• Apr 7, 2010
2010 Honda Crosstour – Click above for high-res image gallery

Its introduction was a case study in how to bungle an automotive social media campaign. Badly. It had people running for thesauruses to find new and fascinating synonyms for "ugly." Its TV campaign has something to do with jazz music and animals. And yet, for all the hubbub, hysterics and lamentations that Honda had completely lost its mind, the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour quietly showed up and began finding customers.

Last month – its best sales performance to date – 2,587 people drove the odd-looking hatchwagon home. Recently, we took delivery of our own Crosstour EX-L tester, loaded-up with all-wheel drive and navigation, to see how we felt about spending a week with Honda's latest experiment.



Photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright ©2010 Weblogs, Inc.

There's no question – none whatsoever – that the Honda Accord Crosstour's styling is controversial to the point of distraction. Some might call it upsetting. Others, however, might like it. Such is the reaction I experienced upon bringing it home. Prior to its arrival, I had essentially characterized the Crosstour as being Medusa on wheels to my better half. She, upon walking outside for a look at the car, returned, looked me in the eye and flatly stated, "That's not ugly. I don't know what your problem is."

To some extent, she's right. Not to damn it with faint praise, but from certain angles, the Accord Crosstour is genuinely not bad to look at. It's weird that way. The front three-quarter view actually has a jacked-up sportiness to it, as the fastback roof profile tapers gracefully, and the car's bulbous fanny is hidden from view. From the side, Honda's attempt to grab the Accord Coupe's jaunty visual mojo and apply it to a four-door body (well, five-door, but you get the gist) is plainly evident.



And you know, it has some juice to it; there's a muscular shoulder above the rear wheels, and the variety of additional creases and lines in the sheetmetal do their best to break up the big-car monotony. Even the bootylicious tail section works out fairly well in profile, with its subtle little lip spoiler punctuating the roofline's trailing edge. From the rear, the CRX/Insight-style split-glass tail looks pretty decent, as does the pair of polished exhaust tips fitted to our V6-powered tester. What basically kills the look for us is the Crosstour's face, which is unnecessarily overwrought thanks to its cartoonishly large radiator grille, which extends too far below the headlamps and bears no familial resemblance to either the Accord Coupe or Honda's bread-and-butter sedan. If Tim Burton and Michael Bay joined forces to make the Cheshire Cat into a Decepticon, this is what he'd look like.

Give Honda credit, though. They sure weren't afraid to take some risks with the styling. Sure, we'd bitch less if it were shaped like a traditional wagon (after all, Honda's served up a couple of tasty-looking ones under the Accord nameplate), but the wagon-averse U.S. auto market says that'd probably have been a far riskier business gamble than the hatchback we ended up with. If you're a Honda loyalist who's desperate for a regular wagon, head to your Acura store later this year and buy the TSX, but remember, if you want the V6 and AWD, the Crosstour is where it's at in the Honda Universe.



Inside, the Crosstour is the opposite of controversial as everything you see from the driver's seat is straight-up Accord. The instrument panel is the same straightforward, classy presentation you'll find in the sedan and coupe. This is mostly a good thing in terms of user-friendliness, though we're still nitpicky about the HVAC control layout (they're split up on either side of the wide center stack) and Honda's puzzling decision to use a dial for the audio system volume, but not the tuner, which gets a rocker switch (Acuras get dials for both functions). The optional nav meant we got the recessed, high-mounted LCD display in the center of the dash. No touchscreen here – inputs are done via the large controller in the middle of the stack or through voice commands you initiate by thumbing a button on the steering wheel. The control interface for the screen-based nav/audio system takes a little getting used to, but once you set up your radio presets and get comfortable with everything, it's very much second nature. There's a six-disc CD changer, but it may as well be an eight-track deck; satellite radio and the car's USB connector made CDs seem positively quaint. Bluetooth setup is easy, with the voice command menus clear enough that we never needed to crack open the owner's manual.

The leather-clad front seats are heated, wide-bottomed and decently bolstered; they're comfy if not overly sporty, a description that summarizes the Crosstour in general. The cupholders mounted between them are fine at keeping the crucial morning-commute coffee secure, and can be covered when not in use. You'll also find the same automatic transmission shifter used in other Accord models, and the center storage bin is plenty roomy and ready to swallow up all manner of random in-car detritus.



Rear-seat passengers have little, if anything, to complain about. It's spacious back there, with ample legroom even for taller passengers. The Crosstour's aggressively-sloped roofline belies a surprising amount of backseat headroom, too. Average-sized adults will have no problems whatsoever, and even tall folks should find it surprisingly accommodating. If you have kids, mounting a baby seat or booster (or both) is no biggie. The Crosstour lives right up to the Accord moniker's family-car reputation. Our tester's all-black interior will doubtless be popular with many buyers, but we thought it contributed to a somewhat cavelike ambiance. If it were us forking over the as-tested price of $36,930 (the Crosstour ain't exactly cheap), we'd be sure to pick an exterior color that allows the Ivory interior to be selected. We've looked at Crosstours so equipped, and in our opinion, the cabin has a cheerier feel and a more premium (read: expensive-looking) visual impact with the lighter seats and trim.

