• Jul 29th 2010 at 12:00AM
  • 168
Lenny Lee and his 2003 Pontiac Aztek (Lenny Lee).

The Pontiac Aztek seemed like a great idea at the time. It was the late ’90s, the American economy was booming, and we were buying Sport Utility Vehicles by the literal millions. By 2000, the light truck category accounted for approximately one third of the 17 million cars bought in the U.S., a ratio that would trend even higher as the decade progressed. The midsized Aztek was a can’t-miss opportunity, or so GM thought.

First sketched in 1994 as the “Bear Claw,” at first designers couldn’t decide if the vehicle should be a truck or a sports car. By the time the first concept rolled out in 1999, this “sport recreation vehicle” had a new moniker: Aztek. Reviews were mixed, but the Aztek had plenty going for it: a sporty, rugged look, gear-carrying capability, and the much-coveted-in-suburbia elevated driving height. GM didn’t know it at the time, but it was among the first automakers to develop a crossover.

But when the production Aztek rolled into showrooms for the 2001 model year, it was markedly different than the concept GM had shown two years earlier. This vehicle shared a platform with the Pontiac Montana minivan, and it was boxy and unattractive, to say the least. Introduced in both front-wheel-drive and “Versatrak” all-wheel-drive versions -- both powered by a barely adequate V6 engine -- the Aztek was so poorly executed that it quickly became the butt of jokes.

“That thing is butt-ugly!” my neighbor screamed, loud enough for all of Brooklyn to hear when I rolled up my block on a beautiful, sunny Tuesday in 2001, navigating a rain-slicker-yellow Aztek test driver. The comment was only the first of dozens of raspberries and guffaws I absorbed over a week driving the Aztek in and around New York City. The next came from my own brother: “That’s the Ernest Borgnine of SUVs.” GM might as well have hung a “Kick me!” sign on the Aztek’s rear bumper.

I wasn’t crazy about the Aztek, either, but my complaints weren’t about its looks. “The inside reminds me of an economy hotel,” I wrote in the New York Daily News. “Everything is clean but ever-so-cheap; I half expected a mass-produced painting to be bolted to a door.”

A few auto pundits praised where praise was worthy. The basic concept was sound: It was a mini-vannish, versatile family vehicle, distinct from every other similarly priced SUV on the market. The Aztek interior was vast, big enough to hold a piece of plywood, or so GM boasted. But the problem with its styling remained.

“Every time we look at the Aztek, we wonder what they were thinking,” said Car and Driver. “GM stumbles again... a hideous front end and a huge, angular rear end,” reported Forbes. “Jaw-dropping, chin-scratching, what-the-heck-is-that?” said The Car Connection. Time Magazine even called it one of the 50 worst cars of all time.

If there was anything GM did right it was in the accessory market. These included a bicycle rack, a tent with an inflatable mattress with a built-in air compressor, a center console doubling as a cooler, seatback-mounted backpacks and racks galore for the snowboards, canoes and bicycles. Finally, there were two rear cargo area options, a pullout tray with built-in wheels that held up to 400 pounds, or a cargo net rig that held up to 200 pounds and could be configured 22 different ways. It was this kind of stuff that led many of the Aztek’s early fans to embrace the vehicle, but as it turned out there were just not enough “active lifestyle” customers.

Plagued by nonexistent sales upon the Aztek’s introduction, GM changed the crossover’s plentiful grey cladding to body color and added a spoiler to the rear hatch just a year later. It also dropped the price by $1,450. Though GM had projected it would sell 75,000 Azteks each year (and had even hinted at larger volumes), it later revised that number to 50,000, which was still wildly optimistic. The best year for sales saw only 27,793 sold in 2002. By 2005, when GM cancelled the “Ishtar” of the automotive world, sales had dipped to just 5,020. The public had spoken, and that seemed to be the end of the Aztek story.

The only problem is that a lot of people bought Azteks, loved them, and are still proudly driving them today.

“I’ve had my Red 2001 Aztek since ’03, and I drive it every single day,” says corporate project manager Ken Rhyno, who runs a 1,700-plus member Aztek Fan Club from his home in Port Elgin, Ontario, Canada. “I still get cracks from people, but the car runs great, gets up to 30 miles to the gallon and the amount of stuff you can haul in it is fantastic. People have got to understand it’s not a Corvette. Its looks are not the point.”

Rhyno loves his Aztek so much that he bought Aztekfanclub.com in 2006. “I was a member of the club and then the original owner turned it over to me,” he says. “The last rally we had was in 2008, in Ohio. About 30 Azteks showed up from all over the country. We had people come up from as far away as Texas.”

Musician Lenny Lee told AOL Autos, “I've got a 2003 Aztek and can't say a bad thing about it, despite the ridiculous-looking rear end. I bought it from a relative in '03 who liked it but wanted the same vehicle with 4-wheel-drive and a tow package. Rather than taking a beating on a trade-in, he sold it to me with 2,000 miles for fourteen grand. I couldn't turn down the price.”

Lee says he hasn’t taken his Aztek camping, doesn’t own the tent accessory and doesn’t pay attention to mileage.

“Let’s just say it can get out of its own way,” the Dutchess, New York resident says. “It thrives on neglect. The odometer just passed 200,000 and virtually nothing has gone wrong with it. I’d never intended to keep it this long, but it’s been so dependable and still runs fine and the stereo system sounds good. I just drive it. I figure I’ll let her come in for a smooth landing when she’s ready.”

