<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog Safety</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog Safety</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>
<itunes:author>Dan Roth, Zach Bowman and  Jeff Ross</itunes:author><itunes:image href="http://o.aolcdn.com/os/autoblog/ab-podcast-itunes.jpg" /><itunes:summary>The podcast by the people who obsessively cover the auto industry.</itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Games and Hobbies"><itunes:category text="Automotive" /></itunes:category><item>
    <title><![CDATA[205k Suzuki models being investigated for airbag sensor issue]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/" rel="tag">Suzuki</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-grand-vitara-xsport/"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2008-suzuki-grand-vitara.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/autoblog-garage-2008-suzuki-sx4-sport-with-trip/"><img class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2008-suzuki-sx4.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 163px; float: right;" /></a><em>The Detroit News</em> is reporting that the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has opened an investigation on the 2006-11 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/grand+vitara/">Suzuki Grand Vitara</a> and 2007-11 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/sx4/">Suzuki SX4</a> due to issues with the airbag and seatbelt for the front passenger seat. So far, NHTSA has received 128 complaints on these vehicles for airbag warning lights, airbag off lights and seatbelt lights, on a vehicle set that totals around 205,000 units, but there is no indication as to how many, if any, injuries have reported.<br />
<br />
Via technical service bulletins, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/suzuki/">Suzuki</a> has already acknowledged two airbag-related issues with front passenger seats on both vehicles, including a programming error for the passenger seat load indicator on 2009 models and an open-circuit problem for the sensor mat that determines if an adult or child is sitting in the front seat. Since this latter issue would not shut off or lessen the impact of the passenger airbag, Suzuki has already extended the warranty for the seat cushion bottom to 10 years or 120,000 miles. After <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/05/american-suzuki-motors-files-chapter-11-will-no-longer-sell-car/">ceasing new-car sales in the US</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/27/suzuki-ending-auto-sales-in-canada-too/">Canada</a>, potential recall repairs (which still may or may not happen) would be handled by remaining dealers as laid out in the recent <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/court-approves-suzuki-bankruptcy-plan/">court-approved bankruptcy plan</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/">205k Suzuki models being investigated for airbag sensor issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20625873/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>recall investigation</category><category>suzuki</category><category>suzuki bankruptcy</category><category>suzuki grand vitara</category><category>suzuki sx4</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:59:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20625873/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20625873/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/19/205k-suzuki-models-being-investigated-for-airbag-sensor-issue/20625873/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20625873</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2008-suzuki-grand-vitara_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[LiveMap develops augmented reality motorcycle helmet]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a></p><a href="/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/#continued"><img alt="LiveMap Helmet" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/livemap-helmet-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 444px;" /></a><br />
<br />
While mobile <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/navigation/">navigation</a> for cars has evolved into a staple, in-cabin feature, motorcyclists have been stuck with paper maps and aftermarket solutions for years. A new Russian company is out to change that with a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/helmet/">helmet</a> that boasts integrated nav. <a href="http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/livemap-motorbike-helmet-with-navigation">LiveMap</a> uses a microphone, light sensor, ear phone and micro display to convey pertinent travel information in full color that the rider can control using voice commands. The system works just like the heads up display found in modern fighter jets.<br />
<br />
The system projects directions in the center of the rider's visor rather than in the upper right hand corner as with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/google+glass/">Google Glass</a>. The team behind the development says this actually safer since the light sensor keeps the directions transparent no matter what the time of day. It also allows the rider to stay focused on what's ahead of the bike. An integrated gyroscope and digital compass keeps the projection oriented correctly even as the user tilts his head or leans the bike. Very cool.<br />
<br />
The LiveMap helmet is supposed to offer up to a day's worth of use thanks to a pair of lithium-ion batteries, though a USB charge plug can provide extra juice when necessary. Right now, LiveMap is sourcing funding through Indiegogo. The company is looking to raise $150,000 to create a working prototype. After that, production models could cost around $2,000. That's steep, but hopefully the cost could come down over additional generations. Check out <a href="/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/#continued">the introductory video below</a> for more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>LiveMap develops augmented reality motorcycle helmet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/">LiveMap develops augmented reality motorcycle helmet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20626326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>helmet</category><category>livemap</category><category>motorcycle helmet</category><category>motorcycle navigation</category><category>nav</category><category>navigation</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20626326/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20626326/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/18/livemap-develops-augmented-reality-motorcycle-helmet/20626326/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20626326</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/livemap-helmet-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#continued"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2005-jeep-liberty.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> made big news earlier in the month by <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">refusing a recall request</a> from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> for the 1993-2004 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee</a> and 2002-2007 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Jeep Liberty</a>. Last week, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/">NHTSA boss David Strickland countered</a> by defending his agency's request for the recall of 2.7 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> SUVs. Today marked the deadline for Chrysler to formally respond to NHTSA, and it seems that both parties have met in the middle with Chrysler inspecting and upgrading some of the affected vehicles without using the word "recall," which would constitute the admission of a defect; instead, Chrysler said that it is conducting a "voluntary campaign."<br />
