Chrysler has come out with the official fuel economy information on the new 200 following the info that was leaked from the EPA earlier this week. It turns out that our initial report of 18 miles per gallon in the city and 29 mpg on the highway for the all-wheel-drive V6 was correct.

What we didn't know at the time, though, was what sort of economy the 200's other powertrain options managed. Outfitted with the 2.4-liter four-pot, Chrysler is promising 23 mpg in the city and 36 mpg on the highway, with a combined rating of 28 mpg. Those figures are fairly impressive; besting figures of the 2.5-liter Ford Fusion and tying the 1.5-liter, EcoBoost, non-start-stop model. It's also beats the four-cylinder Toyota Camry's 35-mpg highway figure while tying its combined efficiency.

Stepping up to the 295-horsepower Pentastar V6 pushes the economy down to 19 mpg in the city, while the highway figure is a respectable 32 mpg for the front-driver. The combined rating for the FWD V6 is 23 mpg. Those figures can't quite match the 270-horsepower 2.0-liter, EcoBoost four of the Fusion, which nets 22 city and 33 highway. In fact, the V6 200 has trouble besting even the 3.5-liter V6 of the Camry, which returns 21 mpg city and 31 mpg highway. Again, though, the 200 is noticeably more powerful.

What are your thoughts? Has Chrysler hit its mark with the new 200's fuel economy, or were you expecting a bit more? Let us know in Comments.
Show full PR text
All-new 2015 Chrysler 200 Delivers Highway Fuel Economy of up to 36 Miles Per Gallon, an Extraordinary Driving Experience and Cool Features With a Starting U.S. MSRP of Just $21,700

All-new 2015 Chrysler 200 highway fuel economy improves five miles per gallon compared with the outgoing model, achieving 36 miles per gallon highway with the standard 2.4-liter Tigershark MultiAir®2 I-4 engine
2015 Chrysler 200 models equipped with the available award-winning 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine delivers an EPA highway fuel economy rating of 32 miles per gallon, a three-mile-per-gallon improvement versus the outgoing model
2015 Chrysler 200 is the industry's first mid-size sedan with a standard nine-speed automatic transmission, a key enabler for the improved fuel economy rating, along with state-of-the-art electronic shifting with rotary dial
Choice of two world-class engines are available: the 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine produces a best-in-class 295 horsepower and 262 lb.-ft. of torque, or the standard 2.4-liter MultiAir®2 Tigershark I-4 engine produces 184 horsepower and 173 lb.-ft. of torque
The all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 has a starting U.S. Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of $21,700 (excluding $995 destination)


March 27, 2014 , Auburn Hills, Mich. - Simple elegance, an exhilarating driving experience, state-of-the-art and easy-to-use technology and fuel economy of up to 36 miles per gallon (mpg), the all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 is a car that makes the commute more enjoyable at a value customers appreciate.

"With fuel economy ratings of up to 36 miles per gallon and features typically found on more expensive luxury vehicles, the all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 delivers the premium features customers want at a price they can afford," said Al Gardner, President and CEO - Chrysler Brand, Chrysler Group LLC. "With a standard nine-speed transmission, state-of-the art available all-wheel drive, a choice of two powertrains and interior that will wow drivers and passengers alike, the new Chrysler 200 is raising the bar for what customers should expect from a mid-size sedan."

The all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 sedan leapfrogs expectations in the mid-size sedan segment for comfort, ride and handling. Engineered to provide premium driving dynamics, highway fuel economy of up to 36 mpg highway, a quiet cabin and an enthusiastic driving experience, the all-new Chrysler 200 delivers exceptional ride and handling characteristics for all roads and weather conditions.

The 2015 Chrysler 200 with the standard 2.4-liter Tigershark MultiAir®2 I-4 engine is rated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 23 mpg city, 36 mpg highway and 28 mpg combined, a five mile per gallon improvement in the highway rating versus the outgoing model.

2015 Chrysler 200 models equipped with the available best-in-class 295 horsepower Pentastar V-6 engine are rated at 19 mpg city, 32 mpg highway and 23 mpg combined. The highway rating is a three mile per gallon improvement versus the outgoing model with the V-6 engine.

