the cost of gas when it's adjusted for inflation. There are spikes in the red line from the oil embargo in the '70s and the recent increases since the war in Iraq and Hurricane Katrina hit, but if you watch the red line we should expect the price to go back down. Unfortunately, the actual price of gas will probably continue to rise as it has since 1918, as well. Just as long as it doesn't catch up to the inflation curve, the sting won't hurt so much. <br /><br />[Source: The Auto Prophet]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/seriously-gas-isnt-that-expensive/">Seriously, gas isn't THAT expensive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 11:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://theautoprophet.blogspot.com/2007/05/inflation-adjusted-gas-prices.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/seriously-gas-isnt-that-expensive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/905760/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/30/seriously-gas-isnt-that-expensive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cost of inflation</category><category>CostOfInflation</category><category>gas</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>inflation</category><category>price of gas</category><category>PriceOfGas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 11:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[We can't all make $39.4 billion: Chevron earns only $3.77 billion last quarter]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/06/we-cant-all-make-39-4-billion-chevron-earns-only-3-77-billio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/06/we-cant-all-make-39-4-billion-chevron-earns-only-3-77-billio/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/06/we-cant-all-make-39-4-billion-chevron-earns-only-3-77-billio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a></p><p><a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=&amp;storyid=2007-02-02T190949Z_01_WEN3486_RTRUKOC_0_US-CHEVRON-RESULTS.xml&amp;src=nl_usbusinessclose"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/71651765.jpg" /></a>The nation's No. 2 oil producer Chevron had a "disappointing" 4th quarter, earning only $3.77 billion dollars in the closing months of 2006. You may be thinking that $3.77 billion can't be all that bad, but No. 1 oil producer ExxonMobil ended the same quarter with $10.25 billion in profits, nearly tripling its closest rival. Chevron's profit drop of 9% was expected by analysts after total revenue fell from $47.75 billion to $53.79 billion during the same period in 2005. In fact, Chevron actually beat analysts expectations by a penny per share, so the quarter wasn't that bad, it just looks that way in comparison to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/exxonmobil-earns-record-39-5-billion-in-2006/">record profits</a> of ExxonMobil. <br /></p>
<p>[Source: Reuters]</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/06/we-cant-all-make-39-4-billion-chevron-earns-only-3-77-billio/">We can't all make $39.4 billion: Chevron earns only $3.77 billion last quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=&amp;storyid=2007-02-02T190949Z_01_WEN3486_RTRUKOC_0_US-CHEVRON-RESULTS.xml&amp;src=nl_usbusinessclose>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/06/we-cant-all-make-39-4-billion-chevron-earns-only-3-77-billio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/747557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/06/we-cant-all-make-39-4-billion-chevron-earns-only-3-77-billio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevron</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>gasoline</category><category>Oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 07:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OPEC keeping cost of gas low to discourage alternatives like E85]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/25/opec-keeping-cost-of-gas-low-to-discourage-alternatives-like-e85/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/25/opec-keeping-cost-of-gas-low-to-discourage-alternatives-like-e85/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/25/opec-keeping-cost-of-gas-low-to-discourage-alternatives-like-e85/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,222840,00.html"><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/10/corn-ethanol-pump.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></a>OPEC wants gas prices at the sweet spot which looks a little like this: "high enough to justify its investment in future production capacity but low enough to allow economic growth and deter a flood of alternative fuels," or roughly $2.25 a gallon, according to Fox News. Good business sense or a case of irritating exploitation? </p>
<p>Regardless of one's interpretation, the idea seems to be that high fuel prices this summer and last stirred up the E85 pot enough that it freaked out our friends over at OPEC, who weren't thrilled to read about all of the plans to increase production of E85 and improve our infrastructure to distribute it. By reducing the price of gasoline, consumer confidence in gasoline and vehicles that don't burn it all too efficiently is back on the rise and interest in E85 and other alternative fuels has dipped once more.</p>
