<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler UConnect wins AOL Autos Technology of the Year Award]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a></p><img alt="AOL Autos Tech of the Year"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/marios-zenios-toy-ces-2013-1357765379.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 405px;" /><br />
<br />
The first annual AOL Autos Technology of the Year Award has been <a href="http://autos.aol.com/award/">won by Chrysler's upgraded UConnect system</a>.<br />
<br />
Over 35 entries were considered and narrowed down to six finalists in three categories: Connectivity, Telematics and Active Safety. <a href="http://toy-final.sandbox.autos.aol.com/award/judges/">The judges</a>, which included editors from AOL Autos, <em>Autoblog</em> and <em>Engadget</em>, as well as a number of other auto and tech journalists and luminaries, chose UConnect over the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/myford/">MyFord Mobile</a> app, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/13/audi-connect-now-with-google-streetview-internet-radio/">Audi Connect</a> with Google Maps, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/cue/">Cadillac CUE</a>, Honda's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/lanewatch/">LaneWatch</a> technology and Nissan's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/24/nissans-easy-fill-idiot-proofs-tire-inflation/">Tire Pressure Alert and Refill System</a>. Even readers who were <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/">polled on which technology should win</a> chose UConnect.<br />
<br />
AOL Autos Editor in Chief David Kiley remarked that Chrysler's UConnect deserved the first Technology of the Year Award not because of what it does, but for how UConnect performs every time it's used. Kiley went on to say UConnect works the way it's supposed to, fills a need and puts a smile on your face. By meeting those requirements, UConnect very much deserved AOL Auto's first Tech of the Year award.<br />
<br />
Accepting the trophy was Marios Zenios, head of connectivity for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a>. The official announcement was made today, Wednesday, on the Engadget stage at CES in Las Vegas.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/">Chrysler UConnect wins AOL Autos Technology of the Year Award</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20422647/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>aol autos</category><category>aol autos technology of the year</category><category>aolautostechnologyoftheyear</category><category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler uconnect</category><category>chrysleruconnect</category><category>technology of the year</category><category>uconnect</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Tutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:43:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20422647/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/09/chrysler-uconnect-wins-aol-autos-tech-of-the-year/20422647/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20422647</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/marios-zenios-toy-ces-2013-1357765379_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[These are your top 10 worst-selling vehicles of 2012]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a></p><a href="/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#continued"><img height="419" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/mitsubishiikbb10best20121-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Despite 2012 being the best year of auto sales this country has seen since 2007, not every vehicle got an equally large share of the sales pie. Some barely got a sliver, as evidenced by this year's list of the top 10 worst-selling vehicles of 2012.<br />
<br />
We've dug through sales data from every automaker to come up with this year's list and, like last year, we've set some parameters to ensure it includes legitimately bad-selling vehicles.<br />
<br />
The first parameter is a starting MSRP under $100,000, which automatically excludes what's parked in most one-percenters' garages. We're also excluding vehicles cancelled in 2012, even if they garnered sales through the end of the year while dealerships sold off remaining inventory. This includes models like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/eclipse/">Mitsubishi Eclipse</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/r-class/">Mercedes-Benz R-Class</a> and last year's worst-seller, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/rl/">Acura RL</a>. Next, vehicles are considered as they are reported by the automaker, which means that, while sales of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/murano+crosscab/">Murano CrossCabriolet</a> were probably low enough to make the list, because <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> reports only one number for all <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/murano/">Murano</a> sales, it was excluded. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a>, however, reports sales of the Escalade EXT separately from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/escalade/">Escalade</a>, hence its repeat appearance.<br />
<br />
Finally, there was the question of whether or not eligibility should be given to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/">Suzuki</a> vehicles, as the brand <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/05/american-suzuki-motors-files-chapter-11-will-no-longer-sell-car/">announced in November that it would end sales in the US</a> as soon as its current inventory ran out. We decided Suzuki vehicles should be included as the brand was offering 2013 models at the time of the announcement, and as far as we can tell, inventory levels remained high enough to satisfy demand through the end of the year.<br />
<br />
Without further ado, below are the <a href="/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#continued">top 10 worst-selling vehicles of 2012</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>These are your top 10 worst-selling vehicles of 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/">These are your top 10 worst-selling vehicles of 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20417056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>acura</category><category>apps</category><category>audi</category><category>bmw</category><category>c30</category><category>equator</category><category>escalade</category><category>escalade ext</category><category>gt-r</category><category>gtr</category><category>gtr nurburgring time</category><category>i</category><category>lancer</category><category>lancer sportback</category><category>mitsubishi</category><category>nissan</category><category>subaru</category><category>tribeca</category><category>tt</category><category>volvo</category><category>worst selling cars</category><category>worst-selling vehicles</category><category>worst-selling vehicles of 2012</category><category>z4</category><category>zdx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20417056/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/07/these-are-your-top-10-worst-selling-vehicles-of-2012/20417056/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20417056</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/mitsubishiikbb10best20121-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[These are your top 10 best-selling vehicles of 2012]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-ford-f-150-lariat/"><img height="386" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/03-2013-ford-f-150-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The best-selling vehicle in all the land last year was, of course, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150/">Ford F-Series</a> pickup. If our math is correct, that makes its string of sales crowns 31-years long. While last year's performance of 645,316 units sold is far from the 900,000+ sold in 2001, 2004 and 2005, it was still enough to best the F-150's main competitor and second-best-selling vehicle of 2012, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/silverado/">Chevrolet Silverado</a>, plus that truck's twin, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/sierra/">GMC Sierra</a>, combined.<br />
<br />
This year's list of the top 10 best-selling vehicles in the US doesn't hold a lot of surprises, but there are a few items to note. Look closely and you'll see that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/camry/">Toyota Camry</a>, long America's best-selling car, nearly overtook the Silverado for the list's second spot. Last year was probably the Camry's best shot, as an all-new Silverado and Sierra will go on sale soon and likely put first runner-up honors out of reach.<br />
<br />
There were two vehicles bumped from the list year: the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fusion/">Ford Fusion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze/">Chevrolet Cruze</a>. The Cruze made its first and only appearance on the list in 2011, but strong competition from redesigned competitors like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic/">Honda Civic</a>, which reappears on the list for 2012, kept its sales flat. The Fusion's absence is also likely due to its fiercely competitive segment. Redesigned for 2012 and with more production capacity than ever before, however, could see it on next year's list.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#continued">Scroll down</a> to see the rest of this past year's best-selling vehicles.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>These are your top 10 best-selling vehicles of 2012</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/">These are your top 10 best-selling vehicles of 2012</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20417241/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>best-selling</category><category>best-selling vehicles of 2012</category><category>f-150</category><category>ford</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20417241/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/04/these-are-your-top-10-best-selling-vehicles-of-2012/20417241/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20417241</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/03-2013-ford-f-150-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2012 - Don't Call It A Comeback Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><em><big>Best Year Since 2007, F-Series And Camry Remain Top-Sellers</big></em><br />