<br />
At issue on these vehicles is the positioning of the fuel tank behind the rear axle that could get damaged during a rear-end collision. NHTSA has stated that at least 51 people have been killed in rear-end collisions involving these Jeeps after the vehicles caught fire, to which Chrysler countered by pointing out that both models "met and exceeded" the requirements for fuel-system integrity.<br />
<br />
As a compromise on the situation, Chrysler says that it will inspect all pre-2004 Grand Cherokees and pre-2007 Liberty models and, "if necessary, provide an upgrade to the rear structure of the vehicle." According to <em>Automotive News</em>, this upgrade will consist of adding a trailer hitch that will presumably better protect the rear-mounted gas tank. Vehicles already equipped with a factory or <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/mopar/">Mopar</a> hitch will not be modified. Chrysler's official statement on the matter is <a href="/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#continued">posted below</a>, but no additional information has been released, such as when the campaign will begin and how many vehicles could be affected.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/">Chrysler resolves recall issue with NHTSA, will inspect, upgrade affected Jeeps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20626565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>jeep</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:25:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20626565/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20626565/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/18/chrysler-resolves-recall-issue-with-nhtsa-will-inspect-upgrad/20626565/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20626565</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2005-jeep-liberty_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Mitsubishi Outlander, Evo to keep things safe at Pikes Peak]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/" rel="tag">Mitsubishi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/racing/" rel="tag">Racing</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mitsubishi-pikes-peak-safety-cars/"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/mitsubish-pikes-peak-safety-cars.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a> has already announced that it will be <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/17/mitsubishi-confirms-pair-of-miev-evolution-ii-electric-racecars/">returning as a competitor</a> to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/pikes+peak+international+hill+climb/">Pikes Peak International Hill Climb</a> with a pair of all-electric <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/i/">MiEV</a> Evolution II racecars. In addition to these entrants, the automaker will also be the presenting sponsor of the race as well as providing the official safety vehicles to the event using specially prepped versions of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/outlander/">2014 Outlander</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/lancer+evolution/">Lancer Evolution</a>.<br />
<br />
While it isn't clear what exactly will be demanded of the safety vehicles, this isn't going to your run-of-the-mill pace car duty. To get the Outlander and Evo ready for the 156-turn, 12.42-mile course, Mitsubishi teamed up with companies such as BBS, Cobb Tuning, AEM and Muellerized Suspension Systems as well as DC Sports and Kenwood to create these one-off safety cars. These vehicles, and all the racecars, will be at Pikes Peak later this month for the 91st running of America's second-oldest racing event. <a href="/2013/06/17/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the official press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mitsubishi Outlander, Evo to keep things safe at Pikes Peak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/">Mitsubishi Outlander, Evo to keep things safe at Pikes Peak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20624825/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2014 mitsubishi outlander</category><category>mitsubishi</category><category>mitsubishi lancer evolution</category><category>mitsubishi outlander</category><category>pikes peak</category><category>pikes peak international hill climb</category><category>safety vehicles</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:32:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20624825/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20624825/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/18/mitsubishi-outlander-evo-to-keep-things-safe-at-pikes-peak/20624825/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20624825</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/mitsubish-pikes-peak-safety-cars_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Liverpool tourist duck boat sinks, rescues caught on video]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/uk/" rel="tag">UK</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/special-limited-editions/" rel="tag">Specialty</a></p><a href="/2013/06/16/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/#continued"><img alt="Duck boat sinking in Liverpool - video screencap" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/duck-boat-accident.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 358px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Visit just about any major city on the water, and you're sure to find duck boats taking tourists out for a different view of the city. The safety of these land and sea vehicles have been questioned following some high-profile accidents including a fatal collision with a barge in Philadelphia back in 2010. Over the weekend, a duck boat in Liverpool, England sank just after entering the water. Fortunately, all 31 passengers managed to escape without serious injury, though 17 passengers were taken to the hospital for treatment.<br />
<br />
A man was able to capture the boat sinking on video, but he obviously failed to realize the severity of the situation as he laughs while passengers jump into the frigid water. Fortunately, a nearby boat quickly sprung to action and showed up on scene just as the amphibious vehicle was fully submerged. <a href="http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/dozens-rescued-as-amphibious-duck-bus-sinks-in-liverpool.21345255"><em>The Herald Scotland</em> reports</a> that the company that owned this particular duck boat also had another vessel sink back in March with no passengers aboard. After that incident, the company's fleet of duck boats was ordered to stay out of the water, but it isn't clear what (if anything) changed before this latest accident occurred. <a href="/2013/06/16/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/#continued">Scroll down</a> for some videos of the incident including a news report, first-hand amateur video and another video that allegedly shows this very boat struggling to get out of the water in the past.