• Dec 29, 2010
Left to right, Ron Gremban, Felix Kramer, Andy Frank

For a long time, the plug-in vehicle scene was small enough that a few handshakes and introductions were all that was needed to meet most of the people involved. This will be forever gone in 2011, when tens of thousands of people get a plug-in vehicle of their very own.

As a follow-up to the post last week about CalCars' Felix Kramer and Ron Gremban and the "father of the plug-in hybrid," Andy Frank, taking deliveries of their new Chevy Volts, we have an expanded version of Gremban's remarks from the ceremony. Imagine that: A ceremony for delivering three plug-in vehicle. These sorts of things are important now and mark the end (well, an important next step, at least) of a very long road, but they will also soon become a thing of the past. Check out Gremban's comments after the jump.

CalCars' Ron Gremban Welcomes the Chevy Volt
By Ron Gremban, Technology Lead, The California Cars Initiative (CalCars.org)

Yesterday, in a historic event at Novato Chevrolet, my colleagues Felix Kramer, Dr. Andy Frank, and I got the key fobs to the Volts we've had on order ever since we could order one. Ours are all among the first; mine is #24 off the assembly line! Here's a written version of my remarks at that happy event.

GM did an outstanding job engineering this vehicle, and it shows, inside and out. The Volt is arguably the most technologically advanced vehicle on the road today. My first impressions are that GM didn't just build an electric car, it built a flagship. It is all GM representatives have claimed it to be, and more. First, of course, it is the world's first mass-produced Plug-in Hybrid or PHEV (GM prefers to call it an Extended-range Electric Vehicle or EREV to differentiate it from the many upcoming plug-in hybrids that will require internal combustion engine participation for full performance).

Though its PHEV capabilities are enough to make it the most special and important car GM has produced in a century (more on that later), I also found it far more refined and more of a joy to drive than any other car I've owned, including both my converted plug-in Prius and my once-beloved BMW 535i that I drove for 242,000 miles. And it has amenities galore, including internet connectivity rivaling that of my Android phone.

Soon I will write a Volt review that covers topics and perceptions the many, many other reviewers have not yet reported on, as well as a comparison of the various PHEVs I have driven – but not today. Felix told his story of how he got here and where he's going very, very well at -- see http://www.calcars.org/photos-plugins-arrive.html for photos and coverage. Here in brief is mine.

If I were a novelist, I might start with, "It was a dark and stormy night..." 42 years ago when I was one of three exhausted Caltech students driving past the finish line at MIT in Boston after 8 3/4 days and nights of continuous driving and charging, from Caltech in Pasadena, CA. We were young and enthusiastic proponents of electric cars to help solve the horrendous smog, due to gasoline cars, then smothering Los Angeles and other cities. But the auto manufacturers weren't listening, so it took decades of painful, forced, incremental steps to get the much cleaner but still polluted air we enjoy today.

After heading up R&D for the Sebring-Vanguard Citicar, an early Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) that appeared during the Arab oil embargo in the early '70s, I went on to do other engineering –on television special effects switchers, stock and bond trading systems, and photovoltaic solar energy systems – until Toyota came out with the 2004 Prius, the first strong and very successful hybrid. I met Felix, who had the vision of turning one into a plug-in hybrid – not because it would be cool to own, but as a tool to demonstrate that an existing mass-produced car was already capable of driving on electricity rather than gasoline, to show the advantages and promise of PHEVs, and to build public awareness and grass-roots pressure on government and the auto manufacturers to actually mass-produce plug-in vehicles. I also met Andy, who had, with his students at UC Davis, been building plug-in hybrids for decades.

Thus began a marriage (so to speak) born in heaven: Felix and I teamed up. I bought a Prius (Felix already had one) and led a bunch of enthusiastic volunteers, working in my garage to turn mine into a PRIUS+. We didn't know if driving a Prius on grid electricity was possible, but together we tried and failed before succeeding in November 2004. Our first version had proprietary technology from a private company, EnergyCS, but over time we came up with our own very different method for which we could put complete how-to instructions online in the public domain, which we did in partnership with the Electric Automobile Association, in a wiki at http://www.eaa-phev.org. With Felix' spectacular public relations expertise, our Prius conversions made even more waves than we had hoped for. For months, our efforts got national and even international media attention. We let Members of Congress and their staff in Washington, D.C, drive these plug-in conversions just as the automakers' CEOs were called on the carpet at the White House.

