At what point does a car cease to be a car and start becoming a people-mover? One survey hints that we're less than two decades away from that eventuality. Whether auto enthusiasts think that's a good thing is another matter altogether.

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, or IEEE, polled about 200 people within academia, research and government agencies about the concept of self-driving vehicles and future automotive design, and got a sense of what people thought would become superfluous during the upcoming decades. Taken into consideration was rapid advancements in things like sensor technology, software, driver-assistance programs and GPS.

And with those advancements, the respondents said items like rear-view mirrors, horns and emergency brakes would be gone by 2030. And five years later, steering wheels, brakes and accelerator pedals would no longer be necessary, either. And by that time, at least three-quarters of US states will have laws on the books allowing for driverless vehicles. Nothing was mentioned about floor mats, of course.

The subject of autonomous driving continues to pick up relevance. In late May, Google unveiled its first self-driving car, which is sans steering wheel, brake pedal, gas pedal or gear shift and has a top speed of 25 miles per hour. Punch in an address and off it goes, theoretically. Stay tuned. And in the meantime, check out IEEE's press release below.
Show full PR text
IEEE Survey Reveals Mass-Produced Cars Will Not Have Steering Wheels, Gas/Brake Pedals, Horns, or Rearview Mirrors by 2035

Sensors and Software Are Most Instrumental Technologies, While Legal Liability and Policymakers Identified as Challenges to Mass Adoption of Driverless Cars

14 July 2014 - IEEE today unveiled the findings of a survey that revealed expert opinions about the future of driverless cars, such as speed bumps to mass adoption, essential autonomous technologies, features in the car of the future, and geographic adoption. More than 200 researchers, academicians, practitioners, university students, society members, and government agencies in the field of autonomous vehicles participated in the survey.

Speed Bumps to Mass Adoption
When survey respondents were asked to assign a ranking to six possible roadblocks to the mass adoption of driverless cars, legal liability, policymakers, and consumer acceptance were ranked as the biggest obstacles, while cost, infrastructure, and technology were viewed as the smaller speed bumps.

"Any time you have a technology that has the potential to fundamentally change our daily lives, laws and policies need to be established to ensure the technology is going to be used properly and benefit humanity. This is especially true with intelligent vehicles," stated Yaobin Chen, IEEE Senior member and professor and chair of electrical and computer engineering at Purdue School of Engineering and Technology. "Once the foundational elements, like legal liability and policy, are in place, the technology and infrastructure will be there, so intelligent vehicles will become more widely accepted."

Car of the Future
As more autonomous features are being incorporated into cars, it will enable them to be manufactured without some of the equipment that is commonplace today. When asked to specify the year in which specific equipment will be removed from mass-produced cars, the majority of respondents believe rearview mirrors, horns, and emergency brakes will be removed by 2030 and steering wheels and gas/brake pedals will follow by 2035. In addition, more than 75 percent of respondents also indicated that all 50 US states would pass legislation permitting use of driverless vehicles within this time period.

"We've seen incredible growth in the driverless vehicle industry over the past few years, both in technological advancement and manufacturer acceptance, that has dramatically affected the consumer adoption timetable," stated IEEE Fellow Alberto Broggi, professor of computer engineering at the University of Parma in Italy and founder of VisLab. "The scientific community and car manufacturers have been working together to incrementally include autonomous features in modern-day cars, with the intention of producing driverless vehicles in the near future. For mass adoption, it's important that we begin trusting this technology."

Dynamic Autonomous Technologies
Advancements in technology will be the most instrumental in the continued development of driverless vehicles, with more than half (56 percent) of respondents believing that sensor technology is most essential, followed by software (48 percent), Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (47 percent), and GPS (31 percent).

"A driverless car needs a constant stream of information of the road and its environment to make calculated decisions, which are referred to as perception. Sensors are one of the most important and trusted technologies for advancing perception scenarios," stated Christoph Stiller, IEEE member and professor at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany. "Sensors are small, non-intrusive, and offer reliable data. Also, sensor technology is relatively cheap and will be influential in creating affordable driverless vehicles."

Along with sensors, creating digital maps of the road is a necessary function for allowing autonomous vehicles to travel safely on the roads. When asked to predict how long it will be before a complete digital map of the world will exist, nearly three quarters (74 percent) of respondents indicated these maps will be available within the next 15 years.

Geographical Acceptance of Driverless Cars
While autonomous cars will prove to be beneficial around the globe, the majority of experts (54 percent) believed that North America would most benefit from driverless vehicles, with Europe second (28 percent) and Asia (17 percent) rounding out the top three.

About the Survey
The survey was given to attendees at the IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symposium in Dearborn, MI, USA, from 8 to 11 June, as well as distributed via e-mail to members of IEEE's Intelligent Transportation Systems Society. Industry experience among participating experts of the survey ranged from university students to those with more than 20 years of experience. The analysis of the results revealed consistency through every experience level, indicating that time spent in the field was not a factor in providing insight into the future of the driverless vehicle industry.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 67 Comments
      Jonathan
      • 5 Months Ago
      I'm very uneasy about this... The thought of having a car that I can't control seems... unsafe. I figure cars will be like they were in iRobot. They'll drive themselves, but the driver will still have the option to take over from themselves. ... Hopefully, they won't all be Audis...
      • 5 Months Ago
      If this is the case, I hope I'm dead by 2035
      john m
      • 5 Months Ago
      Yeah, right... Computers don't work 100% at times but I'm supposed to trust an autonomous car??? I'm not against autonomous cars. In fact I think they'll be quite helpful in some circumstances like for handicapped people, people who are in high traffic commutes who would rather spend their time more productively, taxis, maybe busses but I think it would be most useful for medium to long range trucking. I like to drive so I won't be buying one.
      jonnybimmer
      • 5 Months Ago
      Even though in reality it'd be no different than riding as a passenger, no steering wheels or pedals still makes me feel hesitant about it all though a lot of my concern is probably with how well autonomous vehicles will operate in general and not the lack of controls. And by 2035? Seems a little too optimistic. The lack of horns sounds nice though.
      IBx27
      • 5 Months Ago
      Those IEEE guys give us mechanical engineers a bad name. Here's a twist; I want cell phones, touchscreen infotainment systems, and facebook updates in the gauge pod gone from cars by 2016, but that's not going to happen.
        Zoom
        • 5 Months Ago
        @IBx27
        You're right it won't happen. Because most people don't want was driving enthusiasts want.
      SloopJohnB
      • 5 Months Ago
      No eefing way.
      tegdesign
      • 5 Months Ago
      This is the wet dream of a Automobile hater. I call BS BS BS.
      jphyundai
      • 5 Months Ago
      A top speed of 25 mph. The car also communicates with the passenger and other vehicles. So the passenger would see a message saying you are about to be hit by a truck. The car would communicate with the truck. The truck would run over the Google car. End od story.
      dani
      • 5 Months Ago
      Good news for those who see cars as appliances
      superlightv12
      • 5 Months Ago
      By then I won't enjoy driving, so who cares? So many cars on the road now have drivers that are not driving because they are distracted, may as well take control away from them.
      Stinkyboy
      • 5 Months Ago
      add the option of no back seat drivers and I'm sold
      mycommentemail
      • 5 Months Ago
      Oh my god! Everyone freak out!
    • Load More Comments