<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #312 LIVE!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="/2012/11/26/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-310-live/#continued"><img alt="Autoblog Podcast graphic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp.jpg" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px; margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 305px; " /></a><br />
<br />
We record Autoblog Podcast #312 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&amp;A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">in iTunes</a> if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/channel/autoblog-podcast">UStream</a> (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.<br />
<br />
<strong><big>Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #312</big></strong><br />
<ul>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/09/honda-fit-getting-3-new-variants-including-sedan/">Honda Fit line expanding</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/07/white-house-clears-way-for-nhtsa-to-mandate-vehicle-black-boxes/">White House clears way for black boxes</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/05/gm-profits-threatened-by-glut-of-pickups/">GM has too many pickups</a></li>
	<li>
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/05/jeep-grand-cherokee-headed-for-detroit-reveal-on-diesel-power/">Jeep Grand Cherokee Diesel headed to Detroit</a></li>
</ul>
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript">var vhm_widget_settings = { eventId: 3134103, colorScheme: 'redblack', width: 628, height: 550, sizeClass: 3};</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/qawidget.js.jsp"></script><noscript><span>Can't see the EventBox? <a href="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/view?eventId=1920456&amp;colorScheme=redblack">Click Here.</a></span><br/><br/><a href='http://www.voicesheardmedia.com'>Voices Heard Media</a></noscript><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/">Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #312 LIVE!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20398216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet silverado</category><category>2014 honda fit</category><category>2014 jeep grand cherokee</category><category>autoblog podcast</category><category>autoblog podcast topics</category><category>black box</category><category>black boxes</category><category>fit</category><category>gm</category><category>gmc</category><category>grand cherokee</category><category>honda</category><category>jeep</category><category>nhtsa black box</category><category>podcast</category><category>podcast topics</category><category>sierra</category><category>silverado</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20398216/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/12/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-312-live/20398216/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20398216</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM schedules 21-week idle of three truck plants]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-chevrolet-silverado/#photo-4403258"><img height="419" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/gmpickupfactoryidel.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Four of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gm">General Motors</a>' full-size truck plants, three of them in the U.S., will go intermittently silent for a total of 21 weeks in order to retool for 2013 model year production. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/">Fort Wayne, Indiana</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/gm-will-build-next-gen-pickups-in-flint-investing-328-million/">Flint, Michigan</a> plants have both been in the news lately as recipients of multi-million dollar investments for just this purpose.<br />
<br />
Fort Wayne will shut down for nine weeks over the course of 10 months, from January to October of 2012, while Flint will stop production for seven weeks from June to November, and the Arlington, Texas facility will be quiet from June to December for five weeks. The Mexico plant in Silao will find out its shut-down schedule next year. GM has been stockpiling a 90-day supply of its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Silverado</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/sierra">Sierra</a> pickups to make up for the loss of production.<br />
<br />
When the 2013 models arrive, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/29/unconfirmed-next-generation-ford-and-gm-truck-powertrain-details/">unconfirmed reports indicate</a> we can expect a new forced-induction V6, the continuation of the 5.3- and 6.0-liter V8s, and the 6.2-liter V8 going into the heavy-duty versions exclusively.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/">GM schedules 21-week idle of three truck plants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20134992/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet silverado</category><category>2013 gmc sierra</category><category>2013 sierra</category><category>2013 silverado</category><category>arlington</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>chevrolet silverado</category><category>flint</category><category>fort wayne</category><category>gmc</category><category>gmc sierra</category><category>sierra</category><category>silao</category><category>silverado</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20134992/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/12/26/gm-schedules-21-week-idle-of-three-truck-plants/20134992/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20134992</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/gmpickupfactoryidel_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM confirms $275M investment in Ft. Wayne Assembly for next-gen pickups]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/#continued"><img alt="General Motors Fort Wayne Assembly" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/gmftwayneinvestment01-opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> has announced its final factory investment, a $275 million spend on the Fort Wayne, IN, plant that assembles full-size pickups.<br />