<br />
<img class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/uphill-car-1325715318-1357249597.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 143px; float: right;" />Most automakers probably wish the party that was 2012 would keep right on going into 2013, because the past year was was very good for the auto industry in terms of sales. With <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/december-2012-new-years-rockin-eve-edition/">December sales now reported</a>, the final seasonally adjusted sales rate of the year is 15.38 million vehicles. <em>Automotive News</em> reports that 14.49 million light vehicles were sold in all, which is up 13 percent compared to 2011 and marks the third straight year of growth over 10 percent.<br />
<br />
Of the major brands, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> was the biggest winner with a 39.13-percent rise in sales compared to 2011, followed closely by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> with a gain of 35.06 percent. Of the big, big brands, however, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> led all with a rise of 27.12 percent on sales of 1,838,338 units. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> followed with a gain of 12.69 percent on 1,266,569 sales. Both Japanese automakers can now be said to have fully recovered from both natural disasters that disrupted their production and supply lines, as well as recalls from previous years that had damaged both their brand images and reputations for sterling quality.<br />
<br />
Perhaps it would be quicker to talk about the brands that didn't perform well, as that group is much smaller. Coming in under a red flag were <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> (-1.71 percent), <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jaguar/">Jaguar</a> (-2.16 percent) and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/">Lincoln</a> (-4.08 percent) - all luxury brands and each missing out on reporting a sales gain by relatively small margins. At the bottom of the barrel, however, is <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a>, which found itself with sales falling 28.09 percent compared to 2011. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/">Suzuki</a> was also down, 4.73 percent to be exact, despite some speculating the fire sale of its remaining inventory would lead to an improvement in sales for the brand, which announced it was <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/05/american-suzuki-motors-files-chapter-11-will-no-longer-sell-car/">exiting the US market</a> back in November.<br />
<br />
Lastly, let's go over some particular stats to give you a better picture of last year's winners.<br />
<ul>
	<li>
		Best-Selling Brand: Ford (2,168,015)</li>
	<li>
		Best-Selling Luxury Brand: Mercedes-Benz (295,063 *includes Sprinter)</li>
	<li>
		Best-Selling Vehicle: Ford F-Series (645,316)</li>
	<li>
		Best-Selling Car: Toyota Camry (404,886)</li>
	<li>
		Best-Selling CUV: Honda CR-V (281,652)</li>
	<li>
		Best-Selling Minivan: Dodge Caravan (141,468)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>
		Battle of the Pony Cars: Chevrolet Camaro (84,391, -4.4%) beat Ford Mustang (82,995, +17.8%)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>
		Top Five Midsize Sedans: Toyota Camry (404,886), Honda Accord (331,872), Nissan Altima (302,934), Ford Fusion (241,263), Hyundai Sonata (230,605)</li>
	<li>
		Top Five Minivans: Dodge Caravan (141,468), Honda Odyssey (125,980), Toyota Sienna (114,725), Chrysler Town &amp; Country (111,744), Nissan Quest (18,275)</li>
</ul>
<iframe frameborder="0" height="875" src="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Ak5AOQV8Y76adE9Oa3dSTWM4MnpCdWtiSXpEdUdkUUE&amp;output=html&amp;widget=true" width="628"></iframe><br />
<br />
<em><strong><small>*Brands and companies are displayed in descending order according to their percentage change in volume sales. There were 307 selling days in 2012 and 307 selling days in 2011, so there is no difference between the change in yearly sales volume and the change in average daily sales rate (DSR) for each brand/company. Also, brands are combined and reported as companies only if their sales figures are released jointly.</small></strong></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/">2012 - Don't Call It A Comeback Edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20416385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 auto sales</category><category>2012 yearly auto sales</category><category>by the numbers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20416385/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/01/03/2012-dont-call-it-a-comeback-edition/20416385/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20416385</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/uphill-car-1325715318-1357249597_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Vote for the 2012 Technology of the Year]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://autos.aol.com/award/"><img height="409" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/toy-award-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Our sister site, <a href="http://autos.aol.com/award/">AOL Autos</a>, has been working hard all year to collect and narrow down this year's most interesting and innovative automotive technologies into six finalists for its inaugural <a href="http://autos.aol.com/award/">Technology of the Year Award</a>.<br />
<br />
Over 30 technologies were considered across the areas of Connectivity, Active Safety and Telematics. After reviewing them all, the group has been <a href="http://autos.aol.com/award/">narrowed down to six finalists</a> by a panel of 16 judges, which includes myself and four other Autoblog editors, as well editors from <a href="http://engadget.com/">Engadget</a> and <a href="http://translogic.aolautos.com/">Translogic</a>, and even Tony Fadell, the former leader of Apple's iPod team and creator of the <a href="http://www.nest.com/">Nest learning thermostat</a>.<br />
<br />
There is, however, a 17th judge, and that's you. We'd like you to cast your vote for the best new technology of 2012. When the judges reconvene next month to pick a winner, the votes cast by you and other readers will count as the seventeenth judge with the final vote to cast.<br />
<br />
<strong><a href="http://autos.aol.com/award/">Click here</a></strong> to visit the AOL Autos Technology of the Year webpage, read up on the finalists and vote for your favorite.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/">Vote for the 2012 Technology of the Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20389698/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>aol autos</category><category>autoblog</category><category>engadget</category><category>technology of the year</category><category>tony fadell</category><category>translogic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20389698/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/27/vote-for-the-2012-technology-of-the-year/20389698/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20389698</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/toy-award-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Chevy closeout deals have 2013 Malibu Eco sitting on lots in favor of 2012 models]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-chevrolet-malibu-eco-review/"><img alt="2013 Chevy Malibu Eco" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/01-2013-chevrolet-malibu-eco-review.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
First, the good news: The <a href="http://autoblog.com/chevrolet/malibu">Chevrolet Malibu</a> is selling at a great pace.<br />
<br />
Now, the bad news: It's the wrong Malibu.<br />
<br />
Dealer lots are filling up with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/07/2013-chevrolet-malibu-eco-review/">2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco</a> models as customers turn to the remaining <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/malibu/">2012 models</a> still there. After incentives are added up, the older Malibu costs about $6,000 less, <em>Automotive News</em> reported.<br />
<br />
Through June, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/">General Motors</a> has sold about 7,000 mild-hybrid 2013 Ecos, which get 25 miles per gallon in the city and 37 mpg on the highway, since it launched in March. During the same time frame, Chevrolet has sold 100,000 2012 Malibus, which get 22 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway.<br />
<br />
