Catching up with Chevrolet's 1,200-mile pre-production Volt fleet drive
Chevy Volts on 1,200 mile drive - Click above for high-res image gallery
Yesterday, we had an opportunity to chat with Chevrolet Volt chief engineer Andrew Farah as he rode through the hills of West Virginia during a development drive. On Tuesday, a fleet of eight pre-production (a.k.a. IVER) Volts set out from the company's Milford Proving Ground in Michigan on three day, 1,200 mile jaunt through Ohio, Pennsylvannia, Maryland, West Virginia and back. This event is known in General Motors' engineering process as a "65-Percent Drive" and as it implies it's one of a series of milestones on the road to production.
The 65% roughly corresponds to the minimum level of completeness of development of all the hardware, and more specifically, the software. At this point, many of the systems are in fact approaching 90-100% complete. Over the next several months, 70, 80, 90 and 100 percent drives will follow on the way to production launch a year from now. Read on to find out what we learned from Farah.
Gallery: Chevrolet Volt 65% drive
This drive is being used evaluate a variety of aspects of real world performance – especially the charge sustaining mode. Over the course of the drive, at various times, parts of the fleet are being run with a full charge while others are being run with the battery depleted. For example, on day two, only half of the cars were plugged in overnight at the motel, a scenario that is very likely to occur on a road trip with the Volt. According to Farah, regardless of the state of charge, overall vehicle performance was comparable and there was no degradation.

One of the big questions about the Volt's charge sustaining mode has been the behavior of the engine and overall NVH characteristics. Early on, the thought was that during charge sustaining mode, the engine would simply run at a constant speed to maintain the battery level. However, over time the engineering team realized that wasn't necessarily the most efficient way to run the engine. The engine-generator will be feeding power directly to the drive motor on an as-needed basis, with any surplus energy going to the battery.
The generator won't be trying to completely recharge the battery, as that would be less efficient overall than taking electricity off the grid. However, the actual battery state of charge will fluctuate somewhat around the minimum charge level based on high level power demands and charging from the generator and regenerative braking.
The plan now is to run the engine-generator between approximately 1,200 and 4,000 rpm. A map that looks at factors like speed and power load requirements will be used to select the desired engine speed. Because engines typically run more efficiently at higher loads where they can avoid pumping losses, the intent is to keep the engine between 30 and 100 percent load whenever possible. Farah declined to get specific about just what kind of mileage the Volt is currently getting in steady state charge sustaining mode.

Farah did tell us that the final capacity of the fuel tank has not yet been decided upon, but that the prototypes are currently easily exceeding the 300 mile range target on a tank. The cars are not being run to full empty on this trip, but based on the amount of fuel that was put in on the first two fill-ups, 300 miles won't be an issue with gasoline. The Volt, of course, is also a flex-fuel vehicle and some of the cars will be filled with E85 on the final day before returning to Milford.
At this point, the cars are running in near ideal conditions for a battery powered car, not to hot or too cold – both conditions that degrade performance. Farah acknowledges that there are still some "node" inefficiencies in the pre-production vehicles, so in their current form, they aren't quite hitting the 40 mile range target – but they are close. He expects to hit the bogey with the next round of testing.
Another aspect of the Volt's behavior that is being evaluated is its noise, vibration and harshness. As we know, electric vehicles are typically very quiet, and the Volt is in essence an EV. The concern is that when the engine generator starts up, there will be a significant increase in noise. Farah tells us that in general, the Volt will always be running in EV mode at startup and low speeds. Typically, the engine won't come on until the vehicle is motion, when factors like road and wind noise start to overwhelm any sound of the engine. Nonetheless, Farah seems satisfied with the powertrain NVH, although the crew is still working on some road and wind noise issues between 25 and 40 mph.

The silent start likely won't always be the case, however. As we've previously heard from GM's Denise Gray and Bob Kruse, in cold conditions the engine may start up immediately to help support the heating and defrosting needs of the car. This will be especially true if the Volt hasn't been plugged in. No doubt this will be one of the major issues evaluated during cold weather testing over the next several months.
Recently, another team of Volt engineers took the car to Pikes Peak in Colorado for evaluation as it climbed the 14-mile road to the 14,000-foot summit. One of the concerns about the the Voltec powertrain has been that once the battery is depleted, the performance of the car would drop significantly. Because the battery is typically only used down to about 30-35% charge, there is some reserve left over when the engine-generator is running. When at full power beyond the engine-generator's approximately 100 hp output, the battery can be drawn down further.
Eventually, however, the battery will reach a point where it can't provide any more juice. Beyond that, only the engine generator provides power, a condition Farah dubbed the "tipping point." According to GM engineer John Blanchard, "The entire trip was run in charge sustaining (range-extended mode) and system was able to maintain State of Charge during the entire drive." If that is true, it bodes well for any kind of real world usage pattern never hitting that tipping point.
Not having experienced the Volt's charge sustaining mode firsthand, we'll reserve judgment and take Farah at his word – for now. Once Farah and his team return to Michigan late Thursday, they will start diving into all the data and notes to determine what areas still need more work before the 70 Percent Drive. Perhaps with any luck, we'll join the party.


