Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX charts a new course for thick part of the market

2010 Cadillac SRX – Click above for high-res image gallery
The first generation Cadillac SRX brought General Motors' premium brand into the crossover segment, providing better fuel economy compared to similarly sized SUVs while also delivering significantly improved driving dynamics. We bought into that first-generation, rear-wheel-drive SRX when we reviewed it way back in 2007, but the luxury car-buying public apparently wasn't all that interested. Sales of the sharp handling SRX never took off, largely keeping Cadillac off of the luxury crossover gravy train long dominated by the Lexus RX 350.
Cadillac hopes to change its crossover fortunes with the introduction of the all-new 2010 SRX. This time out, the SRX is very different from the one it replaces, with a fundamental shift from a rear-wheel drive platform (with available all-wheel drive) to a front-drive setup (also with available AWD). Along with that shift in powered wheels, the 2010 model goes with smaller, more efficient powertrains. Cadillac doesn't try to hide the fact that the new SRX is gunning for the RX, but GM's designers and engineers didn't want to simply copy the strong-selling Lexus. Cadillac wanted its crossover to be more expressive inside and out, with state-of-the-art tech and superior driving dynamics. Does the new SRX have what it takes?
Follow the jump to find out.
Gallery: Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Photos Copyright ©2009 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
Cadillac has already won a big battle with the Lexus in undercutting its entry price by some $3,500. The SRX starts at $34,115 while the base RX comes in at a more sobering $37,675 with delivery. Optioned out, though, the two vehicles come closer in price. Our Radiant Silver 2010 SRX tester came equipped with Cadillac's mid-level Performance Collection, which carries an MSRP of $45,820 including destination charges.

Among the option boxes ticked for our tester were all-wheel drive, 20-inch alloys, a navigation system and a moonroof. Our tester also came equipped with the standard 265 horsepower, direct-injected 3.0-liter V6 engine mated to a six speed automatic transmission. An uplevel, turbocharged 2.8-liter V6 capable of 300 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque will be available this Fall.
One common complaint about the outgoing SRX is that its styling was both startling and stale. The wreath-and-crest brand applied its "Art and Science" design aesthetic to the crossover body style, which resulted in acres of flat sheetmetal and creases sharp enough to cut cheese. While we didn't mind that car's styling, some accused it of looking more like a tall wagon than a conventional crossover, and prevailing thought has it that lower-to-the-ground aesthetic harmed sales. Thus, Cadillac designers have changed all that in a big way, giving the model more traditional upright proportions with dimensions very similar to that of the benchmark Lexus.




With less interior volume than its predecessor, the SRX has lost its third row of seats, but since those were only suitable for small children, we're guessing the empty nesters and young professionals that Cadillac is targeting won't miss them.
To bring the design of the SRX closer to the rest of the Cadillac family, designers have incorporated the next generation of the aformentioned Art & Science design cues. An in-your-face grille punctuated by a big badge resting between two huge, uniquely-shaped HID headlights give the front end a look that is unmistakably Cadillac. An elegant, sweeping roofline and a wide stance with a muscular looking beltline lend the SRX a suitably sporting appearance. Team Cadillac punctuated the SRX with long, vertical taillights that have long been a trademark design element for the brand.

Cadillac is hoping that luxury crossover buyers looking for brash, no-excuses exterior styling will find the SRX well suited to their wants, and it passes the Autoblog eye exam. But to seal the deal, the SRX needs to flat-out nail the interior test. Once inside the SRX, all eyes are drawn to the cabin's impressive center stack. With a jewel-like analog clock, high-end materials and the massive (and we mean truly huge) retractable nav screen in our tester, it's hard not to stare.
The seats are supportive and generous in size, the dual stitched dash is soft and pliable to the touch, and the thick, leather-stitched steering wheel is a joy to hold. We also found that the wheel's control buttons were easy to use, which is important considering all the tech and features at the driver's finger tips. Cadillac has also taken great pains to keep noise out of the cabin, and we were able to hold a conversation with passengers in the rear seats without raising our voices. And if you must have a moonroof, the SRX has got a good one. The large expanse of overhead glass was a topic of conversation for all who entered the SRX, as its absolutely huge dimensions gives occupants an unencumbered view of the world above them.