Over time, environmental organizations like the Sierra Club that had had misconceptions about electric cars realized that EVs are cleaner than gas-guzzlers even on electricity generated from coal, and that they get cleaner over time as the electric grid gets cleaner. Other promotional and lobbying organizations such as Plug In America, Set America Free, and Plug-in Partners jumped in and often out-publicized us, greatly expanding the reach of our message. Working together, we helped raise public awareness of the immediacy and benefits of plug-in vehicles.

Two years after our first conversion, GM stunned the Detroit Auto Show with the Volt concept prototype. Whether or not our efforts contributed to GM's inspiration, they no doubt helped set the stage for the public and media excitement that propelled GM into actually designing and building the Volt. We were thrilled, and are even more so now, after the company stuck to its plan through thick and thin -- even bankruptcy -- and today is delivering this terrific car in what will soon be five-digit quantities.
It took 42 years, auto manufacturer bankruptcies, global climate change, impending peak oil, an influential movie ("Who Killed the Electric Car?"), tremendous grass-roots enthusiasm, and serious governmental incentives to get to today's deliveries of the world's first mass-produced plug-in hybrid, done by a re-emergent U.S. manufacturer.

Just days before, I also witnessed the delivery of the first Nissan LEAF, the world's first mass-produced pure electric vehicle. Both vehicles are major milestones in the electrification of transportation. Just as the IBM PC and the very different Apple Macintosh that followed it were both critical to launching the tsunami of personal computing that followed, leading to today's potent mix of personal empowerment through billions of GUI-based devices, these two vehicles with very different electric propulsion systems are together poised to open the public's eyes to the personal joys as well as social advantages of electric vehicles.

But this isn't the end, it's just the beginning. With both peak oil and climate change staring us in the face, we will be unable to keep our civilization intact and our planet livable without far more major changes to business as usual. After a decade, hybrids had reached just 3 of the cars on our roads! The Volt and the LEAF are truly desirable clean vehicles whose time has come, but their kind will not quickly become the norm without displacement of incentives from fossil fuels to renewables throughout the global economy, a process that, especially in the U.S., has barely begun and may now be stalled.

With today's entrenched-interest politics, none of this will happen until a shot of awareness – of the physical realities that climate science and international energy organizations point to, and of impending economic as well as environmental catastrophes inevitable without major change – shakes the public to its very core. Katrina didn't do it; the BP disaster didn't do it; tales of extreme climate and resulting environmental catastrophes from Russia to Pakistan haven't done it. What will it take, and what can we do, individually and collectively, to help out? I don't have an answer except to keep on telling our stories, focusing on possible solutions, and emphasizing facts over fiction.

So...even if EVs achieve 10 times the penetration rate that hybrids have seen, it will take at least 15 years to make a dent in either energy security or greenhouse emissions, which is why CalCars is now promoting (at http://www.calcars.org/ice-conversions.html) en-masse conversion of the biggest gas guzzlers on our roads today into plug-in vehicles of all types. Such a program could be economical while saving a decade and much vehicle manufacturing energy compared to crushing and rebuilding. But people are as skeptical of this today as they were of PHEVs six years ago, so once again we at CalCars have a huge mountain to climb. Well, we did it once
...


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 31 Comments
      • 4 Years Ago
      Ahhhh... that could explain why all the large majority of people at my local EV club are 50yrs and older :P

      Ya know what's sad.. if GM wouldn't have sold the NiMH patent to Texaco, we could have had electric cars on sale 12 years ago.

      Yeah, i'm still bitter.
        • 7 Days Ago
        Well you young whipper snapper! I am 48. I did not wait at all for EV's, gas went to 4 per gallon and I bought one. Before that I drove my 3 V8's and thought little of it. My motto was if you can't beat big oil then join them and burn all their is before it is gone. I found a way to beat big oil with a very usable car, thanks to lithium. Yea, GM is unforgiven for selling Texaco those nickle batteries. Some think GM should get a break for producing the Volt but they use the Volt to attack EV's just like they did with the EV1. Down with big oil and the auto corps that support it!

        17,450 miles and I will have owned it for 2 years by the middle of January 2011. Of course it was either waiting for repairs or shipped out of the country for repairs for 8 of those first 24 months I have owned it. The heater is now working intermittently think Lion motors will fly out some techs from NC to repair it? I some how doubt it but I well tell them about it anyway.
        • 7 Days Ago
        Your view is certainly unique. I don't know anyone else who owned a bunch of V8 cars and went straight to a little electric compact car.

