<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog Recalls</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog Recalls</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator>
<itunes:author>Dan Roth, Zach Bowman and  Jeff Ross</itunes:author><itunes:image href="http://o.aolcdn.com/os/autoblog/ab-podcast-itunes.jpg" /><itunes:summary>The podcast by the people who obsessively cover the auto industry.</itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Games and Hobbies"><itunes:category text="Automotive" /></itunes:category><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Cadillac to recall 20,000 SRX models over wheels that could fall off]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/" rel="tag">Cadillac</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-cadillac-srx-new-york-2012/"><img alt="2013 Cadillac SRX - front three-quarter view, silver" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-cadillac-srx.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
A potential issue with the lug nuts on 19,871 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/srx/">2013 Cadillac SRX</a> in the US and Canada has lead to a recall of the luxury crossover. Those lug nuts that have a Teflon topcoat, identified by their bluish tint, could loosen and cause "creaking, rattling or grinding noises or steering vibrations." In the worst case scenario, a wheel could fall off, but there have been no reports of that happening, nor any reports of accidents or injuries due to the issue. <br />
<br />
This is the second recall action on the SRX over the last few months. In March, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/cadillac/">Cadillac</a> recalled 27,000 SRX models over a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/03/21/gm-recalling-2013-buick-lacrosse-cadillac-srx-over-transmission/">transmission programming issue</a>. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gm/">General Motors</a> will begin notifying customers with the potentially faulty parts on June 3, at which time they can take their vehicles to dealers to have the tires rotated and new nuts installed. A further 7,397 SRXs exported from North America also face the recall action. <p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/">Cadillac to recall 20,000 SRX models over wheels that could fall off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20580817/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac</category><category>cadillac recall</category><category>cadillac srx</category><category>cadillac srx recall</category><category>cadillacsrxrecall</category><category>gm</category><category>lug nut</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>srx recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20580817/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20580817/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/23/cadillac-to-recall-20-000-srx-models-over-wheels-that-could-fall/20580817/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20580817</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013-cadillac-srx_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Alfa Romeo 8C, Maserati Quattroporte and Granturismo models recalled over rust fears]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/maserati/" rel="tag">Maserati</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/alfa-romeo/" rel="tag">Alfa Romeo</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/luxury/" rel="tag">Luxury</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2009-alfa-romeo-8c-competizione-2/#photo-338323"><img alt="Alfa Romeo 8C"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/alfa-romeo-8c.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 412px;" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has announced <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/maserati/">Maserati</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/alfa+romeo/">Alfa Romeo</a> are recalling certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/maserati/quattroporte/">Quattroporte</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/maserati/quattroporte/">Granturismo</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/alfa+romeo+8c/">8C</a> models over potentially faulty tie rod ends. According to NHTSA, 2005-2008 Quattroporte, 2008 Granturismo and 2008 8C units may have been assembled with tie rod ends that have insufficient corrosion protection. As such, the components may rust, weaken and potentially fail. If that happens, the driver could lose control of the vehicle and cause an accident.<br />
<br />
Maserati and Alfa Romeo will contact owners and replace the tie rod end assemblies once the recall gets underway in June. All told, 7,438 vehicles are impacted by the recall. You can read the full NHTSA notice <a href="/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/#continued">below</a> for more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Alfa Romeo 8C, Maserati Quattroporte and Granturismo models recalled over rust fears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/">Alfa Romeo 8C, Maserati Quattroporte and Granturismo models recalled over rust fears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 20 May 2013 08:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20575204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2008 maserati granturismo</category><category>alfa romeo</category><category>alfa romeo 8c</category><category>maserati</category><category>maserati recall</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:44:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20575204/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20575204/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/20/alfa-romeo-8c-maserati-quattroporte-and-granturismo-models-reca/20575204/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20575204</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/alfa-romeo-8c_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[2013 Subaru Legacy and Outback recalled over potential steering loss]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/wagons/" rel="tag">Wagon</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/" rel="tag">Subaru</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-subaru-legacy-0/"><img alt="2013 Subaru Legacy sedan - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/017-2013-subaru-legacy628opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> today announced a recall that affects 5,379 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/legacy/">Legacy</a> sedan and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/outback/">Outback</a> wagon models in the United States. All of the affected 2013 model-year vehicles were built between February 15 and June 15 of 2012.<br />
<br />
