• Jun 9, 2009

2010 Acura TSX V6 – Click above for high-res image gallery

Acura has a good thing going in the luxury segment. Unlike Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi – but like Lexus – Acura's best selling car is not its entry-level model: Acura moves more TLs than anything else in its line-up. And unlike those other brands, Lexus included, all of Acura's offerings carry five-star safety ratings from NHTSA, are rated as top safety picks by the IIHS, and the Automotive Lease Guide has declared that Acura offerings have the best resale value among luxury brands. Now, Honda's premium division has grown by one with the addition of the TSX V6, and Autoblog was invited to find out if the new, more powerful sedan could keep the brand's good thing going. Follow the jump to find out.



Photos Copyright ©2009 Jonathon Ramsey / Weblogs, Inc.
Shot with a Nikon D70 and Nikon 18-200 lens

The TSX V6 was engineered to fill the gap between the four-cylinder TSX and the relatively new TL. With the latest TL having gone upmarket in several areas, Acura felt there was enough space between its entry and mid-market lines to offer a stepping stone between the two. But this wasn't strictly about plopping a V6 into a TSX and adding some bigger digits after the dollar sign. According to officials, this car is about creating a more comprehensively sporting version of the TSX, yet one that wouldn't trod on the bumper of the TL.



If you're familiar with the 2009 TSX that was introduced last year, then you're up-to-speed on the TSX V6's exterior; there were essentially no changes made to the car beyond larger wheels, a V6 badge on the trunk and a different compound on the rear brakes. Even the dual tailpipes are the same size on both cars, and there are no interior changes – not one – to differentiate the four-pot from the sixer. Acura decided the V6's buyers were looking for sport package identity, they simply wanted more power. So, as with the bionic man, this is an operation to be felt, not seen.



But in Acura's estimation, this is also a car meant to truly compete with the A4, 3 Series, and C-Class. The 2.4-liter four-cylinder in the base TSX has 201 horsepower and 170 lb-ft of torque, leaving it ten horses and 88 lb-ft down versus Audi's 2.0-liter four. The 3.5-liter V6 in the TSX boosts its numbers to 280 hp and 254 lb-ft, giving it better outputs than the sixers in the Mercedes C350 and Audi A4 3.2, figures bested only by the BMW 335i – and it shades all of them by a hair in the fuel consumption stakes.

As stated, Acura didn't do anything to the interior, but it still deserves mention. Overall, the inside offers a placid view and the designers have done a good job of providing visual variety. There are plenty of contrasting curves, overlaid with four different plastics treatments throughout and perforated leather inserts in the doors. It won't grab you by the heart when you take a seat, but it ought to age well – a trait that seems too rare in the luxury segment. (something that would go some way toward explaining that resale value...)



The seats remain wide and comfy. Strikingly, compared to the skinny seatbacks becoming au courant among smaller luxury cars, the side of the seat is thicker than a brick wall. Rear legroom doesn't appear to be compromised since it's only the bolsters that create the bulk, but it did come as a surprise.

As for another detail of the interior: we appear to be alone in this, but the dash feels awash in buttons. The steering wheel has 11 buttons on it, seven of them multi-function. The center stack is a button convention with two multi-function knobs as special guests. We're sure it wouldn't take much to adapt and find our go-to buttons, but the initial cockpit survey leads us to think Airbus, not Acura.

Still, none of that is any deterrent to enjoying the car. Besides, in this league, it's the driving that counts.



Acura's assertion that this wasn't just about more power but about creating a sportier car is backed up in every way. In our review of the four-cylinder TSX, the engine was said to be "sufficient, but still lacks real grunt," and the car was described as doing "its job without much fuss, but never gets your adrenaline pumping."

Not so in the TSX V6. Although the V6 model gains an additional 194 pounds, the additional horsepower and torque offsets the extra poundage. Lay on the gas from a stop in the base TSX and the car aspires to action. In the V6, you only get the action.



The new coil springs and damper settings fore and aft do a terrific job of keeping road harshness away from cabin occupants. They're aided in the quest for cabin quietude by electronically controlled engine mounts and a feature only available on the V6: Active Sound Control (ASC), a noise cancellation system that filters out certain frequencies.

If you tell a group of automotive scribes that you've engineered a sedan for sporty performance and let them loose in twisties, they will, without fail, beat the bejeezus out of it to redline, smoking brakes and beyond, then compare it to the platonic ideal of a rear-drive BMW. Put through that tried-and-true test, the front-drive Acura fares well. Going hot and heavy into a hairpin will get you a serving of understeer and a flashing yellow triangle while the traction control works to keep the ship righted. But we were delighted to find that the flashing yellow light was the most intrusive part of the TC – no piercing whistles, no dominatrix-like clampdown on the brakes, no sudden wondering "Where did the power go?" It was always just enough to keep you going over the road and not over the cliff.