Price trumps mileage, is anyone surprised?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/">Big Chevy closeout deals have 2013 Malibu Eco sitting on lots in favor of 2012 models</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20289024/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2013</category><category>auto sales</category><category>car dealers</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>malibu</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Burgess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:59:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20289024/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/07/30/big-chevy-closeout-deals-have-2013-malibu-eco-sitting-on-lots-in/20289024/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20289024</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/07/01-2013-chevrolet-malibu-eco-review_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New Mini John Cooper Works GP unveiled]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mini/" rel="tag">Mini</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp/"><img alt="New Mini John Cooper Works GP" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/13mnigp01628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 439px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/28/mini-cooper-s-john-cooper-works-gp-spotted-testing/">Spy shots</a> pretty much said it's coming, and here it is: the new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/Mini/">Mini</a> John Cooper Works GP. It's making an appearance at the Mini United Festival in France this weekend, and while Mini has yet to detail specific power numbers or show off the car's interior, it has produced a Nurburgring time: 8 minutes, 23 seconds, which, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/04/mini-cooper-s-jcw-gp-is-20-seconds-faster-around-the-ring-than/">as we reported back in April</a>, betters the last Mini GP (circa 2006) by 19 seconds.<br />
<br />
Like its predecessor, the GP-spec hardtop loses its back seat for weight reduction, gets a full complement of power and suspension upgrades, including a race-spec suspension and brakes, and sports exclusive aero tweaks, wheels and graphics to differentiate itself from "regular" JCW models. Figure on a power figure north of the 214 horses the last GP produced (standard JCW Minis make 208 hp right now). Only 2,000 of the new Mini JCW GPs will be built and sold globally.<br />
<br />
Given that the regular John Cooper Works models are fairly marvelous as is, the GP should be deliriously fun. No pricing yet, but since a loaded-up John Cooper Works easily runs into the high-$30K range now, we'd expect the limited-production GP to skip right past the $40,000 mark.<br />
<br />
Now, when are they unveiling the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/18/mini-preparing-jcw-gp-version-of-cooper-coupe-too/">GP Coupe</a>?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/">New Mini John Cooper Works GP unveiled</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 12 May 2012 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20236957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>breaking</category><category>gp</category><category>hardtop</category><category>hatchback</category><category>jcw</category><category>john cooper works</category><category>mini</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20236957/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/05/12/new-mini-john-cooper-works-gp-unveiled/20236957/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20236957</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/13mnigp01628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW recalling 7,600 3 Series models over faulty head restraints]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-bmw-3-series-first-drive/#photo-4619924"><img alt="2012 BMW 3 Series" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/2012-bmw-3-series-628.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 418px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw">BMW</a> is recalling certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/3 series">2012 3 Series</a> models for head restraints that can be raised beyond the federal limit. As a result, in a collision, the head rest could move down slightly, increasing the risk of a neck injury. According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, the recall covers 7,600 vehicles manufactured between October 18, 2011 and March 18, 2012.<br />
<br />
BMW plans to notify owners this month, and dealers will address the problem by installing a small clip to limit the head rest's travel. The work will, of course, be done for free. For more information, head over to the <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/recalls/results.cfm?rcl_id=12V176000&amp;searchtype=quicksearch&amp;summary=true&amp;refurl=rss">NHTSA website</a> or <a href="/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/#continued">scroll down</a> or the full recall bulletin.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BMW recalling 7,600 3 Series models over faulty head restraints</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/">BMW recalling 7,600 3 Series models over faulty head restraints</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 08 May 2012 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20233654/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 3 series recall</category><category>2012 bmw 3 series</category><category>3 series</category><category>bmw</category><category>bmw 3 series</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20233654/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/05/08/bmw-recalling-7-600-3-series-models-over-faulty-head-restraints/20233654/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20233654</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/2012-bmw-3-series-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[This is why LeMons is the best race series]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/humor/" rel="tag">Humor</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/special-limited-editions/" rel="tag">Specialty</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/racing/" rel="tag">Racing</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/24-hours-of-lemons-race-camper/"><img height="437" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/lemonscamper628.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
This weekend, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/Audi/">Audi</a> marked the <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/114133424228405038490/posts/Xw4PURYcYG9">competition debut</a> of its latest <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/R18/">R18</a> race cars at the second round of the World Endurance Championship at Spa-Francorchamps. Yet the most spectacular race car running on any track this weekend was thousands of miles away at the New Hampshire Motor Speedway in the 24 Hours of Lemons "Loudon Annoying" event taking place at the very same time.<br />
<br />
Yes, that's a pop-up camper trailer that's been <a href="http://forums.24hoursoflemons.com/viewtopic.php?id=16030">converted into a race car</a> by <a href="http://www.speedycop.com/">SpeedyCop</a> &amp; the Gang of Outlaws. And there's <a href="/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/#continued">video of it after the jump</a>. Now, before you click, see if you can guess what the car underneath is. (Hint, there's another photo in the gallery that makes it very clear.) That answer is also posted <a href="/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/#continued">after the break</a>, and it makes the whole rig even more fantastic.<br />
<br />
Thanks to our friend (and <a href="http://ConsumerReports.org">Consumer Reports</a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/17/consumer-reports-lets-its-hair-down-drifts-subaru-brz/"> hotshoe</a>) Jake Fisher for the on-site photos!<br />
<br />
<strong>Update:</strong> Final race recap now posted at <a href="http://blog.caranddriver.com/lemons-new-england-the-winners/">Car and Driver</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>This is why LeMons is the best race series</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/">This is why LeMons is the best race series</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 06 May 2012 09:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20232159/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>24 hours of lemons</category><category>awesome things</category><category>camper</category><category>lemons</category><category>loudon annoying</category><category>new hampshire</category><category>New Hampshire International Speedway</category><category>New Hampshire Motor Speedway</category><category>race camper</category><category>race car</category><category>racer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 09:44:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20232159/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/05/06/this-is-why-lemons-is-the-best-race-series/20232159/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20232159</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/lemonscamper628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[12 Hours of Sebring celebrates 60 years with exciting finish]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/" rel="tag">Audi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-12-hours-of-sebring/"><img height="418" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/141488417-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The inaugural <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/12%20hours%20of%20sebring/">12 Hours of Sebring</a> was held 60 years ago in 1952. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ferrari/">Ferrari</a> was the first to build a dynasty of overall wins, followed by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>, then <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/">Porsche</a>, then <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a>, and today we live in the era of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/">Audi</a>. With its main rival, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/peugeot/">Peugeot</a>, having <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/18/peugeot-exiting-le-mans-racing-effective-immediately/">pulled out of endurance racing altogether</a> this year, the only manufacturer that could prevent Audi from claiming its tenth overall victory at the 12 Hours of Sebring was Audi itself.<br />
<br />