According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, "the inner and outer shafts of the steering column assembly may become disengaged from one another" in these vehicles. If that happens, the driver can lose the ability to steer the vehicle, which could obviously lead to all sorts of harmful things.<br />
<br />
Subaru will notify owners of the problem, and affected models will have their steering columns replaced at dealerships, free of charge. <a href="/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the official NHSTA report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2013 Subaru Legacy and Outback recalled over potential steering loss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/">2013 Subaru Legacy and Outback recalled over potential steering loss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 15 May 2013 10:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20569881/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 subaru legacy</category><category>2013 subaru outback</category><category>recall</category><category>subaru</category><category>subaru legacy</category><category>subaru outback</category><category>subaru recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:44:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20569881/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20569881/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/15/2013-subaru-legacy-outback-recalled-steering-loss/20569881/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20569881</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/017-2013-subaru-legacy628opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee/#photo-199701"><img alt="2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 400px;" /></a><br />
<br />
 <img class="right border" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2010-jeep-commander.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 250px; height: 156px; float: right;" /><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> has issued a recall covering a combined 469,000 units of the 2005-2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/grand+cherokee/">Jeep Grand Cherokee </a>and the 2006-2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/jeep+commander/">Jeep Commander</a> (inset). Of that number, 295,000 are in the US, roughly 33,000 in Canada and Mexico and the remainder in other markets. It seems an electrical fault in the transfer case can allow the affected SUVs to shift into neutral on their own, while an <em>Associated Press</em> report says that Chrysler had "found cracks in a circuit board that turns the four-wheel-drive system on and off." The issue was discovered when an owner started his car remotely and it rolled away.<br />
<br />
Chrysler is expected to begin notifying owners in June 2013, who can then take their cars to dealers. The dealer will reflash the final drive controller free of charge. There's a bulletin from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> <a href="/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#continued">below</a> with more information.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/">Chrysler recalls 468,700 Jeep Grand Cherokees, Commanders over rollaway risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 13 May 2013 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20565869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>jeep</category><category>jeep commander</category><category>jeep commander recall</category><category>jeep commander recalls</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>jeep grand cherokee recalls</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>jeep recalls</category><category>jeepcommanderrecall</category><category>jeepcommanderrecalls</category><category>jeepgrandcherokeerecalls</category><category>jeeprecall</category><category>jeeprecalls</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:45:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20565869/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20565869/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/13/chrysler-recalls-468-700-jeep-grand-cherokees-commanders-over-r/20565869/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20565869</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2008-jeep-grand-cherokee_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[BMW adds 42k 3 Series models to massive airbag recall]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130506/AUTO0104/305060385/1148/rss25"><img height="419" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2002-bmw-3series628.gif" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
On the heels of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/">massive airbag recall</a> just last month, which included a total of 3.4 million Japanese automobiles from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/Nissan/">Nissan</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/">Mazda</a>, German automaker <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/">BMW</a> has announced that it will recall 42,000 of its 2002-03 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/3+series/">3 Series</a> models (E46 platform) for the same problem. The recall is blamed on a single defective part, all from the same supplier, which may cause the airbag to catch fire or send metal fragments towards passengers in the front seats. BMW spokesman Dave Buchko told the <em>Detroit News</em> that the automaker knows of no improper "deployments or injuries related to this issue in any BMW."<br />
<br />
The part in question, supplied from a company named Takata, was manufactured incorrectly at its Moses Lake, WA, plant. The company also disclosed that some airbag components may have been exposed to moisture at another one of its locations, in Mexico. According to Takata, there have been six incidents worldwide (four in the United States) and none have resulted in injuries.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/">BMW adds 42k 3 Series models to massive airbag recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 06 May 2013 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20559341/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>airbag</category><category>airbag recall</category><category>bmw airbag recall</category><category>bmw recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:45:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20559341/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20559341/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/06/bmw-adds-42k-3-series-models-to-massive-airbag-recall/20559341/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20559341</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2002-bmw-3series628_thumbnail.gif</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[38k GM eAssist hybrids recalled for circuit board, fire risk]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-chevrolet-malibu-eco/"><img alt="2013 Chevy Malibu Eco" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013malibueco026-1303317332.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/gm/">General Motors</a> has issued a recall covering 38,197 2012 and 2013 model-year <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/malibu/">Chevy Malibu Eco</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/lacrosse/">Buick LaCrosse</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/regal/">Regal</a> sedans equipped with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/eassist/">eAssist</a>, and sold in the United States. The automaker will check the generator control module for proper operation. Only vehicles built before December 2012 are being recalled.<br />
