Review: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO gets measured against the original
2010 Ford Taurus SHO – Click above for high-res image gallery
There's a small group of enthusiasts who worship a car you just wouldn't expect: the original Ford Taurus SHO. And I'm one of them. After years of searching for an example in good shape, I bought my very first vintage SHO, a 1991 Ford Taurus SHO Plus model (we'll explain what the "Plus" means later) earlier this year. At the same time, somewhere in a secluded Dearborn bunker, Ford was planning to announce that the SHO name would return with the redesigned 2010 Taurus. Clearly, 2009 was shaping up as a big year for SHO fans – especially me.
Thus, it was beyond argument in the virtual halls of Autoblog HQ that the task of reviewing the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO would fall to yours truly – but could an unabashed SHO fan pass judgment on the resurrection of his all-time favorite car without bias? You can judge for yourself after the jump.
Gallery: Review: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO
Photos copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.
If you're expecting a knock down, drag out comparison test between old and new that pits my '91 SHO with 86,000 miles against this 2010 model with 1,218 clicks, sorry to disappoint. While my baby may look concours ready on the outside, what's underneath is 100% Grade C first-gen Taurus that's decaying like a Big Mac box. Therefore, we won't be comparing lap times or lining them up at the drag strip because, well, my guy would lose every time and probably snap in two. Fortunately, there are other ways to compare these sibling models that may reveal if the modern one really deserves to be called S-H-O.

SHO stands for Super High Output, and the original model's 3.0-liter V6 truly gave those words meaning. There's lots of speculation about how this motor came to be, but the prevailing theory is that Ford contracted Yamaha to design and build a motor for a mid-engine sports car meant to compete with the Pontiac Fiero. That project was canceled, but Ford was on the hook for these engines and needed somewhere to stuff them. We can only guess what strong narcotics were consumed that night when a Taurus engine bay became the answer, but that's how the SHO was (supposedly) born.
Arriving on the scene in 1989, the original SHO's engine was way ahead of its time, producing 220 horsepower at 6,200 rpm and 200 lb-ft of torque at 4,800 rpm when other V6-powered sedans from Toyota, Honda and Nissan were still years away from breaking the 200-hp barrier. While the engine could naturally rev to a lofty 8,500 rpm redline, Ford engineers cut the fun off at just 7,000 rpm to save any Taurus-spec parts like the A/C compressor, power steering pump and alternator from being spun to an early grave.




The top of the SHO engine, however, is its calling card. Those long and short intake runners that weave together like a pair of hands praying are not just industrial art; they give the original SHO a dual personality. Below 3,500 rpm, the longer runners lift the torque curve for comfortable around town cruising. Above 3,500 rpm, the short runners transform SHO v1.0 into a she-devil that howls up to redline with a demonic frequency. An engine this great needs a good operator, and back in 1989, computer-controlled automatics couldn't be trusted. So the last ingredient was a five-speed manual transmission borrowed from Mazda that put Yamaha's gem of an engine in the palm of your hand.
Ford is hoping that history repeats itself with the 2010 Taurus SHO, that some of the original car's lightning can be felt in the new car's bottle. On paper it would seem the new SHO is a natural extension of the original. For one thing, it starts with a big honkin' sedan that you wouldn't normally peg as "sporty", in this case the redesigned 2010 Taurus. Finally free of the Five-Hundred's dowdy silhouette, the new Taurus looks, dare we say, spectacular. The front end features sophisticated shapes imported from Ford of Europe, the hood now bulges and steps down to a pair of tastefully flared front fenders, the character line along the side vanishes and reappears on the rear fenders with a wink, and those 427 concept-inspired blocky taillights remind us of a time when Ford design actually had a little chutzpah. Tie it all together and the adjective you taste on your tongue is "interesting".

