• 49

But do "substantial upgrades" and "class competitive" equal "nice interior?" Yes and no. First, here's what we liked: The comfy, leather-cladded seats in our tester provided great lateral support for both light off-roading and pedestrian errand-running. The leather-wrapped steering wheel had a great feel, and the switches and buttons were easily accessed, losing much of the cheap sensation of its predecessor. Our tester was also gussied with tastefully applied chrome appliqués that gave the otherwise stark black interior a kick of visual flare.

Also included was a host of infotainment options that car buyers have come to expect. Navigation, MP3 connectivity, satellite radio, UConnect hands-free system and 30 gigs worth of storage are all present and accounted for, and it didn't take a degree from MIT to get everything to work properly. Chrysler's 6.5-inch navigation system may bet a bit out of date compared to other OEM systems on the market, but it wins on ease of use.



We also enjoyed the 368-watt, nine-speaker Boston Acoustic sound system, which provides high quality sound at a reasonable cost. Two of those speakers are attached to the hatch and folds down when open – they're a perfect tailgating companion to be sure, but a bit flimsy-looking upon closer inspection. The upgraded sound system with the hard drive storage, moonroof and nav combine to be a $2,580 option; a relative bargain compared to other options on the market.

Yet while the Patriot's interior has improved dramatically since its 2007 debut, there are a few remaining issues. Our "Limited" tester will set buyers back a hefty $30,510, placing it against much more polished competition, yet the doors and center arm rest are still covered with hard, unattractive plastics at the major touch points. The massive opening above the glove box is still an ergonomic oddity and running our hands over the edges reveals sharp plastic that just doesn't pass muster. In short, you get the sense that the Patriot has gone under the knife, but the surgeon only hacked out part of the cancer and is still charging you full price.



Even worse is the powertrain. The Patriot continues to be saddled with an anemic 2.4-liter mill that provides the bare minimum of acceleration. We know we're talking about a 3,315-pound utility vehicle equipped with a Trail Rated 4WD system, but it would be nice to feel like we could get out of our own way when the need arises.

That said, the Patriot's 172-horsepower, 165 pound-feet engine is perfectly adequate around town, but taking off from a stop or passing on the freeway can be a white-knuckled chore. And it's not like we're getting world-beating fuel economy in exchange for sacrificing get up and go. The Patriot's trip computer averaged just over 22 mpg during a week of mixed driving, which isn't horrible, but certainly not worth the four-pot's atrophied muscle. And while it doesn't feel like Chrysler's "World Engine" is working very hard, it sure sounds like a soprano without a voice coach. Or a gaggle of bees ricocheting around the crank case.



When we looked over the Patriot's list of equipment, the 2.4-liter motor wasn't the only red flag. Chrysler opted for a continuously variable transmission to manage its asthmatic powerplant, a tranny that tends to agitate rather than inspire. But while we braced for the worst, we quickly discovered that the CVT wasn't part of the Patriot's powertrain predicament. In fact, we hardly noticed that droning "one-speed" sensation found with many CVTs – the transmission eased the engine into the optimum RPM range without fuss or muss.

We managed to travel about 500 miles during our week with the Patriot, and while we are left wanting more power, we had no qualms with the little ute's ride and handling. The Patriot doesn't have the off-road chops of it's Liberty sibling, but the little CUV is far more comfortable around town. On paved roads, the Patriot goes Clark Kent, behaving like other crossovers in its class. Pot holes are tackled without drama, the brakes are solid, the steering decently weighted and body roll is nicely controlled. However, unlike many of its competitors, this Clark Kent has some surprising off-roading superpowers.



That's right, the very same front drive "soft-roader" that Jeep enthusiasts derided has an available "Trail Rated" package for those who enjoy the road less traveled. Our tester came equipped with the aforementioned Freedom II package, which incorporates a one inch higher ride height over the Freedom I package, a 27.5 degree approach, 23 degree brakeover and 31.4 degree departure angle. The Freedom II package also includes its own CVT configuration with a class-leading 19:1 low ratio for crawling over rocks, undulating uneven surfaces and clearing otherwise troublesome rough spots. Fog lights, tow hooks, 17-inch all-terrain tires, a full-size spare and an air filtration system are among the other features included in the package.

We didn't have any undulating hills or Mojave-style rocks at our disposal, so instead we set out into a field filled with dirt, mud and several hidden holes that would leave most vehicles stuck and stranded. The water-mud mixture we tackled ranged from four- to 10-inches deep, with six-foot tall grass hiding large rocks and even larger water-filled crevices. Thankfully, the package includes additional body sealing and high-mounted drivetrain vents to traverse 19-inches of liquid fun. At one point there was some deliberation as to whether or not we should step into the swamp and take some pictures (our better judgment told us not to), and while we were noodling over our options the Patriot began to sink. Naturally, we got a bit nervous and decided to back out before we had to make an apologetic call to Chrysler. But to our amazement, we escaped so effortlessly that we popped the slush box back into D and retraced our steps to show the mud who's boss. We never even came close to getting stuck, but the smiles were seemingly frozen in place for quite a while. It appears Jeep takes its Trail Rated badge very seriously and to our amazement and delight the brand's DNA remains intact.