<br />
According to the automaker, a malfunctioning generator control module could slowly drain the battery, causing an indicator to light up in the dash. If that indicator is ignored, the driver may experience a stalling engine, and in some cases, "a burning or melting odor, smoke, and, in rare instances, a fire in the trunk."<br />
<br />
GM says the issue is not with the eAssist battery pack; the smoke and fire comes from overheating of the control board. One trunk fire has been reported, but no injuries are known. Scroll down <a href="/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/#continued">below</a> for the official press release from GM.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>38k GM eAssist hybrids recalled for circuit board, fire risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/">38k GM eAssist hybrids recalled for circuit board, fire risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 06 May 2013 13:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20559352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>buick</category><category>buick lacrosse</category><category>buick regal</category><category>chevy</category><category>chevy malibu eco</category><category>eassist</category><category>gm</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:27:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20559352/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20559352/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/06/38k-gm-eassist-hybrids-recalled-for-circuit-board-fire-risk/20559352/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20559352</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/2013malibueco026-1303317332_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-2013-toyota-fj-cruiser/#photo-5738632"><img height="410" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/004-toyota-fj-cruiser.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
Now, hold on. This recall isn't quite as serious as it sounds. Yes, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> is recalling 11,489 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/fj+cruiser/">FJ Cruiser</a> models from the 2007 to 2013 model years, and yes, it's because the vehicles, as <a href="http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/owners/SearchResults?searchType=ID&amp;targetCategory=R&amp;searchCriteria.nhtsa_ids=13V163000&amp;refurl=rss">the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration states</a>, "fail to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, 'Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment.'" But read the fine print and you'll see the catch: This recall is only for vehicles fitted with the automaker's auxiliary lighting kit that can be mounted to the front bumper.<br />
<br />
Basically, the auxiliary lamp assemblies use 55-watt bulbs, and when these are turned on in conjunction with the upper beam headlamps, it's a pretty blinding sight. NHTSA states that excessively bright lights can blind other drivers, increasing the risk for a crash.<br />
<br />
To remedy the situation, Toyota will replace the 55-watt bulbs with cooler 35-watt units. The recall is expected to begin later this month. <a href="/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the full details in the NHTSA report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/">Toyota recalling FJ Cruiser due to excessively bright headlights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 05 May 2013 11:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20557364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>headlights</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota fj cruiser</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 11:12:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20557364/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20557364/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/05/05/toyota-recalling-fj-cruiser-due-to-excessively-bright-headlights/20557364/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20557364</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/05/004-toyota-fj-cruiser_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/" rel="tag">Subaru</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2014-subaru-forester-xt-first-drive/"><img alt="2014 Subaru Forester - front three-quarter view" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/forester-xt-lead-opt.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 419px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Pedal entrapment and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/unintended+acceleration/">unintended acceleration</a> are hot-button topics these days, so automakers are always staying alert for potential problems. For <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> and its newly introduced <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/forester/">2014 Forester</a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued a recall due to improperly manufactured floor mats that could become an obstruction for the gas, brake or clutch pedals. The good news, of course, is that even if drivers experience this problem, the 2014 Forester comes standard with <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/brake+override/">brake override</a>.<br />
<br />