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Liverpool tourist duck boat sinks, rescues caught on video</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/">Liverpool tourist duck boat sinks, rescues caught on video</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20624102/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>amphibious car</category><category>amphibious vehicle</category><category>duck boat</category><category>duck boat accident</category><category>duckboat</category><category>liverpool</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20624102/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20624102/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/17/liverpool-tourist-duck-boat-sinks-rescues-caught-on-video/20624102/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20624102</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/duck-boat-accident_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Mercedes ready to offer Car-to-X communications by end of year]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mercedes-benz/" rel="tag">Mercedes-Benz</a></p><a href="/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/#continued"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/mercedes-car-to-x.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Although <a href="http://www.auoblog.com/mercedes-benz/">Mercedes-Benz</a> isn't the first automaker to develop a Car-to-X system, it sounds like it will be the first to get this automated safety technology into a production vehicle. Car-to-X allows a car to transmit and receive data in order to warn the driver of impending danger or traffic problems.<br />
<br />
Using a mobile communication platform, the car would be sent alerts for approaching concerns including a broken down car, dangerous weather conditions or a car being driven the wrong way. In addition to automatic alerts, this system will have the ability to allow users to warn other motorists of road dangers, such as animals or debris on the road.<br />
<br />
Mercedes says that it will not only have this technology as a standard feature in its vehicles by year's end, but will also offer a kit that can be retrofitted to older models. It sounds like this technology will likely be limited to Germany or Europe for now, and the automaker it is also working with other automakers to get such a system implemented quicker. <a href="/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/#continued">Scroll down</a> for a press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mercedes ready to offer Car-to-X communications by end of year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/">Mercedes ready to offer Car-to-X communications by end of year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20622521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>automated vehicle safety</category><category>car-to-x</category><category>mercedes</category><category>mercedes intelligent drive</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20622521/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20622521/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/17/mercedes-ready-to-offer-car-to-x-communications-by-end-of-year/20622521/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20622521</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/mercedes-car-to-x_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Ford using robot drivers to test durability [w/video]]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/commercial-trucks/" rel="tag">Work</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/ford-using-robots-to-test-truck-durability/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/ford-robotic-driver-opt-1.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
In testing the durability of its upcoming <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/transit/">fullsize Transit vans</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> has begun using autonomous robotic technology to pilot vehicles through the punishing courses of its Michigan Proving Grounds test facility. The autonomous tech allows Ford to run more durability tests in a single day than it could with human drivers, as well as create even more challenging tests that wouldn't be safe to run with a human behind the wheel.<br />
<br />
The technology being used was developed by Utah-based <a href="http://autonomoussolutions.com/">Autonomous Solutions</a>, and isn't quite like the totally autonomous vehicles being developed by companies like <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/google/">Google</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.search.aol.com/search?q=audi+autonomous&amp;s_it=header_form">Audi</a> for use out in the real world. Rather, Ford's autonomous test vehicles follow a pre-programmed course and their position is tracked via GPS and cameras that are being monitored from a central control room. Though the route is predetermined, the robotic control module operates the steering, acceleration and braking to keep the vehicle on course as it drives over broken concrete, cobblestones, metal grates, rough gravel, mud pits and oversize speed bumps.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/#continued">Scroll down</a> to watch the robotic drivers in action, though be warned that you're headed for disappointment if you expect to see a Centurion behind the wheel (<a href="http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Cylon_Centurion">nerd alert!</a>). The setup looks more like a <em>Mythbusters</em> experiment than a scene from <em>Battlestar Galactica</em>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford using robot drivers to test durability [w/video]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/">Ford using robot drivers to test durability [w/video]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20622557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>autonomous</category><category>autonomous solutions</category><category>durabilty testing</category><category>ford</category><category>ford transit</category><category>robot drivers</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:03:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20622557/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20622557/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/16/ford-using-robot-drivers-to-test-durability-w-video/20622557/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20622557</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/ford-robotic-driver-opt-1_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[GM recalls over 230,000 more Trailblazer-family SUVs over door electronics]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saab/" rel="tag">Saab</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chevrolet-trailblazer/"><img height="419" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/chevrolet-trailblazer.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Back in August, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> announced a recall on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> GMT360 SUVs (<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/buick+rainier/">Buick Rainier</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/trailblazer/">Chevrolet Trailblazer</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/envoy/">GMC Envoy</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/isuzu+ascender/">Isuzu Ascender</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/saab/9-7x/">Saab 9-7X</a>) ranging from the 2005 to 2007 model years and the 2006 GMT370 SUVs (Chevrolet Trailblazer EXT and GMC Envoy XL) due to potential fires associated with the driver's door module. Initially limited to <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/20/gm-recalling-250-000-suvs-over-door-electronics/">250,000 units sold or registered in 20 Snow Belt states</a> (and the District of Columbia), the recall has now been expanded to include an additional 193,000 of these SUVs in the US and, according to <em>The Detroit News</em>, 40,000 more sold outside the US, including Canada and Mexico.<br />