<br />
Back in May, the General promised it would be spending $2 billion on factory investments over the next year and a half. A series of announcements followed, with upgrades promised to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/04/gm-investing-131-million-in-corvette-factory/">Chevrolet Corvette factory</a> in Bowling Green, KY, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/13/gm-investing-109m-in-mi-to-boost-1-4l-ecotec-production/">engine plants</a> in Flint and Bay City, MI, and a <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2011/05/16/gm-invest-204-million-fuel-saving-8-speed-transmission/">powertrain facility in Toledo, OH</a>, among others. Most of GM's money will be saying close to home in the Midwest, with over $1.4 billion spent in Michigan, Indiana and Ohio.<br />
<br />
Today's announcement follows a previous earmark for production of the next-generation <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado/">Chevrolet Silverado</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/sierra/">GMC Sierra</a> pickups. GM had already confirmed <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/18/gm-will-build-next-gen-pickups-in-flint-investing-328-million/">$328 million for Flint Assembly</a>. Previous reports have indicated that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/07/05/next-gen-chevrolet-silverado-and-gmc-sierra-coming-in-2013/">GM will launch its redesigned pickups as 2013 models</a>.<br />
<br />
For the entire press release, click <a href="/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/#continued">past the jump</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM confirms $275M investment in Ft. Wayne Assembly for next-gen pickups</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/">GM confirms $275M investment in Ft. Wayne Assembly for next-gen pickups</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20091090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet silverado</category><category>2013 gmc sierra</category><category>fort wayne</category><category>general motors</category><category>gm</category><category>pickup</category><category>sierra</category><category>silverado</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Sabatini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20091090/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/10/26/gm-confirms-275m-investment-in-ft-wayne-assembly-for-next-gen/20091090/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20091090</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/10/gmftwayneinvestment01-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[GM marketing boss not concerned with Ford EcoBoost success]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><p>
	<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-f-150-ecoboost/"><img alt="Ford F-150 EcoBoost" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/ecoboost-burnout.jpg" style="width: 630px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
	<br />
	Commanding <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/08/10/ford-reports-f-150-sales-are-being-overrun-by-v6-engines/">over 40 percent</a> of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150/">2011 F-150</a> pickup's sales, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> is making huge waves on both the sales floor and in the garages of the truck-buying and trailer-towing masses with its EcoBoost-powered models. Having driven several examples of the turbocharged and direct-injected V6, it's easy to see why - excellent performance and good fuel economy go hand-in-hand with refinement and a price that's rather easy to swallow.<br />
	<br />
	So, is <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/gm">General Motors</a> worried that it doesn't have a competing technology in its full-size pickups? Not according to Chris Perry, Vice President of Global Marketing for <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet">Chevrolet</a>. In a new <em>Ward's Auto</em> article, Perry claims that GM can beat the F-150's fuel mileage performance with the suite of technologies in The General's arsenal when the <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado">Chevrolet Silverado</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/gmc/sierra">GMC Sierra</a> are given their next major redesigns.<br />
	<br />
	"(<a href="http://autoblog.com/ford">Ford</a> has) done a good job of marketing the EcoBoost, and that's a challenge on our side to make sure that consumers understand you can get similar mpg out of a V8 Silverado without sacrifice," Perry says. "Without sacrifice" isn't really a sentiment we can agree with, however. In point of fact, the V8 engine GM offers that posts fuel mileage figures close to the EcoBoost's is the 5.3-liter V8, and that engine's power levels (315 horsepower and 335 pound-feet of torque) pale in comparison to the 365 horsepower and 420 lb-ft delivered by the Ford.<br />
	<br />
	In any case, we look forward to 2013, which is when GM is expected to roll out its next-generation full-size trucks. We fully expect to see advancements in both fuel efficiency and power, with turbocharged engines, eight-speed transmissions and even hybrids on the menu. Of course, we don't exactly expect Ford to sit on its britches 'till then, either...</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/">GM marketing boss not concerned with Ford EcoBoost success</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20035809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2013 chevrolet silverado</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>ecoboost</category><category>f-150</category><category>f-150 ecoboost</category><category>ford</category><category>gm</category><category>gmc</category><category>sierra</category><category>silverado</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20035809/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/09/07/gm-marketing-boss-not-concerned-with-ford-ecoboost-success/20035809/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20035809</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/09/ecoboost-burnout_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>