At issue with the floor mats on 10,137 Forester models built between January and March of this year is that the resin material used on the underside of the mats can curl when exposed to heat. If the leading edge of the driver's mat curls enough, it can come in contact with the pedals making acceleration, braking and shifting more difficult - possibly resulting in a crash. To fix the problem, Subaru is replacing the entire set of floor mats in all of the affected units. The official NHTSA recall notice is posted <a href="/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/">Subaru recalls new Forester over pedal entrapment fears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20551818/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2014 subaru forester</category><category>forester recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>recall</category><category>subaru</category><category>subaru forester</category><category>subaru recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:01:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20551818/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20551818/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/30/subaru-recalls-new-forester-over-pedal-entrapment-fears/20551818/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20551818</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/forester-xt-lead-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-nissan-altima-first-drive/#photo-5044351"><img alt="2013 Nissan Altima - front three-quarter view with brick wall" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2013-nissan-altima.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
A pressure regulator that over- or underinflated spare tires for five days earlier this year has led to a recall of 123,308 units of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/altima/">2013 Nissan Altima</a>. Sedans that were manufactured from March 21-26 are those possibly affected by the temporary tire snafu, the recall for which will begin on May 3.<br />
<br />
Those notified of the issue can take their sedans to their local <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> dealer, who will check the tire pressure and correct it if necessary, but we imagine owners can probably just whip out a tire gauge to check and adjust the inflation for themselves. Should you need it, there's an official notice from the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> <a href="/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#continued">below</a> with a few more details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/">Nissan recalls over 120,000 Altimas due to... spare tire inflation?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20550797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 nissan altima</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan altima</category><category>nissan altima recall</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>recall</category><category>spare tire</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550797/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550797/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/29/nissan-recalls-over-120-000-altimas-due-to-spare-tire-inflati/20550797/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20550797</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2013-nissan-altima_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Honda recalls 2012-13 Fit Sport models over stability control issue]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-honda-fit-sport/#photo-4370170"><img height="439" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2012-honda-fit-sport.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> is recalling 43,782 examples of the 2012 and 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/fit+sport/">Fit Sport</a> in the US and close to 2,000 more in Canada. During federal compliance testing it was discovered that the software for the Vehicle Stability Assist allows an excessive tilt angle before applying the brakes to prevent a crash. The issue only affects Fit Sports equipped with a certain kind of tire.<br />
<br />
Honda will notify owners in mid-May, at which time owners can take their cars to dealers to have the stability control software updated free of charge. There's a press release from Honda <a href="/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/#continued">below</a> with more details.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Honda recalls 2012-13 Fit Sport models over stability control issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/">Honda recalls 2012-13 Fit Sport models over stability control issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20550795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>honda</category><category>honda fit</category><category>honda fit recall</category><category>honda fit sport</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category><category>stability control</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:44:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550795/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20550795/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/29/honda-recalls-2012-13-fit-sport-models-over-stability-control-is/20550795/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20550795</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/2012-honda-fit-sport_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Japanese government chides Mitsubishi over recall delays]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/" rel="tag">Mitsubishi</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-phev-paris-2012/#photo-5322634"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/mitsubishi-outlander-phev.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
An official with the transport ministry in Japan has some stern words for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a>, taking the carmaker to task for not being more proactive and honest about its recalls. An investigation into The Tri-Star last December found Mitsubishi was tardy investigating problems and didn't explain itself forthrightly to the transport ministry about the issues. None of Mitsubishi's actions were illegal, and we should stress that this is a dialogue with Mitsubishi in Japan, not Mitsubishi Motors North America.<br />
<br />
The official advised the automaker to, "Come up with plans for improvement, implement them and report them to the ministry." It looks like the company will get more practice than it wants in that department, having to announce another recall for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/mitsubishi+outlander+phev|outlander+phev/">Outlander PHEV</a> over software and hardware glitches. Those recalls come just after Mitsu <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2013/04/25/mitsubishi-outlander-plug-in-battery-fire-cause/">finally figured out</a> the problem with overheating lithium-ion batteries that <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2013/04/15/mitsubishi-outlander-phev-production-halt-extended/">caused a production halt</a> of the plug-in hybrid SUV.