        Bah, GM. The only good thing they make is a Corvette, a few caddies, and various trucks.
        They better make good on 100% of that damn loan we gave to them because their direction disgusts me, and has for a long time.

        • 7 Days Ago
        The Z06 is one of the great cars, the CTS is phenomenal, the Malibu is an excellent car, the Silverado is still my favorite pickup (even tho I wrecked mine), the Cruz looks to be a great little car and the Volt is THE electric car most of us can use today, not 5 years from now when batteries get to where they need to be. I would use 3 or 4 gallons a month in the winter, less during the rest of the year. I can get 2 or 3 clients into it and drive all day when I need to. GM has built a car that no one else could. I couldn't give a rats ass about Nimh.
      • 4 Years Ago
      You'd think these guys would be more jazzed about the Leaf than the Volt.
      • 4 Years Ago
      I hope we see too peoples, compagnies experimenting portables electrical sources prototypes machines ( onboard and parked ) to electrically recharge theses electrics cars batteries.

      No more stoned ages technologies like petrol products, harshs internal combustion engines getting aged and more and more capricious and conter-regulated by goverments and manufacturers themselfs.

      More portables then conventionnal electrics sources like 110 volts and 220 volts outlets.

        • 7 Days Ago
        yeah.

        I hope we see too peoples, compagnies experimenting portables electrical sources prototypes machines ( onboard and parked ) to electrically recharge theses electrics cars batteries.

        No more stoned ages technologies like petrol products, harshs internal combustion engines getting aged and more and more capricious and conter-regulated by goverments and manufacturers themselfs.

        More portables then conventionnal electrics sources like 110 volts and 220 volts outlets.

        • 4 Years Ago
        "stoned ages" lol, yeah that 60's tech is pretty dated now.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Good un, Larzen. You must go elsewhere water fuel peddler, your Jedi tricks will not work here.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Calling the Seebring Vanguard CitiCar a NEV is not being taken kindly by any of the C-Car Owners. Our C-Car's (both CityCar and Comuta-Car) are perfectly legal on all US and Canadian roads. They meet all vehicle roadworthy and safety standards for their year(s) of manufacture. Our C-Cars are just as fully road capable as my 1963 Studebaker. Therefore, I find that appellation repugnant.

      • 4 Years Ago
      Hyfusioin, increase your gas milage by at least 20% or more. the best water fuel cell operate unlike traditional electroysis.Water Fuel Cell produces at least 300% more Brown's gas than typical electrolysis units. http://www.hyfusion.com/HHOGeneratorPlans.htm
      • 4 Years Ago
      I'm glad CalCARS supports flex fuel PHEVs, that is, the liquid fuel for the extended range part being E85.
      • 3 Years Ago
      Yes the current strides in electric transportation is very electicying. But all that is new has been done many, many years ago. When the Electric Auto Association was formed (as were other EV clubs) they converted vehicles to all battery - plug-in electrics. Today is nothing new, and GMC does not deserve credit for any advancement in electric technology. GM missed the boat when they had made the EV-1 and then sneakily recalled that vehicle and crushed the design so it would not be offered to the public.
      If the largest auto manifacture had stayed with their plan they would not have been bankrupt and would be the leader of the worlds electric vehicle field. But greed and devious management has made GM only one of the pack.
      I look forward to the fuel cell revolution in EV transportation which I hear will be in 2011.
      MPG range of 200 or better may be achieved so there plug inners.
      • 4 Years Ago
      My friend with a Volt has used less than one gallon of gas in his week of ownership.

      He's driven 100 miles so far.

      He overall mpg (not mpge, just measure of miles travelled versus gas used) was over 250mpg until yesterday, but then I asked him to pick me up at the airport, and the entire return trip (about 10 miles) was on gas because he didn't have time to charge up the car sufficiently before picking me up.

      He'd still be over 250mpg if he had a 240V charger. He would have had enough battery for the airport trip if he has 240V to charge from instead of his 120V charger which only puts in about 4 miles range per hour.
        • 7 Days Ago
        Tim W. & EVsuperhero:
        I was not referring to GM's figures, but my friend's experiences.

        So if you have a problem with quoting mpg, take it up with me not GM.

