Alongside the F-35 Lightning II fighter, there's hardly a single military program that has been subject to as much criticism as the US Navy's Littoral Combat Ship. The controversial program has resulted in two classes of small surface combatants (shown above, Freedom-class at left and Independence-class at right) along with millions of dollars in budget overruns and production problems.

As William D. Hartung and Jacob Marx of the Center for International Policy see it, there are even more deeply embedded issues that have doomed the LCS program. Those range from a lack of congressional oversight to the proclivity of defense contractors to deliver "unrealistically low" bids to the DOD's unrealistic expectations of what new programs can accomplish.

The two break down the problems with the LCS program at its core, and discuss why the Navy simply doesn't need the compact new ships over at Defense One. Head over and take a look.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
  • From Our Partners

    You May Like
    Links by Zergnet
    Share This Photo X