<br />
Like the original recall, the issue is still a faulty driver's door module that can short out, which could lead to a fire. <em>The Detroit News</em> is reporting that, out of the 443,000 units being recalled, GM says that there were 58 fires that caused 11 minor injuries, and the expanded recall accounted for six fires and one injury. Despite the lower number of fires, the recall notice recommends that owners park their vehicles until the recall repairs has been performed.<br />
<br />
On recalled units with functional modules, the repair consists of a protective coating being applied to the module, while vehicles with modules that are not working properly will have the driver's door module replaced. The official recall notice is <a href="/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/#continued">posted below</a>, and it includes contact information for customers of all five brands.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM recalls over 230,000 more Trailblazer-family SUVs over door electronics</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/">GM recalls over 230,000 more Trailblazer-family SUVs over door electronics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20623271/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>buick</category><category>buick rainier</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy trailbalzer</category><category>chevy trailblazer ext</category><category>gmc envoy</category><category>gmc envoy xl</category><category>isuzu</category><category>isuzu ascender</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>saab</category><category>saab 9-7x</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:01:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20623271/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20623271/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/16/gm-recalls-over-230-000-more-trailblazer-family-suvs-over-door-e/20623271/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20623271</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/chevrolet-trailblazer_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[NHTSA boss Strickland weighs in on Jeep recall fracas]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130613/AUTO0101/306130122/1148/rss25"><img alt="David Strickland"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/david-strickland.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 418px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Adding yet another chapter to the ongoing <a href="http://autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> recall story, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> (NHTSA) head David Strickland has gone on record to defend the government's request that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> recall 2.7 million out-of-production <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Jeep Liberty</a> vehicles after the agency investigated fiery rear-end collisions that have reportedly killed at least 51 people over the years. In statements made to <em>The Detroit News</em>, Strickland said, "We felt very strongly that the process that we undertook and the findings that we made and ... we made the decision to issue a recall request. We do not take that very lightly." The top US auto safety regulator stopped short of telling owners to park their cars until the automaker takes action. "They can make their own risk assessment and their own choices," he said.<br />
<br />
Chrysler <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">does not intend to recall the models</a>, insisting the "vehicles met and exceeded all applicable requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, including FMVSS 301, pertaining to fuel-system integrity" when they were manufactured and sold. "The company does not agree with NHTSA's conclusions and does not intend to recall the vehicles cited in the investigation. The subject vehicles are safe and are not defective," Chrysler announced last week in a statement. "We believe NHTSA's initial conclusions are based on an incomplete analysis of the underlying data, and we are committed to continue working with the agency to resolve this disagreement."<br />
<br />
Legally, Chrysler has until June 18 to formally respond to NHTSA's request. If the automaker does not take action, NHTSA is expected to issue a formal finding and seek a recall.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/">NHTSA boss Strickland weighs in on Jeep recall fracas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20622369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>fuel tank recall</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep fires</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>nhtsa</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:01:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20622369/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20622369/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/15/nhtsa-boss-strickland-weighs-in-on-jeep-recall-fracas/20622369/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20622369</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/david-strickland_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Study suggests voice-controlled technology in the car is less safe than thought]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/147250172/Measuring-Cognitive-Distractions-FINAL"><img alt="voice-control cell phone in car" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/eyes-free-distracted-driving.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 386px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Technology has become so mobile that we bring it everywhere we go, including behind the wheel of our cars. Thus, the cell phone in our pocket has become the main target of anti-distracted driving advocates, as making and taking phone calls while driving, as well as texting, have arisen as legitimate distractions from the task of driving.<br />
<br />
One solution automakers have been developing over time would have us using your voice to control technologies in the car, the assumption being that you're much safer performing a task in the car if yours hands are on the wheel and your eyes on the road. That assumption, however, might not be true according to a recent <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/147250172/Measuring-Cognitive-Distractions-FINAL">study by the American Automobile Association</a>, aka AAA.<br />
<br />
The researchers behind the study, which is titled Measuring Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile, developed a standard metric by which they could rate and compare the level of cognitive distraction while performing certain tasks while driving. The results showed that while talking to a passenger, using a hand-held phone and making a hands-free phone call all created similar levels of cognitive distraction, using a text-to-speech system to send a text or email actually ranked higher on the scale. Indeed, the text-to-speech task ranked high enough to be classified as a Category-3 level of distraction, whereas the others were all classified Category-2.<br />
