Review: The 2009 Mercedes-Benz G550 makes us feel glücklich

2009 Mercedes-Benz G550 - Click above for high-res image gallery
The Mercedes G550 is an unlikely niche vehicle. As with perhaps every other military-derived civilian 4x4, it's a box on wheels, all straight lines and fender flares. Yet unlike most other military-derived civilian off-roaders, it comes standard with solid axles front and rear, three electronically locking differentials front, center, and rear, and, get this, heated rear seats. Celebs, trendsters, and the generally rich keep it in the public consciousness. When Mercedes decided to kill it, a general uproar caused them to belay the order. It costs $100,250, and has no options. Before we drove it, we didn't know why people dug it. Yet after a week with it in the Autoblog Garage, we think we know why: it is colossally fun.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Mercedes-Benz G550
Photos copyright ©2009 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.
There is little about the Geländewagen that one could call attractive. There are no "lines" of the variety that make aesthetes coo. The fender-mounted turn signals strike us like carbuncles. From the front, the Xenon headlights framed by the chromed bumper guard make it look studious, like a warthog wearing glasses. Without even the rounded lines of the Range Rover – another tall and stupendously upright vehicle – the G550 looks like it is always at attention and will never be at ease. If anything, the attempt at sleek in the rake of the windshield (which does form a nice bodyline that runs all the way to the front wheel arch) only stands out as an absurdity against the perpendicularity of the rest of the vehicle. If we were a product planner looking at the rear of the vehicle, our first question would be, "We're going to sell that? To civilians?"

Still – and we'll be the first to admit that this is this blogger's personal view – the G550 is not unattractive. In fact, it actually seems to transcend the idea of attraction at all; it is simply the ultimate in pragmatism. Crampons aren't beautiful, but they are wonderfully useful. Tubas aren't beautiful, but they can make wonderful noises. A Porsche key fob isn't beautiful, but it can make wonderful events happen on any given night.
Likewise, the G550 isn't exactly beautiful, but it can do wonderful things.
Number one among them: it's nothing but fun to drive.




As soon as we got in, we were all smiles. Why? Because -- and Mercedes might shoot us with a Heckler & Koch for this – the seating position takes us back to being behind the wheel of our favorite old pickup truck. The G550 is bolt upright and close; there's plenty of room, but the cabin isn't spaced out like it is even in current trucks. Everything is a flick away: you roll down the giant windows and slide back the giant sunroof, rest your left elbow on the door, rest your right wrist on the steering wheel, and cruise the streets like an urban cowboy with in a leather-lined chariot with 610 watts of 5.1-channel audio gold pumping out the latest T.I.... or Rhinestone Cowboy, if that's how you roll. We had fun, fun, fun, until Mercedes took the G550 away.
What's wrong with it? Well, technically, nothing, since the G550 is a niche vehicle that sells not even 3,000 units a year. It's like asking 'what's wrong with the Koenigsegg?' If you have the dosh to throw $100,250 at an eight-cylinder brick, then you've got at least four other cars that can check off all the necessary luxury boxes. And that's not including the rides stored at your villa in Mallorca.

But if we must compare, we'll say that the design of the G550 is all over the place. It's best not to think of the G550 as a dated military-derived SUV but as a dated military vehicle with some consumer concessions. It's silly tall, but the door handles are way down low. It has a giant windshield, but tiny windshield wipers, like the arms on a Tyrannosaurus Rex. If you want to hear the sound of small-caliber gunshots, close the doors; it's an undamped explosion of metal-on-metal. Mercedes' typical Rube Goldberg multiple cupholder contraptions are replaced by a single cupholder and a bunch of netting elsewhere.
Other than the windshield, the vehicle is utterly vertical and this leads to a woeful degree of reflections. Given the cover of night to play with, light bounces so freely around the cabin that when we had our Blackberry in the center console behind the gearshift, buried deep between the front seats, we were distracted by the flashing light of the phone on the driver's side window because it was bouncing off the windshield.

