Thomas Timko is being sued by his daughter (GMA)
Kaitlyn Timko's father was driving her back to her mother's house after a visit with him when another driver shot him in the head during a road-rage dispute in Philadelphia. He slumped over the wheel and the car was bloodied as Kaitlyn sat in the back seat.

Neither the four bullets fired nor the flying glass struck the 9-year-old. But she was barely responsive when a counselor interviewed her that week, and her mother said she remains traumatized two years later.

Now Kaitlyn - through her mother - has sued her dad, charging that he set off a chain of events that led to the gunfire by cutting off the other driver.

"He cannot provoke other drivers, especially when he has his kid in the car," plaintiff lawyer Christopher Culleton said. "Mr. Timko gave him the finger, through the sunroof. That escalated the situation."

Culleton represents Lori Hardwerk, 40, of Norristown, who filed suit on her daughter's behalf this year in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court. Hardwerk is seeking damages to pay for the intensive counseling she feels the 10-year-old needs to deal with post-traumatic stress.

The once-bubbly child never wants her mother out of sight, remains anxious about visits with her father and sometimes struggles to focus at school, Hardwerk said.

"Before, she was real outgoing, energetic and athletic. Then when it happened, it's like everything shut down," Hardwerk told The Associated Press this month.

Weekly therapy visits secured through a crime victims' program has helped, but not enough, she said.

"She's taking tiny baby steps ... but she still has a lot of anxiety when it comes to being separated (from me)," the mother said.


The October 2009 expressway shooting near the Walt Whitman Bridge left Thomas Timko with permanent brain injuries, a disfiguring scar and high medical debts. Shooter Christian Squillaciotti, a schizophrenic ex-Marine, is serving a 13- to 26-year prison term after being convicted of two counts of attempted murder and weapons charges.

Timko's lawyer calls the shooting unforeseeable - and argues that his client did not directly cause it.

"In no way was Mr. Squillaciotti's act of shooting another driver a normal consequence of driving into the lane of travel of another vehicle," lawyer Kevin McNulty wrote in a motion to dismiss the case. "Mr. Squillaciotti is the proximate cause of her alleged emotional distress, not her own father."

The judge denied the motion, moving the case to discovery, which is now under way. The case is not expected to go to trial for at least a year.

Neither Squillaciotti nor Timko appear to have any assets to recoup, leaving Culleton to go after Timko's auto insurance under negligent driving claims.

Squillaciotti's insurance would not apply because the shooting was intentional, Culleton said. But the lawsuit also names his wife and passenger, Chastity Squillaciotti, as a defendant, under the theory that she co-owned the Ford F150 pickup, and should not have let her 6-foot-4, 275-pound husband drive it in his presumably agitated state.

"Clearly, she knows her husband's got problems, and she's sitting in the car while he's driving. We need to explore whether she should have done something, whether she could have done something," said Culleton, a personal injury lawyer.

McNulty, who defends insurance companies, did not return phone messages, and a home listing for Timko could not be determined. He lived in Galloway, N.J., at the time of the shooting, but lost his home and his livelihood afterward.

Timko, 44, once worked as a warehouse supervisor, Hardwerk said. She did clerical work for Vanguard, an investment firm in Malvern, until a 2001 car accident left her disabled, she said.

The couple, though never married, were together for about 20 years and had two children before the relationship ended in 2009. They remained cordial, and Timko saw his children regularly, she said.

Timko was driving his daughter home that day from his home in New Jersey, where they had gone swimming and shopped for clothes. The dispute occurred on the bridge, and continued until the shooting on a nearby expressway. Timko managed to bring his car to a stop on the shoulder.

A woman who saw Kaitlyn's face pressed against a rear window stopped to help the child.

Hardwerk does not accuse Timko of routinely driving recklessly, or using profanities, in their children's presence. And there are no custody or child-support fights, and the lawsuit has not caused a rift between them, or between Timko and Kaitlyn, Hardwerk said.

"She knows why I'm doing it. She knows it's for her well-being," Hardwerk said.

Timko's visits with his children continue - but at Kaitlyn's request, his girlfriend does the driving, Hardwerk said.

McNulty argues in court papers there is case law to support his position that Timko's actions "are too remote" to have directly caused Katilyn's alleged emotional distress.

He noted that in 2000, a state Superior Court ruled against a Philadelphia police officer who lost her job after shooting her husband with her service revolver, then sued a hospital that had misdiagnosed her newborn baby with syphilis.

The officer blamed her dismissal on the misdiagnosis, which led her husband to admit to an affair, and allegedly sent the marriage into a tailspin.

"The Superior Court ... summarized a line of cases which also conclude that the alleged harm to plaintiff is so remote from the actions of the defendant that a defendant cannot be found legally responsible," McNulty wrote.