The electronic power steering returned decent feedback. Most importantly, we always knew where to put the wheel when planning a line, and corrections weren't necessary when we laid the course. The suspension kept to its tasks just as well when flying as it did at town speeds, keeping all the wheels where they needed to be even as the car was squatting and flicking to stay in its lane. The brakes did get tired a bit early. They were fine all the way up and over the mountain, but there was a gradual yet noticeable fade while plugging through corners. Not surprisingly, when we exited the car, the tangy scent of hot brakes was heavy in the air.

However, few of this TSX's drivers will ever belt this car like it's a Belmont Stakes runner. And if you are looking for a ride to do your Crank imitation of Jason Statham... you shouldn't be looking at a TSX anyhow.



Back here on Earth, and off the Hollywood set, the TSX V6 comes good with just about everything you'd want from it. The drive-by-wire throttle that feels like instant-on acceleration at low speeds loosens up nicely on the trot. The five-speed automatic (no manual option on this car) knows its gears and isn't afraid to kick down, and the extra power pulls the TSX nicely out of apexes. Even though there's a manual shifting mode with paddles on the steering wheel, we barely used it and rarely called on peak horsepower. The latter doesn't come on until 6,200 rpm, just 700 rpm shy of the redline, and at that height, even the ASC can't keep the cabin from becoming vociferous.

The grabby brakes loosen up as well – which is as much down to fade as anything else when it's really hard going. But maintain a rhythm, don't stab at the stoppers like a serial killer, and they'll serve you well.



In short: drive this car like it's a TSX with more power and better dynamics – not like it's a Lotus Elise – and you'll get a fabulously put together package that comes standard with a bucket of kit. If you want a TSX with more power, you've got that and more with this model. And if you're looking for an Acura that handles enthusiastically enough to seriously play on the same pitch as the three gatekeepers of the entry-level premium segment (3, C, and A), here you are. And you'll get it for less coin than those other cars: base base MSRP is $34,850 plus $810 destination and, if you're game, $3,100 for the Technology Package. That money will also save you money: you'll get better gas mileage than those other cars as well.

If that isn't how you keep a good thing going, then we don't know what is...



Photos Copyright ©2009 Jonathon Ramsey / Weblogs, Inc.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 51 Comments
      JDM Life
      • 5 Years Ago
      Give me the previous model.

      Too much "Honda" going on there....the interior looks like it was pulled from a accord.
        Bob Pradella
        • 2 Years Ago
        @JDM Life
        It is an Accord you idiot. Let me guess, the Audi A4 looks too much like a jetta? Well guess what, same car. And people like you call yourselfs enthusiast.
      • 5 Years Ago
      This and a few of the other cars in Acura's line up now look like a Parrot fish.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I really like Acura, but I see too much Honda DNA and I can't get past that awful shield.
        • 5 Years Ago
        more power, performance.......more care.... more ugly
        • 5 Years Ago
        @Ligor, might as well, you get gray plastic trim in the TSX or cheaper looking faux metal grey plastic in the G37, both are about the same. Might as well go for the 330 hp v6 if that's ur priority.
        • 5 Years Ago
        @ zamafir:

        True. I own a G sedan and while I prefer the design of the interior (and exterior) and the RWD chassis, in terms of fit & finish and material quality I actually think the Acura's is a lil' bit better. In my experience, they hold up better to wear & tear also. Plus when you start ticking the options, fully loaded vs. fully loaded will result in the Acura being thousands cheaper. Wouldn't trade the handling dynamics of the G, but the TSX isn't as bad as some make it out to be.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I am not sure if that is even a valid concern.

        TSX is based on JDM and Euro Accords, which have little to do with US Accords. And the European Accord is actually positioned to compete with low-end BMWs.
        • 5 Years Ago
        @ Zamafir:

        I believe it does have real metal. The previous and current TL has it too.
        • 5 Years Ago
        @ Zamafir:

        The interior assembly quality and material quality of the TSX are actually quite good. The reason it doesn't seem that way is simply because it doesn't look elegant. It's dark and not playful the way the new LaCrosse's interior is, or Malibu, and so on.
        • 5 Years Ago
        It's not just the nose. The interior quality too. But whatever, it undercuts BMW and Audi, you get what you pay for.
        • 5 Years Ago
        @Other Man - I didn't comment on the quality, simply the look of the material. If vws can use actual metal trim, it'd be nice if Acura could do the same.