All-new 2015 Chrysler 200 mid-size sedans equipped with the Pentastar V-6 engine and the state-of-the-art all-wheel-drive system are rated at 18 mpg city, 29 mpg highway and 22 mpg combined.

The improved fuel economy ratings are achieved through a number of technologies:
A segment-first standard nine-speed automatic transmission and world-class engines, including the 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine with a best-in-class 295 horsepower, add up to an enjoyable, spirited driving experience in the all-new 2015 Chrysler 200
An available, innovative, state-of-the-art all-wheel-drive system which features a segment-first fully disconnecting rear axle that improves fuel economy by operating in front-wheel drive when all-wheel drive is not needed
The all-wheel-drive system features a one-speed power transfer unit (PTU) and uniquely disconnects and reconnects the rear axle – automatically and seamlessly – as needed and at any speed
The disconnecting rear axle disconnects at both the PTU and rear drive module, which improves fuel economy by reducing parasitic loss when all-wheel drive is not needed
The all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 is the world's first mid-size sedan to feature a nine-speed automatic transmission, which comes standard. The benefits of the advanced-technology transmission are numerous, including highway fuel economy of 36 mpg when powered by the 2.4-liter MultiAir®2 Tigershark I-4 engine
The addition of more gear ratios optimizes both fuel economy and performance by precisely matching the gear state to the most efficient engine operating condition. This benefits fuel economy and the driving experience
The high-tech transmission dispenses power smoothly for elevated refinement. Such performance is made possible because the ratio steps between its gears are smaller than those of other transmissions
The all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 delivers exceptional aerodynamics with a 0.27 Cd which aids improved fuel economy, on-road dynamics, and reduced noise, vibration and harshness (NVH). The quiet cabin is another positive factor in the superior driving experience
The all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 is where exquisite style meets exceptional performance. The Chrysler 200 raises the bar for a mid-size car with an elegant exterior design, a thoughtful, beautifully crafted interior and an exceptional driving experience complements of a segment-first nine-speed automatic transmission and Chrysler's Compact U.S.-wide chassis. With highway fuel economy of up to 36 miles per gallon; the most available safety and security features in the segment with 60; an available, best-in-class all-wheel drive system; easy-to-use, state-of-the-art technology and a starting U.S. Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of just $21,700, the all-new 2015 Chrysler 200 is engineered to exceed customer expectations in every category.

The 2015 Chrysler 200 is designed, engineered and built with pride in Michigan.

About Chrysler Brand
The Chrysler brand has delighted customers with distinctive designs, craftsmanship, intuitive innovation and technology – all at an extraordinary value – since the company was founded in 1926.

Whether it is the groundbreaking, bold design of the Chrysler 300, the sleek elegant styling of the Chrysler 200 Convertible, or the family room on wheels functionality of the Chrysler Town & Country, Chrysler brand vehicles reward the passion, creativity and sense of accomplishment of its owners. Beyond just exceptionally designed vehicles, the Chrysler brand has incorporated thoughtful features into all of its products, such as the Stow 'n seating and storage system on the Chrysler Town & Country, the fuel-saving Fuel Saver Technology in the Chrysler 300 and Uconnect phone utilizing Bluetooth technology on the Chrysler 200 and Chrysler 200 Convertible.

The world-class interior of the Chrysler Town & Country minivan is beautifully crafted with high-quality materials that are soft to the touch, and offers tech-savvy entertainment features and smart storage and seating options including Stow 'n seating with one-touch fold-down function, dual DVD entertainment system, navigation and SIRIUSXM satellite radio with Travel Link making the Chrysler Town & Country the ultimate family vehicle. A 3.6-liter Pentastar V-6 engine is s 10 Best and produces a best-in-class 283 horsepower and is mated to a six-speed automatic transmission with a fuel economizer mode. Town & Country achieves 17 miles per gallon in the city, 25 on the highway.

