Vital Stats

Engine:
Turbo 2.5L I5
Power:
306 HP / 310 LB-FT
Transmission:
7-Speed Auto
0-60 Time:
5.0 Seconds (est.)
Top Speed:
155 MPH
Drivetrain:
All-Wheel Drive
Curb Weight:
3,800 LBS
Seating:
2+3
Cargo:
12.6 / 44.6 CU-FT
MPG:
18 City / 28 HWY
Base Price:
$52,000 (est.)
The year 1994 was a really good year for German performance fans, because it was that year when Audi released its very first official RS model (for "RennSport," or racing sport), the RS2 Avant. Recently, I was invited to participate in a three-day leg of the Audi Land of Quattro Alpen Tour, a blatant flaunting over hill and dale of the company's current lineup of RS models. We hit Austria, Switzerland and Italy – the roads were epic and the weather held for this exquisite boondoggle.

Our chief focus on this tour, which included the RS6 Avant and RS7, was the newcomer RS Q3 small crossover that will absolutely never be coming to North America, but which starts deliveries in November of this year. This no-North America policy is because we still don't have enough customers who see the thrill or sense in a $52,000 all-wheel-drive baby sport utility that gets to 60 miles per hour from a stop in under five seconds. Meanwhile, in crazy, drunken Europe, orders for this ridiculous, wondrous set of wheels have, to quote Quattro head of technical development Stephan Reil, "far outstripped the limited production numbers of the business case." Those silly Europeans, don't they know that an RS Q3 makes no sense at all? Sheesh.
2014 Audi RS Q32014 Audi RS Q32014 Audi RS Q3

The engine is a slightly less uppity version of the five-cylinder used in the TT RS.

The wee RS Q3 is pumped up with a not-so-wee 306 horsepower between 5,200 and 6,700 revs, and then 310 pound-feet of torque from 1,500 to 5,200 revs. This is clearly meant to be one dense little sucker.

The engine is a slightly less uppity version of the "W28" 2.5-liter TFSI five-cylinder used in the TT RS, a car that has always struck me as wrong in execution (admittedly, a minority opinion among the Autoblog team). It's a question of sheer expectations; the TT RS should be a consummate sports car right out of the box and it is not. But then if you place that very same powertrain and drivetrain in a crossover like the Q3, well then heck, it's good enough because my expectations were honestly low prior to shooting off into the curve-covered Alps.

2014 Audi RS Q3

This RS Q3 very soon felt just about perfect.

It was most likely due to the very narrow nature of the squiggly two-lanes I was driving that this RS Q3 very soon felt just about perfect. The little CUV and I were routinely arriving at high-altitude coffee stops and lunch/relief breaks several minutes before any of the other big RSes could manage. Overtaking tall German tourist buses and little two-cylinder Piaggios filled with plumbers was rendered easy by the point-and-shoot capabilities of the littler Audi (that nonetheless still cracks the scales at 3,800 pounds, similar to a Ferrari F12 Berlinetta or Chevrolet Camaro Z/28).

The RS recipe is by now relatively repeatable: the RS Q3 is lowered by one inch versus the standard Q3, which accentuates even more the natural dynamic properties of Audi's aluminum-and-steel subframe assembly. The tubular anti-roll bars front and rear are of an ever so slightly greater diameter, again for side-to-side stiffness. For my mountain sojourn at speed, Audi fitted the optional 20-inch five-spoke "Rotor" wheels wrapped in Pirelli PZero treads – 255/35 R20 97Y front and rear. The electro-mechanical steering system, with such a setup and on such prettily maintained mountain pass roads, has come a long way since the Germans started going this route with all of their cars about three years ago. Besides, on a configuration like this Q3, the expectations are again such as they are that the steering exceeded them. The modified lower front wishbones of forged aluminium also help matters significantly when speaking of ride and handling.

2014 Audi RS Q3
2014 Audi RS Q32014 Audi RS Q32014 Audi RS Q3

The hills were alive with the sound of the music as the RS Q3 thundered along.

Helping matters always here was the latest massaged version of what many call the "faux" Quattro all-wheel-drive setup using the Haldex differential mounted for these smaller transverse engines. Maximum torque to distribute to the front axle as needed is 70 percent, while the max in back is up to 85 percent. This fairly peerless traction system is coupled to an electronically locking differential and, as this is not an RS5 we're talking about, the arrangement works absolutely fine in exceeding every small-utility-vehicle driver's needs, even the sportiest thereof.