Just like the original, however, you have to look closely for any SHO-specific design cues. The things you have a shot at noticing are a spoiler on the trunk lid that's unique to the SHO, dual tailpipes split to either side of the rear apron, a "SHO EcoBoost" badge on the rear and small SHO badge in the armpit of the C-pillar. Then there are those giant 20-inch wheels that make my car's 16-inchers look like the blades on a Magic Bullet. I think I speak for all SHO fans when I say we're disappointed that Ford won't be offering a wheel design inspired by the original's iconic "slicer" design. Those wheels, which first appeared on a limited number of 1991 models, mine included, became ubiquitous on second-gen SHOs from 1992-1995. You see one now, you know it's attached to a SHO. Updating the original slicer design would've been a piece of low-hanging fruit for Ford to pick, but the designers skipped it in favor a five-spoke wheel that just isn't SHO-y enough.
I'm big enough to admit, however, that my SHO's interior doesn't hold a candle to the new car's cockpit. Back in 1991, state-of-the-art was an in-dash CD player. Today, it's SYNC, Bluetooth Audio, a 12-speaker Sony stereo, satellite radio, push button start, heated and cooled front seats with Active Motion butt massagers and multi-color ambient lighting, all of which the new SHO's got. Both passenger and driver get their own hooded parts of the dash, which is bisected by a sloping center console that brings the intelligently laid out HVAC and stereo controls out to you. There's even another rare appearance of the SHO logo on the right side of the dash.




The seats are a model of comfort, though their grippy, suede-like covering will hold your shirt like velcro in a turn while the barely there bolstering lets your body slide right off the seat back. This is a big car with a big interior, so four people of even above average proportions will be comfy cozy. We did dock the new SHO a few points for its tall, upright seating position, which, while great for long trips and general comfort, is not the most confidence-inspiring perch from which to pilot a sport sedan. That said, there are some plusses that come with owning a car this big. At 20.1 cubic feet, the trunk with 60/40 split-folding rear seats can accommodate just about anything short of 4x8 sheets of plywood, and who doesn't know at least one person who owes his or her very existence to a big back seat?
Of course, being a SHO isn't about exterior design or interior amenities. It's about one thing: the engine. What kind of engine does it take to earn the title "Super High Output"? The new SHO's twin-turbocharged and direct-inject EcoBoost V6 towers over other six-cylinders with 365 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque available at a barely-over-idle 1,500 rpm. While opening the new car's hood doesn't reveal a gorgeous tangle of intake runners like the original, we're just as interested in power as being pretty and the EcoBoost V6 makes more of that than V8s in the Pontiac G8 GT (361 hp), Chrysler 300C (360 hp), BMW 550i (360 hp) and Audi A6 (350 hp). At the same time, it earns the "Eco" in its name by beating all at the pump with a 17 city mpg/25 highway rating, though premium fuel is its cocktail of choice.

3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 (left) and 3.0-liter Yamaha V6 (right)
What this engine feels like beneath your right foot is another matter entirely. Sliding the SHO's T-bar shifter into Drive and mashing your clodhopper to the floor will elicit the same amount of thrust as this car's V8-powered competition, if not more thanks to those two small turbos dragging peak torque down to the tachometer's basement. It's good for a 0-60 time in the low- to mid-5.0-second range, which is at least two seconds quicker than my '91 model when it was new – a remarkable feat considering the 2010 model weighs some 1,283 lbs more than the original.


Whereas the original reacted with some violence when you marshaled 100% of its motor's reserves, the new SHO hardly blinks. It delivers you your quick 0-60 mph time on a plate with the crust cut off and goes back to reading the latest Barbara Kingsolver novel. We miss the sounds and vibrations associated with an engine hard at work, as well as the participation factor provided by the original SHO's manual transmission. The new SHO offers only Ford's 6F55 SelectShift six-speed automatic transmission, a stout runner of ratios that shifts quickly and smoothly, but again drains the drama when caning the car between stop lights. There are a pair of paddle shifters for manual control, each requiring a pull back for upshifts and forward push for downshifts. This arrangement took some time to get used to, especially the downshifts that require your thumbs to do something other than just hold on. The paddles themselves aren't made of the highest quality material either, and each bears a passing resemblance to the shoulder blade of a spider monkey.
As a mere sedan, the modern SHO excels thanks to its 2010 Taurus roots. It's a big car that rides like it owns the road. Even with those giant 20-inch steam rollers, the SHO's suspension mutes minor bumps and remains upright and composed at all times. It's mature demeanor comes from a complete set of suspension tweaks that includes unique shock absorbers, springs, stabilizer bars and strut-mount bushings, though you can tell that decent ride and handling prowess is already baked into the base Taurus sedan.

