We weren't exactly smitten with the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco when we got the chance to take one out for a spin, thanks in part to the eAssist wizardry aimed at improving the vehicle's fuel economy. With a lackluster drivetrain, regenerative brakes and low rolling resistance tries, the Malibu Eco simply isn't capable of keeping its head high among the competition.

Even so, we were told to wait for the Ecotec 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder set to debut this year. Now we know why. According to General Motors, the engine is good for 269 259 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque. More importantly, all that torque comes on at a very low 1,700 rpm.

The direct-injection engine helps the Malibu hit 60 mph in a scant 6.3 seconds. Trust us when we say that's an improvement over the Eco model. While there's no word on fuel economy, we would expect the engine to return well better than the 17 mpg city and 26 mpg highway supplied by the outgoing 3.6-liter V6, an engine that was only good for 252 horsepower.

This isn't the first time GM has dabbled with a turbocharged four-cylinder. The company supplied buyers with a 2.0-liter Ecotec in vehicles like the Pontiac Solstice GXP, HHR SS and Cobalt SS that put out 260 horsepower. See below for the full press release.
Show full PR text
Power-Dense Powertrains Drive Malibu's Global Rollout

Chevrolet midsize style and performance introduced to more than 70 countries this year

DETROIT – The all-new Ecotec 2.5L debuting on the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu midsize sedan this summer is one of the most-powerful naturally aspirated four-cylinder engines in the midsize segment, topping the output from the new Ford Fusion and Toyota Camry. It will be joined this fall by a new Ecotec 2.0L turbo engine, delivering more horsepower than any previous V-6 offered in a Malibu.

Malibu's Ecotec 2.5L delivers an SAE-certified 197 horsepower (147 kW) and 191 lb.-ft. of torque (259 Nm) – the most torque of any naturally aspirated four-cylinder in the segment. And when compared with the competition, it delivers 19 more horsepower (14 kW) and 21 more lb.-ft. of torque (28 Nm) than the 2012 Toyota Camry LE's 2.5L I4 engine, and 27 more horsepower (20 kW) and 21 more lb.-ft. (28 Nm) than the 2013 Ford Fusion's 2.5L four-cylinder.

The Ecotec 2.0L turbo is SAE-certified at 259 horsepower (193 kW) and 260 lb.-ft. of torque (353 Nm). Its peak torque is sustained from 1,700 to 5,500 rpm – a broad range that provides an immediate feeling of power in all driving conditions and helps produce 0-60 performance in 6.3 seconds.

The new engines feature direct injection for increased fuel efficiency and higher power, and help drive Malibu's performance around the world. Both will be offered in the United States, Canada, Israel and other markets, while rounding out a diverse North American powertrain lineup that also includes the segment-exclusive, fuel-saving eAssist™ technology in the Malibu Eco. It combines start-stop technology with regenerative braking and a lightweight lithium-ion battery to provide an electric boost in certain conditions, delivering a GM-estimated 25 mpg in the city 37 mpg on the highway. That's better fuel economy than any non-hybrid midsize sedan currently available.

"The 2013 Malibu is the latest entry in Chevrolet's growing global car portfolio, which has seen almost an entirely revamped lineup in the last 15 months," said Chris Perry, global Chevrolet marketing vice president. "We sold 4.76 million Chevys worldwide in 2011 – one every 6.5 seconds – and the new Malibu will help us grow the brand globally even more this year, where it will be introduced for the first time in many markets."

The 2013 Malibu is Chevrolet's first global midsize sedan and will eventually be sold in nearly 100 countries on six continents. It is already on sale in South Korea and China, with sales to begin this year in more than 70 additional countries, including Canada, throughout Europe, Scandinavia, the Middle East, Africa and other Asia-Pacific markets.

In the United States, current generation Malibu sales are up 4.4 percent for the first two months of the year, building on 2011's near-record U.S. sales of nearly 205,000.

The new Malibu was designed to be the most finely tuned Chevrolet midsize sedan ever and is built on an award-winning global architecture that helps deliver a more confident, responsive and connected driving experience. The body structure is 20-percent stiffer for a greater feeling of solidity, quietness and quality.