<br />
The researchers remarked, "The assumption that if the eyes were on the road and the hands were on the steering wheel then voice-based interactions would be safe appears to be unwarranted. Simply put, hands-free does not mean risk-free." They go on to warn their findings apply equally to any voice-based interaction with a vehicle, not just speech-to-text systems. So behaviors we've already become accustomed to, like asking <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/sync/">SYNC</a> to play an artist or <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/idrive/">iDrive</a> to set the navigation's destination to home, could be more distracting than holding our smartphones up to our ears.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/">Study suggests voice-controlled technology in the car is less safe than thought</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20620824/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>aaa</category><category>american automobile association</category><category>distracted driving</category><category>measuring cognitive distraction in the automobile</category><category>voice control</category><category>voice recognition</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:30:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20620824/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20620824/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/13/study-suggests-voice-controlled-technology-in-the-car-is-less-sa/20620824/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20620824</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/eyes-free-distracted-driving_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[NASCAR's Jason Leffler dies from injuries sustained in crash]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/racing/" rel="tag">Racing</a></p><a href="http://Veteran NASCAR driver Jason Leffler was killed in a race accident Wednesday night, during a sprint car event at the Bridgeport Speedway in New Jersey. Having raced at many levels of NASCAR as well as IndyCar, Yahoo! Sports says that the 37-year-old racer spent this year racing on dirt tracks in a Sprint Car."><img height="418" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/jason-leffler-628.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Veteran <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nascar/">NASCAR</a> driver Jason Leffler was killed in a race accident Wednesday night, during a sprint car event at the Bridgeport Speedway in New Jersey. Having raced at many levels of NASCAR as well as IndyCar, <em>Yahoo! Sports</em> says that the 37-year-old racer spent this year racing on dirt tracks in a sprint car.<br />
<br />
The report says that his car flipped over during the "Night of Wings" event, and he was airlifted to the hospital where he was pronounced dead. According to <em>ESPN</em>, this marks at least the fourth fatal crash at a dirt track this year, including <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/17/two-killed-in-crash-at-california-sprint-car-race-w-videos/">two people killed at a sprint car event</a> at Marysville Raceway Park in Northern California.<br />
<br />
Leffler had most recently run in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/sprint+cup+series/">Sprint Cup</a> race last weekend at Pocono, but spent most of his 12-year NASCAR career in the Nationwide Series where he visited victory lane twice. He also won a race in the NASCAR Camping World Truck Series and finished 17th at the 2000 Indianapolis 500. A single father, Leffler is survived by his 5-year-old son.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/">NASCAR's Jason Leffler dies from injuries sustained in crash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20620311/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>jason leffler</category><category>lefturn</category><category>nascar</category><category>racecar safety</category><category>sprint car</category><category>sprint car crash</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:31:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20620311/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20620311/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/13/nascars-jason-leffler-dies-from-injuries-sustained-in-crash/20620311/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20620311</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/jason-leffler-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Automakers to use scratch-resistant Gorilla Glass in the very near future]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/view/515921/mobile-summit-2013-cornings-gorilla-glass-is-coming-to-cars-next/"><img height="419" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/gorilla-glass-628.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Today's automotive windshields are commonly made with two layers of tempered glass sandwiching a sheet of optically clear polyvinyl butyral (PVB), a plastic layer that holds everything in place even when the glass is broken. While the basic design works very well (credit <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/henry+ford/">Henry Ford</a> with introducing laminated glass in 1919), scratches and chips in the glass weaken the material to the point where it may eventually crack and require replacement.<br />
<br />
But those headaches may disappear if Corning's Gorilla Glass becomes an industry standard. Gorilla Glass is the registered name for the durable and scratch resistant glass that covers the face of more than 1.5 billion consumer electronic devices. Whether the maker of your smartphone, tablet or PDA admits it or not, chances are good that you've got the material close at hand.<br />
<br />
Having a windshield that is scratch and chip resistant is a big improvement, but there are other advantages to Gorilla Glass, says Corning. The company's senior vice president, Jeffrey Evenson, told <em>MIT Technology Review</em> that the glass is lighter than what is used today, and it provides a better acoustic barrier from outside noise.<br />
<br />
As is often the case with innovative technologies, Gorilla Glass doesn't come cheap. Even so, Evenson predicts that at least one unnamed high-end automaker will introduce a vehicle with Gorilla Glass within the year. Any guesses on whom it will be?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/">Automakers to use scratch-resistant Gorilla Glass in the very near future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20619068/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>automotive windshield</category><category>corning</category><category>gorilla glass</category><category>gorilla glass windshield</category><category>windshield</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:29:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20619068/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20619068/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/12/automakers-to-use-scratch-resistant-gorilla-glass-in-the-very-ne/20619068/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20619068</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/gorilla-glass-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Aston Martin recalling 689 vehicles over faulty throttle arms]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/" rel="tag">Aston Martin</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-aston-martin-db9-review/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2013-aston-martin-db9-review.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
