Review: 2010 Roush 427R raises bar for Mustang tuners
2010 Roush 427R – Click above for high-res image gallery
During both our first drive and in our full review, we concluded that the 2010 Ford Mustang has raised the bar for modern day pony cars. The sculpted body, finely tuned suspension, higher quality interior and additional horsepower make it one of the best Stangs to ever come from the Blue Oval's stable. With a flood of aftermarket variants sure to come, we couldn't help but wonder if the new Mustang would provide an even better platform to work with, or if tuners might struggle to improve on an already excellent product. We now have the answer.
Roush, who were given inside access to the 2010 Mustang by Ford for their own product development, were first to market with their 427R Mustang that was unveiled back in March. We were lucky enough to be one of the first to get behind the wheel, and recently spent a full week with the 427R. Was Roush able to use their five years of experience with the S197 platform to capitalize on the upgrades and refinements made available in the 2010 Mustang? Read on to find out.
Gallery: Review: 2010 Roush 427R
Photos copyright ©2009 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.
When Roush Mustangs come to mind, we think of aggressive, edgy styling. Since the late '90s, Mustangs coming from the Livonia, MI assembly plant have had a distinctive look that we could spot from a mile away. That's why we were so surprised when the wraps came off the 2010 427R. Instead of the boy racer Mustang we were expecting, a fairly subtle pony car sat in its place. We had to do a double take to see if Roush had even added a body kit, as the overall profile is so close to a stock Mustang.

We were also somewhat disappointed by the lack of any significant horsepower increase compared to the previous 427R. Not that 435 horsepower is anything to scoff at, but it's the same as the 427R Trak Pak we tested last summer. We also had our doubts. Could Roush improve on the performance of the suspension without rendering it too harsh? How much would they actually be able to improve the interior?


With those expectations, we took delivery of a brand new 2010 Roush 427R. To our complete surprise, it took only a few minutes for us to completely fall in love with the car. You could say it was a case of love at first sound. The Roush exhaust system completely transforms the character of the Mustang from a pony car to a mean, snarling muscle car. The exhaust sounds fantastic doing just about anything – idling, cruising, downshifting, and, of course, at full throttle. Even while slowing to a stop, the tailpipes emitted a wonderful rumble and burble. A quick visit to the Roush web site revealed that the exhaust system is actually an option and not standard on the 427R, but to us it would be mandatory. Since Roush also sells their parts individually, the exhaust is also available for regular Mustangs. If you've recently purchased a 2010 Mustang GT, go buy the Roush exhaust. No seriously, do it right now. It's worth every penny.

That's not to say the exhaust is the only part of the car we loved. While the standard 2010 Mustang is significantly down on power compared to the Camaro SS and Challenger R/T, Roush has made sure that owners of the 427R won't need to shy away in a meeting of the musclecars. A roots style supercharger has been added atop the Mustang's 4.6-liter V8, boosting horsepower to 435 horsepower and 400 lb-ft torque that helps to enforce our fondness for this fortified Mustang.
Yes, it's the same rating as the 2009 Roush lineup, but we were reminded that Mustang does far more with its horsepower than either the Camaro or Challenger. The 427R pulls strong and hard from any rpm, with a torque curve flatter than Kansas. We had the chance to strap the Roush to a dyno, and the results more than confirmed that the supercharged V8 was putting out as advertised. The 400 horsepower and nearly 370 lb-ft torque at the rear wheels easily cover a 15% driveline loss and indicate Roush is probably underrating the 427R's motor.




Compared to the previous generation 427R, the engine bay has also been reworked to be more efficient and provide a more OEM look with higher quality materials. The intake tube, which previously wrapped around to the left side of the motor, now has a direct shot to the throttle body to provide optimum air flow. The intercooler reservoir is double the size, and the radiator has been upgraded to provide more efficient cooling.
While we initially had doubts that Roush could do any significant improvements to the Mustang's suspension, we needn't have worried. Roush engineers literally spent tens of thousands of hours on both the street and track to come up with what they believe is the best compromise between comfort and performance, and after a week in the car we can confirm that they did an excellent job of taking the Mustang's handling to the next level.