“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder,” says Rhyno. “People where I work drive Honda Elements, which I think are pretty ugly.” Still, he says, “Nothing draws the fire like the Aztek.”

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 8 Months Ago
      Why is Honda, Scion and Kia (foreign car makers) allowed to make an ugly boxy car, but GM is not? Lots of hypocrites out there.
      • 8 Months Ago
      I had one and it was amazing. I am still sorry I traded it.
      • 8 Months Ago
      jrrepairguy posted this..ahem..tidbit: "The Aztek was also ugly, but it wasn't NEAR as ugly as most of the other ugly boxes I see stupid, fat people driving, and that is another reason these ugly vehicles are being foisted upon us all: most Americans anymore are great big fat slobs who can only fit their big, ugly asses into a huge SUV and can no longer fit into a normal sized car. Sickening." My reply: Which of course explains a vehicle like a Chevy Suburban from let's say 1970, right? :P (And no, not bashing GM/Chevy, just first big vehicle that's like a SUV that came to mind that was about 40 years old). SUV's were and to some degree are popular still sure. But do explain if SUV's are being foisted upon us why Hummer is being shut down. Or why so many car makes have came out with new SMALL vehicles in the last couple of years. Or why so many are now bringing out or engineering more SMALL hybrids. SUV's exist for those that need or want such, sure. But there's small to mid sized sports cars, small econocars, the crossovers that are a hybrid between a station wagon and a SUV (or I guess in the case of the Aztek, a minivan and a SUV), and yes..midsized sedans. Like oh, I don't know..the newest Ford Taurus, the Honda Accord, the Nissan Altima...need I continue? Or the short form: Unless you prove someone is walking up to you with a gun and saying "BUY A SUV OR DIE", your post about something being foisted upon you is pure drivel. I think each and every car maker that doesn't specalize with one specific type of car has at least a couple sedans and midsized coupes in their brand still.
      • 8 Months Ago
      I have a 2004 Aztek and my husband and I LOVE it! He is a hunter and he can pack just as much in the hatch of the Aztek as he can in his Silverado....AND it stays dry when it is rainy weather! It is cheaper to drive in every aspect. Have had no major issues just pure enjoyment! looks grow on you after time and actually I agree I like having something that everyone else does not have already. We wanted a SUV but not the payment that came with it...Price was great!
      • 8 Months Ago
      Many and I mean MANY of these cars are now driving around in Mexico. Rarely do I ever see one in the states but down here they are plentiful.
      • 8 Months Ago
      Whoever designed it was on a bad ACID TRIP ! Who ever baught one smoked some BAD WEED that is why I DRIVE A JEEP , THE ONES WHO INVENTED THE S.U.V.
      • 8 Months Ago
      I had rather read about rich doctors. com, hot women for ugly guys.com , young girls for old perverts.com, bbbbw(fat) women for handsome men. com , 10.s 4 1's.com , millionaires for crackheads. com and what ever.com than this aztec stuff. WTF I guess we are all bored.
      • 8 Months Ago
      noblious, The Aztek was shown at the Chicago Auto Show, and the crowd loved it. The trade magazines loved it. Granted, if I remember correctly, the car had the camping package attached, so you really couldn't see how ugly it was. ironmikemiata, The Aztek hauls more stuff than the Grand Cherokee. Our neighbors with a GC wished they bought an Aztek for the room, plus the fact that there are so many silver GCs in every parking lot. Another feature about the Aztek is the split hatch. Instead of having one hatch hinged at the top, it has a hatch and a tailgate. I can unload light items (groceries and the like) by opening the hatch, with my garage door close. With a single hatch, I would have to open the garage door to unload goceries. And the tailgate has cut outs for sitting plus two cupholders. Most SUVs, CUVs, and mini-vans force you to sit on the bumper, which isn't very comfortable.
      • 8 Months Ago
      I had a 2003, and loved it too. Started to leak oil so I traded it. Wish I would have just fixed it. Awesome stereo, loved the cooler console, got noticed, and yeah, I got the ugly comments too. Didn't care! Loved that car!! The auto broker who sold it to me had one, and so did his daughter. They loved theirs!
      • 8 Months Ago
      @skeochc75, I think you are referring to the Nissan Cube. I definitely agree ********* ugly and boxy. My parents test drove an Aztek several years ago and I think my mom described it perfectly, "It looks like a sneaker!" I have an '02 Forester that I bought to replace my beautiful '02 Saab 9-5. I personally think the '02 Forester body is incredibly unattractive, but it gets me EVERYWHERE during the harsh mountain winters I experience every year and it's so dependable it's hard not to love it. Every now and then I miss my sleek beautiful Saab, but I don't miss being in the shop every 2 weeks! As many car owners know, dependability is much more attractive in the long run; apparently the Aztec offers that for many of its owners!
      • 8 Months Ago
      And let me guess the guy who thinks the ponticrap asstek is cool...is probably gay! All the hom's around here drive the typical fag mobiles...prius's, subaru's, any wacked out ugly piece of $hit
      • 8 Months Ago
      All v-6 vehicles were under powered in the early '90's. The aztec was an angular box that was ugly by the design standar of the time, curvy lines, fender bulges, etc. But with the element, scion, ant several other versions of the rollong box being sold today, the Aztec looks like a vehicle that was ahead of it's time. in 1992 we bought an Aerostar instead of the Aztec. Bad move, many problems with the Ford. The only thing wrong with the Aztec was Rosie O'donnel's endorsement of it
    • Load More Comments
    Share This Photo X