Right when it looks like Hyundai can do no wrong, we have this: A consumer protection group is asking the United States Environmental Protection Agency to look into claims that the Elantra has exaggerated fuel economy numbers.

Consumer Watchdog sent the EPA a letter citing a litany of public criticism of the compact Elantra's real-world fuel economy, and asking the EPA to "re-test the 2011 and 2012 Elantra models in its own facility, to seek an explanation for the MPG disappointments of so many Elantra buyers."

Except that many Elantra buyers are actually satisfied with their mileage. When we asked Hyundai for a response to the allegations, its public relations staff pointed us to a J.D. Power APEAL study showing that, "Elantra owners are the happiest in the entire compact segment competitive set in terms of fuel economy."

Hyundai did note that real-world fuel economy results often differ from EPA label values, but stopped short of writing the whole thing off as "your mileage may vary." According to Hyundai, when Consumer Reports put the Elantra through its tough city cycle test regimen, the results were consistent with other compact cars, all of which underperformed compared to the EPA test. Hyundai said the Elantra achieved 20 mpg, which was higher than Honda Civic at 19, Ford Focus at 18, and Chevrolet Cruze at 17. "These results show rank-order consistency with the EPA results of Elantra (29), Civic (28), Focus (28), and Cruze (22)," said Hyundai.

The Elantra was redesigned for the 2011 model year, and when we tested one, we averaged 31 mpg over a week of mixed driving, compared to EPA numbers of 29/40/33 city/highway/combined. For 2012, Hyundai has actually added its ActiveECO system that it says can improve fuel economy by up to seven percent. Sales of the Elantra were up 44 percent in November.

Click past the jump to read the full press release.
Show full PR text
Consumer Watchdog Urges EPA to Re-Test Elantra 40 MPG Claim, Hold Hyundai to Account


Washington, D.C. -- As automakers make their annual pitch for holiday sales, Consumer Watchdog has asked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to investigate Hyundai's high mileage claims for its popular Elantra model (29/40 MPG city/highway, 33 MPG average).

The Elantra has attracted an unusual number of consumer complaints about real-world MPG averaging in the mid-20s, far from Hyundai's stated average of 33, said Consumer Watchdog.

"Gasoline remains well above $3 a gallon and MPG is a key factor for car buyers, who expect to match the window-label MPG if they drive carefully," said Judy Dugan, research director for Consumer Watchdog. "A loss of 6 or 7 miles per gallon, a conservative average for the Elantra based on tests and complaints, adds up to real money for drivers."

The letter said, in part:
"As the holiday season commences, automakers are touting discounts and year-end deals; record-high gasoline prices for the season will make MPG a significant part of their red-bow advertising. ...

"This makes the accuracy of EPA MPG estimates all the more important, to prevent any maker from marketing autos on a stated city or highway MPG that substantially misstates the result that drivers will get on the road. In general, the new EPA MPG estimates seem to comport closely to real-world results. ...

"However, a notable exception to this rule has caught the attention of Consumer Watchdog. For the two most recent model years, Hyundai Motors has actively marketed its base models of the Elantra on their very high 29/40 MPG, and 33 MPG average, leaving a trail of disappointed drivers. An Edmunds online Town Hall discussion on the Elantra attracted scores of drivers who can't, no matter how hard they try, duplicate such numbers. One very public example of this was USA Today tech writer Jefferson Graham, whose Sept. 22 article on his new Elantra expressed his disappointment that he averaged only 22 MPG, a gap that no "break-in" period seems likely to fill.

"Additionally, while Motor Trend named the 2011 Elantra Car of the Year in its class, the magazine's on-road testers achieved only a very disappointing 26.5 MPG average, bad enough to get special note in the review. Consumers Union found similar fault in with the 2012 Elantra, a redesign. While CU's highway mileage was 39, its city mileage, with experienced drivers who know how to drive a low-mileage auto, was only 20 MPG--very far from the listed 29 MPG. ...

"Gasoline prices remain at record high levels for this season, making efficiency a top purchasing issue for consumers. Neither Hyundai for any other car company should be allowed to misrepresent its efficiency standards or dupe consumers into buying its cars. We ask you, through prompt re-testing and action as needed, to send a message to the company and the auto industry that MPG misrepresentation will not be tolerated."

