• 34
Curve Control on the 2011 Ford Explorer – Click above for high-res image gallery

When the new 2011 Explorer goes on sale later this year, Ford plans to highlight the new unibody 'ute's safety and fuel efficiency. The Explorer will be exclusively powered by four- and six-cylinder EcoBoost engines, which are expected to increase efficiency by 20-25 percent, while delivering the power consumers crave. Expect more drivetrain details to be forthcoming, but before then, Ford invited us out to its Dearborn proving grounds to see what it has in store on the safety front.

Ford confirmed last fall that the Explorer would be the first vehicle to get its new inflatable rear seat-belts, but the latest – and arguably more interesting – feature on the Explorer is dubbed "Curve Control." The system is a software enhancement built on top of the existing roll stability control (RSC) and electronic stability control (ESC) systems, and we had a chance to experience it first hand. Make the jump to find out more.

[Source: Ford]

According to Ford, over 50,000 accidents a year happen in the United States as a result of people trying to drive through curves (think highway interchanges) too quickly. This is especially problematic for SUVs, crossovers and pickups, which have a higher center of gravity and are more prone to trip-over curbs and shoulders when they run wide. The engineer's answer to this problem is Curve Control, which goes above and beyond existing ESC to more actively slow down the vehicle when these conditions are detected.

Before we get into the nitty-gritty of Curve Control, let's do a quick review of ESC. Electronic Stability Control is based on the hydraulic brake control technology originally developed for ABS and later, traction control. The hydraulic control unit has the ability to individually manage the pressure to each brake and, in the case of traction control, build pressure to the brakes on the driven wheels independent of the driver. For most ESC systems, the ability to apply brake pressure is expanded to all four wheels.

In order to manage the vehicle dynamics, ESC also includes a set of inertial sensors, including lateral and longitudinal accelerometers and a yaw rate sensor. Yaw is the rotation around the vertical axis of the vehicle when it's turning or worse, spinning. These sensors help the system know what the vehicle is doing. Throttle, brake and steering angle sensors are used to determine what the driver is asking the vehicle to do.

The electronic controls include models of the vehicle's dynamic behavior which are compared against the actual behavior and driver commands. The sensors are used to estimate factors like side slip at the wheels, front slip angles and overall body slip angle (slip angle is the difference between the direction that the wheels are pointed and the actual trajectory of the vehicle). A set of software control functions determine when the vehicle is not tracking where the driver wants, and the system uses a combination of individual brake applications and management of the engine torque to get the vehicle back on track.

Traditional ESC will typically only apply the brakes at one or two wheels at a time and vehicle speed reductions are kept to a minimum. The intent is to apply only enough force to help the vehicle turn where the driver is pointing the wheel. Think of the vehicle like a teeter-totter rotating about its center of gravity. If the driver is trying to turn right, but the vehicle is going too straight, a bit of brake applied on the right side wheels is like pushing on the right side of the teeter-totter, causing the vehicle rotate.

On its trucks, SUVs, CUVs and vans, Ford has added an extra layer called Roll Stability Control (RSC) which brings with it two extra sensors. A vertical accelerometer and body roll sensor provide extra information about possible impending roll-over conditions which are then alleviated by the brakes and engine management.

Curve control is yet another software function added in to the system to help detect when the vehicle is going through a curve too quickly. The combination of sensors detects whether the driver might be trying to negotiate a larger radius turn (an on or off-ramp) and if the vehicle speed it too high, the new control kicks in. While ESC might only apply 0.1 g of deceleration (equivalent to just barely touching the brake pedal), Curve Control applies all four brakes much more aggressively.

2011 Ford Explorer prototype plowing through cones with curve control disabled

The amount of braking at each wheel is still individually controlled to help the vehicle turn in, but over all deceleration could be as much as 0.5 g which is enough to scrub off up to 10 mph of vehicle speed in just one second. On a curve, where the driver has misjudged their speed, that could be enough to make the difference between staying on the pavement and sliding off the side.

Back in the early days of ESC, the systems were much more aggressive and had harsher control than today. Over time, drivers didn't like the sensation and engineers learned to improve the control so that it was more transparent by ramping brake pressure and engine torque up and down rather than using step inputs. Ford's roll stability sensors allow the engineers to do even more because they can better detect conditions like banked or off-camber curves based on the vertical motion and body roll.

Ford didn't have to add any new hardware to implement Curve Control, but developing and calibrating the algorithm has taken about 18 months. We were given a demonstration on Ford's vehicle dynamics pad in a prototype Explorer and the course simulated a typical off-ramp with the test driver went approaching the coned-off area at 50 mph with the Curve Control disabled. The driver simply steered without applying the brakes or throttle when he hit the curve and the Explorer drifted wide through the cones. With the system enabled, he repeated the same maneuver and as the vehicle turned, we could feel the brakes being applied, causing the mule to track right through the curve.

If the driver decides that they actually want to do something different than what the control is commanding it can be over-ridden by either the gas or brake pedal. For example if the vehicle is pulling out of a driveway, hitting the accelerator will prevent the system from braking the vehicle. Similarly, if the driver wants to slow down even more, they can press through the brake pedal and only the ABS and ESC will still come into play.

2011 Ford Explorer prototype tracking past the cones with curve control enabled

In spite of the fairly aggressive braking, the control was very smooth and the Explorer never twitched or jerked around. Obviously, this was done under very controlled conditions and we'll have to judge how good it feels when we get a production model in our hands. The other question that remains unanswered is how robust the Curve Control system is to false activation. We would hate to see it slamming on the brakes while traveling around a regular corner at even slightly elevated speeds.