There have been quite a few recalls to report lately, but as proof that no automaker is immune from the bug, the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has announced a recall that affects almost the entire 2012-13 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/">Aston Martin</a> lineup of vehicles. A total of 689 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/db9/">DB9</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/rapide/">Rapide</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/virage/">Virage</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/v8+vantage/">V8 Vantage</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/aston+martin/v12+vantage/">V12 Vantage</a> models built between May 2012 and April 2013 are being recalled due to an issue with the throttle pedal arm that could cause it to break without warning. Only 498 recalled vehicles are currently in customers' possession.<br />
<br />
Aston Martin says that the first broken throttle pedal was experienced at a press event back in March, and after the part was examined it was determined that the issue was caused by an incorrect manufacturing process. To fix the problem, Aston Martin will be replacing the throttle pedal assemblies on affected vehicles, but no dates have yet been announced for when the recall will begin. <a href="/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/#continued">Scroll down</a> for more info on the recall as well as contact numbers for Aston Martin and NHTSA.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Aston Martin recalling 689 vehicles over faulty throttle arms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/">Aston Martin recalling 689 vehicles over faulty throttle arms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20617231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>aston martin</category><category>aston martin db9</category><category>aston martin rapide</category><category>aston martin recall</category><category>aston martin v12 vantage</category><category>aston martin v8 vantage</category><category>aston martin virage</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20617231/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20617231/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/12/aston-martin-recalling-689-vehicles-over-faulty-throttle-arms/20617231/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20617231</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2013-aston-martin-db9-review_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[SC investigating changeable electronic license plates [w/poll]]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p><a href="/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/#continued"><img alt="electronic license plate"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/electronic-license-plate.png" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 363px;" /></a><br />
<br />
South Carolina may soon lead the way into the future with electronic <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/license+plate/">license plates</a> for cars and trucks. Using so-called electronic paper, technology similar to what is seen on digital readers like the Amazon Kindle, these new license plates would be capable of dynamically changing from normal numbers and letters to a word like SUSPENDED, UNINSURED or STOLEN.<br />
<br />
Both passing motorists and police would be able to read the plate's message, and the designers say warning messages could be in bright red or made to flash. Each digital license plate would be linked to the DMV using a cellular connection, and power for the display would be generated either by the vibrations of an automobile or by a solar film over the plate. Power would only be required to change the plate's display - no power is required to keep the current display in place, and its creators say the DMV would not be able to track the plate.<br />
<br />
At present, a proposal is in the works that would see state-owned vehicles in South Carolina use these electronic plates in a pilot program. If successful, and if cost can be brought to manageable levels, electronic plates could replace the simple stamped metal plates currently in use across the country. We have to wonder, though, how the general population would react to digital license plates that are connected wireless to an agency like the DMV. Why not voice your opinion in our completely unscientific poll, but not before watching the <a href="/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/#continued">video report below</a>.<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/#poll82937">View Poll</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SC investigating changeable electronic license plates [w/poll]</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/">SC investigating changeable electronic license plates [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20618083/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>dmv</category><category>e paper</category><category>electronic license plate</category><category>electronic paper</category><category>eplate</category><category>license plate</category><category>south carolina</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:30:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20618083/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20618083/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/11/sc-investigating-changeable-electronic-license-plates-w-poll/20618083/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20618083</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/electronic-license-plate_thumbnail.png</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[More than 50% of NY drivers fail basic road test]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/city-fail-road-test-2012-article-1.1367690"><img alt="Crazed teenage girl motorist behind the wheel"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/crazed-teen-girl-motorist.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 419px;" /></a><br />
<br />
A new analysis of data from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/new+york+state/">New York State</a> has revealed that less than half of those who took a driving test in <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/new+york+city/">New York City</a> last year passed the on-road exam. <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/city-fail-road-test-2012-article-1.1367690">According to the <em>New York Daily News</em></a>, a total of 46 percent of the 181,196 individuals who took the basic road test in 2012 passed the assessment, down from 52 percent the year prior. Not surprisingly, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/aaa/">American Automobile Association</a> and driving school owners point to the fact that schools have cut driver's education in an attempt to save money as the main culprit behind the slide. Ill-qualified family members often step in to fill the educational gap, and the result is young drivers who aren't properly prepared for a road test.<br />
<br />