See the complete letter at: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/ltrepaelantra11292011.pdf

Consumer Watchdog asked the EPA, if re-testing finds flaws with Hyundai's original EPA-mandated tests, for fines against Hyundai and owner compensation.

"The popularity and increasing sales of the Elantra make it all the more important that drivers get the same or nearly the same results as the EPA mileage," said Judy Dugan, research director of Consumer Watchdog. "EPA's current MPG testing model has been close to real-world results for other high-efficiency models, so at the very least Hyundai has some hard explaining to do about the Elantra's shortfalls."

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 3 Years Ago
      "For 2012, Hyundai has actually added its ActiveECO system that it says can improve fuel economy by up to seven percent. " Except when you go to fuelly, you see that 2012 average is 30.6 mpg, and 2011 is 30.7. So it actually went down .1 mpg in real-world usage. Great.
      • 3 Years Ago
      I had a feeling this news would be coming out sooner or later. Hyundai/Kia as been touting these wonderful EPA numbers, but then most owners and reviews are saying otherwise. You know something is fishy when Honda products with "OLD AND DATED" technology are getting better real world averages than your products with DI and 6 Speed autos and whatnot. I really think they are blowing up their numbers now.....yes mileage will vary but a lot of people aren't getting the estimates. That says something....
        • 3 Years Ago
        +1 to smooth if people were smart enough to look past specs and look at results they wouldnt have to complain. Doesnt matter if they have DI, 9 speed AT, or hybrid if its not fine tuned and optimized all around Its the same with phones, iPhone 4S "only" has 800mhz processor but it is just as fast as competitors with 1.2-1.5ghz chips because everything works together well.
        • 3 Years Ago
        It's hard to compare today's cars with these older Hondas you are talking about. Today's new cars weigh much more than those old Hondas because of the mandated safety equipment and the increasing amount of features and gadgets that customers now demand. Take all that stuff out of today's cars and these modern DI engines with 6-8-speed transmissions would probably blow those old Honda's out of the water.
      emperor koku
      • 3 Years Ago
      It's Hyundai altogether, not just the Elantra. The worst offender is the Sonata Hybrid.
      Dark Gnat
      • 3 Years Ago
      Never buy a car that looks like the Joker.
      • 3 Years Ago
      • 3 Years Ago
      Fuelly.com's aggregate looks close to what Autoblog saw. Of course, it is considerably lower than advertised.
      • 3 Years Ago
      I must say.. there is a real problem with the methods how EPA test cars for MPG... I got an old corolla, and EPA says it can only get 33mpg on HW, but with proper way of driving, I often get 38mpg..
      • 3 Years Ago
      My 2008 Volkswagen Golf with the 2.5L I5 was rated at 29mpg highway. I usually AVERAGED 29mpg overall in mixed driving. Best I ever saw was 34mpg with it AFTER it was broken in. My first few tanks were only around 22mpg! Perhaps the new Hyundais need to be broken in to achieve better mileage? I know GM's Ecotec 2.2 gets much better mileage after fully broken in.
        • 3 Years Ago
        I think that definitely plays a factor. Most GM engines and I think most engines in general get better mileage by the time you pass 6,000 miles/10,000 KM. Just be happy that the EPA's testing was updated a few years back. Transport Canada's testing is still in the dark ages, as very few vehicles can hit the stated number, even during perfect driving conditions. Worse yet, most vehicles' trip computers show MPG in American gallons, while the Transport Canada window sticker shows it in British gallons (which are larger).
      • 3 Years Ago
      this was pretty obvious to all of us who read all the reviews that consistantly showed these same results. Even though it seems obvious that actual milage will be lower we all know that there are tons of people out there that are completely clueless when buying a car.
      • 3 Years Ago
      Man, my old VW gets mpg in the city than that.
      • 3 Years Ago
      Elyria Hyundai
      • 3 Years Ago
      Well, I got 41 mpg on a 110 mile jaunt to deliver paperwork to a guest a few weeks ago...and have had emails from customers that are getting 45+ mpg! So not sure what they are hollering about! Try driving it right and NOT speeding! :)
    • Load More Comments