Inside, the 2013 Malibu delivers:

1.5 inches (38 mm) more front shoulder room
3.5 inches (89 mm) more rear shoulder room
2.7 inches (68 mm) more front hip room
2.8 inches (71 mm) more rear hip room
More than 1 cubic foot (28 liters) more trunk space
Nearly 4 cubic feet (113 liters) of additional EPA interior volume.

Malibu's driving experience is also enhanced with Chevrolet MyLink, an all-new in-car infotainment package that gives customers a higher level of wireless connectivity and customized infotainment options while building on the safety and security of OnStar. MyLink is safe and easy to use. It adds stereo audio streaming and wireless control of smartphones, building on the voice-activated Bluetooth hands-free calling capability already offered in most Chevy vehicles. MyLink is standard in LT, LTZ and Eco Malibu models, along with a seven-inch, high-resolution, full-color touch screen display that makes media selection easy to navigate. The radio face also swivels up to reveal a hidden and illuminated storage area.

The Chevrolet Malibu Eco is on sale now and priced less than a full hybrid vehicle, with a suggested retail price of $25,995, including a $760 destination charge. Additional models go on sale this summer, followed by the Malibu Turbo this fall.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 232 Comments
      D
      • 2 Years Ago
      Cram that engine in the Sonic, please.
      Jeff Tripp
      • 2 Years Ago
      Offer it with a 6-speed manual and we'll have something here.
        Zoom
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Jeff Tripp
        Like a Regal GS? And a $30k+ price tag.
        BG
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Jeff Tripp
        Agreed. And they could market this as a real driver's car.
          QCRamAir
          • 2 Years Ago
          @BG
          Offer this with a 6speed manual and give it the incredible (for FWD) handling characteristics of the Cobalt SS, and they could really be on to something.
      Need Mulally 4 Ford
      • 2 Years Ago
      typo in the first sentence c'mon guys
      scott3
      • 2 Years Ago
      What all of you are missing is the 260 FT LB at 1700 RPM and the torque curve that is flat as the kitchen table. The 2.0 Turbo is one awsome and most over looked engines since it mostly was in niche vehicles till of late. I daily drive a HHR SS that also has the GM Performance Turbo upgrade [two three bar maps and a computer flash and a full GM 5 year warranty]. It has 290 HP and 315 LB FT. I see 24-25 MPG in town and 32 Highway with 0-60 times in the 5 sec range. I expect that this may be the Gen II 2.0 Turbo. We should see more versions of this engine that will get to and over 300 HP at some point. I have noted with the more torque the Regal GS is rated one MPG more then the Regal Turbo. I always said I would never own a 4 cylinder but once I drove the 2.0 I fell in love with it. I can't wait till this engine finds it's way to the ATS and a well tuned Magnetic shocked RWD chassis.
      rluck
      • 2 Years Ago
      This article is incorrect, the turbo engine is rated at 259hp, here is a link to the GM press release http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2012/Mar/0308_malibu
      Alex
      • 2 Years Ago
      The press release says 259hp not 269hp. Why would this engine have less horsepower than the old Ecotec 2.0T which was in the Cobalt SS?
      Rotation
      • 2 Years Ago
      That's pretty good! Can't wait to hear the mpg too. Glad to see GM rolling out LNFs (or similar) all over the place now. they sat on that excellent engine for at least 2 years too long.
      Joe
      • 2 Years Ago
      I clicked back to this article knowing there was going to be a fight because the Malibu actually looks promising and the result was way too predictable. This is hilarious.
      Randy
      • 2 Years Ago
      Is it me or does the top of the fender-to-hood bump look similar to the Ford Taurus?
      Jack Holliday
      • 2 Years Ago
      just saw a new toyota camry,, that thing is even uglier than last years model... ugggggggggggggggggh MALIBU is a much better looking car..
      acr2nv
      • 2 Years Ago
      Headline says 269 gm claims 259 what's up? Just saying
      • 2 Years Ago
      [blocked]
    • Load More Comments