That was unlikely to happen, especially considering that Audi chose to field three teams, each driving the very capable <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/r18/">R18</a> in the car's last appearance before being replaced by the R18 Ultra and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/audi-unleashes-hybrid-awd-powertrain-on-le-mans-with-new-r18-e/">R18 e-tron quattro</a>. Yes, the result in the fastest LMP1 class was a forgone conclusion, and Audi delivered, claiming the first and second steps of the podium. The winning R18 was car #2 driven by Dindo Capello, Tom Kristensen and Allan McNish. Kristensen, who holds the record for most overall wins at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/24%20hours%20of%20le%20mans/">24 Hours of Le Mans</a>, also now has a record six overall victories at Sebring. It was Capello's fifth win at Sebring and McNish's fourth. The team of veterans completed 301 laps of the 3.7-mile track and amazingly finished with no evidence of body contact with another car.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>12 Hours of Sebring celebrates 60 years with exciting finish</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/">12 Hours of Sebring celebrates 60 years with exciting finish</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20195791/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 hours of sebring</category><category>2012</category><category>alan mcnish</category><category>audi</category><category>bmw</category><category>dindo capello</category><category>r18</category><category>tom kristensen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:56:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20195791/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/18/12-hours-of-sebring-celebrates-60-years-with-exciting-finish/20195791/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20195791</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/141488417-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2012 Toyota Yaris Hybrid plays big brother to the Prius C]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/geneva-motor-show/" rel="tag">Geneva Motor Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/"><img alt="2012 Toyota Yaris Hybrid" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota">Toyota</a> has unveiled the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/yaris">2012 Yaris Hybrid</a> at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/geneva motor show">Geneva Motor Show</a> - the first B-segment hybrid in Europe. While the vehicle makes use of a 74-horsepower 1.5-liter gasoline engine, engineers mated the internal combustion mill with a more compact 80-hp electric motor along with a smaller inverter and battery pack. Combined, the two can crank out up to 100 combined horsepower. Toyota says the Atkinson-cycle engine and it's associated techno wizardry is 20 percent lighter than the standard 1.8-liter hybrid drivetrain found in most of the company's hybrid offerings.<br />
<br />
Speaking of batteries, the Yaris Hybrid stores its power via a nickel-metal hydride pack. With fewer cells than those found in the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/toyota%20auris">Auris Hybrid</a>, the batteries are around 20 percent lighter. The drivetrain will net buyers a fuel consumption rating of just 3.5 liters per 100 kilometers, or around 67 mpg on the European scale. <a href="/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/#continued">Click past the break</a> for the full press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2012 Toyota Yaris Hybrid plays big brother to the Prius C</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/">2012 Toyota Yaris Hybrid plays big brother to the Prius C</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20187618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 toyot yaris hatchback</category><category>geneva</category><category>geneva 2012</category><category>geneva motor show</category><category>hatchback</category><category>toyota yaris hatchback</category><category>yaris</category><category>yaris hatchback</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 16:40:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20187618/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/07/2012-toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva-2012/20187618/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20187618</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/toyota-yaris-hybrid-geneva_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[February 2012: Leap Year Edition]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p><em><big>Chrysler Wins Again, Small Car Battle Brewing and Mustang Beats Camaro</big></em><br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/uphill-car-1325715318.jpg" style="margin: 4px; width: 250px; height: 143px; float: right;" />Automakers love Leap Year. And why wouldn't they? Who doesn't love an extra day for selling? Actually, it turns out the extra day that Leap Year provides didn't make that much of a difference, as there were 25 selling days in February of this year versus 24 last year. A variance of one day is not out of the norm for any month. Still, sales were so good last month that you'd think each automaker had an extra week.<br />
<br />
Like last month, the best performer was again <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a>, both the brand and company, which saw sales rise 113.87 and 40.39 percent, respectively. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/300/">300 sedan</a> in particular, which just won our <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/29/2012-hyundai-genesis-sedan-2012-chrysler-300s-comparison-review/">most recent comparison test</a> versus the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/genesis/">Hyundai Genesis</a>, saw sales rise 480% to 7,670 units versus the same time last year.<br />
<br />
Indeed, nearly every major automaker had positive news to report, except for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm">General Motors</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a>. While <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/">Chevrolet</a> posted a positive 5.78-percent increase in sales and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/">GMC</a> a narrow 0.14-percent rise, GM as a whole was dragged down by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/">Buick</a> and especially <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a>, which reported drops of -11.29 and -27.04, respectively. In aggregate, GM reported a sales gain of just 1.10 percent, though its daily average sales rate was 2.94 percent below February of last year. In other words, GM sold about 254 vehicles less per day on average in February of this year than last.<br />
<br />
If we go one level deeper and look at the sales of some individual models, the most interesting numbers were in the small car segment. Both the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/cruze/">Chevrolet Cruze</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/corolla/">Toyota Corolla</a> have been leading the segment lately, but February saw the resurgence of both the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/focus/">Ford Focus</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/civic/">Honda Civic</a>. Focus sales were up 115 percent to 23,350 units while Civic sales rose 36 percent to 27,086 units. Both vehicles sold more than the Corolla at 22,148 units and Cruze at 20,427 units. And we'd be remiss if we didn't mention that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/mustang/">Mustang</a> finally posted a better month of sales than the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/camaro/">Camaro</a>: 7,351 to 6,923.<br />
<div>
	<br />
	<div align="left">
		<table border="2" cellspacing="0" style="width: 628px; height: 880px;">
			<tbody>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>BRANDS</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Vol. %</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Feb-12</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Feb-11</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>DSR* %</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Feb-12</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#FFFF00" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Feb-11</b></font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Chrysler</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">113.87</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">27,008</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12,628</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">105.32</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,080</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">526</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Jaguar</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">62.48</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,022</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">629</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">55.98</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">41</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">26</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Smart</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">58.88</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">769</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">484</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">52.53</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">31</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">20</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Suzuki</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">47.60</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">2,425</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,643</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">41.69</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">97</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">68</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Volkswagen</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">42.47</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">30,577</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">21,462</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">36.77</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,223</