Audi says that 70 percent of RS buyers go for the sport exhaust and, I mean, just look at that blunderbuss at bottom left! Put your Audi Drive Select with the Dynamic Package (taken by 55 percent of RSers) in the Dynamic setting and get ready for a few sophisticatedly loud fireworks. The hills were alive with the sound of the music as the RS Q3 thundered along. I am most grateful that the standard compound brake discs – 14.4-inch front ventilated, perforated and using Audi's wave-design technology and an 8-piston fixed calliper, 12.2-inch arrears – handle this tiny terror without any flinches or very much fade to speak of.

2014 Audi RS Q3

There are those who can and so they will buy it.

Along the same lines of logic as I've mentioned already, the seven-speed S-tronic automated gearbox and its shift paddles work exceedingly well here on the dimensions of this Q3 versus how they work for me on the TT RS. On this small sport SUV, the rhythms of shifting up and down over the mountains while pushing the action fairly hard were correct, while they get me grumbling on the TT RS, due almost exclusively to expectations thwarted.

So, I'll acknowledge the demerits for this relatively useless product even existing, but there are those who can and so they will buy it. The same can be said of many glaring status objects that clients are willing to throw money at. But this RS is at least very pleasantly convincing. There will no doubt be a sporty diesel SQ3 priced in a more acceptable manner for more sales to less rich (on average) people, as has been done with the European SQ5. That just makes this gas-driven RS Q3 that much more a standout showpiece for the silly buyers on the Olde Continent who must have one. Sheesh.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 37 Comments
      ChaosphereIX
      • 1 Year Ago
      RS used to stand for uber asphalt demolishing monsters [2003 RS6, 2000 RS4, 2007 RS4, V10 RS6], now it is merely a badge exercise, sadly. I am a huge fan of what Quattro GmBh can accomplish, but I feel recently they have seen too much green and margins and lost their way...
      waetherman
      • 1 Year Ago
      "we still don't have enough customers who see the thrill or sense in a $52,000 all-wheel-drive baby sport utility" Someone should tell Porsche.
      IBx27
      • 1 Year Ago
      Automatic.
      Joe Liebig
      • 1 Year Ago
      In this segment, Mercedes has the top performance models (AMG 45 with 360hp) and sells them at a big premium for the lead. But Audi seems to find a sweet spot of "not too much of too much power" and "price just slightly unreasonable". It's quite interesting that they are not competing at the same power output (no 300 hp merc, no 360 hp audi).
      A P
      • 1 Year Ago
      Gee what a surprise that this Audi gets a glowing review from a wined and dined editor on a free European junket. Do people really believe such things dont influence writers? Please raise your hand if you are that stupid.
      truewhiteboy
      • 1 Year Ago
      I don't get it. The specs sound like a Subaru STI. I would have thought they could get more out of a 2.5L Turbo some 10 years later. I'm sure the interior is a lot better, but either it has to be getting amazing gas mileage, or it seems incredibly underpowered for the price point.
      • 1 Year Ago
      [blocked]
      Terry Actill
      • 1 Year Ago
      So if it came down to this or that dull new Lincoln crossover? Yes, I thought so.
      Eta Carinae
      • 1 Year Ago
      What the hell is Audi doing......this car on Stilts doesn't deserve the RS badge.......only performance trim I see fit are AMG and V
        James
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Eta Carinae
        Right cause that GLA 45 amy IS SO DIFFERENT FROM THIS.
      Rob
      • 1 Year Ago
      Get the S Q5 and call it a day. This model is not worthy of the RS designation Q3 is pointless in the North American market to start with...like the BMW X1
      ERNSTEVERYTHING
      • 1 Year Ago
      why bother....? when did 55k become the new 35k..?
      ChaosphereIX
      • 1 Year Ago
      don't get the idea of a hot cuv or crossover. not at all. Supposed to be sporty. It might be fast, but it is heavy and top-heavy to boot. Physics. Think of how much more amazing this drivetrain would be in, say, an A4 Avant or Allroad... not a fan of the CUV craze that is worldwide right now, where are all the sporty wagons? Those are better.
        pavsterrocks
        • 1 Year Ago
        @ChaosphereIX
        Nah. When you drive in traffic sitting higher is better. The marginal performance difference between a CUV and a wagon is irrelevant outside the racetrack.
          Hernan
          • 1 Year Ago
          @pavsterrocks
          Sitting higher in traffic is better, that's a fact. However, I disagree as to the performance difference between a CUV and a wagon being irrelevant outside a track. It makes a big difference.
    • Load More Comments