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/">Japanese government chides Mitsubishi over recall delays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20548785/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>japan</category><category>japan transport ministry</category><category>mitsubishi</category><category>mitsubishi outlander</category><category>mitsubishi outlander phev</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:29:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20548785/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20548785/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/27/japanese-government-chides-mitsubishi-recall-delays/20548785/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20548785</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/mitsubishi-outlander-phev_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[About 20k Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti JX models recalled for potentially faulty brakes]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/" rel="tag">Infiniti</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-nissan-pathfinder-first-drive/#photo-5375790"><img height="417"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/13-2013-nissan-pathfinder-fd-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued a recall for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/pathfinder/">2013 Nissan Pathfinder</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/infiniti/jx/">2013 Infiniti JX</a> due to a problem with the front brakes. The problem is a result of the brake torque member (a part that attaches the brake caliper to the front suspension), which was cast improperly with a structural weakness that could possibly lead to "reduced braking, increasing the risk of a crash," according to NHTSA. How, you ask? If the part breaks, the brake caliper could move position and possibly make contact with the wheel.<br />
<br />
Around 20,000 of these sister crossovers are being recalled, but it doesn't sound like all were equipped with the faulty component. Dealers will inspect vehicles built between December 3, 2012 and January 29, 2013, and replace components from the defective batch. The recall goes into effect next month, but until then, the official recall notice is <a href="/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/#continued">posted below</a> with information for how owners can contact <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>About 20k Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti JX models recalled for potentially faulty brakes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/">About 20k Nissan Pathfinder, Infiniti JX models recalled for potentially faulty brakes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20545768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 infiniti jx</category><category>2013 nissan pathfinder</category><category>infiniti</category><category>infiniti jx</category><category>infiniti recall</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan pathfinder</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:17:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20545768/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20545768/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/19/about-20k-nissan-pathfinder-infiniti-jx-models-recalled-for-pot/20545768/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20545768</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/13-2013-nissan-pathfinder-fd-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Honda recalling 204k CR-V, Odyssey, Acura RDX models over rollaway risk]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/minivans/" rel="tag">Minivan/Van</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/" rel="tag">Acura</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2012-honda-cr-v/"><img alt="2012 Honda CR-V" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/cr-v628opt.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px; " /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> has announced a recall over a possible rollaway risk that affects 204,169 crossover and minivan models. The specific vehicles in question are the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/cr-v/">2012-13 Honda CR-V</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/odyssey/">Odyssey</a>, as well as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/acura/rdx/">2013 Acura RDX</a>.<br />
<br />
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, "the brake-shift interlock blocking mechanism may become slow and allow the gear selector to be moved from the Park position without pressing the brake pedal." In other words, these vehicles could unintentionally roll away.<br />
<br />
NHTSA states that this scenario may only happen during sub-freezing temperatures, but notes that this means the vehicles fail to conform with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 114: Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention. Honda will notify owners of the problem, and dealerships will install an updated interlocking mechanism free of charge.<br />
<br />
The recall is expected to begin on May 13. <a href="/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the full details from the NHTSA report.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Honda recalling 204k CR-V, Odyssey, Acura RDX models over rollaway risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/">Honda recalling 204k CR-V, Odyssey, Acura RDX models over rollaway risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20545757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>acura</category><category>acura rdx</category><category>honda</category><category>honda cr-v</category><category>honda odyssey</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:59:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20545757/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20545757/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/19/honda-recalling-204k-cr-v-odyssey-acura-rdx-models-over-rollaw/20545757/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20545757</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/cr-v628opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Toyota, Honda, Mazda and Nissan recall 3.4 million vehicles for faulty airbags]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/" rel="tag">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/" rel="tag">Mazda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/" rel="tag">Nissan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2003-2006-toyota-corolla/"><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/001-2003-2006-toyota-corolla628opt.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 410px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Most vehicle recalls that take place these days are a result of some problem that happens during the manufacturing process by the automaker, but as we see here, parts suppliers can also factor in to problematic safety issues. <em>Automotive News</em> is reporting that a total of 3.4 million vehicles produced by Japanese automakers between 2000 and 2004 are being recalled globally due to faulty airbags produced by an outside supplier, Takata Corp.<br />
<br />