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">894</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Mini</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">42.16</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,980</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,503</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">36.48</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">199</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">146</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Kia</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">37.29</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">45,038</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">32,806</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">31.79</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,802</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,367</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Mazda</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">32.31</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">25,651</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">19,387</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">27.02</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,026</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">808</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Jeep</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">30.37</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">37,312</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">28,619</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">25.16</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,492</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,192</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>BMW</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">29.17</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">21,204</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">16,416</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">24.00</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">848</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">684</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Land Rover</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">27.40</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,255</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">2,555</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">22.30</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">130</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">106</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Dodge</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">27.21</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">42,692</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">33,561</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">22.12</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,708</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,398</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Bentley</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">24.75</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">126</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">101</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">19.76</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Lexus</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">20.73</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">16,678</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">13,814</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">15.90</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">667</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">576</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Hyundai</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">17.50</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">51,151</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">43,533</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12.80</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">2,046</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,814</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Nissan</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">17.14</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">97,492</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">83,226</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12.46</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,900</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,468</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Subaru</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">17.02</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">25,374</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">21,683</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12.34</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,015</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">903</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Mercedes-Benz</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">16.90</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">18,910</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">16,176</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12.23</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">756</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">674</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Lincoln</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">16.21</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,912</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,948</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">11.56</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">276</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">248</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Ram</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">14.72</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">23,282</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">20,294</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">10.13</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">931</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">846</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Ford</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">14.29</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">172,207</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">150,678</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">9.72</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,888</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,278</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Honda</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">13.33</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">98,899</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">87,263</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">8.80</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,956</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,636</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Toyota</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">11.49</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">142,745</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">128,032</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">7.03</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,710</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,335</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Audi</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">10.03</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">8,531</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">7,753</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5.63</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">341</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">323</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Volvo</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">9.76</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,263</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,795</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5.37</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">211</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">200</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Porsche</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6.44</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">2,149</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">2,019</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">2.18</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">86</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">84</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Chevrolet</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5.78</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">151,197</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">142,929</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1.55</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,048</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,955</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Acura</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4.28</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">11,258</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">10,796</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">0.11</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">450</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">450</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Infiniti</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1.04</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">9,239</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">9,144</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-3.00</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">370</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">381</