When you think of old-school Volvos – you know, those boxy designs that pre-date the more curvaceous models of today – what do you picture? The 240? The 850? Or do you think of the ultimate in squared-off Swedish design, the 760?

The model credited with saving Volvo was introduced in February, 1982, making it 30 years old this month. Reflecting on the occasion, Volvo looks back at the 760's development, when it needed a car that would be reliable, efficient, durable, easily serviceable, quiet, somewhat attractive, and be a decent performer (in that order). The result was a rear-drive sedan four inches longer in wheelbase than the 240, yet a good 220 lbs lighter.

And that boxy design? That decision was as financial in nature as it was stylistic. After considering a number of design proposals, the final look was selected to be as cost-effective to produce as possible. In the end, those budgetary restrictions left us with a car that was, while not particularly exciting to behold, certainly an enduring icon of its time. Follow the jump to read the full retrospective, and flip through the images in the attached gallery.
Show full PR text
Volvo 760 turns 30 - The car that saved Volvo Car Corporation

In February 1982 - 30 years ago - the new Volvo 760 GLE was launched. No typical Volvo, yet unmistakably a Volvo. Seen as elegant and exciting with its characteristic design it was well received. The 760 became the car that actually saved Volvo Car Corporation back then and paved the way to the modern company of today.

When the first plans for the new car were drawn up around 1975 the automotive industry in general was experiencing a lot of difficulties, and Volvo in particular. The first oil crisis had just passed and at Volvo, problems were rising regarding the build quality of the new Volvo 240. It was also a very difficult economic time for the company. It was expensive to build cars in the Torslanda plant, too expensive in fact, and it was no longer profitable to export them.

The 200-series was soon to be complemented with a new generation of smaller cars from the Dutch subsidiary Volvo Car BV, but at the same time a new large volume-seller for the 1980s was desperately needed. A car designed and built to meet the continuously higher demands for fuel efficiency, exhaust emission control and safety that kept appearing. It was just as difficult to foresee what kind of car the customers of the 1980s would want.

A new way to tackle the task
The 760 was conceived in a time when conditions changed almost daily and in the company there were many strong and different opinions regarding the new car. There was no Internet to surf in order to broaden the views but Volvo made use of the best possible tool available at the time, a very thorough analysis of the surrounding world. Careful studies and large mental flexibility would lead the team on to the right track and along that track there was very little or no room for mistakes.

More car at less weight
It was decided that reliability, fuel efficiency, longevity, serviceability, low noise levels, design and performance in that order should guide the development work on the new project. It was also decided that rear-wheel drive should be employed, that the wheelbase should be 10 cm (4") longer than that of the 240. The car was also to be somewhat shorter than the 240 but have the same width and be 100 kg lighter. For cost reasons most of the technical content was to be carried over from the 200-series with only minor modifications. This was, for instance the case with transmissions, suspensions and many other system solutions. The exterior design, however, had to be brand new.

The project, which was now known as the P31, was subject to changes. The technical specifications were only finalized at about the same time as the final design was frozen. Choosing the right design is just as difficult and important as filling the car with the right technical content.
The introduction was initially planned for 1980 but was at this stage postponed until 1981.

Boxiness becomes a concept
There were many design proposals to consider, many of them from outside designers. Most of them were sedans but Volvo's head of design, Jan Wilsgaard, was more into a hatchback. The finance department, on the other hand, wanted a design with straight and flat surfaces, with angular lines, preferably 90 degrees, in order to reduce the production costs as much as possible,

In the end, the battle stood between the favourite of the marketing department and the engineering department alternative, when the sometimes very secretive Wilsgaard pulled an unknown contestant out of his sleeve. It was his own proposal which blended the properties in a different way: A car with a drawn out rear end in the estate fashion with straight body sides and with an abruptly cut-off rear, in other words a cut-back. This cut-back remained in the final discussions but eventually a modified version of it - a sedan with an almost vertical rear screen and boxy rear section - was chosen. The straight sides lent the interior a spacious feeling which was also very comfortable. And above all, the car had real character.

It soon proved to be the right choice. In the midst of the round and slippery soap dishes offered by other manufacturers, the Volvo boxiness was a hit and soon turned into a hallmark. Very valuable during this selective process was the use of so-called product clinics which Volvo used for the first time and at which people's reactions regarding the new car were investigated without revealing any details like the brand of car etc. The reactions were not entirely positive, but in the USA, the planned main market for the new car, people loved it and looked upon it as their type of car.

Guiding large parts of the development work and affecting the project, besides the design, was new legislation and the engine programme. There were still drawing boards in the engineering department but computers were used in an increasingly larger scale with advanced calculation models, especially in the safety development work. By now, the project entered its final phase and at the beginning of 1978 it was humorously re-named 1155, i.e. five to twelve. It was time to hurry up.

VCC - an appetizer
A lot of things happened before the 70s turned into the 80s. In the spring of 1978, the first driveable prototype was ready and many more test vehicles were quickly finished. The time-consuming and thorough field test work started and the cars covered a total of 3.200.000 km on three continents, in the hottest and coldest climates available, in order to sort every thinkable detail.

In 1979, the AB Volvo car division was turned into its own company - Volvo Car Corporation - with Håkan Frisinger as its first CEO and in 1980 an interesting concept car was shown which hinted more than just a little bit about what was coming a year later. The Volvo Concept Car was an updated version of Wilsgaard's cut-back which was the real design inspiration of the 760. Although shorter at the back than the 760 was to be, it was almost identical.