In New York, those applying for a driver's license are required to first get a learner's permit and complete a five-hour driving course. New drivers under the age of 18 must complete 50 hours of driving practice while supervised by a licensed driver. The state requires 15 of those hours to be at night.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/">More than 50% of NY drivers fail basic road test</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://cms.aol.com/8/content/posts/edit/20617655/0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20617655/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>drivers license</category><category>driving test</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york drivers fail driving test</category><category>new york state</category><category>test</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:30:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20617655/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20617655/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/11/more-than-50-of-ny-drivers-fail-basic-road-test/20617655/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20617655</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/crazed-teen-girl-motorist_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[2013 Dodge Dart faces recall over stalling issue]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-dodge-dart-review-0/"><img alt="2013 Dodge Dart - front three-quarter view at sunset" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2013-dodge-dart-628-sunset.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> has announced that it will recall some 14,800 <a href="http://autoblog.com/dodge/dart/">Dodge Dart</a> compacts due to a potential stalling issue. The Auburn Hills-based automaker says that select 2013 model year sedans equipped with its 1.4-liter Multiair four-cylinder engine and dual-clutch transmission may need to have their engine control modules remapped.<br />
<br />
According to Chrysler, the problem was uncovered during routine cold weather testing. Apparently, engineers parked a Dart inside of a 20-degree climate chamber for eight hours, only to have it stall after startup and driving "a short distance." Dealers have reported similar issues in customer cars, prompting the recall, but Chrysler says it knows of no accidents or injuries that have been reported as a result of the problem.<br />
<br />
The action covers around 12,900 vehicles in the US and its territories, as well as 1,900 units in Canada, five in Mexico and 16 examples that have ventured beyond the NAFTA region. No word yet on when customers will be notified to bring their vehicles in for service, but the ECM retuning will be performed at no cost.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2013 Dodge Dart faces recall over stalling issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/">2013 Dodge Dart faces recall over stalling issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20606226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 dodge dart</category><category>dodge</category><category>dodge dart</category><category>dodge dart recall</category><category>dodge recall</category><category>multiair</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:45:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20606226/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20606226/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/11/2013-dodge-dart-faces-recall-over-stalling-issue/20606226/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20606226</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/2013-dodge-dart-628-sunset_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #336 LIVE!]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/infotainment/" rel="tag">Infotainment</a></p><img alt="Autoblog podcast graphic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/podcastlivev2stamp-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 305px;" /><br />
<br />
We're set to record <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast #336 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments via our Q&amp;A module below. Subscribe to the <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">in iTunes</a> if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/channel/autoblog-podcast">UStream</a> (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.<br />
<br />
<strong><big>Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #336</big></strong>

<ul>
	<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">Jeep rear-mounted fuel tank controversy</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/07/first-live-photos-and-impressions-of-toyotas-2014-corolla/">2014 Toyota Corolla</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/apple-unveils-ios-for-the-car/">Apple iOS for cars</a></li>
</ul>
<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript">var vhm_widget_settings = { eventId: 3221259, colorScheme: 'redblack', width: 628, height: 550, sizeClass: 3};</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/qawidget.js.jsp"></script><noscript><span>Can't see the EventBox? <a href="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/view?eventId=1920456&amp;colorScheme=redblack">Click Here.</a></span><br/><br/><a href='http://www.voicesheardmedia.com'>Voices Heard Media</a></noscript><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/">Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #336 LIVE!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20607131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2014 toyota corolla</category><category>apple</category><category>apple ios</category><category>apple ios for cars</category><category>autoblog podcast topics</category><category>ios for cars</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep fuel tank</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>podcast</category><category>podcast topics</category><category>toyota</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:49:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20607131/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20607131/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/10/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-336-live/20607131/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20607131</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/podcastlivev2stamp-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Bob Lutz, UAW rep commend Chrysler for not bowing to NHTSA recall pressure [w/poll]]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a></p><img alt="Auto exec Bob Lutz interviewed by reporters" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/bob-lutz-interview.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 420px;" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/bob+lutz/">Bob Lutz</a>, the well-known executive with a range of automakers including both <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/general+motors/">General Motors</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a>, says he supports Chrysler for not caving under <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/05/chrysler-defies-nhtsa-says-it-wont-recall-2-7m-jeep-grand-cher/">federal pressure to issue a recall</a> on 2.7 million <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/">Jeep</a> vehicles. The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is arguing that the plastic fuel tanks positioned behind the axles of certain 1993-2004 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/grand+cherokee/">Grand Cherokee</a> models and 2002-2007 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Liberty</a> models may become punctured in a collision and potentially catch fire, so it has called upon Chrysler to recall the vehicles. 15 deaths and 46 injuries have been attributed to the issue. For its part, Chrysler has maintained that its models "met and exceeded" all safety applicable mandates when they were manufactured, and furthermore, they argue that the government agency's own data proves that the vehicles are no more dangerous than similar SUVs produced by other automakers at the time. As a result, it is taking the unusual step of refusing to recall the vehicles.<br />