Outward visibility is good straight ahead and to the sides, but the view out back is sketchy at best, even with the glass panel on the face of the tailgate. When reversing, we were thankful for the tester's included rearview camera, as it's the only way to honestly tell what you're about to back over. It's important enough, in fact, that we'd go so far as to say that if it's within your financial reach, you really ought to take a hard swallow and hand over the added premium for the Navi model, as that's the only way you get the backup cam. The view over your shoulder basically stinks, thanks to the dramatic roof angle. Get those mirrors adjusted properly, folks, unless you want a mundane lane change to turn into some sort of driver's ed cautionary tale.



If you're buying a Crosstour for its voluminous cargo capacity, you should probably check your research, since it trails pretty much every conceivable rival in this regard. Behind the back seats, you get 25.7 cubic feet of space; flipping down the second-row seats boosts total cargo room up to 51.3 cubic feet. As you can see from the sampling below, the competition wins this battle pretty handily. Even some compact SUVs like the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue come out ahead in terms of the cargo volume numbers game, thanks to their boxier styling:



The discrepancy is due to a combination of the Crosstour's rakish profile – where you pay the price for the fastback look – and intrusive rear strut towers and wheel wells that crowd the cargo area on both sides, eliminating any possibility of fitting long, wide cargo, even with the back seats folded. As for the space that is available, it's more than enough to handle a big shopping trip to the grocery store or DIY-big-box outlet. Just don't plan on hauling any really tall or bulky stuff. The rear cargo area also features hidden under-floor storage in the form of a removable, easy-to-clean plastic bin. It looks like it'd be handy for carrying messy stuff like trays of flowers, or just keeping loose trunk junk like your flashlight, jumper cables and first-aid kit out of the way.



If you're okay with everything we've discussed so far, you'll be happy to know that the Crosstour is entirely pleasant to drive. The 271 horsepower and 254 pound-feet of torque delivered by the 3.5-liter V6 is more than ample in town and on the highway, announcing itself with a subdued growl from beyond the firewall. Acceleration is not of the neck-snapping variety, but at the same time, it's no slouch should you give the long pedal a proper workout. As we noted previously, our tester had AWD, which will doubtless help sales in states that deal with snowy winters, but the worst weather we experienced was some rain, which the Crosstour would have tackled equally well if it were a front-driver. Honda's Variable Cylinder management is standard, allowing the engine to switch seamlessly between three-, four- and six-cylinder operation. If not for the indicator light in the instrument cluster, we wouldn't even have noticed when VCM was doing its thing. However, despite the cylinder deactivation we still only averaged fuel economy in the mid-teens in what wound up being predominantly local driving. The EPA rates the AWD Accord Crosstour at 17 mpg city, 24 mpg highway and 20 mpg in mixed use. Your results, as they say, may vary.



Dynamically, the Accord Crosstour is bereft of surprises despite its slightly higher stance and added heft. This is a good thing, as behavior is predictable, with a suspension tune that's reasonably firm and nicely communicative without compromising overall passenger comfort. Probe the limits, and it can get a little squishy when the road gets bendy, but seriously, that sort of driving is outside the Crosstour's prime directive. Nobody buying one is going to go there. Ever. In relaxed, kid-taxi/grocery-getter mode, it's a shining beacon of Accord-ness. Steering feel and response are also nicely dialed-in, and before long, you forget that you're not sold on the looks, because it's such a solid drive.

Ultimately, if you want to compare it to something reasonably similar, the Toyota Venza is the roomier and more stylish choice, but the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour delivers the clearly superior behind-the-wheel experience. We'd happily road-trip one of these, even though we'd have to bring less stuff along for the ride. If you can get past its (extremely) polarizing styling and the lower cargo capacity that comes with it, the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour is eminently capable. Enjoyable, even. Is this the Accord wagon so many of us hoped for? No. Instead, it's probably the best Accord hatchback ever. Pity it's not the best-looking one, too.



Photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright ©2010 Weblogs, Inc.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 106 Comments
      Kaisu
      • 4 Years Ago
      It looks as though a Acura ZDX had a few too many Long Island iced teas and woke up the next morning with a BMW X6 and fled the scene. 9 months later the result is parked before you. It has the hulking stance and 4 doors of the X6 and some almost-pleasant vestiges of the ZDX's sporty styling, yet though the inspiration is there, something is missing....as it turns out, the RSX wasn't the culprit; the ghettotastic proportions of the tail end and the design of the rear fascia point to the true paternal inspiration for this badonkadonk dragalong: the Honda Insight did it with the roofies in the garage!

      Now get this thing a thong and stick it in a Lil' Wayne video.