According to the report, vehicles from <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/nissan/">Nissan</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/">Mazda</a> are being recalled because of passenger front airbags that do not inflate properly. Globally, Toyota is said to be recalling around 1.73 million cars including 510,000 in the US composed of <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/corolla/">Toyota Corolla</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/matrix/">Matrix</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/sequoia/">Sequoia</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/tundra/">Tundra</a> as well as the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/sc/">Lexus SC430</a> for the 2001 through 2003 model years; this is the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/01/30/toyota-announces-two-recalls-affecting-1m-corolla-matrix-and-le/">second time this year</a> the 2003 Corolla and Matrix have been recalled for an airbag problem. Honda is recalling 1.14 million models, Nissan another 480,000 and Mazda 45,463. The article says that Takata supplied faulty airbags to non-Japanese automakers, but it did not specify which ones.<br />
<br />
Honda and Toyota have released information on their own websites about the recall, while Nissan and Mazda have not yet commented. Read <a href="/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/#continued">official press releases from Honda and Toyota</a>, below, and look for updates as we have word from the others.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota, Honda, Mazda and Nissan recall 3.4 million vehicles for faulty airbags</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/">Toyota, Honda, Mazda and Nissan recall 3.4 million vehicles for faulty airbags</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20537342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>honda</category><category>honda recall</category><category>lexus sc430</category><category>mazda</category><category>mazda recall</category><category>nissan</category><category>nissan recall</category><category>recall</category><category>takata corp</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota corolla</category><category>toyota matrix</category><category>toyota recall</category><category>Toyota Sequoia</category><category>toyota tundra</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20537342/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20537342/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/11/toyota-honda-nissan-mazda-recall-3-4-million-for-faulty-airbags/20537342/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20537342</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/01/001-2003-2006-toyota-corolla628opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Chrysler recalling over 200k vehicles across its brands]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/" rel="tag">Ram</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-review/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/04/dodge-challenger-srt8-392.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
With more than 200,000 units across six separate recalls and almost all of its brands, it appears that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/">Chrysler</a> has officially jumped headfirst into the recall pool this month. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has issued three official recalls for the automaker, and <em>The Detroit News</em> is reporting that the automaker itself has announced three more.<br />
<br />
The biggest of the recalls applies to about 120,000 Dodge <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/charger/">Charger</a>, Dodge <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/challenger/">Challenger</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/300/">Chrysler 300</a> models for 2011 and 2012 due to faulty wiring harnesses for the seat-mounted side airbags, which could lead to these airbags not deploying in the event of a crash. A little more than 60,000 two-wheel-drive versions of the 2007-2008 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/">Dodge</a> Nitro and 2008 Jeep <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/liberty/">Liberty</a> SUVs are being recalled due to a heat shield that could cause the driveshaft to break, which if that isn't bad on its own, could then hit underneath where the airbag sensor is mounted, causing the airbags to deploy. Wrapping up NHTSA's recall notices, about 20,000 Jeep <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/patriot/">Patriot</a> and Jeep <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/jeep/compass/">Compass</a> models for 2012 are also being recalled due to a problem with the fuel tank transfer tube that could lead to the vehicle stalling. The LX car recall campaign is going into effect this month, while the other two will start next month - all three notices are posted below.<br />
<br />
In addition to the official NHTSA recalls, <em>The Detroit News</em> is also reporting that Chrysler is recalling more than 16,000 Ram trucks and a small number of Dodge Dart sedans. Around 6,500 2013 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/1500/">Ram 1500</a> trucks will be recalled due to an improper adjustment of the parking brake cable from the factory, while 7,000 Cummins-powered 2013 Ram Heavy Duty trucks are being recalled due to an engine cover that does not have as much heat resistance as it is supposed to. Finally, a total of 46 Dodge Dart sedans are being recalled due to a problem with the brake calipers and/or parking brake.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler recalling over 200k vehicles across its brands</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/">Chrysler recalling over 200k vehicles across its brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20536183/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler 300</category><category>chrysler recall</category><category>dodge</category><category>dodge challenger</category><category>dodge charger</category><category>dodge nitro</category><category>dodge recall</category><category>jeep</category><category>jeep compass</category><category>jeep liberty</category><category>jeep patriot</category><category>jeep recall</category><category>National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</category><category>ram</category><category>ram 1500</category><category>ram heavy duty</category><category>ram recall</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20536183/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20536183/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/10/chrysler-recalling-over-200k-vehicles-across-its-brands/20536183/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20536183</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/04/dodge-challenger-srt8-392_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Hyundai recalling 186k Elantras due to possible headliner