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>GMC</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">0.14</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">32,581</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">32,534</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-3.86</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,303</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,356</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Buick</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-11.29</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">14,023</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">15,807</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-14.83</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">561</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">659</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Cadillac</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-27.04</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">11,505</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">15,768</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-29.95</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">460</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">657</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Mitsubishi</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-31.29</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,736</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,893</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-34.04</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">189</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">287</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Fiat</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">NA</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,227</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">0</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">NA</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">129</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">0</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td bgcolor="#FFFF00" colspan="7" valign="middle">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>COMPANIES</b></font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Chrysler Group</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">40.39</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">133,521</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">95,102</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">34.78</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,341</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,963</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Jaguar LR NA</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">31.72</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,277</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,247</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">26.45</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">171</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">135</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>BMW Group</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">31.45</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">26,184</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">19,919</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">26.19</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1,047</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">830</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Nissan NA</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">15.55</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">106,731</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">92,370</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">10.93</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,269</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">3,849</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Ford Mo Co</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">14.36</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">179,119</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">156,626</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">9.79</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">7,165</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,526</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>Toyota Mo Co</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12.39</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">159,423</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">141,846</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">7.90</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">6,377</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">5,910</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>American Honda</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">12.34</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">110,157</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">98,059</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">7.84</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,406</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">4,086</font></td>
				</tr>
				<tr valign="bottom">
					<td valign="middle" width="83">
						<font face="Arial" size="2"><b>General Motors</b></font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#CCEBAE" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">1.10</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">209,306</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">207,028</font></td>
					<td align="center" bgcolor="#E69999" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">-2.94</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">8,372</font></td>
					<td align="center" valign="middle" width="67">
						<font face="Arial" size="2">8,626</font></td>
				</tr>
			</tbody>
		</table>
	</div>
</div>
<br />
<em><strong><small>*Brands and companies are displayed in descending order according to their percentage change in volume sales. There were 25 selling days in February 2012 versus 24 selling days in February 2011, so there will be a difference between monthly sales volume and the average daily sales rate (DSR) for each brand/company. </small></strong></em><em><strong><small>Also, brands are combined and reported as companies </small></strong></em><em><strong><small>only</small></strong></em><em><strong><small> if their sales figures are released jointly.</small></strong></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/">February 2012: Leap Year Edition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20183952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>auto sales</category><category>by the numbers</category><category>february</category><category>february 2012 auto sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20183952/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/03/01/february-2012-leap-year-edition/20183952/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20183952</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/03/uphill-car-1325715318_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2012 Hyundai Azera [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/driving/" rel="tag">First Drives</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/reviews/" rel="tag">New Car Reviews</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><em><big>Finally Focusing On The FWD Luxury Game</big></em><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive/"><img height="423" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/2012-hyundai-azera-lead-opt-2.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Luxury used to be so simple in this country. Life was demarcated by a series of vehicular gradations from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet">Chevrolet</a> to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/oldsmobile">Oldsmobile</a>, Oldsmobile to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick">Buick</a> and finally, when one had clambered up every last rung of the socioeconomic ladder, Buick to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac">Cadillac</a>. But that was generations ago, a time before German automakers like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw">BMW</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz">Mercedes-Benz</a> quietly brushed aside makes like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln">Lincoln</a> and Cadillac to establish themselves as the pinnacle of luxury. It was before names like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti">Infiniti</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus">Lexus</a> elbowed their way up to the luxury buffet as well.<br />
<br />
These days, buyers with an eye toward a comfortable, well-equipped vehicle have more options than nearly any other customer thanks to the careful segmentation of the luxury market. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai">Hyundai</a> has long positioned itself as an automaker that knows how to give buyers heaps of content for their dollar, and vehicles like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/genesis sedan">Genesis</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/equus">Equus</a> have proven the Korean company can play on the luxury field with the rest of the rear-wheel-drive bruisers out there.<br />
<br />