The setup is stiffer than Ford could get away with on a production Mustang targeted towards the general consumer, but not enough to make the ride harsh or uncomfortable. Thanks to new front struts, rear shocks and springs, beefier front and rear sway bars, and a wheel hop reduction kit, the 427R has virtually no body roll, the steering has a nice weight and feel, and turn-in is quick and accurate. We made sure to spend time on some of Southern California's best driving roads, and couldn't find a stretch of payment that the Roush couldn't handle with ease.


Our test car was also fitted with the Roush big brake upgrade, which includes front 14-inch slotted rotors and 4-piston calipers. It's definitely not a cheap option at over $2,800, but we think it's a necessity for Mustangs with this amount of horsepower. A few years ago we drove a previous generation 427R with the stock brakes and felt uncomfortable in their capability of consistently bringing the car quickly to a stop. We'd recommend checking this on the option list more out of necessity than anything.


That brings us to the exterior. The 2010 Mustang provides a much more difficult canvas on which to work than previous models, with more creases, curves and angles to deal with than before. While we're still not completely sold on the design, we have to admit that it grew on us by the end of the week. It's easier to notice and appreciate the exterior details in person, like the front chin spoiler and the diffuser-style rear fascia, and the 427R now comes off as a more 'grown up' Roush than the previous generation. We especially like the rear spoiler, which gives some additional length to the rear end and somehow makes the taillights look good on the car.
One thing we still don't get is the front fascia and the addition of extra driving lights. The Mustang already has four lights – the main headlights and the auxiliary driving lights in the grille, so we don't know why it needs two more. We're guessing that Roush has future plans to offer a plain billet grille like on the previous generation, in which case we would probably like the look more.

One of our favorite features of the 2010 Mustang was its new interior, with a redesigned instrument panel and soft-touch plastics. Because of this Roush didn't feel the need to change too much. In fact, the only standard interior upgrades on the Roush are embroidered Roush floor mats and a billet aluminum shift knob. Our test car was also fitted with white faces gauges ($320), sport leather/Alcantara seating ($1,725), a vent pod with boost gauge ($435), illuminated door sill plates ($220), and a short throw shifter with black ball knob ($410). Each of the upgrades was a nice touch, but the shifter was the only option that we felt was a 'must have'. Not only does it look awesome, but it provides more direct and accurate gear changes and makes shifting a pure joy.
If there is any downside, it's the price. Our test car came in at a whopping $22,338 over the base price of a 2010 Mustang GT, adding over 2/3 to the price. Roush did the best job they could to keep pricing down, including reducing the cost of the base components by over $1,400 and working to get the $1,000 gas tax removed, but there is still a price increase from 2009 due to the nearly $3,000 additional cost for the Mustang GT Premium model that is used as a base for the 427R.

Still, if you order the car with only the essentials options – the exhaust, shifter, and big brakes – you can limit the damage to just $18,153, putting the price right at about $50,000 and in the same range as a GT500. Which one should you pick? Well, decide what you like better: driving in a straight line or around turns. If it's the former, go with the Shelby, and if it's the latter then pony up the cash for the Roush.
So did Roush come through with their latest offering? You bet. Just like Ford exceeded our expectations and quelled our doubts about the 2010 Mustang, Roush has done the same with the 2010 427R. It's fairly easy to gauge how much we like a car based on how tough it is to give it back at the end of the week, and all we could think about as we handed back the keys is how we were going to miss the sound of the exhaust, the feel of the shifter, the pull of the supercharged V8, and rush of tackling tight corners with the superb suspension. Maybe we can convince them to loan it to us again for another week...
Gallery: Review: 2010 Roush 427R
Photos copyright ©2009 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.










Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Kumail 12:11PM (6/12/2009)
You guys have some of the best reviews out there. I like how you guys put real world stuff into the reviews, nicely done.
Also loving the cars you guys are getting, you guys are moving up in the world, nicely done.
Reply
Matt 12:49PM (6/12/2009)
I think the Autoblog reviews are decent enough, but with no real-world or instrumented testing numbers, they'll always be at the back of the pack compared to Edmunds and the print pubs.
Kumail 12:54PM (6/12/2009)
But those numbers are available everywhere, C&D, Insideline, MotorTrend, Automobile Mag, etc.
inteller 4:15PM (6/12/2009)
raise the bar? no it just raises the price tag.
Kimura 10:14PM (6/21/2009)
I agree, I like how their reviews are fair and don't reek of bias. I also appreciate how the reviews don't sink to the level of say, edmunds, who try to be funny and come off as annoying.
BoxerFanatic 12:14PM (6/12/2009)
The front end of that car looks better than the stock '10 GT.
It still needs body color grille sides between the grille and the headlights.
Those headlights are also begging for the horizontal strakes through the headlights, like the Parnelli Jones and other pre-'10 mustangs had as a applique.
The '10 headlights have the split in-headlight turn signals, a strike through right at that point, and across the bulb-sheild for the headlight...
I still don't like the rear part of the car. the slanted backward tail light panel, and the odd shaped tail lights just don't do as well as the previous generation even did.
At least the front bumper cover and airdam is an improvement over stock.
Reply
Farris 12:21PM (6/12/2009)
I LOVE the front end of this car. Honestly, I don't like the body color grille-sides or the horizontal lines through the headlights. Different strokes, I guess.
I do agree on the tail end of the car though. Something about it doesn't look right, and I don't like it.
Dustin 12:29PM (6/12/2009)
The front end is still lacking some detail I can't put my finger on, but I agree the Roush is better than standard. And I will add that the additional fascia driving lights are probably a nod to the lower facia-mounted turn signal lights on the original Mustangs. Just a thought.
Christian de Saint Preux 12:18PM (6/12/2009)
Car looks really good... and coming from a GM/Corvette Fan that is saying a lot to the mustang... Now... Here is my question... Is it that Ford's engines only produce HP with a supercharger on it? Why call a 427 an engine that doesn't have 427CID? Make a 427 and let's see what a Ford powerplant has to offer!
Reply
arturo 12:56PM (6/12/2009)
I think its because it has close 427 horses even though it has more, but just like the GT500 that now has 540 horses it would still be OK to call it 427. That's my take on this. An If in my Fresno,Ca town there was a track I would take the Roush, but since there is none the GT500 would be the car to get. I cannot afford neither at this time anyways just a thought.
Franz 12:28PM (6/12/2009)
Nice, but I'd like it a little more subtle... no chrome wheels or blue graphics for me. In any event though, at this price I'd rather get a Shelby GT500.
Reply
Motor_Yakuza 12:30PM (6/12/2009)
This 'stang it a pretty sweet car.
Reply
Jared 12:31PM (6/12/2009)
Another ugly $50k+ special edition or tuner Mustang. Meh.
Reply
Matt 8:29PM (6/12/2009)
Yeah...but at least Roush makes the car perform like it should...rather than the pig of a car we get from Ford.
The only Mustang worth paying actual money for, is a Roush Mustang. The factory cars are just junk. 70's looking exteriors and cheap interiors.
KT 12:06AM (6/13/2009)
The Mustang won the comparo with the Camaro SS and Challenger R/T in the latest issue of C/D. Both of those losers had more power than the Mustang and IRS. But the Mustang was the winner. It's best of the american muscle available today. So eat it.
It would be cheaper to get a stock GT and add a Vortech, Whipple or Kenne Bell and maybe the exhaust and have money left over.
Dustin 12:36PM (6/12/2009)
Couldn't you guys take ONE picture of the car with its headlights off? Just asking. (No the dyno one does not suffice).
Reply
Steve_S 12:41PM (6/12/2009)
So 100hp down on a GT500 but in a similar price range (not including "market Adjustment"). Thinking they will have a hard time selling alot of these (certain parts for GT's like the exhaust sure) when you can get more power from the factory with warranty in tact.
Reply
Joe 1:03PM (6/12/2009)
Roush cars come with a full factory warranty, IIRC. Also, this and the GT500 really are different beasts. As the last paragraph sums up, the GT500 really is more of a straight line racer, and is more targeted at the guys that have the money, but never put the car on the track. The Roush Mustangs have always had much more of a racy feel to them, and turn laps on a road course much better. If I had to guess, I'd be that even down on power, this thing would turn similar laps to the GT500 on the 1/4 mile, and would decimate the GT500 on a road course. That's not to say that the GT500 can't turn, but this thing is MADE to turn.
Stuka 4:23PM (6/12/2009)
The previous generation Roush bested the previous GT500 on a road course by several seconds, even though it only had 428hp. So the suspension tuning that Roush does is worth every cent.
I love the car. And if it was my money, it would be the Roush hands down.
john 12:52PM (6/12/2009)
its a great car lets face it. and alot of fun.
Reply