• Sep 22nd 2010 at 6:01PM
  • 29
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration claims that in 2009 alone, 5,500 fatalities and half a million injuries occurred as a direct result of distracted driving. The problem is so severe that Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (above) recently felt compelled to address Autoblog readers directly in an effort to spread the word about how dangerous it is to multitask while driving.

The Department of Transportation isn't resting its hopes on Autoblog, though. The DoT has initiated the second National Distracted Driving Summit this week to shine light on the problem, and the government's latest offensive isn't going out to texting teens or phone-obsessed commuters. The early pressure is on drivers transporting hazardous materials, commercial truck and bus drivers and rail operators. LaHood opened this week's summit by talking up new laws that ban commercial bus and truck drivers from texting and driving, while train operators can no longer legally use cell phones or other electronic devices from the driver's seat. Companies are also getting in on the act, as 1,600 corporations have banned distracted driving, affecting 10.5 million drivers. Another 500 companies will reportedly follow suit in the next year.

Beyond new laws covering commercial drivers, LaHood and friends are also touting the results of heavily increased enforcement. In Hartford, Connecticut 4,956 tickets have been passed out to texting or talking drivers. Syracuse, New York police have issued another 4,446 citations. We usually get anything but excited when hearing about increased tickets and fines, but the results of the texting and talking crackdown are difficult to ignore. The DoT press release after the jump tells us that surveys and observations claim that phone usage is down 56 percent in Hartford and 38 percent in Syracuse. Further, texting is down 68 percent and 42 percent, respectively. Hit the jump to read over the press release.

[Source: Department of Transportation | Image: AP]

Show full PR text
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood Kicks Off Second National Distracted Driving Summit

Announces new anti-distracted driving regulations, employer policies, preliminary results from enforcement campaigns

WASHINGTON – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood kicked off the 2010 national Distracted Driving Summit today by announcing new anti-distracted driving regulations for drivers transporting hazardous materials, commercial truck and bus drivers, and rail operators, and by identifying more than 550 U.S. companies – employing 1.5 million people nationwide – that have committed to enacting anti-distracted driving employee policies in the next twelve months. The Department of Transportation also released interim data this morning from its pilot enforcement campaigns in Hartford, Connecticut and Syracuse, New York, showing that its "Phone in One Hand, Ticket in the Other" enforcement efforts have already dramatically reduced distracted driving behavior in both cities.

In kicking off the 2010 national Distracted Driving Summit this morning, Secretary LaHood announced that he is initiating a new rulemaking to prohibit commercial truck drivers from texting while transporting hazardous materials. In addition, Secretary LaHood announced that two rules proposed at last year's summit have now become the law of the land. Rules banning commercial bus and truck drivers from texting on the job and restricting train operators from using cell phones and other electronic devices while in the driver's seat have been posted today.

"We are taking action on a number of fronts to address the epidemic of distracted driving in America," said Secretary LaHood. "With the help of the experts, policymakers, and safety advocates we've assembled here, we are going to do everything we can to put an end to distracted driving and save lives."

The U.S. Department of Transportation has also been working with the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS) to engage the private sector to promote anti-distracted driving policies in the workplace. NETS, which was created by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), is an employer-led public-private

partnership dedicated to improving the safety and health of employees by preventing traffic crashes. The USDOT and NETS today announced that almost 1,600 U.S. companies and organizations have adopted distracted driving policies to date, covering approximately 10.5 million workers nationwide. An additional 550 organizations have committed to adopting policies that will cover another 1.5 million employees within the next 12 months.

"I am thrilled that businesses across the country are making anti-distracted driving policies an integral part of their employee culture," said Secretary LaHood. "President Obama led by example last year by banning four million federal workers from texting behind the wheel. Employers across America are doing the same to help us set an example and keep our roads safe."

Today, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also released interim data from its pilot enforcement programs currently underway in Hartford, Connecticut and Syracuse, New York. Dubbed "Phone in One Hand, Ticket in the Other," the year-long pilot campaigns were launched in April to test whether increased law enforcement efforts combined with public service announcements can succeed in getting distracted drivers to put down their cell phones and focus on the road.