None of that matters, however, and for the same reason that you don't nitpick the foibles in a K10 Chevrolet Blazer or an International Harvester Scout: it's a hoot to drive. The steering wheel is meaty and the steering is direct enough, even at highway speeds. The 5.5-liter V8 has gumption aplenty: 382-horsepower and 391 lb-ft of torque – this is a 5,510-pound vehicle that can lope to 60 mph in six seconds. The seven-speed auto kicks down quickly, and a massive lump of torque is available from just 1,000 rpm which keeps hunting and lugging in check. The suspension compromise – on-road civility forced to share a bunk with massive off-road prowess – is just as refined as you'd get on the Land Rover Range Rover or Lexus LX570. We wouldn't recommend an autocross, but the G-Wagen will take the occasionally surprising highway curve at speeds that get your attention and the attention of the people in the next lane.




And when you're finished with all that practicality, there's the backup camera (black & white, though) and reversing radar, the heated windshield, the heated and cooled front seats, the heated rear bench with two settings and a ton of room in the back for what doesn't appear to be a large vehicle, the iPod integration, the COMAND control system, 12-volt outlets everywhere, and all that Mercedes-ness. And there's that Harmon/Kardon stereo assisted by the fact that the G550 is nothing less than a big sound box.
We didn't get a chance to take the G550 off-road, but with proper four-wheel-drive and a 30-year pedigree of German military service we'd be given to thinking it can do the business. YouTube videos seem to point in that direction. However, we do hope to correct the omission ourselves, perhaps with a trip to Bolivia... or the center of the Earth. Stay tuned.

