<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[SEMA 2009: 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2 packs 411 HP]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sema/" rel="tag">SEMA Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/off-road/" rel="tag">Off-Road</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="0" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2010svtraptor007_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor in Blue Flame - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
When Ford first revealed the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/model/f-150+svt+raptor">F-150 SVT Raptor</a> a year ago, the initial powerplant was the same 5.4-liter V8 found in more pedestrian F-series trucks. At the launch, however, Ford officials promised that an all-new 6.2-liter V8 would become available right about ... now!. Well a month from now. The order books for the Raptor 6.2 officially open on December 1. Ford has already taken 3,000 orders for the 5.4-liter Raptor and 700 have gone to customers. <br />
<br />
Last year, Ford told us the 6.2 would crank out at least 400 horsepower and 400 pound-feet of twist. Now that the engine has been certified and the final numbers are in, the targets have been exceeded. The 6.2-liter for the Raptor has been officially rated at 411 hp at 5,500 rpm and 434 pound-feet at 4,500 rpm. <br />
<br />
According to F-150 Marketing Manager Mark Grueber, the Raptor 6.2 will get to 60 mph 1.5 seconds faster than the 5.4 while matching its fuel economy (as though anyone buying a Raptor will car about MPGs). That should put the 6.2 somewhere in the upper six- to low seven-range for a 0-60 mph run (Mike Levine at PickupTrucks.com clocked a Raptor at 8.8 seconds with a brake torque). But take heed, with more power comes a higher MSRP: the new engine will cost $3,000 more than the carryover 5.4, starting at $41,995 delivered. <br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/low/">2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2010svtraptor007_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2010svtraptor006_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2010svtraptor008_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2010svtraptor009_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-ford-f-150-svt-raptor-0/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2010svtraptor010_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
[Source: Ford]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEMA 2009: 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2 packs 411 HP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/">SEMA 2009: 2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2 packs 411 HP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19210023/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/03/sema-2009-2010-ford-f150-raptor-6-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010</category><category>2010 ford f-150</category><category>2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor</category><category>2010 ford f150</category><category>2010FordF-150</category><category>2010FordF-150SvtRaptor</category><category>2010FordF150</category><category>6.2</category><category>6.2 liter v8</category><category>6.2 v8</category><category>6.2l v8</category><category>6.2lBossV8</category><category>6.2LiterV8</category><category>6.2lV8</category><category>6.2V8</category><category>f-150</category><category>f-150 svt raptor</category><category>F-150SvtRaptor</category><category>ford</category><category>ford f-150</category><category>ford f150</category><category>ford f150 raptor</category><category>Ford F150 SVT Raptor</category><category>FordF-150</category><category>FordF150</category><category>FordF150Raptor</category><category>FordF150SvtRaptor</category><category>raptor</category><category>SEMA</category><category>sema 2009</category><category>SEMA Show</category><category>Sema2009</category><category>SemaShow</category><category>svt raptor</category><category>SvtRaptor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fuzzy logic has Cadillac CTS-V producing 567 horsepower]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/27/fuzzy-logic-has-cadillac-cts-v-producing-567-horsepower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/27/fuzzy-logic-has-cadillac-cts-v-producing-567-horsepower/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/27/fuzzy-logic-has-cadillac-cts-v-producing-567-horsepower/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/04/cts-v-engine.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><em>Click above for more high resolution shots of the 2009 Cadillac CTS-V</em><br /><br />When the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/08/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v-revealed-with-550-hp/">Cadillac CTS-V</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/19/detroit-2008-the-king-is-back-atop-the-hill-2009-corvette-zr1/">Corvette ZR1</a> were introduced in Detroit, they both had nice, round horsepower figures that look good in a press release. Last week, GM <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/officially-official-corvette-zr1-makes-638-hp-and-604-lb-ft/">restated the output</a> of the ZR1, raising it from 620 ponies to 638, which is an increase of about 3%. Cadillac admits that they didn't want to overstate the final horsepower figure for the CTS-V either, so we're likely to see a similar press release from GM's luxury division in the near future. Given the fact that the 550 hp figure for the top CTS was likely a lowball figure, Inside Line used the same 3% understatement from the ZR1 to peg the CTS-V's real horsepower number at 567. <br /><br />While Inside Line's 567-hp hypothesis was based on the fact that the CTS-V has the same basic engine as the ZR1, 567 is nothing more than a well-placed dart on the horsepower pinwheel. When we talked with GM's Ron Meegan, he <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/05/video-corvette-zr1-eaton-supercharger-in-depth/">pointed out</a> that there were several differences between the two powerplants, including the length of the rotors in the Eaton Supercharger. While adding 3% to 550 sounds logical, there is likely more to it than that. But as is the case when making a guess, they may actually be right, too. Whether the final output is 550 or 567 hp or somewhere in between really doesn't matter, as anything in the 550 range represents an absolutely ludicrous tally that will surely catapult the CTS-V to the stratosphere of sports sedans. We can't wait to take one for a spin.