• Apr 22, 2011
Ford Focus Econetic – Click above for high-res image gallery

Here in the States, it's the 40-mile-per-gallon SFE trim on the 2012 Focus that's the fuel efficiency champ of Ford's compact hatchback lineup. However, over in Europe, it's the Focus Econetic. Developed purely with efficiency in mind, Ford says that the Econetic will get an estimated 80 mpg on the European testing cycle (67 mpg U.S.) and should emit less than 95 grams of CO2 per kilometer. Final emissions and fuel economy certifications will be completed in late 2011.

If the Focus Econetic can meet the targets that Ford has set, then it will become Europe's most fuel-efficient compact vehicle, topping all of its diesel-, gasoline- and hybrid-powered competitors.

The Focus Econetic's efficiency starts with a 103-horsepower, 1.6-liter Duratorq TDCi diesel engine. That, combined with low-friction piston rings, Ford' Durashift six-speed manual transmission, start-stop technology, regenerative charging, Ford's Eco Mode system and a revised final drive ratio, allow the Econetic model to achieve its outstanding fuel economy. The Focus Econetic will be offered in both four- and five-door body styles and should hit European streets in early 2012.




[Source: Automotive News – sub. req.]


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 15 Comments
      Rotation
      • 8 Days Ago
      95g/km on Diesel is not 67mpg US. As an example, the Audi A3 (140HP) Diesel emits 129g/km CO2 and is rated at 34mpg (combined) i the US. This vehicle uses 73% as much fuel, so it would be rated more like 46mpg combined on the US system. Outstanding fuel economy? It's pretty good. It doesn't match the Prius though.
        GeorgeS
        • 8 Days Ago
        @Rotation
        Your right the numbers don't make sense. It can't be 67 MPG US. 95g/km is 162 g/mile which isn't all that good.
          • 8 Days Ago
          @GeorgeS
          You are mixing emissions and mileage. The 95g/km is the CO2 emissions. By comparison a Prius does 104 g/km. So 95 is very good.
      Edge
      • 8 Days Ago
      Surprised this site has not mentioned it yet, but Kia has just introduced the Rio which outputs even lower amounts of C02 than this car, at 85 grams of CO2 per kilometer. It also has start-stop tech, which I wish becomes the norm in a few years on all models announced.
        Kai F. Lahmann
        • 8 Days Ago
        @Edge
        Yes, that one is even the *most efficient car at all* in Europe - but that's a subcompact.
        Dan Frederiksen
        • 8 Days Ago
        @Edge
        the polo bluemotion is probably better too. Ford probably disqualifies those by calling them subcompacts. electric cars are not interesting either :)
      GeorgeS
      • 8 Days Ago
      67 MPG in a non Hybrid?? Sounds almost too good to be true. How do they do it??
        paulwesterberg
        • 8 Days Ago
        @GeorgeS
        By using the horrible European testing cycle which relies in much lower speeds than the EPA test. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Fuel_economy_in_automobiles#Europe CO2 emissions reported are often a better indicator of mileage. 95g/km is better than average, but still more than the 89g/km for the 50mpg prius.
          Peter
          • 8 Days Ago
          @paulwesterberg
          1) Its not a horrible testing cycle - its just different. Lets be a little tolerant here. Note that EPA mileage is the same for a Jetta and Golf and the sport wagon with the same engine and tranny and yet they all have different masses and drag coefficients (and some have different frontal areas) so they can't have the same mileage in real life. In any economic region whatever testing regime is in place will give some idea as to relative economies. The EPA value, I would point out, is done on a dynamo and not real world either (and what is the real world to me is not what you may drive) 2) I agree that C02 figures are a better indicator of mileage, but remember that there is more carbon in diesel than in gasoline. If you want to compare gas to diesel mileage by proxy of the CO2 emissions you have to allow for the difference Gasoline carbon content per gallon: 2,421 grams Diesel carbon content per gallon: 2,778 grams 95g/km x 2421/2778 = 82.7 thus this Ford will be ahead of the Prius in liters of fuel burned, presumably on the extra-urban cycle. The Prius will be ahead in CO2 and presumably in the urban cycle.
          JakeY
          • 8 Days Ago
          @paulwesterberg
          "Its not a horrible testing cycle - its just different" "Horrible" is a subjective measure, but you can easily say the Euro cycle is more lenient. Therefore you will never see those high figures in the US for the same car. Keep in mind if you are within 3%, you can have the same mpg. Having the same mpg doesn't mean the exact same mileage because of the granularity of the measure. So any CdA (not just Cd and frontal area measurements) and weight differences need to be different enough to get out of the margin (and keep in mind they don't have a 1:1 relation to efficiency).
      Kai F. Lahmann
      • 8 Days Ago
      The comments here show once again, the big difference between Europe and the USA. The first thing are the numbers themself: European numbers are normally 20-25% better than US numbers, just because the test cycle works a bit different. Now to the big "how good it this?" question: In fact 3.5l/100km diesel (what this should be) is the best in a compact car; currently the best ones (four of them) are at 3.8l and eight subcompacts are at or below 3,5l. With 4.5l you are a gas guzzler in a compact, that's an average value for a mid-size car. Everybody, who cares about his fuel cost here drives a diesel. This also explains why the Toyota Prius isn't that much successful in Europe than it is elsewhere: 4l diesel are cheaper than 4l gasoline. The Honda Hybrids won't even win with both fuels are the same price.
      paulwesterberg
      • 8 Days Ago
      So that means that ford isn't planning on selling it here?
      paulwesterberg
      • 8 Days Ago
      Did ford forget about the leaf?
      • 8 Days Ago
      The question still begs for an answer. "Why won't Ford sell the diesel equiped Focus in the U.S.? Who are they afraid of pissing off? Also, the Toyota Tacoma/Hilux, why isn't the diesel version of that sold in the U.S.? There are many versions of vehicles sold overseas but not in the U.S. that have more power and meet the U.S. emission/safety standards.
    • Load More Comments