      Now to be serious, in truth, this car doesn't carve a new niche (Infiniti, BMW, Acura, Toyota have all struck first claim) and it actually isn't that massive of a design failure. The problem with the design isn't initially flawed inspiration; no, instead the problem is that the designers never finished. They started at the rear and made it all the way to the A-pillars before unceremoniously giving up and slapping some random intern's grill design on the front of an Accord. This car is only polarizing from the side mirrors forward. The rear half is what it is: obesely cohesive. But the front half just doesn't belong. This could easily be fixed but adding some bulge to the hood to increase the illusion of bulk along with sharpening the angle of the windshield to give it a sportier look and dilute the econo-sedan proportions. Do that and you'll have a nice, cohesive, decidedly less awkward vehicle on your hands.

      Do all that and simplify the grill and you have the Acura ZDX.

      ....oh.
      • 4 Years Ago
      I was in a Honda dealership not too many weeks ago and found myself alongside one of these. So I had a look. I thought it came off quite well in the flesh and much better than in photos. But that seems to be the case with a number of vehicles. It was a loaded example and trimmed out very nicely. I'm sure it would be a very nice ride for any number of folks.

      Gee, one of our cars is an Element! It'll win no beauty contest but we like it and have gotten a great deal of utility from it and the family and friends we have loaned it to for same. I rather like not looking like every other vehicle on the road and it doesn't bother me if some don't care for them. They don't have to buy one!
      • 4 Years Ago
      Drives better than it looks.
      But others drive better, and have more space.
      Tries to be a design for every niche, but is master of none.
      I won't be buying this Cross-breed.
      • 4 Years Ago
      you kno as much as I want to hate it, when I saw the Crosstour in person, I actually thought it looked very nice. Altho I'm still looking forward to whatever Ford can bring to this new vehicle segment
        • 4 Years Ago
        The SHO wagon already exists in the form of an ecoboost Ford Flex
      • 4 Years Ago
      I'm becoming convinced that everyone who is appalled by the way this thing looks are just incapable of thinking outside the box, quite literally.

      Sure, it's awkward from some angles, but also captivating, sleek, and daring.
        • 4 Years Ago
        Pretty much exactly how I feel. People are clamoring for more variety, excitement, boldness, etc from manufactures and are suddenly shocked and belligerent when they finally get it? Makes no sense. Sure, not everything will be for everyone, but that's the best part about it!
        • 4 Years Ago
        I am sorry.. but there is nothing captivating, sleek, and daring about this. Such claim totally undermines the importance of fundamentals of good design. You can create something really daring and different, yet holds all elements of good design where proportions, graphics, and volume come all together.

        Crosstour? Ugly is ugly. No question about it.

        • 4 Years Ago
        I think you guys are missing a key point of those who hate this so much:

        This car isn't just ugly. Daring and ugly can be endearing. Hell some cars have a purposeful ugliness that suits them well. A Subaru WRX STi comes to mind but there are many, many more. This is SAFE and still EXTRAORDINARILY UGLY! There is nothing interesting here. It's a combination of elements that have no interesting qualities and go together so poorly it must be some sort of record. Think back to the Aztek and you'll see what I mean. It wasn't outlandish or interesting. It wasn't polarizing. It was just ugly.

        If you think differently, I have a group of auto designers who would like you meet you with baseball bats in hand. After all, your lack of taste makes their jobs of creating interesting things of beauty obsolete.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Such a shockingly ugly car. Only thing more shocking was when a family member told me how much he wanted this great new "SUV"

      ....uh...ok..enjoy your homely car with the gigantic butt.
      • 4 Years Ago
      ZDX is uglier.
      • 4 Years Ago
      I have seen a few on the road. They are not as ugly as i thought they would be. Still not the best looker out there but it definitely drivable.
      • 4 Years Ago
      A new niche? The horribly ugly niche? I think it's been done before. Most companies just don't go out of their way to claim it as their own.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Toyota venza please?

      Not even giving this honda a second thought...
      • 4 Years Ago
      This Accord Crosstour looks similar to the 78-80 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
        • 4 Years Ago
        That's an insult to the Olds. This is truly terrible on a level I have no seen since...well the rest of the Honda line. This is just one of the last nails in the coffin, when the public's done with Toyota, I would bet Honda will be next to be crucified.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Reminds me of the old Rover SD

        • 4 Years Ago
        When each Crosstour was crash tested, the engineers let out a mighty cheer. They promptly took a break to celebrate (with cake!) and to hit the shattered carcasses with baseball bats before lighting them aflame. The video of the crash tests were later replayed to discover that, as the vehicle hurtled towards destruction, the dummies cried "Yaaaaaaaay!" with sheer joy as they knew their deaths would serve a purpose beyond that of any other dummy.

        If I stuck a pencil up my nose, pointy bit sticking out of course, I'd be able to scrawl a picture of a car better looking than this. It would however not be fit to put on the market...SO WHY IS THIS?!?
    • Load More Comments