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/low/">2009 Cadillac CTS-V</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/05/ctsv_greenhell1280_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/x09ca_ct001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/x09ca_ct002_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/x09ca_ct003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/detroit-2008-2009-cadillac-cts-v/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/x09ca_ct004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-cadillac-cts-v-live-shots/low/">Detroit 2008: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V - Live Reveal</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-cadillac-cts-v-live-shots/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2009-cadillac-cts-v-04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-cadillac-cts-v-live-shots/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2009-cadillac-cts-v-01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-cadillac-cts-v-live-shots/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2009-cadillac-cts-v-02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-cadillac-cts-v-live-shots/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2009-cadillac-cts-v-05_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-cadillac-cts-v-live-shots/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/2009-cadillac-cts-v-03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=125943">Inside Line</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/27/fuzzy-logic-has-cadillac-cts-v-producing-567-horsepower/">Fuzzy logic has Cadillac CTS-V producing 567 horsepower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=125943>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/27/fuzzy-logic-has-cadillac-cts-v-producing-567-horsepower/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1178664/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/27/fuzzy-logic-has-cadillac-cts-v-producing-567-horsepower/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>567 HP</category><category>567Hp</category><category>6.2L V8</category><category>6.2lV8</category><category>Cadillac CTS-V</category><category>CadillacCts-v</category><category>Corvette ZR1</category><category>CorvetteZr1</category><category>eaton supercharger</category><category>EatonSupercharger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chevy Tahoe LTZ gets 6.2L V8]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/12/tahoe_ltz_lo.jpg" /><br /><em>Click image for gallery</em><br /><br />You'll soon be able to get General Motors' 6.2-liter V8 in all three flavors of GMT900 truckness. GM announced today that the 380-horsepower/417 lb-ft eight cylinder will be available in the 2WD Tahoe LTZ beginning in 2008. If you're like us (and by "us" I mean "me") and you think that the Tahoe is the best-looking of the 900s, this is good news, as you'll be able to get Denali power (this is the exact same engine found in the top-of-the-line GMC) at a presumably lower price. This engine also powers the Escalade, where it's tuned to produce upwards of 400 horses. Like its GMC and Cadillac brethren, the Tahoe LTZ's 6.2 is hooked up to a six-speed automatic with manumatic tapshift buttons mounted on the column shifter. And yes, using said feature is about as awkward as it sounds. Maximum towing capacity with this powertrain is 7,900 pounds. <br /><br />[Source: GM]<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-chevy-tahoe-ltz/low/">2007 Chevy Tahoe LTZ</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-chevy-tahoe-ltz/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x07ct_ta034_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-chevy-tahoe-ltz/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x07ct_ta035_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-chevy-tahoe-ltz/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x07ct_ta036_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-chevy-tahoe-ltz/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x07ct_ta037_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2007-chevy-tahoe-ltz/low/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/x07ct_ta038_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chevy Tahoe LTZ gets 6.2L V8</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/">Chevy Tahoe LTZ gets 6.2L V8</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1071047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/26/chevy-tahoe-ltz-gets-6-2l-v8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>6.2l v8</category><category>6.2lV8</category><category>tahoe ltx</category><category>TahoeLtx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 13:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mercedes and McLaren part ways on next supercar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/mercedes-and-mclaren-part-ways-on-next-supercar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/mercedes-and-mclaren-part-ways-on-next-supercar/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/mercedes-and-mclaren-part-ways-on-next-supercar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/05/slr-reject.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />For years, McLaren and Mercedes seemingly went together like peanut butter and jelly, but now HWA is stepping in to tune Mercedes' next supercar. The scribes over at Automotive News Europe say the separation stems from Mercedes' dissatisfaction with the performance of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/and-we-didnt-think-the-slr-mclaren-could-get-any-beefier/">SLR McLaren</a> vs. its primary rivals. This comes as quite a shock since only a few months back, all signs pointed to Mercedes <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/04/and-we-didnt-think-the-slr-mclaren-could-get-any-beefier/">buying McLaren</a>. It's not exactly as though McLaren and Mercedes are splitting up altogether, though, as it's been less than a month since a drop-dead gorgeous SLR McLaren drop-top was announced.<br /><br />Power for the HWA-tuned supercar will come from a tweaked version of AMG's hand-built 6.2L engine, and if the SLR performance is less than satisfactory, expect HWA's effort to be flat-out ridiculous. Speaking of AMG, the new supercar will be badged as such to make it road-legal, but it will still be a full-blown HWA race-developed product. To make room for its latest project, HWA is tripling the size of its manufacturing facilities to 3,600 sq. ft. to the tune of &euro;4.5 million.<br /><br />We find it almost comical that McLaren's 3.5 second 0-60 time and 640hp aren't enough to suit the finicky folks in Stuttgart, but with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/02/spy-shots-more-corvette-z07-pics/">Corvettes</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/09/detroit-auto-show-2008-dodge-viper-with-extra-bite/">Vipers</a> on the way with the same power for a quarter of the price, Mercedes had to do something to raise the already ridiculously-high bar.<br /><br />[Source: Motor Authority]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/mercedes-and-mclaren-part-ways-on-next-supercar/">Mercedes and McLaren part ways on next supercar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 31 May 2007 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/supercars/mercedes-building-new-super-sports-car-without-mclaren/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/mercedes-and-mclaren-part-ways-on-next-supercar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/907232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/05/31/mercedes-and-mclaren-part-ways-on-next-supercar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>6.2l v8</category><category>6.2lV8</category><category>amg</category><category>mclaren</category><category>mercedes</category><category>slr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:33:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>