For the past several years, the answer to the question of whether producing ethanol from corn is a net energy benefit or loss has depended on who you asked. An assortment of studies have come down on both sides of the equation. Michigan State University professor Jake Ferris comes down firmly on the net benefit side in an op-ed published by the Lansing State Journal.

Ferris references a study released by the U.S. Department of Energy in June of this year that concluded that corn ethanol yields 2.3 BTUs of energy for every BTU used to grow it. It turns out that the calculation in this study added in a factor for the reuse of the waste materials from ethanol production. The distillers' dried grain that is left over from the milling and fermentation process is now commonly being incorporated into livestock feed in place of raw corn grain and high protein meal. Since feedstocks that have already been grown are replacing the need to grow more, there is a net positive change in the energy balance.

Unfortunately, the DOE's calculation still doesn't account for water use in growing and processing the corn and this may actually be a bigger problem than the energy use. Until cellulosic ethanol production is widely commercialized, the overall cost-benefit ratio of biofuels is likely to remain vague.

[Source: Lansing State Journal]

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • From Our Partners

    You May Like
    Links by Zergnet
    Share This Photo X