The Chrysler brand's succession of innovative product introductions continues to solidify the brand's standing as the leader in design, engineering and value. The premium for the Chrysler brand is in the product, not the price.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 77 Comments
      TheTank
      • 8 Months Ago
      This kind of writing is irritating as hell. In the first paragraph, you say: "It also beats the four-cylinder Toyota Camry's 35-mpg highway figure while tying its combined efficiency." so 1MPG better = "beats" However, in the third paragraph you state: "In fact, the V6 200 has trouble besting even the 3.5-liter V6 of the Camry, which returns 21 mpg city and 31 mpg highway" So now 1MPG better = "has trouble beating" WTF? Is it meant to sensationalize the difference? (probably) But it just seems stupid.
      kyle720
      • 8 Months Ago
      Where are you getting the Fusion's horsepower at 270??
      charles
      • 8 Months Ago
      These are very good figures for this car,and I wish Chrysler well.They are really coming up with nice cars.I hope they can now stop the recalls.I guess this is not possible with any manufactures, as cars are more sophisticated.
      Avinash Machado
      • 8 Months Ago
      Quite reasonable.
      downwithlaser
      • 8 Months Ago
      That's about as good of a rating as my '09 Civic; Not bad!
        Andrew Ramos
        • 8 Months Ago
        @downwithlaser
        2009 Civic: 34 mpg highway, 113 horsepower. So the Civic is smaller, lighter, has 70 less horsepower and gets poorer fuel economy. Go screw.
        Andrew Ramos
        • 8 Months Ago
        @downwithlaser
        2009 Civic: 34 mpg highway, 113 horsepower. So the Civic is smaller, lighter, has 70 less horsepower and gets poorer fuel economy. Go screw.
      Hazdaz
      • 8 Months Ago
      Impressive numbers.... and to think that just a few short years ago 23 MPG on the HIGHWAY was considered good, let alone 23 MPG in the CITY. That's what happens when these automakers stop hiring lawyers and lobbyists to keep CAFE standards from increasing, and instead spend on that money on engineers and invest in R&D spending. These companies needed to be pushed and prodded into bettering their fuel economy, and in return everyone is benefiting.
      Ronh
      • 8 Months Ago
      Nothing like using the 94 Honda hoopdie as a benchmark.
      CoolWaters
      • 8 Months Ago
      More bull, what's the City, as in real mileage. As most people don't drive on lonely uncontested highways.
      Joeviocoe
      • 8 Months Ago
      It is amusing how regular autoblog writers are impressed with those MPG numbers... while an autoblog green writer would laugh.
        justgoawaymad
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Joeviocoe
        AND the autoblog writer would laugh at the carbon foot print of the "green" cars. No getting away from batteries are a huge foot print that no one wants to talk about or admit to.
        justgoawaymad
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Joeviocoe
        AND the autoblog writer would laugh at the carbon foot print of the "green" cars. No getting away from batteries are a huge foot print that no one wants to talk about or admit to.
      EB110Americana
      • 8 Months Ago
      Here's an actual comparison with 2014 models. Looking at 4-cylinder automatics/CVTs, ignoring any hybrids, plugins, start-stop, diesels, sport models, or manuals, here is the ranking: 1) Altima: 27/38 - 31 2) Mazda 6: 26/38 - 30 3) Accord: 27/36 - 30 4) Malibu: 25/36 - 29 5) Camry: 25/35 - 28 6) Chrysler 200: 23/36 - 28 6) Fusion 1.5L: 23/36 - 28 6) Sonata: 24/35 - 28 9) Passat 1.8L: 24/34 - 28 10) Optima: 23/34 - 27 11) Fusion 2.5L: 22/34 - 26 12) Passat 2.5L: 22/32 - 26 Looking at V6s, and turbo 4 cylinders (all of which are 2.0L), and again ignoring manuals and sport models: 1) Accord: 21/34 - 26 1) Fusion: 22/33 - 26 3) Altima: 22/31 - 25 3) Sonata: 21/32 - 25 5) Camry: 21/31 - 25 6) Malibu: 21/30 - 24 6) Optima: 20/31 - 24 8) Chrysler 200: 19/32 - 23 9) Passat: 20/28 - 23 So for the base model 2.5L, the Chrysler 200 is tied in 6th place with the up-level Ford Fusion 1.5L EcoBoost and the Hyundai Sonata, which is not bad considering 5 out of the 12 cars all managed that same 28 mpg combined. For the V6, the 200 comes in near the bottom at 8th place, but it also has the highest horsepower output at 295hp and the 5th highest torque (and the highest of any of the V6s, beaten only by the turbo 4s). Despite the 8th place combined ranking, it has the third highest highway mileage, tied with the Sonata behind the Accord and Fusion, so it should make for an efficient road tripper. See the same chart below numbered by ranked highest hp+torque=combined score), and listed "hp/torque," yet in the same order as above: 3+8=12) Accord: 278/252 9+2=11) Fusion: 240/270 6+6=12) Altima: 270/258 4+3=7) Sonata: 274/269 7+9=16) Camry: 268/248 8+1=9) Malibu: 259/295 4+3=7) Optima: 274/269 1+5=6) Chrysler 200: 295/262 2+6=8) Passat: 280/258
