Ford EcoBoost Engines see high take rate, customers see higher transaction prices
2010 Lincoln MKT – Click above for high-res image gallery
Ford has been pushing its EcoBoost engines hard since they came out of the gate, with almost as many commercials touting its twin-turbo technology as we've seen all other Blue Oval spots combined. And all that marketing mojo appears to be paying off, as the Ford Motor Company has told The Detroit News that EcoBoost has really taken off on the showroom floor.
Ford just started offering EcoBoost in July, but the early returns show that customers are very interested in Ford's promise of V8 performance with V6 fuel economy. Lincoln MKS sales have been 30 percent EcoBoost, while the Taurus SHO is currently accounting for 20 percent off all sales of Ford's new large sedan. The MKT has only been on the market for a month, but early returns show that over 40 percent of customers want 355 horsepower in their giant crossover. The Ford Flex is seeing a 13 percent EcoBoost take rate, nearly double the expected 8 percent figure.
In fact, Ford says all four EcoBoost-equipped vehicles are exceeding expectations to date, and the engine tech also appears to be bringing in conquest customers at an accelerated rate. For example, an impressive 44 percent of Taurus buyers come from another OEM, while the number jumps to 54 percent with the EcoBoost-equipped Taurus SHO. The MKT has a similar 10 percent conquest boost courtesy of turbo power. And those conquest wins at the dealership also add to Ford's bottom line, as EcoBoost-equipped vehicles carry a $5,000 to $10,000 MSRP bump versus their naturally aspirated counterparts.
While the 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine looks like an early success, the real turbo test comes when other, higher volume EcoBoost engines hit the market. Some future boosted Ford engines will come in 2.0-liter and 1.6-liter displacements, and the DetNews is reporting that a much smaller, 1.0-liter three-cylinder version is on the way for applications like the new Fiesta and Focus. Engines as small as 1.0-liter are sure to be an efficiency boon for the Blue Oval, with potential paybacks in the high 40 MPG range in the EPA highway cycle.
The next vehicles to receive EcoBoost will reportedly be the F-150 and Ford Explorer toward the end of next year. Ford is hoping to push the engine tech on 90 percent of its models within the next few years, with up to 1.3M global EcoBoost sales.
[Source: Detroit News]








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
audi_arena 11:39AM (11/13/2009)
This data is expecially impressive to me considering how freaking ugly that vehicle is.
Reply
Redline 11:54AM (11/13/2009)
That grille is horrendous.
Nathan 12:04PM (11/13/2009)
About as sexy as a manatee.
Actually, kind of reminds me of a manatee.
bismillah 12:16PM (11/13/2009)
Quit picking on the manatee!! This thing is way uglier and much more comical-looking.
kevin 12:29PM (11/13/2009)
It's not that much worse than the BMW X6. Lets face it fugly is a school of auto styling right now.
JimBob 12:56PM (11/13/2009)
This is awkward to the extreme.
Tyler 5:02PM (11/13/2009)
I know it's beyond me how a bunch of people actually approved this design, and enough with the grill Lincoln should be focusing on brand recognition first, then crazy styling things. Like I honestly think this is one of the top ten ugliest vehicles ever created, Aztek being first.
Mercennarius 11:44AM (11/13/2009)
Turbos FTW
Reply
Soccer Mom 12:05PM (11/13/2009)
That is one hideous car, I have to tell you. Aztek, you have a brother!
Reply
Ross 12:13PM (11/13/2009)
The only thing sillier than the nose on this whale is Lincoln's naming strategy: MKS, MKT, MKX and MKZ.
The funny thing is, one of those vehicles is, IMO, a heck of a great-looking car. I just can't for the life of me remember which MK? it is.
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 12:14PM (11/13/2009)
Possibly partially because you can't get an AWD Taurus non-SHO right now. It's on the list, but you can't find them on the lot.
Reply
tbirdfive0 1:40PM (11/13/2009)
On Wednesday I noticed 3 on the lot near my house (though didn't look at them all) and one in he showroom. All were non-SHOs
But they do have a Supercharged 2008 Foose F-150 that is supercharged for $38k... brand new, sticker is $55k... a bit of a discount.
why not the LS2LS7? 4:24PM (11/13/2009)
Okay, well, 3 weeks ago you couldn't find one, at least around me.
Jim 12:16PM (11/13/2009)
Ecoboost or no, the MKT still looks like someone dropped a baleen whale onto a hearse.
Reply
nardvark 12:21PM (11/13/2009)
Turbo'd 3-cylinders? I feel like that's going to be a tough pill for people to swallow. What modern car has had a 3-cylinder? I don't care if it's comparable to a NA 4-cylinder, I think the marketing will be impossible.
That said, offer me a 1.6l or 2.0l turbo with direct injection, and I'll be more than happy to buy it in a Focus hatch.
Reply
montoym 3:51PM (11/13/2009)
I can see where you are coming from. But, at the same time, I can't help but think that if you polled many owners about their cars, a lot of them wouldn't have any clue as to the size of the engine in their car and probably the number of cylinders as well. Remember, the vast majority of consumers are not car enthusiasts, cars are appliances to them.
The numbers that will matter to most of them (particularly the buyers of economy cars that the 3cyl would be aimed at) is the EPA mileage, not how many cylinders the car has.
BTW, the Geo/Chevy Metro and Suzuki Swift had a 3cyl engine and there are some currently available in the European market as well.
Art 1:19PM (11/13/2009)
a deserved success by ford. looks to be a solid, great engine. and the tuning community hasnt even got a hold of it!
Reply
ryuryuryturtuy 1:28PM (11/13/2009)
way ugly period.
Reply
tbirdfive0 1:42PM (11/13/2009)
I used to drive a turbo 3-cyl for work... granted it was a diesel, and on a $40,000 lawnmower, but still...
Reply
tbirdfive0 1:43PM (11/13/2009)
Ugh, that was supposed to be a reply to nardvark