The VCC is today on display in the Volvo Museum. The name, in its shortened version, also stood for the initials of the company, Volvo Car Corporation. In terms of technical content, the VCC featured the constant-track rear suspension of the forthcoming 760 and a powerful turbodiesel which showed the enormous future potential of the compression engine principle.

Driving pleasure and common sense
The plans for the 760 launch at the 1981 Frankfurt Motor Show had to be pushed forward again and when Volvo finally presented the car, in February 1982, an elegant car with a completely new and unconventional design was shown; pleasant to drive, comfortable and offered with three different choices of engine: a four-cylinder turbo, the V6 now bored out to 2.8 litres and the Volkswagen-built but Volvo specified in line-six D24 turbodiesel. When fitted with this engine, the 760 was the quickest diesel car off the mark in the world at the time.

In Sweden, the new 760 GLE was priced just below the psychological SEK 100,000 limit - at SEK 99,800 - and for that money the customer got a car that was very well equipped: a V6 engine with automatic transmission, air conditioning, a sunroof and power steering. No wonder the sales took off instantly, both on the home market and abroad. In true Volvo manner, sales started from the top down, with the 760 GLE followed later by the 740 series, in four and five door versions.

The Volvo 760 became a turning point for Volvo Car Corporation, product wise and financially, and formed the basis for the continuation of the company. Without the 760 no 850, without the 850 no S80 and so on. But it was an investment of gigantic proportions, SEK 3.5 billion. The whole idea behind it was that the 760 and all future derivatives were to keep up the sales during the rest of the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s, which they did. It wasn't until 1998 that production ended with the V90, the last Volvo car with its roots in 760 technologies.

In total 221,309 units of the 760 were made (1,230,704 including the 740) before it was replaced in the autumn of 1990 by the more modern 960. By then, the 760 had been a profit-maker and prestige-builder par excellence for Volvo Car Corporation for almost a decade.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      anonymous guy
      • 3 Years Ago
      Amazing how Volvo could make a brick look elegant and stylish!
      • 3 Years Ago
      I like the large glass area with fantastic visibility. And the steeply-raked rear window does not throw off glare like so many sloping windows in modern designs. And have you ever seen the trunk in one of these? It's huge. Why do so many modern cars with ponderous bulbous bodies that slope up to the rear have so much smaller trunks? Yes, these 1980s and 1990s Volvos were great cars, and they were durable, but the maintenance was somewhat fiddly (i.e., if you keep up with things, then the car lasted forever).
      Devin Christiansen
      • 3 Years Ago
      Most underrated vehicle of all time right here.
      • 3 Years Ago
      The boxy designs of the 80s and early 90s have a certain stateliness that the modern melts lack, and it's perfectly demonstrated with this car. The other example that comes to mind is the XJ. I was very happy that Jaguar kept roughly that same design up until the last refresh.
      • 3 Years Ago
      Volvo was one of the few that started the "wedge" design back in the 80's which made cars like Buick and Cadillac want to copy it. Their new designs are nice, but don't come close to the old one's true flavor. The 240 and 760 will always live in my heart as true Volvos.
      • 3 Years Ago
      Built like tanks, and Top Gear approved. That engine is so roomy people stick V8's in them easy.
      • 3 Years Ago
      • 3 Years Ago
      240's are where it's at. I treat my sedan well, and it rewards me back with as close to zero maintenance issues as you can get. Not to mention easy to work on when you have to. I barely spend any money on it, while everyone else driving new cars can deal with their repair nightmares. Plan on keeping it for a good number of years more.
      Michael S
      • 3 Years Ago
      My parents had three Volvos from the '80s: a 760 diesel, which was a lemon but saved their lives in a crash; a 1987 740 turbo; and a 1988 240 GL, which I learned to drive in. The latter two were sold a few years ago, but I still seem them running around the neighborhood from time to time. Those cars were built to last.
      • 3 Years Ago
      240's Rock Who cares about the 760. I like a car to feel like a Tank.....GO 240's
      • 3 Years Ago
      Never been a fan of this design personally, although it accomplished what it needed to. The 240 is where it's at! It managed to do the 'square' thing but I think looked far better, in fact they still appeal to me today, which I definitely can't say about the 760. But either way, these RWD bricks were the true Volvo's! I am tempted to retire my manual trans 240 DL and get one of the slick-looking newer ones... But my mechanic and other Volvo aficionados keep telling me, "Never get rid of this car!"
      • 3 Years Ago
      I had a white 1984 760 GLE with the turbodiesel VW engine (unfortunately w/ an automatic). That car had a respectable amount of power and was generally more fun to drive (in a spirited manner) than the 1985 Mercedes 300D I had at the time too. It would roast the Benz in a 0-75mph run. I loved how the Volvo had a self-leveling suspension - all built into the shocks...no electronic gismos or hydraulic pumps/lines to fail. It's just too bad it was never as reliable as the turbodiesel Mercedes (electrical gremlins - ugh...Volvo parts departments that looked at you as though you just asked for Chevy parts - even more irritating), but I still managed to get 280k on it (with little maintenance on the drivetrain) before selling it off to a Volvo enthusiast. Something the article forgot to mention - while the 700 series might have 'saved' Volvo, the 200 series (240) still managed to be produced after the last of the 700 series rolled off the factory line...
    • Load More Comments