Back in 1991, Ford offered option package #212A for the SHO, a.k.a the Plus Package. Very few were made (mine was one of them), but those that did leave the factory were blessed with a lighter weight plastic "Power Bulge" hood and several cosmetic treatments to set them apart. The new SHO gets its own version of the Plus Package called the 12S–Performance Package, but in this case looks were left untouched and Ford upped the ante on performance hardware. Included are higher performance brake pads squeezing identically sized discs, 20-percent-stiffer damping, nine-percent-stiffer rear springs, an even bigger anti-roll bar and shorter 3.16 final-drive ratio.
Does the new SHO deserve those three letters at the end of its name? The tough answer is no.
Buyers of package 12S also get special sport tuning for the steering and stability control system, the latter of which gains a "Sport Mode". Finally, those 20-inch wheels are standard with the Performance Package and lovingly hugged by a set of Goodyear Eagle F1 summer tires. The price for all this? $995. We say get it, not just because the Performance Package is a steal at twice the price, but also because a SHO so equipped can go harder, turn faster and grip stronger while not taking a hit to everyday drivability.Our tester was equipped with the Performance Package, and what we can say is that the 2010 SHO is a physics-defying car. From the outside it appears too big and heavy to dance, but behind the wheel it feels as light and precise as a B-list celebrity on the season finale of Dancing with the Stars. The EcoBoost V6 is there for you at all all times with power and torque to make the trip to each corner a short one, and when you arrive, the SHO remains remarkably flat and uses its Haldex all-wheel-drive system to keep all four wheels clawing. The steering is accurate and nicely weighted, though surprisingly little information about where the wheels are pointed and how hard the tires are working gets through. That means your eyes alone are left in charge of knowing where the SHO is about to go at all times, which can be unsettling considering how far away all four corners are. Lastly, even with the Performance Package's upgraded pads, the brakes are woefully incapable of stopping the SHO with confidence. The brake pedal's travel is long, mushy and seemingly detached from the mechanical operation that's taking place at each wheel.




Despite those few missteps, the new SHO is a seriously fun-to-drive large sedan thanks to its uniquely powerful engine. It's a totally different answer to the same question that many of its competitors have answered with big V8 engines and rear-wheel drive. Yes, you can buy a Chrysler 300C with all-wheel-drive and an almost equally powerful V8 for a similar price, but it won't handle like this. You can also buy a Pontiac G8 GT with rear-wheel drive and another almost equally powerful V8, but it won't be as comfortable or offer the latest infotainment tech. You can also buy your choice of Germany's finest large sport sedans, but you'll just be spending a lot more money for a name. And in all cases, you'll get slightly less power and worse fuel economy. Much like the original, the new SHO is selling a unique powertrain in a familiar package that has no problem running with a more expensive pack.
Our tester began with a base price of $37,995 and added option package 401A for $2,000 that includes a power moonroof, heated/cooled front seats and a Sony 12-speaker stereo; the Performance Package for $995; multi-contoured "Active Motion" front seats with built-in butt massagers for $595; and another $295 for the Red Candy Metallic paint job. Total: $41,800 including a destination charge of $825. Of the aforementioned competing class, only a Pontiac G8 GT costs less, and ignoring the fact that Pontiac is dead and the G8 along with it, you couldn't get one comparably equipped with all-wheel drive and numerous other options like a nav system, which would add $1,995 to the SHO's bottom line.