detachment]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-hyundai-elantra-review/"><img alt="Hyundai Elantra" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/08/01-2011-hyundai-elantra-review-opt.jpg" style="width: 628px; height: 417px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Following at least one reported incident of a man who <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/05/14/feds-investigating-2012-hyundai-elantra-after-airbag-separates-d/">claimed his ear was sliced in half</a> following the deployment of his side airbag, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> has announced a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/recall/">recall</a> for certain model year 2011 through 2013 Elantras; specifically those manufactured from November 12, 2010 through March 5, 2013. In these <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/elantra/">Elantra</a> models, a support bracket that is attached to the car's headliner may become dislodged when the side curtain airbag deploys. If that should happen, occupants may be in danger of a laceration injury by way of the flying bracket.<br />
<br />
Hyundai will notify owners of affected vehicles, while dealers will service the dangerous bracket by applying adhesive strips. (Feel free to insert your own duct tape joke here.) The service will be performed free of charge, starting in May of this year. Follow on to read the <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> notice, <a href="/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai recalling 186k Elantras due to possible headliner detachment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/">Hyundai recalling 186k Elantras due to possible headliner detachment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20535165/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2011 hyundai elantra</category><category>2012 hyundai elantra</category><category>2013 hyundai elantra</category><category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai elantra</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>nhtsa recall</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Seyth Miersma]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:58:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20535165/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20535165/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/10/hyundai-recalling-186k-elantras-due-to-possible-headliner-detach/20535165/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20535165</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/08/01-2011-hyundai-elantra-review-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport recalled over brake lamps]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/" rel="tag">Mitsubishi</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-1/#photo-5161116"><img alt="2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/001-2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 410px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<div>
	<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/">Mitsubishi</a> is recalling certain <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/outlander+sport/">2013 Outlander Sport</a> models for a couple of brake-related reasons. According to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, the brake lamps may illuminate continuously or intermittently. On top of that, the NHTSA report states that the vehicle's shift lever could be moved out of the Park position without depressing the brake pedal.<br />
	<br />
	A total of 4,539 Outlander Sport models are being recalled for these issues. All of the affected vehicles were built between June 11 and September 11, 2012.<br />
	<br />
	Obviously, both of these issues can be hazardous. If the brake lamps do not illuminate properly, other vehicles may not realize that the car is stopping. And if the shift lever can be moved from Park without touching the brake pedal, the vehicle could roll away unexpectedly.<br />
	<br />
	Mitsubishi will be notifying owners about these issues in the near future, though no specific schedule has been released as of this writing. <a href="/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the official NHTSA release.</div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport recalled over brake lamps</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/">2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport recalled over brake lamps</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20528565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 mitsubishi outlander sport</category><category>mitsubishi</category><category>mitsubishi outlander sport</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven J. Ewing]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 08:00:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20528565/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20528565/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/05/2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport-recalled-over-brake-lamps/20528565/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20528565</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/001-2013-mitsubishi-outlander-sport_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Small number of 2013 Buick Encore models recalled for loose steering wheel]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/" rel="tag">Buick</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-buick-encore-first-drive/"><img height="417" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/2013-buick-encore-fd.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/general+motors/">General Motors</a> has issued a recall and a stop sale for the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/buick/encore/">2013 Buick Encore</a> due to an issue that could result in the steering wheel falling off on certain models. In a letter to the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a>, GM says that 144 Encores equipped with heated steering wheels could have been incorrectly retrofitted due to a parts shortage.<br />
<br />