<p>[Fox News via <a href="http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/showthread.php?p=799965#post799965">GM Inside News</a> and <a href="http://www.e85fuel.com/news/102306_opec_release.htm">E85fuel.com</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/25/opec-keeping-cost-of-gas-low-to-discourage-alternatives-like-e85/">OPEC keeping cost of gas low to discourage alternatives like E85</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,222840,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/25/opec-keeping-cost-of-gas-low-to-discourage-alternatives-like-e85/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/690200/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/25/opec-keeping-cost-of-gas-low-to-discourage-alternatives-like-e85/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative fuels</category><category>AlternativeFuels</category><category>E85</category><category>ethanol</category><category>Gasoline</category><category>hybrids</category><category>OPEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How gas prices work]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/24/how-gas-prices-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/24/how-gas-prices-work/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/24/how-gas-prices-work/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/gas_pump.jpg" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></p>
<p>We're certain that we're not the only ones that shake our heads in disgust when we roll by a gas station (and bow our heads in shame when we actually have to fill up). With the price of gas starting to come down, we certainly all are a little puzzled about what influences fuel prices. Howstuffworks.com comes to the rescue with a overview about what factors control the price of gasoline and the price of oil. While this is far from an exhaustive analysis at the elements that influence energy prices, the article does provide more in-depth analysis about the hot button topics in the economics of fuel.</p>
<p>The only explanation that we did not see is how oil companies are making record profits with oil AND its derivative product, gasoline, at such high prices. We want to see a step by step look at each stage in the process from well to wheels, and where each side takes its cut. Otherwise, the howstuffworks.com article does give more time to the subject than we typically see in other media outlets. So get going and find out what goes into making a $3.00 gallon of gas. </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/24/how-gas-prices-work/">How gas prices work</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.howstuffworks.com/gas-price.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/24/how-gas-prices-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/673313/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/24/how-gas-prices-work/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fuel prices</category><category>FuelPrices</category><category>Gas</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>Oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OPEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Halcomb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 10:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EEStor ceramic electric motor]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/eestor-ceramic-electric-motor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/eestor-ceramic-electric-motor/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/eestor-ceramic-electric-motor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/15/technology/disruptors_eestor.biz2/index.htm"><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/09/feelgoodzenn.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></a>Alternative-fuel engines of different sorts all suffer from one major drawback or another: poor range, hard-to-find filling stations, high cost, poor performance. EEStore is out to change all that with a revolutionary new kind of "battery". We put "battery" in quotation marks because the unit doesn't store power in a chemical capsule like a conventional battery, but instead uses some kind of glass- and aluminum-coated ceramics. The inventors are understandably tight-lipped on the way their creation works, but they're adamant it could completely replace the internal combustion engine.</p>
<p>Feel Good Cars, the Toronto company responsible for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/02/zenn-ev-coming-to-u-s-in-late-july/">ZENN</a>, wants to get the unit on the road by 2008. The most significant benefit would be its efficiency: a car powered by the EEStor unit could run on the equivalent of 45 cents per gallon, driving 500 miles on $9 worth of electricity after just five minutes to charge.</p>
<p>We could tell you this invention could be the fix for our addiction to foreign oil, but that's scary talk for gear-heads. So we'll tell you about the performance instead. The company's CEO insists that "a four-passenger sedan will drive like a Ferrari". That's a tall order, but if he's right, the prancing horse could find itself grazing on greener pastures.</p>
<p>(Thanks to Robert for the tip!)</p>
<p>[Source: CNN]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/eestor-ceramic-electric-motor/">EEStor ceramic electric motor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/15/technology/disruptors_eestor.biz2/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/eestor-ceramic-electric-motor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/672306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/21/eestor-ceramic-electric-motor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative</category><category>ceramic</category><category>economy</category><category>eestor</category><category>electric</category><category>ev</category><category>feel good</category><category>FeelGood</category><category>gasoline</category><category>hybrid</category><category>oil</category><category>powdercoat</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:56:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>