For 2012, the company has sharpened its nearly forgotten <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/azera">Azera</a> to give front-wheel-drive luxury buyers something else to chew on. With its new exterior, gorgeous cabin, V6 power and a host of standard equipment, the sedan is a natural alternative to hardware like the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/avalon">Toyota Avalon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/lacrosse">Buick LaCrosse</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/taurus">Ford Taurus</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2012 Hyundai Azera [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/">2012 Hyundai Azera [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20180041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 hyundai azera</category><category>2012 hyundai azera first drive</category><category>azera</category><category>featured</category><category>first drive</category><category>FirstDrive</category><category>hyunai azera review</category><category>hyundai</category><category>review</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:57:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20180041/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/02/27/2012-hyundai-azera-first-drive-review/20180041/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20180041</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/02/2012-hyundai-azera-lead-opt-2_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Is this Fiat Abarth ad good enough for the Super Bowl?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/marketing-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing/Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/fiat/" rel="tag">Fiat</a></p><a href="/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/#continued"><img height="393"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/abarth-ad.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/fiat/">Fiat USA</a> put a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/17/fiat-500-abarth-ditches-jlo-for-italian-sex-appeal/">video showcasing the 500 Abarth</a> on the Internet last November that tested the bounds of what is doable on network TV. That's one of the big reasons it hasn't been put on TV yet.<br />
<br />
You'll see what we mean when you view the ad, titled "Seduction," <a href="/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/#continued">after the jump</a>. It was the foam that made it iffy for the networks.<br />
<br />
But we chatted with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> marketing chief Olivier Francois at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/detroit-auto-show/">Detroit Auto Show</a> about <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/super%20bowl/">Super Bowl commercials</a> where advertisers are known to push the envelope. In the Chrysler-Fiat world of double titles, Francois is also CEO of Fiat.<br />
<br />
Francois, who is considering a few options for the big game, is wondering if the Abarth video is Super Bowl worthy, and wants to know what Autoblog readers think about the spot. Good enough for the big game, also known as the Super Bowl of advertising?<br />
<br />
Chrysler, of course, was the toast of the Super Bowl in 2011, showing an <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/02/10/why-chrysler-and-eminems-super-bowl-ad-almost-didnt-happen/">unprecedented two-minute ad</a> featuring Eminem's "Lose Yourself," an appearance by Eminem himself and the new ad theme, "Imported From Detroit."<br />
<br />
It's a high bar to reach again.<br />
<br />
What do you think? Does this Abarth ad have the right stuff?<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/#poll72898">View Poll</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is this Fiat Abarth ad good enough for the Super Bowl?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/">Is this Fiat Abarth ad good enough for the Super Bowl?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20151595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>500</category><category>500 abarth</category><category>fiat</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl commercials</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Kiley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20151595/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/01/19/is-this-fiat-abarth-ad-good-enough-for-the-super-bowl/20151595/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20151595</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/abarth-ad_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Dacia shows new Lodgy minivan ahead of Geneva debut]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/geneva-motor-show/" rel="tag">Geneva Motor Show</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/dacia-lodgy/"><img alt="2012 Dacia Lodgy" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/01-dacia-lodgy-628.jpg" style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px; " /></a><br />
<br />
The auto show mill is officially kicking into high gear for 2012, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/dacia">Dacia</a> has already shown off what we can expect from the company at this year's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/geneva motor show">Geneva Motor Show</a> in March. Fans of obscure European MPVs may now lick their chops at the first clear view of the Dacia Lodgy. The Romanian brand says its new vehicle will be available both in five- and seven-seat configurations when it debuts across Europe, though a final decision on whether or not a right-hand drive version will be offered has yet to be made.<br />
<br />
Dacia isn't offering up any details on what's under the hood of the Lodgy, though with an overall length of under 15 feet, we'd be surprised to see anything other than a small-displacement four-cylinder humming along behind the headlights. Look for further details when the Lodgy debuts in March, but for now, check out our high-res gallery and <a href="/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/#continued">hit the jump</a> for the full press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dacia shows new Lodgy minivan ahead of Geneva debut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/">Dacia shows new Lodgy minivan ahead of Geneva debut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20141069/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 geneva motor show</category><category>dacia</category><category>dacia lodgy</category><category>geneva</category><category>geneva 2012</category><category>geneva motor show</category><category>lodgy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20141069/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/01/05/dacia-shows-new-lodgy-minivan-ahead-of-geneva-debut/20141069/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20141069</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/01/01-dacia-lodgy-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2012 Toyota Camry gets <i>Consumer Reports</i> "Recommended" rating]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-toyota-camry-first-drive/"><img alt="2012 Toyota Camry SE front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/08/2012-toyota-camry-se-fd.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 630px; height: 418px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> was once the unquestioned lead sled dog when it comes to the <em>Consumer Reports </em>"Recommended" list, but the automaker and the consumer advocacy group have had a bit of a falling out over the past couple years. In 2010, the publication <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/01/consumer-reports-may-restore-toyota-recommended-ratin/">removed the Recommended ratings of many models</a> as a result of Toyota's unintended acceleration controversy. In January <a href="http://autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> nearly <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/05/ford-nearly-overtakes-toyota-in-consumer-reports-brand/">overtook Toyota</a> in overall Recommended ratings.<br />
<br />
We're on the verge of a new year, and it appears that the Toyota is getting back on CR's good side. <em>Bloomberg</em> reports that the February issue of CR reveals that the <a href="http://autoblog.com/toyota/camry/">2012 Camry</a> has scored the coveted tag. The non-profit lauded the Camry for its improved interior and fuel economy, along with an upgraded ride. The four-cylinder Camry averaged 27 miles per gallon during CR testing, tying the <a href="http://autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata/">Hyundai Sonata</a> for most efficient in the mid-size segment.<br />
<br />
We're quite certain that the 2012 Camry would have sold like gangbusters whether or not it was Recommended by <em>Consumer Reports</em>. But at the same time, CR subscribers seem to really like their Toyota models, so it certainly helps to have a thumbs-up from the powerful publication.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/">2012 Toyota Camry gets <i>Consumer Reports</i> "Recommended" rating</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20137392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 toyota camry</category><category>camry</category><category>consumer reports</category><category>consumer reports recommended</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>recommended</category><category>toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20137392/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/12/30/2012-toyota-camry-gets-consumer-reports-recommended-rat/20137392/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20137392</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/08/2012-toyota-camry-se-fd_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[IIHS reports record year for Top Safety Picks, 18 new 2012 models added]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr121511.html"><img height="420" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/swr115916-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/iihs/">Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</a> announced today that 2012 model year vehicles set a record for the number of highly valued <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/top%20safety%20pick/">Top Safety Pick awards</a> earned: 115 total winners with 18 of those being brand new recipients.<br />
<br />
The break down includes 69 cars, 38 SUVs, five minivans and three pickups, so if owning a Top Safety Pick award-winning vehicle is important to you, there are options available in every category.<br />
<br />