When we first analyzed the Patriot on paper, we couldn't wrap our heads around why Jeep would build a vehicle almost identical in size to the Liberty, but minus the off-roading capability. But after a week's worth of plebeian runs and inspired flogging, there is one big reason anyone would buy the Liberty at a $5,000 premium. The engine. While the Patriot is more comfortable, almost as roomy and has 90 percent of the capability of its more rugged sibling, its uninspired powertrain remains its Achilles' heel. Outfitted past $30k, the Patriot is certainly a tough pill to swallow, but its increased fuel economy, improved road manners and off-road ability give it a reason for being. It might've been born under a bad sign, but in its second life the Patriot is worth a second look.



Photos by Chris Shunk / Copyright ©2010 Weblogs, Inc.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 49 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      The new interior of the Patriot is a huge upgrade over the previous model. Compared to the interiors of mini SUVs it is right up there with the rest. Certainly no worse that the Element. Even the new Tucson is filled with hard touch plastics of the same quality. I think a lot of auto editors get spoiled by driving many cars most people would never be able to afford. I was very impressed by the new interior. The vehicle is a Jeep, you can't expect the interior of an Infinity.

      As for this particular trim level, there really isn't a point for it. The reason why it costs $30k is because of all the trail rated gear 99% of Patriot buyers would never need. People that want to go off roading will just buy a Wrangler.

      The Patriot is much better than the Liberty for everyday driving. A standard Patriot with road tires can get close to 30mpg on the highway. You'll be lucky to get 16mpg out of the Liberty. For around $20k you can get a nicely loaded soft roader that looks like an old Cherokee. For many people that is all they need and all they want.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I've always appreciated the Patriot's Cherokee-like styling, but, unfortunately, that's about all there is to appreciate.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I have spent about two and a half weeks with two different Patriots, both rentals and I almost downright hated both.

      The pre-refreshed interior was the worst modern automotive interior that I have ever seen. Fit and finish as well as material quality must have been a foreign concept to the people at Chrysler. The CVT and the 2.4 are a terrible match and the seats felt as if they have MAYBE two inches of foam on the bottom. I have never sat in a more uncomfortable vehicle.

      The post-refreshed and current interior is an improvement, but I definitely wouldn't say it comes close to being competitive. Flashing, fit and finish, and overall material quality is still behind the pack as is overall comfort. It was quiter if I remember correctly and I think the CVT had different programming.

      Still, if I were in the market this wouldn't even be on my radar. As far as I'm concerned, the Tucson and the CR-V are still the ones to beat in this segment.
        • 5 Years Ago
        As soon as I saw the email notification pop-up on my desktop, I knew it was going to be an ignorant comment.

        The Sportage, whose design is older than the Patriots, is still far better than the Jeep product. I'd take a Sportage over a brand new Patriot any day of the week. The Patriot is an awful vehicle no matter what way you look at it. The only nice thing about it is the exterior.

        There is a reason why it has been a sales flop.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Quote: ""The pre-refreshed interior was the worst modern automotive interior that I have ever seen""


        You have a limited horizon. Try driving any 2 year old KIA product.

        The Sportage for example, is in a class of awful all its own.

        • 5 Years Ago
        Angelo,

        As much as I like Chrysler, the pre refreshed interior of the triplets were absolutely horrible, there really was no two ways around it.

        Still, overall I wouldn't say it's horrible There are many very satisfied Patriot owners and the manual gearbox makes a world of difference, and the thing drives quite nice aside from the buzzy engine.
        Calling it a sales flop is stretching it too, the triplets actually sells in decent numbers.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Chrysler apologists are cute. Down rate me, I don't care.

        Anyone who knows anything about cars in general knows better not to buy one of these. Every single major automotive publication has criticized this thing to no end.

        Oh well.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I remember looking at a Patriot at an auto show when it first came out and being amazed at the horrifically crappy interior. Cheap to say the least! And even the exterior although decent looking enough, just seemed poorly put together with inconsistent body panel gaps. Typical Chrysler offering.
      • 4 Years Ago


      i really like this article..i just want to appreciate you for this work..and i would like to

      read more article on this... Stock News
      • 5 Years Ago
      Cool car. Love it. christian louboutin shoes
      • 5 Years Ago
      '2010 Jeep Patriot deserves a second look' and confirm your gut feeling... IT IS UGLY!!!!!!!!
      • 5 Years Ago
      That's 2 looks too many.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I am sure you can google for my statements, but I consider(ed) the Patriot to be one of the best buys of ALL, when it was introduced. The base price has crept up, though.

      Like the Neon, when it was under $9,000 base price; then crept up quickly.
        • 5 Years Ago
        It also had full vinyl seats, no air conditioning, or side airbags of any sort. I don't even think the base model had ABS. I haven't seen cheap vinyl seats in a non-workhorse vehicle since the mid 80's, excluding BMWs pleather and MB-Tex.

        I don't think it was the deal of ALL time at all, rather the opposite.
      • 5 Years Ago
      This thing should have never, ever been made along with the Compass. It is a total afront to the brand. It's also a Caliber plant charity project to add volume, the cheap and nasty way. The sooner it's killed and forgotten the better for Chrysler and Jeep.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Nice to see Chysler's check cleared ;). Two days, two pro-pentastar stories.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Recall the automotive market circa 2004-2005. Gas was cheap, credit was extended to the incredible, Jeep dealers were howling for a three row vehicle.

      Recall the $4 gas panic immediately thereafter. The same dealers howled for something with a better mileage sticker.

      Chrysler didn't have a remotely suitable product for either situation, so they responded the usual Detroit way - with half assed platform sharing and 0% financing.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I hereby declare the AB comment reply system utterly worthless.

    • Load More Comments