The new Explorer will have a driver selectable terrain management system that adjust various control features when off-roading. If the driver selects either the mud or sand modes, the curve control will be disabled to prevent it from causing problems when the Explorer is pretending to be a Jeep. After the Explorer launch, Ford will be adding Curve Control to 90 percent of its trucks, vans, SUVs and CUVs by 2015 and eventually to cars as well.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 5 Years Ago
      Urgh I hope it looks better than this. It may have good control but it is ugly
      • 5 Years Ago
      Now that's pretty cool! I know of a dozen times that would have come in handy while I was driving and I'm actually paying attention! I wonder how that would work though if you've just started to pull out and nail the gas and turn the wheel to avoid getting hit my someone that wasn't paying attention at a 4 way stop. Happened to me last weekend so it's fresh in my mind.....It's probably just at speeds greater than X-amount or something.. I'd imagine...

        • 5 Years Ago
        I'm not sure if the system will have a defeat button (the article said they did the test once with it on and once with it off, but they're driving a test mule) but the system is defeatable by hitting the gas or the brakes (at which point ABS/ESC/RSC are the only systems active). So if you turn the wheel and floor it to avoid something the system won't cut you off.
      The dawg
      • 2 Years Ago
      there is a curve up the street from my house. People drive right off the road all the time lmao
      • 5 Years Ago
      It is nice to see Ford pushing the safety envelope on this large SUVs. I don't think even Mercedes has this feature...
      • 5 Years Ago
      The motto of the safety groups at Ford should be "cheating Darwin, one idiot at a time".
      • 5 Years Ago
      Automakers regularly improve their stability control. Ford is just milking it for all they can.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Kids kids this is called Acura's SH-AWD
        • 5 Years Ago
        no....calling it SH-AWD is downgrading the sophistication of the technology.

        SH-AWD...and basically...MOST AWD systems don't use wheel braking...they got torque vectoring
      • 5 Years Ago
      Amazing how much trouble people will go to so that they can continue to sell/buy/drive something with a fundamental design flaw.
        • 5 Years Ago
        SUV's have a rollover rate that is 3X higher than cars. Considering that accidents with rollovers disproportionately produce fatalities, I would call anything with a center of gravity that results in a significantly higher rollover rate flawed.

        And yes, it's ultimately driver error, but driver error is a non-fixable constant. If people are behaving within the regular bounds of "human panic mode" where they jerk the wheel when something dives in front of their vehicle, the vehicle needs to be designed to handle that sudden input without killing the occupants.
        • 5 Years Ago

        In nardvark's defence, the term "flaw" is relative. A stiff ride isn't likely to be considered a "flaw" to someone who buys an Elise or Mitsubishi Evo, because they know cars, and know it's a hardcore chassis and they made their choice accordingly.

        On the other hand, your typical SUV buyer just wants a sedan/station wagon that's bigger and more expensive-looking than the neighbors' car, and feels big, tall, and safe on the kiddies' school run. It's more of an appliance that makes an image statement.

        For an example, remember the extremely high number of complaints lodged with the NHTSA by H2 owners in 2004-2005, who were shocked to find that their mastodons got really bad mileage. A "flaw" ceases to be one when the owner expects it... but SUV buyers (and buyers of fashion/image products in general) tend to be some of the least savvy out there regarding their purchases.

        In any case, the "3X" figure might be debatable, but the fact that vehicles with demonstrably higher centres of gravity are less stable in transient maneuvers is not.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Design flaws notwithstanding, EVERY car will understeer if you carry too much speed into a corner and turn the wheel without pressing either the accelerator or the brakes (like the guy demonstrates in the video). I can see an inexperienced driver panicking in a situation like this and doing just that: not touching either the accelerator or the brake. This technology would therefore most likely make all cars safer.

        Unfortunately, it also sounds like an incredibly intrusive system in terms of performance. Offroad it would just plain suck. Onroad in a performance-oriented car, it might even be counter-productive if you're either trying to induce oversteer or trying to control a front-wheel-drive car with power through an understeer. Kinda reminds me of the ESC on my 2002 Mini Cooper S. That thing completely KILLED power whenever you tried to take a corner "too fast".
        • 5 Years Ago

        "If people are behaving within the regular bounds of "human panic mode" where they jerk the wheel when something dives in front of their vehicle, the vehicle needs to be designed to handle that sudden input without killing the occupants."

        You do bring up a valid point regarding human behavior. How people react in an emergency while driving an SUV can send said SUV into a tizzy.

        Hence, no human should drive SUVs. Meaning, their production should be banned.

        Seems reasonable to me.

        But, if that were to happen... all the world's lawyers would starve! And... I'm totally okay with that.

        Then again, ANY vehicle can and will kill its occupants if driven beyond its limits, regardless of the reason. There comes a point where the problem rests solely on the head of the driver, and no other factors can be blamed.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Ford have the Stig testing for them now? A future reasonably priced car?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Pain in the ass.
      Especially if you switch from one vehicle to another. Who takes their foot off the gas in a corner? That's a SURE way to oversteer.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Throttle by sensor, says that you don't have your foot on the gas (even if you do)
        • 5 Years Ago
        I think this works even if you have your foot on the gas.
      • 5 Years Ago
      So does this mean U-haul will finally start renting trailers to Explorer owners?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Really? I usually just brake when I see a corner coming up fast. :P
      What ever happened to driver involvement? If you can't figure out how to control your car when you are hurtling toward a corner maybe you shouldn't be driving in the first place.
    • Load More Comments