When we first began driving the new SRX, we weren't sure if we liked the fact that the navigation screen was of the pop-up variety (like that of the CTS), but after some time with the system, we were sold. When not in use, the nav screen stays tucked away, and when it was time to find something, the system came alive with the touch of a button. And using the system is a piece of cake, although some among us still prefer the ease of use of On-Star's turn-by-turn directions. Why punch in coordinates while the car is in Park when you can have someone else do it for you while you're already on the road? Luckily for Cadillac owners, with the SRX, you can do both. We also liked the fact that the stowed nav system would pop up whenever we shifted into Reverse so that we could make use of the backup camera, and when we put the shifter in Drive, it tucked itself back inside the dash.
Our favorite feature inside the new SRX was easily the customizable display built into the instrument panel. Not only does it look great as the centerpiece gauge, it's also packed with info. The nifty little readout shows everything from instant miles-per-gallon to trip mileage, just like most other systems on the market – but Cadillac's system can assist with turn-by-turn navigation directions and tell you how many of your kids in the back seat have their seatbelts on.

Our lone complaint about the SRX's interior is that we've sat in more comfortable seats with better bolstering in other vehicles that occupy the same price range, and this CUV's leather seating surfaces were merely adequate in quality. The competition from Audi, BMW and Lexus are a bit ahead of Cadillac in this regard. We would have also liked cooled seats, but that option is available for buyers willing to opt up for the Luxury package.
To give the new SRX improved fuel economy while also providing class competitive power, GM opted for a new direct-inject 3.0-liter V6 engine that produces 265 hp and 223 lb-ft of torque on regular fuel. Cadillac engineers tell us that direct injection has improved fuel economy by 3 percent while also boosting power by up to 8 percent. The front-wheel-drive SRX carries an EPA estimate of 18 mpg city and 25 mpg highway, while the all-wheel-drive model is rated at 17/23. We averaged 20.1 mpg in combined driving during our time with the all-wheel drive SRX.




Three liters is a smaller displacement than most engines in the same class as the SRX, yet the GM motor still looks good on paper. Our fully equipped AWD tester, however, weighs in around 4,400 lbs, which is an awful lot of mass to motivate. Delicate gearing finessed for the best possible fuel economy combined with a slow initial throttle response makes the SRX feel more sluggish off the line than its spec sheet would suggest, so buyers interested in higher performance may want to wait for the more powerful engine that will be available in the Fall. The six-speed automatic transmission is very smooth, and in manual mode, it will hold gears all the way to redline. This at least allows you to wring as much power out of the motor as your fingers please.
The SRX uses a unique platform that combines bits and pieces from the Theta platform that also underpins the Chevrolet Equinox and the Epsilon II platform that sits beneath the 2010 Buick LaCrosse. Company officials insists that it mainly uses components found on no other GM vehicle. The FE3 suspension package on our Performance Collection tester was more than willing to tussle with twists and turns, and when diving into a corner, the SRX exhibited very little body roll, even when pushed hard. To give drivers better communication with the road, Cadillac engineers have ditched the electronic steering and instead opted for a hydraulic unit that could be better tuned to suit the new crossover's needs. The result is steering that's nicely weighted and well balanced for both leisurely driving and the occasional switchback.