During two week-long periods of stepped up enforcement to date, police in Hartford have written approximately 4,956 tickets and Syracuse police have issued 4,446 tickets for violations involving drivers talking or texting on cell phones. Before and after each enforcement wave, NHTSA conducted observations of driver cell phone use and collected public awareness surveys at driver licensing offices in each test and comparison site. Based on these observations and surveys, hand-held cell phone use has dropped 56 percent in Hartford and 38 percent in Syracuse to date. Texting while driving has declined 68 percent in Hartford and 42 percent in Syracuse.

"Good laws are important, but we know from past efforts to curb drunk driving and promote seatbelts that enforcement is the key," said Secretary LaHood. "Our pilot programs in Syracuse and Hartford are critical pieces of our overall effort to get people to realize distracted driving is dangerous and wrong. I want to commend the police in Hartford and Syracuse for their excellent work keeping our roads safe and serving as a model for other communities."

In 2009, nearly 5,500 people died and half a million were injured in crashes involving a distracted driver. According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) research, distraction-related fatalities represented 16 percent of overall traffic fatalities in 2009.

To tune into the 2010 Distracted Driving Summit via live webcast and learn more about the U.S. Department of Transportation's efforts to stop distracted driving, please visit www.distraction.gov.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 4 Years Ago
      Ok, so surfing the Internet, watching movies, talking on the cell phone, and emailing (instead of texting/SMS) is ok?

      How about we add to this effort that we make speeding fines proportion to the tonnage of the commercial vehicle compared to that of a non-commercial vehicle? If you fine a two-ton automobile driver $x then fine the commercial vehicle operator 10-25X for each MPH over the limit being cited.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Interesting stats at the end of the piece, talking about the decrease in texting/talking with the new bans in place. However, what I'd like to see is a follow-up study to compare the number of accidents and traffic incidents pre-ban to post-ban. We've got studies run in closed environments showing the dangers of distracted driving and now we have laws prohibiting it on public roads; let's see if the legislation is having its intended effect of making our roads safer.
      • 4 Years Ago
      As someone who hates government intervention, on this one I'm all for it. I personally drive much better when blind ass drunk than when I am trying to send even a simple one or two word text.
      • 4 Years Ago
      When are they going to ban the use of cb radios by truck drivers? It's no different than the rest of us using a cellphone. You are holding a communication device in your hand, talking to it, taking one hand off the wheel to do so and your attention is taken off the road. The same needs to go for cops too. I mean, talking on a device is dangerous for everyone, right?
      • 4 Years Ago
      I think anyone who gets in an accident while texting/driving should get jail time.
      • 4 Years Ago
      The fact that we need a law for this is sad.
      This should be common sense.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Just read today : Cop Drives 126mph While Texting, Kills Teen Girls 10:00 AM - September 23, 2010
      • 4 Years Ago
      No one should be texting while driving End of story!
        • 4 Years Ago
        Agree. You can suicide/kill or big injury even with a little car.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Git 'em, LaHood!!!
      • 4 Years Ago
      They shouldn't be allowed to be on the phone period, while moving, let alone texting
        • 4 Years Ago
        How is hands-free any more or less dangerous than a passenger?

        I still argue that this is an issue under the umbrella of reckless driving, or failure to maintain control of a motor vehicle.

        If it is observed, it should be ticketed and fined as such.

        If it is proven to contribute to an accident, it is an aggravating factor to a further charge.

        If someone dies, aggravated vehicular manslaughter, with a prison term.

        The law already exists. It doesn't need to be be duplicated by bureaucrats, it needs to be enforced.

        LaHood is an executive branch official, not a legislator. And the idea of an agency's whims becoming the full force of law is not good, either. It should have to be voted on by our representative legislators, with their voting record accountable to them.

        Mid level bureaucrats are not elected, and hardly accountable, and if they can enact this sort of law, it is almost impossible to repeal, if the regulations turn out to be bad ideas.
      • 4 Years Ago
      So many LaHood articles here nowadays.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Ok so LaHood is slowly starting to get my respect now. He seems to understand it if you will. Hopefully he'll keep this up and *gasp* push for tougher standards for driving test's and make it a federal law requiring states to test all drivers at the age of 65, then yearly after the age of 70. With those two things in place we should in theory have safer roads.
    • Load More Comments