As for which automakers earned the most awards, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> and its band of merry brands, which includes <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a>, racked up 15, while <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/gm">GM</a> was next with 14, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/">VW</a>/<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/audi/">Audi</a> with 13, and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a>/<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lincoln/">Lincoln</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a>/<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/">Acura</a> both with 12 awards each. Speaking of Honda and Acura, they win the award for most improved, as 10 of the 18 new models to receive the award come from their lineups. No automaker, however, was able to match <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru's</a> repeat performance of earning a Top Safety Pick award for every vehicle in its lineup.<br />
<br />
The IIHS notes that automakers have come a long way since it began giving out Top Safety Pick awards back in 2005. At that time, only 11 models qualified. In fact, last year only 66 vehicles qualified because of less-than-stellar rollover ratings, but automakers apparently responded, addressing the issue in new models or redesigning roofs throughout the year.<br />
<br />
The IIHS Top Safety Pick award stands as the private sector's counterpart to the government's own five-star rating system for vehicle safety conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Both litmus tests for safety have grown increasingly difficult for automakers to ace in recent years, but today's announcement shows that they're clearly up to the task.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IIHS reports record year for Top Safety Picks, 18 new 2012 models added</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/">IIHS reports record year for Top Safety Picks, 18 new 2012 models added</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20128779/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>iihs</category><category>insurance institute for highway safety</category><category>top safety pick</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20128779/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/12/15/iihs-reports-record-year-for-top-safety-picks-18-new-2012-model/20128779/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20128779</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/12/swr115916-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2012 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet drops its innovative top [w/video]]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/convertibles/" rel="tag">Convertible</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/" rel="tag">Porsche</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-porsche-911-carrera-cabriolet/"><img alt="2012 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/01-2012-911-cabriolet-628-1321973201.jpg" style="margin: 4px 0px; width: 628px; height: 410px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche">Porsche</a> has finally officially unveiled its <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/porsche/911/">2012 911 Carrera Cabriolet</a>, and the model will boast the same sleek profile with its soft top in place as its hardtop twin for the first time in the vehicle's history thanks to a unique roof mechanism. The vehicle blends the aluminum and steel chassis of the standard 911 with a folding top manufactured from a slew of lightweight materials, including canvas magnesium and advanced high-strength steel to keep weight as low as possible. Porsche isn't saying exactly how many pounds engineers managed to shave from this vehicle compared to the previous generation, but the company assures us that the latest iteration is "significantly lighter." Sounds good.<br />
<br />
With a 350-horsepower 3.4-liter flat six in the base 2012 Porsche 911 Cabriolet, the vehicle can scoot to 60 mph from standstill in as little as 4.4 seconds. The 911 Cabriolet S, meanwhile, can do the deed in 4.1 seconds thanks to its 400-horsepower 3.8-liter engine. Look to shell out $97,300 for the Carrera Cabriolet and $108,800 for the Carrera Cabriolet S. <a href="/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/#continued">Hit the jump</a> for an official video and the press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2012 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet drops its innovative top [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/">2012 Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet drops its innovative top [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20112217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 porsche 911 cabriolet</category><category>911</category><category>911 cabriolet</category><category>cabriolet</category><category>porsche</category><category>porsche 911 cabriolet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20112217/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/22/2012-porsche-911-cabriolet-drops-its-innovative-top/20112217/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20112217</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/01-2012-911-cabriolet-628-1321973201_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Haven't heard the 2012 BMW M5 yet? Watch this]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/#continued"><img alt="m5 power slide" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/bmw-m5-slide.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 316px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/BMW/">BMW</a> <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/m5/">M5</a> has a long and rich performance history, and that resume <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/22/2012-bmw-m5-first-drive-review/">only improves</a> for 2012. With a twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 pumping out 560 horsepower and an always-willing chassis underpinning it all, we can't wait to get behind the wheel.<br />
<br />
Sadly we're a bit shy on the $92,000 needed to buy our own M5, so for now we'll settle for some stunning video and a melodious soundtrack. <a href="/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/#continued">Hit the jump</a> to hear the racy sounds emanating from the throaty M5, then stay for the sexy slow-motion drifts.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Haven't heard the 2012 BMW M5 yet? Watch this</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/">Haven't heard the 2012 BMW M5 yet? Watch this</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20104831/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>4.4 v8</category><category>bmw</category><category>drift</category><category>engine sounds</category><category>m5</category><category>twin turbo</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20104831/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/13/havent-heard-the-2012-bmw-m5-yet-watch-this/20104831/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20104831</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/bmw-m5-slide_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[2012 MV Agusta Brutale 675 does naked the right way]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorcycles/" rel="tag">Motorcycle</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675/"><img alt="MV Agusta Brutale 675"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/brutale-675.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /></a><br />
<br />
You can go ahead and tear down that poster of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/street%20triple/">Triumph Street Triple R</a>. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/10/28/mv-agusta-teases-the-brutale-675-ahead-of-eicma-2011/">2012 MV Agusta Brutale 675</a> has officially debuted, and the bike promises to bring naked performance to a new level. Essentially a de-bodied <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/23/first-mv-agusta-f3-shots-slip-out/">F3 Supersport</a>, the Brutale 675 packs 113 horsepower and tips the scales at a feathery 358 pounds dry.<br />
<br />
MV Agusta has also equipped its naked warrior with a ride-by-wire system that boats four preset engine maps as well as a user-customizable tune. Eight-mode traction control is also part of the package.<br />
<br />
The 675 cc three-cylinder engine utilizes some pretty trick engineering to offer buyers a more compact powerplant and improved handling at the same time. The engine's water and oil pumps are integrated into the cylinder and crank cases for a design that takes up less space than ever before, and a counter-rotating crankshaft helps reduce the bike's tendency to wheelie off the line.<br />
<br />
In Europe, the 2012 MV Agusta Brutale 675 will set you back &euro;8,990, which is around &euro;100 cheaper than the equivalent <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/triumph">Triumph</a>. Read all about it in the press release <a href="/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/#continued">after the break</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2012 MV Agusta Brutale 675 does naked the right way</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/">2012 MV Agusta Brutale 675 does naked the right way</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20099126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012</category><category>2012 brutale 675</category><category>2012 mv agusta brutale 675</category><category>brutale</category><category>brutale 675</category><category>mv agusta</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20099126/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/04/2012-mv-agusta-brutale-675-does-naked-the-right-way/20099126/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20099126</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/brutale-675_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>