On dry pavement, the new torque-vectoring all-wheel-drive system will help hold the road under forces that would otherwise bring tire squeals and massive understeer to a FWD-only vehicle. When the weather takes a turn for the worse, the system provides drivers with a capable safety net. About three hours after we picked up the SRX for a long weekend, the skies opened up and it rained hard for several hours. The AWD system in the new SRX cut through the wet pavement without a hint of wheel slip, which is not surprising considering the system is capable of shifting 100 percent of available torque to the front or rear wheels at any time. That's pretty common with most AWD systems, but the SRX's Haldex-sourced unit can also shift up to 85 percent of its thrust from side to side. The fruit of the system's labor is peace of mind for the driver, even though it is so seamless that you'll likely never know when it's working.
Cadillac needed to make a real statement with the new SRX in order to steal attention from the perennial best-selling Lexus RX, and the division's designers and engineers have responded with a beautiful cabin and styling that commands attention. The SRX sold us with a driving experience that makes you forget you're behind the wheel of a crossover, and it also delivers excellent utility and top-notch creature comforts that customers in this segment demand. After a few days behind the wheel of the SRX, we're convinced that Cadillac may finally have the goods to go toe-to-toe against Lexus' all-powerful RX. While a more powerful engine and aggressive throttle tuning is required to reach the front of the pack, the 2010 Cadillac SRX still comes highly recommended.
Gallery: Review: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Photos Copyright ©2009 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
| 2010 Cadillac SRX | ||||
| Performance | Brakes/Tires/Wheels | |||
| Engine | 3.0-liter V6 | Front Brakes | 13.6-inch, two-piston caliper (ABS) | |
| Configuration/Valvetrain | DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder | Rear Brakes | 12.4-inches, single-piston caliper | |
| Max Horsepower @ RPM | 265 hp @ 6,950 RPM | Wheels (front) | 20-inches | |
| Max Torque @ RPM | 223 lb-ft @ 5,100 RPM | Wheels (rear) | 20-inches | |
| Drive Type | All-wheel drive | Tires (front) | 235/55 R20 | |
| Transmission | Six-speed Automatic | Tires (rear) | 235/55 R20 | |
| Fuel Injection | Direct Injection | |||
| Compression Ratio | 11.7:1 | Exterior Dimensions | ||
| Recommended Fuel | 87 octane | Length | 190.3 inches | |
| Fuel Capacity | 21 gallons | Width | 75.2 inches | |
| EPA Fuel Economy (city/hwy) | 17 / 23 mpg | Height | 65.7 inches | |
| 0-60 mph time (MFR est.) | Not Available | Wheelbase | 110.5 inches | |
| Top Speed | Not Available | Curb Weight | 4,307 pounds | |
| Suspension/Steering | Interior Dimensions | |||
| Front | Independent, strut-type, anti-roll bar | Maximum Seating | 5 | |
| Rear | Linked H-arm, anti-roll bar | Luggage Capacity | 29.2 cu-ft | |
| Steering | Hydraulic-power-assist rack-and-pinion | Head Room (Front/Rear) | 39.7 / 38.4 inches | |
| Turns Lock-to-Lock | 2.84 | Shoulder Room (Front/Rear) | 58.3 / 56.2 inches | |
| Turning Circle (feet) | 40.3 | Leg Room (Front/Rear) | 41.2 / 36.3 inches | |