        cadetgray
        • 8 Months Ago
        @EB110Americana
        Thank you for compiling this useful information. Regrettably, I must point out one correction based on one of the exclusion parameters you set for comparing models with the standard engine I4's (start/stop)...the 2014 Chevrolet Malibu 2.5 I4 actually features standard start/stop technology on its sole non-turbo four. They dropped the Eco 2.4 mild hybrid when the new base 2.5 achieved almost identical fuel economy without the suffering reduced cargo space and increased manufacturing complexity/costs. I understand the new engine's start/stop feature cannot be disabled by the driver unlike some manufacturers' designs. Luckily to GM's credit the system has been noted as one of the most seamless start/stop implementations on the market. Without start/stop technology, the 2013 Malibu using a similar four of 2.5 liters delivered the following EPA estimates: 22 city/34 hwy - 26 combined. That would place it slightly below the Tigershark 2.4's 23 city/36 hwy-28 combined. The Chevy is standard with a 6-speed auto compared to the Chrysler's standard 9-speed. Here's verification of start/stop implementation from the Chevy 2015 website: "Malibu offers 36 MPG on the highway and it all starts at the heart of this 4-cylinder. Refined and efficient, this engine packs 196-horsepower punch and is designed to help you save gas. Here’s how: With new stop/start technology, stopping is what keeps you going. The engine automatically shuts off when the car is stopped and prepares it for a smooth, seamless start when the brake pedal is released. So smooth, you won’t even notice the transition. Smart. And just another way Malibu delivers precise engineering." Another good comparison would be to compare the AWD 3.6 to the other affordable choices on the market: Chrysler 200 AWD 3.6: 18/29/22 (295 hp/262 lb-ft) $28,695 Subaru Legacy AWD 3.6: 18/25/20 (256 hp/247 lb-ft) $28,895 Ford Fusion AWD 2.0 i4: (22/31/25 (231 hp/270 lb-ft) $32,600 Interestingly, the $3,905 higher initial cost of the Ford offsets any anticipated fuel savings. According to the EPA estimated annual savings of $250 per year above the Chrysler, it would take 15.62 years to compensate for the higher purchase price. Also owners of turbocharged cars across most brands (even those that were built by Chrysler) rarely surpass but often fail to match EPA estimates because to extract the engine's potential the driver is best driving under boost. Again, that you for taking the time to make it easy for us to compare EPA figures across competing brands.
        EB110Americana
        • 8 Months Ago
        @EB110Americana
        Edit Button: Accord in last ranking should read: 3+8=11) Accord: 278/252
        cadetgray
        • 8 Months Ago
        @EB110Americana
        Thank you for compiling this useful information. Regrettably, I must point out one correction based on one of the exclusion parameters you set for comparing models with the standard engine I4's (start/stop)...the 2014 Chevrolet Malibu 2.5 I4 actually features standard start/stop technology on its sole non-turbo four. They dropped the Eco 2.4 mild hybrid when the new base 2.5 achieved almost identical fuel economy without the suffering reduced cargo space and increased manufacturing complexity/costs. I understand the new engine's start/stop feature cannot be disabled by the driver unlike some manufacturers' designs. Luckily to GM's credit the system has been noted as one of the most seamless start/stop implementations on the market. Without start/stop technology, the 2013 Malibu using a similar four of 2.5 liters delivered the following EPA estimates: 22 city/34 hwy - 26 combined. That would place it slightly below the Tigershark 2.4's 23 city/36 hwy-28 combined. The Chevy is standard with a 6-speed auto compared to the Chrysler's standard 9-speed. Here's verification of start/stop implementation from the Chevy 2015 website: "Malibu offers 36 MPG on the highway and it all starts at the heart of this 4-cylinder. Refined and