<br />
According to <em><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130608/AUTO0101/306070047/1148/rss25">The Detroit News</a>,</em> Lutz says Chrysler is right to push back when the government is out of line. Lutz also said that he wished he could have done the same when NHTSA urged Chrysler to issue a recall on certain minivans back when he was with the automaker 25 years ago.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/united+auto+workers/">United Auto Workers</a> Vice President General Holiefield also defended Chrysler by saying, "Our legendary Jeeps are crafted with pride by our dedicated UAW American workforce who work tirelessly to ensure the utmost quality of each Jeep that is produced for customers."<br />
<br />
Who do you think is in the right, Chrysler or NHTSA? Vote in our poll below, then have your say in Comments.<br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/#poll82902">View Poll</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/">Bob Lutz, UAW rep commend Chrysler for not bowing to NHTSA recall pressure [w/poll]</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20605515/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>bob lutz</category><category>chrysler</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>uaw</category><category>united auto workers</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:31:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20605515/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20605515/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/10/bob-lutz-uaw-rep-commend-chrysler-for-not-bowing-to-nhtsa-recal/20605515/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20605515</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/bob-lutz-interview_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[BMW M3 driving off cliff is a chilling PSA]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/#continued"><img alt="BMW E46 M3 about to go over a cliff - video screencap" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/bmw-m3-cliff-roll.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 345px;" /></a><br />
<br />
We're a little shocked that the unnamed owner of this cliff-diving E46 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/m3/">BMW M3</a> would upload the in-car footage of his accident to YouTube. Not only that, he uploaded two videos: raw footage of his roll down the cliff (it looks like somewhere in the Southwest, maybe Arizona) and a tribute video for his <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/">BMW</a> that suffered the most severe consequences of understeer. Not only does uploading the videos leave him wide open for judgment by fellow enthusiasts (just read the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkasHdSb1nQ&amp;feature=youtu.be">YouTube comments</a>), but we imagine if the police and his insurance company somehow don't know about the incident already, they will shortly. <a href="/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/#continued">Scroll below</a> to view for yourself.<br />
<br />
The raw footage shows the sort of driving that led to the M3's violent tumble, and it serves as a good public service announcement reminder for everyone out there: Just like the Spengler's streams, double yellow lines aren't meant to be crossed. Also, hard driving is one thing, but hammering on public roads at speeds clearly above your skill levels as a driver is not only a recipe for legal trouble, it's a script for ruining your car at the very least, if not your life. <p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BMW M3 driving off cliff is a chilling PSA</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/">BMW M3 driving off cliff is a chilling PSA</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20606062/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>bmw</category><category>bmw m3</category><category>bmw m3 drive off cliff</category><category>bmw m3 falls off cliff while</category><category>bmw m3 goes off cliff</category><category>bmwm3driveoffcliff</category><category>bmwm3fallsoffcliffwhile</category><category>bmwm3goesoffcliff</category><category>driving fail</category><category>e46 bmw</category><category>fail</category><category>m3 cliff roll</category><category>video</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:57:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20606062/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20606062/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/10/bmw-m3-driving-off-cliff-is-a-chilling-psa/20606062/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20606062</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/bmw-m3-cliff-roll_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Track worker killed by crane following Canadian Grand Prix]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/racing/" rel="tag">Racing</a></p><img alt="Track worker killed in freak crane accident following Canadian Grand Prix" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/canadian-grand-prix-crane-death.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 422px;" /><br />
<br />
The motorsports community lost a member over the weekend when a track worker was killed just after the checkered flag waved at Formula One's <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/canadian+grand+prix/">Canadian Grand Prix</a> in Montreal. When the race ended, track officials were working to remove the crashed racecar of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/formula+1/">Formula 1</a> driver Esteban Gutierrez (shown above) when a mobile crane lifting the car ran over the unidentified 38-year-old volunteer in a freak accident.<br />
<br />
According to <em>The Globe and Mail</em>, the 10-year track veteran slipped and fell, and the crane operator was unable to see him in time to keep from running over his body. Emergency workers were quick to respond, and the unnamed worker, a volunteer, was soon taken to the hospital by helicopter after being stabilized by track medics. Sadly, he later died as a result of his injuries.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/">Track worker killed by crane following Canadian Grand Prix</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20605387/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>canada</category><category>canadian grand prix</category><category>circuit gilles villeneuve</category><category>f1</category><category>formula 1</category><category>formula one</category><category>motorsports</category><category>motorsports death</category><category>racing</category><category>track marshal</category><category>track safety</category><category>track worker killed</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:28:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20605387/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20605387/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/06/10/track-worker-killed-by-crane-following-canadian-grand-prix/20605387/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20605387</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/06/canadian-grand-prix-crane-death_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>