Family law expert Mary T. Vidas called Hardwerk's lawsuit "pretty novel."

Child actors sometimes sue their parents over earnings the parents hold in trust, and minors can sue to emancipate themselves, she said. But a suit that essentially blames the victim of a road-rage shooting may prove an uphill battle, she said.

"There's no question ... the mother and her lawyer had to sue everybody," said Vidas, a Philadelphia lawyer who serves on the executive board of the American Bar Association's family law section. "The dad probably has no objection, and said, 'Do whatever you need to do because I can't support her.'"

However, Culleton must prove to a judge or jury that Timko should have foreseen the distress suffered by his daughter.

"I don't know how they're ever going to prove that the conduct was foreseeable, ... that he knew by swerving into traffic that he would have been shot in the head, that somebody was going to grab a gun and shoot him four times," Vidas said.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 385 Comments
      christine
      • 3 Years Ago
      I tell you lawyers will sue for anything!! If they think they can get away with it. If this Mother wanted to help the sistuation with her childs mental state then she needs to get a phychiatric help..NOT.. sueing the father and causing MORE trauma for this child with her father! She should be taken to court for keeping this in front of the child!!
      • 3 Years Ago
      You should expect these days that people have guns. So by making someone mad you have set the wheels in motion to potentially be shot. When any of my kids are around I always think before I act...you never know what others will do. He deserves to be sued...he did not provide adaquete care for his child while being in the car. If a parent does not put thier child into a car seat and gets into an accident they should have to pay for ever ounce of damage to that child...they did not provide adaquete care for that child. As a parent you need to foresee events happening. If I get into a road rage incident is there a possibility of being harmed...YES! If I get behind the wheel of a car is there a possiblity of an accident occuring ...YES! If I let my child cross the street by themselves is there a possibility of them being hit...YES! As a parent if you instigate an incident that could harm your child then you should suffer the consequences for your actions! He intigated the whole incident and should have expected the outcome therefore he really should have no rights as a parent anymore! I hope she wins!
      Maria
      • 3 Years Ago
      Uncle made a comment she was a money grubber,,,,well uncle that money grubber didnt put her kid in the state she is in by behaving the way her father did...dad had to be a manly prick and look what it got him? being a single mother is not easy, so yeah, BOTH MEN /boys should be responsible....you arent thinking how the incident f#@%&* her head up...but one can only hope boths guys learned a lesson....
      AtomicE77
      • 3 Years Ago
      He should have foreseen it? You're joking right? now we have to be able to tell the future to drive our cars? Sorry this story really just gets my goat... My apologies for venting
      • 3 Years Ago
      This is bullshit. So I guess if some incident happens to me where say I'm at a bank and some dumbass wants to rob it. The man has a gun and tells me to get on the ground and I fear for my life. Then a year later I'm still traumatized by the incident, I suppose me and anyone else involved in this incident should just be able to sue the bank because they are a bank. I mean I know they can't help they were a bank but they provoked that guy by having all that money, to come in with a gun and threaten lots of innocent people. I guess I deserve to sue because I'm traumatized. Well true story about my life, I was raped by 3 different men growing up. My step father, his father, and my foster father. My step grandfather died of old age, my step father went to jail for just a little while and is still in and out due to other **** he does, and my foster father is still alive and free. Where is my payout for the therapy I've had to go through, where is my compensation. I don't feel I need any. The only I feel I need is for those men to go to jail for their crimes for a proper sentencing. Or for them to be castrated. haha Screw the money. I am married with a 9 month old son, work my ass off, and pretty much live paycheck to paycheck. Life isn't easy but no one deserves the easy way out. We should all work for what we have.
      sgtpepper9094
      • 3 Years Ago
      As George Harrison sang "Doing the Sue Me Sue You blues."
      • 3 Years Ago
      wow this is ridiculous, 95% of this world is stupid stupid people
      Princess
      • 3 Years Ago
      My God what people won’t to with their children to get back at an ex. You have to feel sorry for this little girl, she has a douche for a father and a bitch for a mother.
        • 3 Years Ago
        @Princess
        How is this a political ,much less, a liberal issue? You don't think that you put people at risk by following after that reckless driver, causing her to duck and dodge, then drive up on a curb to get away from you? Or better yet, she could of pulled a gun and shot both you and your girlfriend. Next time, get a plate # and dial 911.
      ljconner
      • 3 Years Ago
      Too bad for the kid..the rest of them are crazy.
      mulepick
      • 3 Years Ago
      Lawyers in love.
      • 3 Years Ago
      I got lost some where why is daughter sueing his father for and he has no Insurance or money daaa...& where's does the mother come in daaaa...
      • 3 Years Ago
      he should be in jail for hes life
    • Load More Comments