Red Bull F1 program could take ball, go home
"The question is not so much whether it makes economic sense but the reasons would be to do with sportsmanship, political influence, and so on," Mateschitz said. "In these issues there is a clear limit to what we can accept."
Red Bull appealed the decision and a date has been set in April for a hearing. Mateschitz is still rather salty, though.
"The team has lodged a protest. The fuel-flow sensor, which was given to the teams by [the FIA], gave divergent readings and it is inaccurate. We can prove the exact amount of fuel flow and this was always within the limits," the billionaire said when asked if he'd reached his self-imposed limit. According to BBC Sport, Red Bull ignored a warning by the FIA in Australia that it must use the official fuel-flow sensor, rather than its own readings. It didn't comply.
Mateschitz is also displeased by the direction the 2014 regulations have taken the sport, saying, "F1 is not there to set new records in fuel consumption, nor to make it possible to have a whispered conversation during a race."
"It is absurd to race a lap seconds slower than last year. GP2 partially provides more racing and fighting and almost equal lap times as F1 with a small fraction of the budget," Mateschitz told the paper.
What do you think? Should Red Bull be penalized? Do you agree with Mateschitz's view of F1?
- Most and least efficient car companies
- Fastest-depreciating cars in the United States
- Find and compare 2017 Models