Herb Simpson, president and CEO of the Traffic Injury Reasearch Foundation, left, demonstates an alcohol ignition interlock device as Sen. Locke Burt, R-Ormond Beach, right and Ken Howes, spokesperson for the Florida Highway Patrol, center, watch, Thursday, Feb. 28, 2002, in Tallahassee, Fla.  Burke is sponsoring a bill that would make the device mandantory equipment in automobiles driven by persons who have had two driving under the influence convictions. (AP Photo/Phil Coale)

A drunk driver prevented the theft of a TJ Maxx in Farmington, CT on Wednesday. Okay, not exactly. The drunk driver's car prevented the theft. According to The Hartford Courant, three men swiped $4,500 worth of ladies handbags from the department store, but didn't get very far. Store security noticed the heist and alerted authorities, who were waiting for the pilferers outside the store.

One man, Levar Fulgham, saw the police and booked it, hopping in a nearby idling car. The only problem, though, was the ignition interlock that was installed. The interlock, which prevented the car from being shifted into gear without first blowing into a breathalizer, was installed because the car's owner had a few too many and got busted driving drunk (shame he didn't have a good friend to try and take his keys).

After revving the engine and realizing he couldn't get it into drive, Fulgham abandoned the car and continued his flight on foot. Police were forced to tase the thief before they could apprehend him. Fulgham was charged with third-, fourth- and sixth-degree larceny, conspiracy to commit fourth- and sixth-degree larceny, refusal to be fingerprinted and interfering with police.