So there's no arguing that the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO is a good performance bargain, but does it deserve those three all-important letters at the end of its name? The tough answer – especially for this self-described SHO fanatic – is no. The problem is that the superlative EcoBoost V6 is also offered in the Lincoln MKS EcoBoost, MKT EcoBoost and Ford Flex EcoBoost (though all three are down 10 hp compared to the SHO), so what we really have here is the 2010 Ford Taurus EcoBoost. It seems to us that someone in Ford's marketing department believed a few extra sales could be had by tugging at the heart strings of enthusiasts, and any SHO fan meeting the new car for the first time will surely admit to having his heart strings played like a fiddle. But the new SHO needs a few of its performance pitfalls corrected and an extra ingredient that makes it much more than just a Taurus EcoBoost. What that is, we don't know, but a manual transmission, "slicer" inspired wheels and Brembo brake package would be a start.
At the end of our time with the new SHO, my answer to this one question best sums up how we feel about the car. Would I replace my vintage 1991 Ford Taurus SHO Plus for a 2010 model? No, but I'd be happily park them next to each other in my garage.
Gallery: Review: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO
Photos copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.









Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
fixitfixitstop 12:11PM (9/14/2009)
There's a bunch of things wrong with calling this an SHO, but I'm happy it exists.
I really wish it had a manual transmission, but I say that about almost every car.
Reply
Sean Flanagan 12:43PM (9/14/2009)
One of the things wrong is calling it "Taurus Show" in the commercials. It just doesn't sit right with me. Unless I'm missing something, it's supposed to be "ess-aych-oh".
Side note: that intake manifold on the Yamaha V6 is a thing of beauty.
Other Man 1:11PM (9/14/2009)
I agree. Well except for the manual. In such a large sedan it would be rather out of place (it's a good bit larger than even a 300C).
And AB: A G8 GT may be its competition, but it's priced like a G8 GXP, and that car is significantly more of a sport sedan than the Taurus.
Now if Ford feels like dropping all this equipment and a manual option into the Fusion ..
By the way, Germany's finest are just a name. That would imply they are basically equal in 'goodness' and a lot more expensive. I think most here agree I'd put my money on an Alpina B7, Audi S8, Jag XJR, or the S63 if you wanted to run one of those around a track with the SHO. Not bashing the SHO because I like it, I just find that comment a bit of wishful thinking.
weelo180 1:21PM (9/14/2009)
Look at the front on photo of both cars in the gallery. crossover SUV!!!
Joe 1:30PM (9/14/2009)
Great car Ford. I've ridden and driven plenty of 'Tortuous-es' over the years... (who hasn't)
I really want to like this car, but at that price I'm sold on the Flex EB.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here but I'd bet the way to an ESS-AAYCH-OH's heart is gonna be through a Fusion or Mondeo SHO variant and not this cruiser.
Silly Pickle 2:13PM (9/14/2009)
@ Sean - agree 100 and 10 percent. It's like call NOS "Nahwse"...no, it's N. O. S. At least it was until the F & F came along and messed it up - at least IMO. That's "Ee-moh" right?
John - I had an 89 for almost 10 years, put over 240,000 km on it myself, hail killed it at 340+ thou km...I never replaced a clutch the entire time I had it, or a timing belt nor had the valves serviced. Probably should have, but didn't...never thought it would last that long the way I drove it for the first 5 years. Beat that car down, only replaced brakes and struts when needed, or other mechanical stuff not related to the engine itself. Would beat up on kids in 5.0 Mustangs (the car I owned prior to the SHO) - I loved driving that car (SHO). May not be the fastest anymore but at one point in time, it was. And it sounded soooo sweet when you reved it out on your way to a win. I can only disagree with you on the blade wheels, I liked my 89 style better, and I like these new 5 spokes even more. But...and as much as I'm sure I'd love this car (AWD would be so much nicer in winter), I can't help but wishing and hoping that they stick that drivetrain in the Fusion. To me that would be the real clincher and should have been the ancestrol bearer of the torch in the first place, and the one I would want. I can't see myself needing such a big car anytime soon, but if I did, it's definiotely a looker in pictures.