        @Franz - totally with you. I rented a G37 Sunday and was pretty shocked at the interior quality. But the engine is a hoot. It's almost like infiniti's chasing the old american car model, not the sharpest looker, not the greatest interior, but a lot of performance for the money. Which again is fine, because that's an admirable focus.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Bmw interiors are pretty boring.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I don't think a single vehicle (near lux or not) in the 30-40K price range has an interior to jump up and down about. Even the A4, the gold standard here, has taken a step or two back in terms of overall quality.

        The biggest offense, when it comes to the G, from a quality perspective is the alignment of the doors with the dash. BTW that is real aluminum trim there.
        • 5 Years Ago
        and why would I not just get a $34K G37 instead
        how is this worth this much coin and who would pay this kind of money

        I bet a Fusion with the sport pack will handle just as well and save you $6-8k

        useless car for the price IMO
      • 5 Years Ago
      I don't know why every car reviewer complains about the number of buttons on the center console. If you look at them carefully, you shouldn't even need to use 90% of them. After entering your presets the only time you need to touch buttons in the middle are to change the air or operate the navi. Operating the radio via steering wheel buttons is a breeze.

      What I don't get is why they set the MSRP @ 35k. The base TL is @ 35k. The base TSX is 30k, so a 5k premium over the 4 cyl model is quite a stretch. There must be some mistake in the press release.
        • 5 Years Ago
        A mistake in the press release also means a mistake in the review, in this case. Way to be sycophants, Autoblog.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I've test driven my friend's TSX 4cyl and I thought it was just a dash better than the Accord 4cyl which was pretty pathetic for a $30K car. She shoulda waited for this car...
      • 5 Years Ago
      Weird that the article makes no mention of this car's main competitor...the Volkswagen CC VR6. The CC has the same HP, more torque, six speeds, more standard equipment, looks SOOO much better in and out and is available with AWD. Oh, and VW was recently awarded best resale value among ALL brands.
      • 5 Years Ago
      What is the MPG rating of the TSX V6... that might be the kicker... Because most of the Honda and Acura lines of cars return good numbers for power and function... i.e. the Acc V6. So, maybe that's the selling point over the competitors.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I have owned a 2004 TSX and then a 2006 TSX. When it came time to get a new car in December, I just couldn't justify getting another Acura when I could get a 2008 G35x for the same price as a TSX. I hate the new front-end design and it really bothers me because I like Acuras. This new V6 version of the TSX is a joke and further diminishes the Acura brand. IMO the entire Acura line needs:

      1. A real wood option on all of its cars
      2. Keyless ignition
      3. RWD with a SH-AWD option
      4. Better styling/new front-end
      5. Luxury coupe/convertible

      Any thoughts?
        • 5 Years Ago
        Pretty much with you there. The last TSX was a sharp-looking sedan! So was the TL... and actually the RL was handsome too, if not quite the looker that the TL was. What happened to the clean lines and understated sportiness?

        I wouldn't fault Acura for going the way of Audi - SH-AWD standard, entry models available in FWD, but something with RWD to compete with uhh... the rest of the segment?

        I like Hondas and Acuras but they're a step behind everyone else in their drivetrain options/availability. FWD luxury is only going to get you so far. I picked my IS over the last gen TSX because of the drivetrain layout, and I'll keep doing it too, until Acura/Honda builds a car that I want. I think Acura's ergonomics are more well-executed than Lexus (god the seats in my IS300 are horrible) and their manual transmissions are head and shoulders above Lexus as well.

        They also need a mid-engined exotic. Honda went from F1 to LMPs, what have they to show for it?

        Acura, if you're listening, (which you're not) build us a RWD/SH-AWD entry sedan with a NORMAL grille and about 250HP and I'll sell my Lexus and buy one.
        • 5 Years Ago
        My friend also owns a 2006 TSX and I think it's a nice car, the styling everything is good about it, I still don't understand what Acura designers were thinking when they created this. The last gen was way much better. I think a better interior, RWD and a better design (both exterior/interior) would be what Acura needs to change imo..
      • 5 Years Ago
      I really like this (V6) car. It is quite fast (5.9 seconds to 60 mph (!!!)), just the right size for most people, extremely comfortable, very well equipped, quite fuel economical, and very reasonably priced. Also, its resale value and reliability can't be beat. I would definitely get one.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Really? If I want sporting, I'm DEFINITELY not going for a TSX.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I guess the 2.3 Turbo is either not what customers wanted, or its just not as good as the V6 in this application.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Interior quality on the TSX has actually declined from the first generation. A lot more metallic-looking plastics, less leather and more hard plastics. Sit in a first generation TSX and it's even nicer than the TL of today.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Acuras 10-20 years ago did not have the reputation they have now... they are a much newer (entry) luxury car company than BMW and Merc, so the comparison is a little off... Acura is too new to have their older cars compared to the tried and proven BMWs and Mercs.
    • Load More Comments