Needless to say, a loose or separated steering wheel would likely cause an accident if it happened while the vehicle was in motion. The recall doesn't go into effect until April 12, but concerned Encore owners can use the official recall notice (attached <a href="/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/#continued">below</a>) to contact GM.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Small number of 2013 Buick Encore models recalled for loose steering wheel</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/">Small number of 2013 Buick Encore models recalled for loose steering wheel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20529261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>2013 buick encore</category><category>buick</category><category>buick encore</category><category>buick recall</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:43:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20529261/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20529261/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/04/small-number-of-2013-buick-encore-models-recalled-for-loose-stee/20529261/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20529261</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/12/2013-buick-encore-fd_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[Hyundai and Kia recalling 1.6M more models for faulty brake switch]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/" rel="tag">Kia</a></p><a href="/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/#continued"><img height="419" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/2011hyundaisonata2.0t---01-opt.jpg" vspace="4" width="628" /></a><br />
<br />
In what is likely the largest recall campaign for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/kia/">Kia</a>, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national+highway+traffic+safety+administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has announced a recall of more than 1.6 million models due to a faulty brake switch. This is in addition to almost 700,000 Hyundai and Kia models <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/20/multiple-hyundai-recalls-for-brake-lamps-and-rust-issues-affect/">recalled for the same problem back in 2009</a>.<br />
<br />
In more than 620,000 Kia models and 1 million Hyundai products for the 2007 through 2011 model years, the brake switch could malfunction causing the brake lights to not illuminate, which could lead to accident. Other possible issues with a faulty switch include the cruise control not cancelling with the brake pedal, the push-button starter not working properly and the shift interlock not disengaging causing the transmission to be stuck in Park. To fix the problem, the brake lights switch will be replaced.<br />
<br />
Due to the large number of units being recalled, both automakers are issuing a notice by next month with parts not expected to be ready until June. The full list of affected vehicles and the NHTSA press releases are posted <a href="/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/#continued">below</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyundai and Kia recalling 1.6M more models for faulty brake switch</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/">Hyundai and Kia recalling 1.6M more models for faulty brake switch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20528166/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai accent</category><category>hyundai elantra</category><category>hyundai genesis coupe</category><category>hyundai recall</category><category>hyundai santa fe</category><category>hyundai sonata</category><category>hyundai tucson</category><category>Hyundai Veracruz</category><category>kia</category><category>kia optima</category><category>kia recall</category><category>kia rondo</category><category>kia sedona</category><category>kia sorento</category><category>kia soul</category><category>kia sportage</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:02:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20528166/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20528166/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/03/hyundai-kia-recalling-1-6m-more-models-for-faulty-brake-switch/20528166/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20528166</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/2011hyundaisonata2.0t---01-opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item>
    <title><![CDATA[NHTSA launching investigation into 2006-2008 Hyundai Sonata rust]]></title>
    <link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/</guid>
    <comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/#comments</comments>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/recalls-tsbs/" rel="tag">Recalls</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/" rel="tag">Hyundai</a></p><a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130329/AUTO0104/303290408/1361/NHTSA-investigating-Hyundai-Sonata-for-rust-complaints"><img alt="2006 Hyundai Sonata" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/sonata-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 405px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<em>The Detroit News</em> reports the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration/">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> is investigating almost 400,000 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/sonata/">Hyundai Sonata</a> models over rust complaints. So far, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/nhtsa/">NHTSA</a> has received six complaints that Sonata models, built between 2006 and 2008, have allegedly suffered rear control arm failures due to subframe rust. Three of those occurred at highway speeds, and two resulted in the actuation of the vehicle's stability control system, though no one was injured. An investigation is typically the first step toward determining whether or not a safety recall is necessary.<br />
<br />
This isn't the first recall for the Sonata. Last year <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/07/30/hyundai-recalls-over-220-000-sonata-and-santa-fe-models-over-air/">saw Hyundai recall</a> certain 2012 and 2013 models for side-curtain air bags that could deploy inadvertently, and the automaker issued a campaign to recall 139,500 Sonata sedans for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/26/breaking-hyundai-recalling-nearly-140-000-new-sonatas/">steering issues</a> back in 2010.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/">NHTSA launching investigation into 2006-2008 Hyundai Sonata rust</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 02 Apr 2013 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="/rss-term-of-use/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20523234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description>
    <category>hyundai</category><category>hyundai sonata</category><category>recall</category>
    
    <dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 08:00:00 EST</pubDate>
    
    <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20523234/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
    <comments-html-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20523234/article-comments.html</comments-html-url>
    <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/04/02/nhtsa-launching-investigation-into-2006-2008-hyundai-sonata-rust/20523234/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
    <postid>20523234</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/04/sonata-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>