efficient, this engine packs 196-horsepower punch and is designed to help you save gas. Here’s how: With new stop/start technology, stopping is what keeps you going. The engine automatically shuts off when the car is stopped and prepares it for a smooth, seamless start when the brake pedal is released. So smooth, you won’t even notice the transition. Smart. And just another way Malibu delivers precise engineering." Another good comparison would be to compare the AWD 3.6 to the other affordable choices on the market: Chrysler 200 AWD 3.6: 18/29/22 (295 hp/262 lb-ft) $28,695 Subaru Legacy AWD 3.6: 18/25/20 (256 hp/247 lb-ft) $28,895 Ford Fusion AWD 2.0 i4: (22/31/25 (231 hp/270 lb-ft) $32,600 Interestingly, the $3,905 higher initial cost of the Ford offsets any anticipated fuel savings. According to the EPA estimated annual savings of $250 per year above the Chrysler, it would take 15.62 years to compensate for the higher purchase price. Also owners of turbocharged cars across most brands (even those that were built by Chrysler) rarely surpass but often fail to match EPA estimates because to extract the engine's potential the driver is best driving under boost. Again, that you for taking the time to make it easy for us to compare EPA figures across competing brands.
        cadetgray
        • 8 Months Ago
        @EB110Americana
        Thank you for compiling this useful information. Regrettably, I must point out one correction based on one of the exclusion parameters you set for comparing models with the standard engine I4's (start/stop)...the 2014 Chevrolet Malibu 2.5 I4 actually features standard start/stop technology on its sole non-turbo four. They dropped the Eco 2.4 mild hybrid when the new base 2.5 achieved almost identical fuel economy without the suffering reduced cargo space and increased manufacturing complexity/costs. I understand the new engine's start/stop feature cannot be disabled by the driver unlike some manufacturers' designs. Luckily to GM's credit the system has been noted as one of the most seamless start/stop implementations on the market. Without start/stop technology, the 2013 Malibu using a similar four of 2.5 liters delivered the following EPA estimates: 22 city/34 hwy - 26 combined. That would place it slightly below the Tigershark 2.4's 23 city/36 hwy-28 combined. The Chevy is standard with a 6-speed auto compared to the Chrysler's standard 9-speed. Here's verification of start/stop implementation from the Chevy 2015 website: "Malibu offers 36 MPG on the highway and it all starts at the heart of this 4-cylinder. Refined and efficient, this engine packs 196-horsepower punch and is designed to help you save gas. Here’s how: With new stop/start technology, stopping is what keeps you going. The engine automatically shuts off when the car is stopped and prepares it for a smooth, seamless start when the brake pedal is released. So smooth, you won’t even notice the transition. Smart. And just another way Malibu delivers precise engineering." Another good comparison would be to compare the AWD 3.6 to the other affordable choices on the market: Chrysler 200 AWD 3.6: 18/29/22 (295 hp/262 lb-ft) $28,695 Subaru Legacy AWD 3.6: 18/25/20 (256 hp/247 lb-ft) $28,895 Ford Fusion AWD 2.0 i4: (22/31/25 (231 hp/270 lb-ft) $32,600 Interestingly, the $3,905 higher initial cost of the Ford offsets any anticipated fuel savings. According to the EPA estimated annual savings of $250 per year above the Chrysler, it would take 15.62 years to compensate for the higher purchase price. Also owners of turbocharged cars across most brands (even those that were built by Chrysler) rarely surpass but often fail to match EPA estimates because to extract the engine's potential the driver is best driving under boost. Again, that you for taking the time to make it easy for us to compare EPA figures across competing brands.
      fcarlo17
      • 8 Months Ago
      For a nine-speed and a "tigershark", that is a little underwhelming considering the Altima's 27/31/38 rating. Well, at least the 200 looks a lot better than the Altima.
      AcidTonic
      • 8 Months Ago
      Ecoboost in the Fusion only makes 240 horsepower.... Not 270 like you tried listing it with. Gotta prop up the Ford's wherever they can.
        onewayroll
        • 8 Months Ago
        @AcidTonic
        It's a typo...first time visiting Autoblog?
        RoyEMunson
        • 8 Months Ago
        @AcidTonic
        240 out of a 2.0L is still pretty damned impressive, especially with those MPGs.
    • Load More Comments