![Officially Official: 2011 Audi A1 finally arrives [w/video]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/02/01-2011-audi-a1-630op_143x85.jpg)








Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Pokey 7:06PM (10/15/2009)
Vaporware?
Reply
Tony 7:13PM (10/15/2009)
Ouch, but sort of true. It's going to be hard to sell these rigs at 40 large when gas is cheap enough to buy a same size class of car and fill it up for 5 to 10 years for the same money.
ForgedInternals 7:22PM (10/15/2009)
even harder if Nissan or Ford can get their EV's out at their projected release dates(about the same time as the volt), It'll make the Volt somewhat obsolete and take away a huge chunk of their demo graph.
jv2k 8:37PM (10/15/2009)
Ouch, but sort of true. It's going to be hard to sell these rigs at 40 large
The 40k figure is still just an estimate and the government has already pretty much guaranteed a 10k rebate making it at least 30k.
Chris O 1:56AM (10/16/2009)
I wish everyone around here would chill out about these cars.
This car certainly isn't vaporware. Environmentally and economically, it's hard to make a compelling argument for hybrids or EVs.... but that's today.
These types of first efforts are required to push along research and development for battery energy density, charging infrastructure, and battery manufacture and recycling improvements. They're science experiments for early adopters... even people buying Priuses with 10 years of powertrain engineering are still buying beta products.
I'm not interested in being an early adopter, but I can still recognize that you can't get from point A to point B until you start walking. I'm pretty sure plenty of people felt the same way about the first cars....
MoonRover 8:26AM (10/16/2009)
As for Ford and Toyota, their product development is light years behind this Volt. Why is it so hard for some of you to realize this will change the way automobiles are powered in the future? This is a revolutionary concept, this is not a Prius+.
Stephen 12:05PM (10/16/2009)
Well said, Chris O. We've all been saying GM (and others) were left out in the cold when the market shifted away from SUV's so rapidly and they didn't have any competitive non-SUV products. Now they are working on product lines that are truly future oriented. This is great news even if it isn't the perfect car for this particular month.
We sure are a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" crowd...
Pokey 3:42PM (10/16/2009)
Wow, almost every single one of you managed to totally misinterpret my post.
I was actually poking fun at all the people who still call this car "vaporware", even though it is clearly not. I guess the question mark at the end was not sufficient enough a clue. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Power Beauty Soul 7:18PM (10/15/2009)
Looks like there was an Insight and a Fusion Hybrid along for the drive as well.
Reply
gerrrg 7:19PM (10/15/2009)
When the Volt finally goes retail, the sheet metal will be old. This is the same problem as the Chevy Beat...play it out in the media for a loooooong period of time, and when you finally release it for retail, the design is stale.
Unless they're going to introduce Volt 2.0 in two years after the initial release, I suspect the Volt will lose out to others with fresher exterior designs.
Reply
chad.dawkins 7:32PM (10/15/2009)
Just like the Camaro right? Don't forget that 97% of people aren't like us. They don't follow a car from rumors to unveil then production. When this comes out and Chevy hits up the marketing it will look "new" to most people.
Cmicasa the GREAT 7:41PM (10/15/2009)
That might make sense if 95% of the buying public, who don't even know that the car exists, were seeing pics every day.
I asked my dad who is a BONAFIDE "Car Guy" what he thought of the Volt and the first thing he said was... " I just hope it doesn't look like that gay ass Toyota."
He finally saw what it looked like when I pulled it on the Web.
He'll definitely see what it looks like when I pull up in his driveway with mine after I replace my G6 with one.. $40K or not.
THANK U GM... Don't let the "glass half empty" and the "I hate Domestics" crowd deter your proper and admirable mission.
Rebelling against change is human, but sometimes progress has to happen via the worst possible scenarios. My point being is that the Combustible engine will hopefully not be our "Horse and Carriage."
That lasted for 5000 years
Henry Ford said, “If I’d have asked my customers what they wanted, they would have told me ‘A faster horse."
KeatMP 10:24PM (10/15/2009)
@ Cmicasa
+1 Very well said.
Rev 10:52PM (10/15/2009)
Well, Cmicasa, at least no car you buy after the G6 can be nearly as miserable, you can't lose. But considering your current car, I think you owe to yourself to perhaps take a little more time on your next auto purchase... There's no hurry!
Cmicasa the GREAT 11:17AM (10/16/2009)
Thanx Keat...
and to the Rev:
My G6 has been absolutely perfect for a mid-size everyday car. It still, after 3.5 years, gets compliments and has not given me one major issue with exception to a bent wheel.. which I blame on Baltimore streets. I am currently cruising around 92K miles on this 2006 Pontiac... and I would swear the 3.5L has gotten more power.
If it will make U feel better about my having to subject myself to a $20K sedan... feel not for me.. because on the weekends, or after work I drive:
a 2009 556HP Cadillac "King V",
or a 2008 475HP Z51 Vette,
or a 320HP Chevy Tahoe LTZ.
GM and Domestics4LIFE
MM 7:19PM (10/15/2009)
Let the hate rants begin. I love the fact that GM gets crap for not being like Toyota and having a Prius, so when they try to do something like the Volt they get flamed all over the blog sites. Lets face it, if Toyota, Honda, BMW, or Hyundai made the Volt, every beige loving CamCord driver would be lined up around the block to get one.
Reply
chad.dawkins 7:33PM (10/15/2009)
And they'd be saying, "Why doesn't GM do something like this? This is why they suck.
Brian 7:44PM (10/15/2009)
Behold: the Vega of the 21st Century.
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/volt-birth-watch-168-shakedown-cruise-in-more-ways-than-one/#more-332190
And this time they have the guile to do it with MY TAX MONEY.
Reply
Brian 7:55PM (10/15/2009)
Also remember when GM said the original Saturn would get 65 mpg highway? Another GM PR hype that turned out to be a huge, big, L-I-E. I expect a similar result for the 230 mpg claim.
No doubt instead of debating me, the GM and Detroit fanbois will merely rate my comments down, demonstrating my superior knowledge of the auto industry over them.
Gary 7:59PM (10/15/2009)
Robert Farago can't leave TTAC soon enough.