• Aug 29, 2009
2010 Nissan Rogue - Click above for high-res image gallery

Nissan has just announced updated pricing information on its smallest crossover, the Rogue. New for 2010 is a so-called 360° Value Package that adds such niceties as 16-inch aluminum wheels, privacy glass, auto-dimming rearview mirror with rearrview monitor, rear spoiler and chrome grille. At $1,040, the Value Package saves you a cool thousand bucks over the cost of these items if purchase separately.

Base versions of the Nissan Rogue will run $20,340 – a reasonable increase of $1,090 over the CUV's starting price in 2008 – its first year on the market – and stepping up to an all-wheel drive model will cost you $21,540. A top-of-the-line Rogue SL AWD with 17-inch alloys begins at $23,130. All Rogue models come standard with the same powertrain: a 170-horsepower 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine mated up to a CVT automatic transmission. Want to know more? Click past the break for the official press release.



[Source: Nissan]

PRESS RELEASE:

Nissan Announces U.S. Pricing on 2010 Rogue

- Introduction of new 360° Value Package on S models -

Nissan North America, Inc. (NNA) today announced pricing for the 2010 Nissan Rogue crossover SUV, which is on sale now at Nissan retailers nationwide. The 2010 Nissan Rogue is offered in four high mileage models, each equipped with a standard 170-horsepower 2.5-liter 4-cylinder engine, Nissan's advanced Xtronic CVT™ (Continuously Variable Transmission), Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC), 4-wheel disc brakes with Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) and six air bags.

The Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Prices* (MSRP) are:

Rogue S FWD $20,340 USD
Rogue SL FWD $21,930 USD
Rogue S AWD $21,540 USD
Rogue SL AWD $23,130 USD

For 2010, Rogue S models are available with a new 360° Value Package, which includes 16-inch aluminum-alloy wheels, privacy glass, integrated rearview mirror rearview monitor, auto-dimming rearview mirror, rear spoiler and chrome grille. The 360° Value Package is priced at $1,040, a $1,000 savings compared to purchasing items separately.

About the 2010 Nissan Rogue
The Nissan Rogue crossover SUV continues to satisfy both the functional needs of the buyers and their emotional needs – including the versatility provided by a large 58 cubic feet of cargo space. Again in 2010, Rogue is available in Rogue S and Rogue SL trim levels and with an intuitive All-Wheel Drive system. Rogue SL models include standard 17-inch aluminum-alloy wheels.

Rogue's interior includes a driver-oriented cockpit with available leather-appointed seating surfaces, heated seats and 6-way power driver's seat. Utility is enhanced by numerous convenient storage and ultra-functionality features, including an oversized glove compartment, a large center console and an innovative available rear cargo organizer.

Available technology features include Nissan Intelligent Key™, Bluetooth® Hands-free Phone System, XM® Satellite Radio (XM® subscription required, sold separately) and a powerful Bose®–developed audio system with Nd® Richbass® woofer and MP3 playback.

Rogue also offers a long list of standard safety features, including front seat-mounted side impact supplemental air bags and roof-mounted curtain side impact supplemental air bags with rollover sensor for improved front and rear-seat outboard occupant head protection.

Rogue fuel economy is rated at 22 mpg City/27 mpg Highway for 2-wheel drive models and 21 mpg City/26 mpg Highway for all-wheel drive models.

About Nissan North America
In North America, Nissan's operations include automotive styling, engineering, consumer and corporate financing, sales and marketing, distribution and manufacturing. Nissan is dedicated to improving the environment under the Nissan Green Program 2010, whose key priorities are reducing CO2 emissions, cutting other emissions and increasing recycling. More information on Nissan in North America and the complete line of Nissan and Infiniti vehicles can be found online at www.NissanUSA.com and www.infinitiusa.com.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 29 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      I think that is the easiest on the eyes design in that segment today. Simple. Unadorned. Charming.

      I have not driven one, though.
      • 5 Years Ago
      The base model has only gone up $120 between 2009 and 2010. That's pretty reasonable.

      Last year's price increase of $800? Not so much.
      • 5 Years Ago
      If I needed something in this segment I can maybe get along with the retarded-looking front end of the Rogue, and the interior is okay, but the CVT kills it again. Every time I rent a Nissan and it had one of those I absolutely hate it. Till Nissan makes a real trannie a no- or low-cost option I'll keep their cars off my shopping list.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Right! I hate the CVT,too.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Rather would have an Edge.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Farmboy... I'll be your best friend if you buy me a GranTurismo :D
        • 5 Years Ago
        I think my name might provide evidence of city driving for me. What it comes down to, for me, isn't fuel economy or price, because, trust me, I have a LOT of money for vehicles. (lots of commas). I think the Edge doesn't look as bad as the Rogue. Everyone I know with an Edge (a ton of people) love them, and the Rogue owners I know (a few) are more of, "Eh, It's a people mover."
        • 5 Years Ago
        Edge is in a whole different class. The Escape would be comparable to the Rogue , and I'd rather have the Escape.
      • 5 Years Ago
      With only 57 cubic feet of storage behind the front seats, I'd rather have an Altima or Maxima Sportwagon which would be much less awkard looking. Yeah I know it will never be made.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Looks better than the Honda CR-V.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I'm not sure how $1090 increase over 2 years is reasonable. Ok I wasn't around in the 70's but a Camaro was in the $6000-7000 range right (I've been told)? if over 2 years that car went up $1090, would people say it was reasonable?

      Just sayin'
      • 5 Years Ago
      Still ugly
        • 5 Years Ago
        I agree. But the interior is worse. It looks so dull and boring on the inside. Like you have no self-esteem enough to treat your eyes well at all with a half-decent interior.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I agree with Farmboy. The interior of this thing looks like something of a GM interior circa mid 90's. Cheap looking is an understatement. The Ford Escape while also having a hard plastic interior on the major panels, looks 100x better than this
        • 5 Years Ago
        Agreed, takes just as much money to design a pretty car as it does a foul one.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I agree on the interior too, so depressingly dull and devoid of any type of styling.
        • 5 Years Ago
        It's just so........ugly.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I'm still not a fan of the 'melting look' phenomenon that has struck car design in recent years.
      • 5 Years Ago
      If NVH is as bad as 09, forget it
      • 5 Years Ago
      Check out that interior :x
      • 5 Years Ago
      Much better then a CR-V or Rav-4
      • 5 Years Ago
      This ol mech was attracted to the clean lines of the 09, but rejected because of NVH peculiarities. Todays comments about it being ugly are amazing & explains why some stylists believe that the more chrome & odd angles, the better it will sell. I wish that my 2010 Equinox, w/it's superior ergonomics & performance looked as smooth & clean.
    • Load More Comments