Oh well, there's always a used S4 somewhere in the market and mpg be damned, it'll sound a lot better than a V-6 anyday. Never mind that it's slower...since when is anything under 6 seconds slow? We've gotten spoiled. LOL
RITmusic2k 2:28PM (9/14/2009)
Sean, the only thing is, Ford got the term from SHO owners. Just like GTO owners started calling their cars 'goats', the SHO community started referring to their cars as S.H.O.s and "shows" interchangeably.
bvz 3:18PM (9/14/2009)
@Silly,
I agree... it feels like the Fusion "SHO" would have been a more direct connection to the original SHO (which was one of my dream cars way back when...)
I'm not a big fan of the current Taurus' size, weight, lousy mpg, or looks. But in large part that is because the car has moved into a different category... and left the Fusion in its place.
Though, to be honest, I would even prefer a new Mondeo over the Fusion.
And... to be really honest... I am not in the market for a new car no matter what the cost/performance/etc... so I'm not their market.
homunculus 12:12PM (9/14/2009)
the rear looks pretty bad, especially the gap between the trunk and rear lights. the belt line is way too high.
then again i liked the 2000 taurus.
Reply
Quantumphysics 3:02PM (9/14/2009)
I agree with you. The back looks hella chunky. The MKS' rear is nicer. They both should also have integrated bumper exhaust.
I don't mind people calling it "SHOW"
I like to call it SHO. This way, everyone knows what it is, and it doesn't sound like yet another 3 letter acronym. They already got MKS, MKX, MKZ, MKT, SRX, CTS, XLR, etc
Paul 12:16PM (9/14/2009)
That's a great review. It is hard to compare classics to its modern reincarnations because you expect them to give you that same feeling as the original did. But, cars change and we're not the same people we were back then either.
It is the same reaction I've had to the BMW 135i that was supposedly going to hark back to the E30s of yesteryear. But alas, it's just marketing ploys to snap a few more sales from the brand faithful.
-ez
Reply
IntoxicatedPuma 12:18PM (9/14/2009)
I think I would disagree with your statement that the SHO is just an EcoBoost Taurus. I understand what you're saying but at the same time, if the Yamaha engine had been put into the Mustang, Continental, and Thunderbird, would people argue that "It's just a Dual Cam Taurus?" I definitely agree though, some hard core performance additions would definitely attract more attention, but I think you'd be driving the price up to the 50k mark really quickly.
Reply
Mike 12:20PM (9/14/2009)
Not bad performance wise, but I would like it if you can get a version without all the fake chrome (i.e. trunk and rear taillights). Also, I hope the aftermarket folks are working on lowering kits because that thing sits high, especially in the rearend.
Reply
Bernie "bud" 12:24PM (9/14/2009)
I had a '92 and then a '93 SHO back in the day. Took the white '92 to a track day once. Underdeveloped car back then, motor was bulletproof just everything else kind of fell short. The new car is handsome but would not make my shopping list because of cost alone.
Reply
Scott 12:21PM (9/14/2009)
I'll take (8) 91's for that price. Don't like the design or weight.
Reply
Farmboy 12:21PM (9/14/2009)
I was incredibly happy with my 89 SHO. Wish I still had it.
Reply
Polly Prissy Pants 12:21PM (9/14/2009)
I actually saw a new Taurus in person the other day and was shocked at how huge it was. I would have been interesting to see photos demonstrating how much larger this new car really is.
And $42,000? You can try to rationalize this any way you like but I have to think there will be very few people willing to pay $42,000 for a Taurus no matter how wonderful it is. In a way I'm glad they built it anyway but it really should be about $10,000 cheaper.
Reply
John 1:11PM (9/14/2009)
It isnt about paying that much for a Taurus, its more about -not- paying $20k more than that for a German car that isnt as quick. Taurus is no longer a Camry/Accord alternative, its a full sized executive car.
About it not deserving the "SHO" name, what the hell else are they going to call a performance version of a Taurus with a special engine not avalable in the other trims?
Yaroukh 1:21PM (9/14/2009)
then go and buy something similar for less
good luck
Farmboy 1:43PM (9/14/2009)
That's how I was. It stopped me in my tracks how big it was. But, it is bigger on the inside. I pre-ordered a SHO the other day, and I can't wait for it to come in.