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)
Nick 12:06PM (7/08/2009)
Nice Traverse! We'll never learn a lesson will we GM?
Reply
greg.slowik 12:12PM (7/08/2009)
I guess Nick never learned about the Traverse before posting ...did he?
drmoomoo 12:16PM (7/08/2009)
It's an Equinox, son. Stop surfing Autoblog and pay attention in class.
zamafir 12:17PM (7/08/2009)
Hmm. You don't think it looks a LOT better than the Traverse?
Flamespoke 12:22PM (7/08/2009)
Actually this car doesn't share its platform with the Chevy Traverse nor the 3.0 liter V6. It more in line with the Equinox and the Vue. Fitting considering this is an entry luxury Crossover.
Tikki 12:27PM (7/08/2009)
actually this car uses very little of the equinox platform. Though some of its looks could be similar the vehicle itself if much different. I think Cadillac has hit a high note with this car its much more appealing than the past model. My only gripe is that I dont think it needed the side air intake, it should have been clean.
why not the LS2LS7? 12:28PM (7/08/2009)
I actually love the egg-look of the Traverse and the angle look of this vehicle. Others, like the Equinox or any of the recent GMCs I don't like much at all.
blogee9 12:29PM (7/08/2009)
"The SRX uses a UNIQUE PLATFORM that combines bits and pieces from the Theta platform that also underpins the Chevrolet Equinox and the Epsilon II platform that sits beneath the 2010 Buick LaCrosse. Company officials insists that it mainly uses components found on no other GM vehicle."
Sounds like it's a lot more than just a badge engineering.
"The FE3 suspension package on our Performance Collection tester was more than willing to tussle with twists and turns, and when diving into a corner, the SRX exhibited very little body roll, even when pushed hard."
I don't think you can say that for Equinox...
alex 12:31PM (7/08/2009)
Way to show you know nothing about GM vehicles. If there's a CUV that the SRX bares any resemblence to (whether it be regarding the looks or mechanics) it is NOT the Traverse.
sunz 12:37PM (7/08/2009)
You guys can argue all you want that it uses different parts etc etc. but they look the same and as dumb as the general public might be, that is how they will be perceived. People do it now when they see the GMC and Chevy Traverse or whatever they are called. It is a confusing and stupid practice that has landed failure after failure for vehicles. Those vehicle that are on the same trim level as each other have a better chance but to call a dressed up Chevy a luxury car is not going to work. At least not for people such as myself. I'll go back to the Germans. I love my S4 and when i upgrade i can stick with the brand instead of going Cadillac. I am severely hoping that i can go to Cadillac .. but badged re-engineered cars do not appeal to people who are not just "label whores". Just because it says Cadillac doesn't make it better than a Chevy. It actually has to be BETTER.
why not the LS2LS7? 12:51PM (7/08/2009)
sunz, you begin by arguing that even if it is better, it will be perceived as no better. Then you close by saying (with no info to back it) that it actually isn't better.
Do you have an actual argument here?
Also, I don't think the Traverse looks like any GMC. It's the Equinox and Acadia that look so similar I think.
inline6 12:51PM (7/08/2009)
sunz,
You sorta suck at logic on this one.
The SRX and the Equinox/Terrain look nothing alike, other than they're two-box tall wagons. They share different wheelbases, overall lengths, tracks, interiors, etc.
Seriously, if you're not trolling, take a look:
Chevrolet Equinox:
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/MediaNav/make=chevrolet/model=equinox/year=2010/photoId=20273564/firstNav=Gallery?control=true
GMC Terrain:
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/MediaNav/make=gmc/model=terrain/year=2010/photoId=20276103/firstNav=Gallery?control=true
Cadillac SRX:
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpcontainers/do/MediaNav/year=2010/make=cadillac/model=srx/firstNav=Gallery/photoId=20242621?control=true
How you can say these look any more alike than the Honda Pilot/Acura MDX do, or the Toyota Highlander/Lexus RX350 do, or the Volvo XC60/Mazda CX-7 do is beyond me.
Jim 12:54PM (7/08/2009)
@sunz
"I'll go back to the Germans."
ah,yes, the Germans. The same Germans who gave us a badge-engineered Touareg and called it a Cayenne?
inline6 12:56PM (7/08/2009)
LS2LS7,
I am amazed by the massive amount of confusion people have about which vehicles are on which platforms.
The Equinox and Acadia are on different platforms...the Equinox is a size smaller, on the Theta, while the Acadia is huge and sits on the Lambda.
And they have totally different styles.
why not the LS2LS7? 1:02PM (7/08/2009)
Yes inline6. But you are making a wrong assumption here. My error is not knowing the platforms apart. It is that I don't know the name of any GMC because I find them all hideous. So it wasn't that I think the Acadia is on the same platform as the Equinox, instead I mistakenly thought the Terrain was named the Acadia.
Your post used pictures and was a lot smarter way to explain all this.
sunz 1:02PM (7/08/2009)
I'm defininately not trolling,
Sorry if you think so. I don't comment very often and trust me i'm a true CAdillac fan when it comes to the CTS and XLR and to some extend the soon to be discontinued STS.
I've just posted two side by side images of the vehicles (SRX and Equinox). I'll also said they are not carbon copies. But you look at successful "re-badges" ie the accord and the TL. then you look at unsuccessful rebadges (i think Toyota tried it with their Landcruiser and Lexus branded version - not 100percent sure). Hell Cadillac successfully rebadged the Escalade from its other GM siblings.
side by side: http://www.sunznet.com/gm.htm
which of those successful and unsuccessful rebadges do you think those images are closest too. Imagine a Cadillac in Camaro Guise would you buy it? If so then hey i'm wrong. but i know that i wouldn't.
As i said before i am definitely not trolling I'm simply offering my perspective.
Jei 1:05PM (7/08/2009)
Wow. Sunz thinks the SRX looks similar to the Traverse....which is wrong.
The SRX & Traverse are two different sized SUVs; the Traverse being larger. The SRX & Equinox share on the most basic platform hardware. Additional suspension & platform parts have been added to the SRX & 9-4x architecture for more supple & performance-like characteristics.
But there's no such conspiracy. SRX & Traverse are quite different vehicles.
sunz 1:13PM (7/08/2009)
Jim,
The tourag and the Cayanne do not look the same. Now mention the Tourag and the Audi SUV and you may have an argument. (Just maybe).
But im seriously not here to argue with you guys. I definitely won't insult any of you. Just offering my opinion and you know what they say .. opinions are like ______, everyone got one.
-sun
sunz 1:13PM (7/08/2009)
Jei,
I never said the SRX and Traverse looked the same. I posted pics of the equinox and SRX. The only time i mentioned Traverse was when i was comparing it to its GMC sibling, the name of which i do not know.
-sun
why not the LS2LS7? 1:22PM (7/08/2009)
sunz:
The Touareg and Cayenne look similar from the rear, IMHO. They don't look similar from the front because of the stupid Cayenne fish mouth.
But that's beside the point. Try to write off the Routan, I dare ya. No company is above platform sharing. And sometimes companies (all of them) use it in ways that probably aren't very smart.