If, for some reason, you "need" more, step up to the G55 AMG. With 500 horsepower and 515 lb-ft, it shaves 0.6-seconds off the run to 60 mph. That's about the only difference, and it will cost you $19,000, but again, if you're hunting this kind of game, the last thing you're worried about is having to bring a little more ammo.
But for the "rest" of you, the G550 should be a thoroughly satisfying. Buckets of fun and go anywhere goodness, it is also the only way we can think of to channel Johnny Paycheck, the plutocrat, and the Pope all at one time. And if that's not worth $100K, then what is?
Gallery: Review: 2009 Mercedes-Benz G550
Photos copyright ©2009 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Sam 12:10PM (8/05/2009)
When the buzz wears off, how about a GLK 350 review for us mear peons?
Reply
MemphisNET 12:28PM (8/05/2009)
Agreed. I've never been a fan of Merc trucks/SUV's, but the GLK is definately pulling me in. Pretty reasonable entry price as well - even in Canuck-Bucks.
Quantumphysics 12:36PM (8/05/2009)
The G looked good to me years ago when its interior looked fresh and techy, but now, its just another car with the OLD s-class interior.
I'd rather drive a Toyota Venza.
axlewood 1:53PM (8/05/2009)
^^^ i think you might be the first person to choose a toyota over a benz.
the4thheat 4:03PM (8/05/2009)
I'd probably choose the Venza over the G-wagon as well as far as actually buying it goes. Like Chris Rock used to say about why he bought an Altima over a Bentley-they're both cars but he's got an extra $250,000 in his wallet.
Now if they were both free I might take the G550, but I'd probably just sell it, buy something less over the top and pocket the change. Whenever I see one of these around it just looks so ridiculous on the road, and the driver is usually driving it like such a d-bag that it makes me want to punch them in the face.
For this kinda money if I actually wanted the capabilities I'd just go buy a Wrangler along with a decent luxury sedan instead of driving this thing on the road. Somehow it's not even just the cost, since the cars like Land Rovers and Land Cruisers don't really give off the same vibe of ridiculousness, but maybe it's just because every G-wagon driver I've seen have been awful drivers who think they're king of the road because they bought a $100K SUV.
Seriously if I could get either the Venza or this monstrosity for free but wasn't able to sell either of them and would be forced to actually drive them around for the rest of my life I'd pick the Venza. First, because I don't really feel like getting shot while driving through the east side of town. Second, because I still have to pay for gas even if the cars are free. But most of all I don't want everyone thinking I'm a d-bag, especially since I'd never take it off roading (no trails here and frankly I don't wanna pay for crazy expensive body damage).
I think sometimes dream cars are really better off left dreams. We'd all like to own that Ferrari but actually trying to daily drive it mostly involves paying like $300 a week for gas, tows to the dealer, and hilarious engine fires.
nastinupe 9:36PM (8/06/2009)
Note to the author... if you're going to start making us do math to figure out 0-60 times (One of my pet peeves of automotive journalism), please make sure that we are actually able to do the math, a la, give us a number to subtract from in the first place. Simply saying "subtract 0.6 seconds off of..." without giving us a number to subtract from is useless.
Which is why I hate that trend in the first place. I mean, who's idea was it to make so benign comment like that when you know that you just wrote a 5 page article that has 3 pages of rim/ tire advertisements between them. So now I have to go back and search for the exact spot you previously mentioned the 0-60 time or 1/4 mile time or whatever. It's quite frustrating if you ask me.
Not THAT Matt 10:41AM (8/07/2009)
"I'd rather drive a Toyota Venza."
You clueless idiot.
Not THAT Matt 10:43AM (8/07/2009)
nastinupe,
Earlier in the review, it was mentioned the non-AMG version of the G550 did 0-60 in six seconds.
So 6 - .6 = 5.4
Eddie 12:10PM (8/05/2009)
Great review. The G-Class is my favorite car/suv in the world. It makes no sense, but for some reason I really want one. I hope Mercedes never stops building these.
Reply
Aloysius Vampa 12:28PM (8/05/2009)
I agree.
Ligor 12:29PM (8/05/2009)
+1
and for those of us w/o that kind of coin the 4-door Wrangler may be the next best thing
it woudl be rough and such but I just want to have one in my garage just in case an end of the world even occurs
Josh 3:24PM (8/05/2009)
I agree, it has some kind of strange irresistible appeal to me. I love surprising people by telling them that it cost $100,000 and seeing their faces change :).
hoov23 7:53PM (8/05/2009)
Last year one of our buyers picked up a new 2008 G500 at auction, and when I saw him pull up I was in stitches, pummeling the stoic and silent G with insults about the ridiculous styling, useless military prowess, and general pointlessness of the car. Then I opened the door and noticed the familiar old-Rolls vault-like feel, sat in the plush but perfectly supportive-seat, fired it up, and took it for one hell of a surprising drive. I felt like an idiot, who would forever desire a G-wagen of my own. Long live the Gelaendewagen!
fixitfixitstop 12:10PM (8/05/2009)
The G is the only Benz I want.
Reply
TimO 2:18PM (8/06/2009)
+1
IK 12:12PM (8/05/2009)
I'm sure the supercharged engine's performance shows more at highway speeds
I'd get one these armored from MB's Guard program, complete with gun-ports and emergency air supply .
:D
Reply
Patliean1 12:18PM (8/05/2009)
Ha Ha you said Heckler & Koch. That was awesome.
Reply
zamafir 12:18PM (8/05/2009)
"What's wrong with it? Well, technically, nothing, since the G550 is a niche vehicle that sells not even 3,000 units a year. It's like asking 'what's wrong with the Koenigsegg?"
While I'm thankful for the review and really appreciate the enthusiasm that's pretty BS coming from an automotive journalist. What's next? The R32's perfect because it only old 5,000 units? Where's the magic limit for the 'limited release = perfect' rule? And conflating the G550 with the koenigsegg, there’s a bit of a stretch, unless I missed all the fanfare the last few years and Koenigsegg’s finding a way to produce a staggering 3,000 examples of their cars a year.
Great review, but watch the fluf. Clarkson gets away with most of this kinda cute stuff because it makes sense. The logic above doesn't, in either direction.
Reply
akboss302 12:40PM (8/05/2009)
I think it was a little bit of a political stab, as in if everybody drove one of these our icebergs would be liquid within the month and everybody would be scared to drive a 'normal car' for fear of being run down by a luxury tank. I'm not sure, but that's what I pulled out of the comment...
zamafir 12:45PM (8/05/2009)
Yeah, I get where he's going, limited production, you know what you're getting into, no options. trouble is, the R32's the same way in terms of concept. 5,000 sold. one option. and it's not flawless. I've driven the G class, my realtor had one and was kind enough to oblige, and it's not perfect, just as the LRs aren't perfect. Wonderful cars, but limited production doesn't exempt them from typical scrutiny. We see how many people quibble about the veyron.
Actually you may be onto something, if the intent is to mach the owners to a degree, who mostly purchase it as a status symbol, then I stand corrected.