• 01-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 02-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 03-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 04-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 05-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 06-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 07-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 08-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 09a-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 10a-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 11a-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 12a-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 13-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 14-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
  • 15-lamborhgini-veneno-monterey
As it turns out, there might just be more than three lucky souls on the planet who will be able to claim ownership of a Lamborghini Veneno. While Lamborghini still plans to make triplets out of the winged and vented hypercar, we hear that there is a Veneno Roadster in the works.

Early yesterday, our own Matt Davis caught wind of an open-top Veneno, but Car and Driver has some more details about the car. The article says that a total of nine Veneno Roadsters could be built with each carrying a price tag of around $4.4 million US. If you're keeping track at home, that's a premium of a cool half-million bucks to get the Veneno to go topless, and with all three of the coupes already accounted for, we're sure Lamborghini won't have a hard time unloading the Roadsters.

There is no additional information about the Lamborghini Veneno Roadster, but if we had to guess, we'd figure it will likely use some lightweight removable roof panels like the Aventador Roadster.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 1 Year Ago
      That may be the most overwrought front end in the history of the industry.
      • 1 Year Ago
      • 1 Year Ago
      Does anyone else get the impression that if Lamborghini wasn\'t an established brand cars like this would be the laughing stock of the industry? http://www.autoblog.com/photos/lamborghini-veneno-monterey-2013/#photo-826127/ Looks straight out of a Japanese comic book. This company produced the Miura and the 350 and 400.
      • 1 Year Ago
      Looks like a movie prop. Just way too much going on for me, Lambo needs to go back and simplify their designs a bit.
      • 1 Year Ago
      I've read people say the new Corvette is garish. I fully agree appreciation of a cars appearance is purely subjective, but to use Arnold's line from Predator... Veneno, you are one ugly muther #$%%$
      • 1 Year Ago
      If they only built 3 of these, how limited can the cabrio be? 1 whole car and 1 partial? Or maybe the buyers who missed out on this car want to be LOOKED AT as the drive through Monaco so they will built 1500 of the open top version.
        • 1 Year Ago
        Golleee, it is exclusivity, whatever that is.
      • 1 Year Ago
      That's unfortunate. Of the big three hyper car reveals recently, this is by far the worst. This makes even the LaFerrari look good(it's growing on me).
        • 1 Year Ago
        I am with you, they are know to be over the top, but I am afraid they are getting into the ugly and pointless category. There is way too much going on in the design it is almost like a transformer aka kiddish!
        • 1 Year Ago
        this isn't a hyper car though. this is just a reskinned and very exclusive aventador.
      • 1 Year Ago
      This is far, FAR from the old designs Lamborghini used to have. I remember seeing one of their tractors and was blown away :P But seriously, they need to take a step back and go back to their roots. Less influence from whatever the heck this came from and more influence from a bottle of red, prosciutto and cheese!
      • 1 Year Ago
      i'm just going to assume veneno is italian for cylon
      Stomp and steer
      • 1 Year Ago
      • 1 Year Ago
      Looks like it was caught transforming mid-way.
      • 1 Year Ago
      who asked for that?! not me, that's for sure!
    • Load More Comments