        I am quoting mpg for the reason I stated. And it is a perfectly valid reason. If you buy a Volt with the purpose of using less gas (and I would state given the Volt's price, that's the only valid reason), then an mpg figure like I quoted could be useful for you to estimate how much gas you would use if you had a Volt.

        You could calculate the same kind of figures if you own a Leaf by just totaling the EV miles you drive on your Leaf and the non-EV miles you drive when taking a trip the Leaf isn't good for. Add them up and divide by the number of gallons of gas you bought and you have a similar composite figure. And again, this figure is useful for calculating how much gas you are using, not for overall efficiency.
        • 7 Days Ago
        Nissan also sued CARB to fight their mpg laws, btw.

        http://www.edf.org/article.cfm?contentID=4192
        • 7 Days Ago
        the "GM thinks electricity is free" thing is because you only measure miles traveled per gallon used when you're actually using gas to move the car.

        MPG was designed to give people a representation of efficiency and cost of operation between any two vehicles. By discarding the energy (and costs) of electricity used to travel, while including all of those miles in "MPG" calculations, the number is extremely skewed.

        If you go on a road trip where you can't recharge (the entire selling point of the volt) you want to know the actual MPG of the engine, not how much gas you burn on average doing daily commutes when you can recharge every night at home. Better to say something like: "My friend has driven 100 miles, and only had to use the gas generator for about 20% of them. With only 40 miles of range and slow 120V charging, an EV can still cover 80% of his daily driving!" than to grossly lie about the efficiency of the gas engine.
        • 7 Days Ago
        @Tim W: He's not lying. He very carefully qualified his statement, clarifying that he is not trying to indicate any sort of efficiency claim, but simply that, for his friend's typical driving usage, he uses one gallon of gas for roughly every 200 miles driven.

        That's all he's saying. He's not saying that the rest of the propulsive energy for the car arrives my magic pixie dust. He's not discounting that his friend has to purchase electricity (which consumes various fuels on the back end) or take time to charge the car (he explicitly cites a case where his friend had to purchase more fuel because he didn't have time to charge the car, as well as the fact that his 120V charger is slower).

        Really, all he's doing is sharing a positive anecdote and giving GM what he considers well-deserved kudos for building a car that helps people lower their gasoline usage while being flexible enough to serve a wide range of commuting patterns. What's so wrong with that?
        • 7 Days Ago
        I have to admit that I don't pay much attention to the amount of electricity a Volt uses because it only takes around a dollar to fill it up if you completely empty the available battery capacity. Most days you won't use more than 70 or 80 cents worth of electricity unless you live in the NorthEast or Hawaii. If you drive 30 miles a day most of the time you will use around 11 kWh of juice, which costs about a dollar here in VA. My car uses 1.6 gallons to go that distance or around $5 and that price is going up. Plus I can make my own electricity with a wind generator or a PVC on the roof of my home. I can't make gasoline.
        A dollar vs. $5 and climbing.
        Energy independence vs. relying on foreign oil.
        Drive all day or a 40 mile leash.
        I will take the Volt any day.
        Sure if I drive more than 35 miles but less than 80 the Leaf would work solely on domestically produced electricity, but the Volt works ALL the time and allows me to use 3 or 4 gallons of gas a month instead of 30-35 gallons while still allowing me to drive all day with my clients when needed.
        • 7 Days Ago
        What does "GM thinks electricity is free" mean? Does Nissan think differently?

        I said the figures were mpg, not mpge. I'm not misrepresenting here, and GM isn't either. The figure is not useful as a measure of efficiency, but it is useful to figure out how much gas you'll use. If you drive about 10,000 miles a year and you can manage to get about 200mpg (as my friend is going), then you can figure out you'll use about 50 gallons of gas a year.

        The 99 (98 actually I think) figure is mpge. It is a measure of efficiency, unlike the mpg figure I am listing here.

        I cannot figure how you are making it out to be a bad thing that my friend is on track to use less than 60 gallons of gas this year in his car.

        My friend cannot put a 240V charger in at his place, so the Volt is the best choice for him. And it's working great.

        I cannot understand you EV nazis. Using less oil is good. Going from buying about 300 gallons in a year to 60 is a big improvement. It'd be hard for him to use less even if he bought a Leaf, because he does take a few long trips a year and the Leaf can't even do the trip to and back from the nearest big city, so he'd have to use gas for those trips too.

        Why the hate?
        • 7 Days Ago
        Sorry, apparently the sticker figure on the Volt is 93mpge, not 98 (or 99).
        • 7 Days Ago
        Congratulations to your friend. GM thinks electricity is free I guess. At least your friend does not get his hands all smelly having to pump gas as much and he is helping the trade deficit by using electrons to motorvate down the road.

        Oh and according to the EPA the Leaf or the Volt can only achieve less than 99 miles mpg on the hwy. So take those shirts off.

        Go, GM, build those electric motors, motor controllers and batteries even if you only intend to put them into gas cars. The car will be junk in ten years but the electric motors may have some life in them.
        • 7 Days Ago
        Now hold on their WhynottheLS... Congratts were sincere. Guess I am known to be some what cynical so I understand your oppositional attitude. Usually I am quite clear when I rag on GM.

        I stand by my statement when the rest of the car is junk the electric motor will still have life for a real EV.

        I do believe GM marketing technique is to ingrain in uneducated masses, that you cannot have a EV without a gas motor in it. In fact I am sure GM wanted to educate our young about this. EV Nazi, sure, so be it, I would rather be a EV Nazi than be taking what ever GM and the oil corps Nazi camp are offering, more of the same (foriegn fuel). Unt you must burn ze oil. EV's are for duntkoffs, it must have ze petrol motor. The smart people know whats up with efficiency, the petrol heads blindly wait for GM and the oil corps, their Nazi masters, to through them a more efficient gas acorn once in a while when they are not suing and lobbying the government to get CAFE standards lowered.

        • 7 Days Ago
        It's going to be a great commuter car for small commutes.
        It would be perfect for me, but I'm a baby boomer and I'm
        going to retire in the next year-and-a-half, so I won't be
        doing much driving - from here to the Supermarket once
        a week.
        • 7 Days Ago
        I would sugget its not a black and white issue and not being an EV Nazi doesn't mean you are at the other extreme.

        Some people have needs the Leaf cannot meet. So the Leaf isn't perfect for everyone and blasting on the Volt and those who buy them is stupid.

        It's best if everyone does what they can. For those whom a Leaf makes sense, it'd be great if they'd buy a Leaf. For those whom a Volt makes sense, it'd be great if they buy a Volt. For those who can't use either, maybe they could just switch to a more fuel efficient gas/Diesel car.
      • 4 Years Ago
      42-years? And I can't even wait 2 years for the Leaf to arrive here in Canada...

      Congrats guys. You won't have to do these dirty conversions anymore.
      • 4 Years Ago
      "Katrina didn't do it; the BP disaster didn't do it; tales of extreme climate and resulting environmental catastrophes from Russia to Pakistan haven't done it. What will it take, and what can we do, individually and collectively, to help out? I don't have an answer except to keep on telling our stories, focusing on possible solutions, and emphasizing facts over fiction."

      Correct. Disaster scenarios have a diminished effect due to a century of disaster related mass media headlines. People have learned to inure themselves against the regurgitation of gloom.

      What IS making a difference is hard, practical facts. Like the $450BILLION we send annually to buy foreign oil. Or the disasterous security risk it is to rely on foreign energy resources. Or the loss of jobs and economic prosperity we get from buying foreign products. Moving to renewable energy is a pragmatic way to immediately improve our economy, it increases our energy / national security. It grows new industries and jobs and demands innovative thinking and action. It is also good for the environment.

      Global warming and peak oil may never be proven phenomena, but what we know right now is - by becoming Energy Independent we improve our economy, security and environment. A win, win, win.
      • 4 Years Ago
      "Great engineering" comments about the Volt are pure BS and hybrid PR. The Volt is perhaps the least elegant design since Rube Goldberg, whose work it more than slightly resembles. It contains not aonly all the parts (and more) of a conventional ICE, but adds many hundreds beyond, all held together by tissue paper and baling wire. Comments about engineering before one even takes delivery of the car striukes me as flim-flam and naked propaganda. Those three elderly gentlemen cannot possibly know anything about this overly-complicated mixed breed monstrosity's reliability until
      years down the road. I will say one thing - GM's dealerships are going to have
      a complete monopoly on the servicing of this little ticking time bomb. That, friends, means monoploy, and that, freinds, means high prices. Of course, the Volt will be totally obsolete within 5 years,at most (probably much less)
      when practical batteries appear. Looks like Tesla is very close to achieving that critical component. And their Model S people actually will want to own as a car, not simply as an emblem showing how Earth-friendly you are. Like, who cares, old geezers?
    • Load More Comments